Local Level participatory planning approach (LLPPA) (埃塞俄比亚)

描述

Participatory planning tools using various PRA techniques to enable the local community to identif their problem prioritize to sellect suitable measures & activities (planing, implementing & mgt of conservation based initiatives.

Aims / objectives: Aims at the sellection of suitable measures & activities in line with the problems needs of the community & individuals relating to soil & water conservation, To develop (enable) the community to involve (participate) fully inplaning, implementing, monitoring managing of conservation based initiatives and decision making, Aims at the selection of suitable measures and activities in line with the problem and needs of the community and individuals, Hence promotion of productivity of the project areas to address the problems, Employ a wide range of methods facilitate community participation in planning discustion on subject area (suitation), i.e. general discustion with community, Group and indvidual discussion community meeting, consulting., Identify targeted areas, initial meeting with community leaders, adminstrators 1st meeting with community. Form (sellect) development team., Problem identification prioritize sellect suitable measures & activities work plan pre paration, planning implementing, monitoring evaluation., Identify the major problems, prioritize identification sellection of proposed development, measures. Work plan preparation, Implementation of sellected activities.

地点

地点: Oromiya, 埃塞俄比亚

选定地点的地理参考
  • 40.0, 7.0

启动日期: 1992

终止年份: 不适用

方法的类型

方法目标和有利环境

该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Micro credit schems, forest development, water development, development of infrastructure.)

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Erosion problem (Soil and Water), Food shortage problem, Infrastructure problems, Production problems.
推动实施本办法所应用技术的条件
阻碍实施本办法所应用技术的条件
  • 社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观: Need external inputs, Lack of responsibility to keep & maintain Treatment through the SLM Approach: Provide training, encourage the participation of community in all activities.
  • 财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性: Poverity; less production yield, shortage of farmland, increasing of family size Treatment through the SLM Approach: Apply income generating projects, intensfy family planning programme, improve local farming system, effective management.
  • 机构设置: Less finanical capacity & skilled man power, lack of well & highly organized institue Treatment through the SLM Approach: Encourage the involvement of different NGO's strengthen their capacity.
  • 了解SLM，获得技术支持: Lack of skilled manpower, ignoring of indigenous k/dge; less technical awareness of farmers. Treatment through the SLM Approach: Capacity building, community training, encourage (modify) indigenous k/dge.

相关利益相关者的参与和角色

该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
该方法涉及哪些利益相关者/执行机构？ 指定利益相关者 说明利益相关者的角色
当地土地使用者/当地社区 Specific ethnic groups: Locally existing groups Because of the local cultural norms cultural barriers. Mainly men be a team leader, and excutives. Group 1 & group 2 By ranking their wealth & using vulnearability ranking & the sellected criteria of land size & live stock holding.
国家政府（规划者、决策者） Regional state, W/resource dev. Authority MOA.
国际组织
当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
无
被动
外部支持
互动
自我动员
启动/动机
consuling; Participate by consulting involved by answering question area.
计划
Mainly: rapid/participatory rural appraisal, public meetings; partly: workshops/seminars, interviews/questionnaires; Planning prepared by Devt. Team descussed with communities.
实施
casual labour, responsibility for minor steps; Participatte by his labour & contribute equipment (materials)
监测/评估
Mainly: interviews/questionnaires, public meetings; partly: measurements/observations; Involved by answering questions
Research
流程图

有关SLM技术选择的决策

决策是由......做出的

  • 仅限土地使用者（自主）
  • 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持
  • 所有相关参与者，作为参与式方法的一部分
  • 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后
  • 仅限SLM专家
  • 政治家和领袖

决策是基于

  • 对充分记录的SLM知识进行评估（基于证据的决策）
  • 研究结果
  • 个人经验和意见（无记录）

技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

以下活动或服务是该方法的一部分

融资和外部物质支持

SLM组成部分的年度预算，以美元计算
  • < 2,000
  • 2,000-10,000
  • 10,000-100,000
  • 100,000-1,000,000
  • > 1,000,000
Precise annual budget: 不适用
Approach costs were met by the following donors: international non-government (-): 100.0%
已向土地使用者提供以下服务或激励
  • 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
  • 特定投入的补贴
  • 信用
  • 其它激励或手段

影响分析和结论性陈述

方法的影响
土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机
  • 不适用
方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？
  • 否
  • 是
  • 不确定

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服

参考文献

编制者
  • Philippe Zahner
Editors
审查者
  • Fabian Ottiger
实施日期: Jan. 21, 2009
上次更新: July 24, 2017
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International