Border between grassland and tilled land (Endla Reintam)

Permanent grassland on peaty and eroded soils (爱沙尼亚)

Püsirohumaa turvas- ja erodeeritud muldadel

描述

A permanent plant cover is maintained or established to protect soil against erosion or peat decomposition.

The technology is applied in sub-humid climate with an average of 696 mm of precipitations per year, from which more comes from July to October and less in March and April. Average annual temperature is +4 C, length of the growing period is 180-195 days. The territory is mostly flat to slopes of 6-10%. Average altitude from the sea level is 50 m. About half of the Estonian territory is above 50 m and half is below it. Soils are from very shallow (less than 0.1 m) inthe north to very deep (> 120m ) in the south. Soil cover is very variable. The peat cover of peatlands varies from 0.3 m to more than 10 m from well decomposed to poorly decomposed peat. On hilly areas the soils are medium textured with low (< 1%) organic matter in topsoil. Groundwater in near the surface in peatlands and deep in hilly areas. Biodiversity of these areas is medium. Market orientation of production system is mixed and off-farm income less than 10%. Relative level of wealth is average from individual households to cooperatives. Soil management is mechanized. Land belongs to land users but is leased also in case of bigger farms (over 1000 ha).
In the agricultural land the area will be excluded from intensive tillage by establishing a permanent plant cover, mainly with grass. The aim is to protect the slopes over 10% against erosion and peaty soils from further intensive decomposition of organic matter and with that the reduction of CO2 emission. The farmers should maintain permanent plant cover in the areas mentioned, or establish permanent plant cover. Renewing of the grassland is allowed from the top (without ploughing) once in a 5 year period. Government pays support of 50 EUR/ha if the area is bigger than 0.3 ha. The technology reduces intensively tilled area and thus the possibility to grow cash crops and/or reduces the yield from grassland. On the other hand it allows to still use wet areas for agriculture (i.e. fodder production).
The rules of the technology are fixed with the Estonian Rural Development Plan (ERDP) for 2014-2020 under activity "Support for regional soil protection" (https://www.agri.ee/et/eesmargid-tegevused/eesti-maaelu-arengukava-mak-2014-2020) related to the reguation of the European Parliment and of the Council 1305/2013, article 28. The regulation is relevant more to the South-Estonia in case to reduce erosion, as the landscape is more hilly there. The exclusion of peatlands from agricultural use is relevant more in West-Estonia where the share of peatlands of the total area is the highest. However, it can be applied in whole Estonia if the area of peatland is bigger than 0.3 ha.

地点

地点: One site: Rapla county, Pae; second site Tartu county, Annikoru, third site Valga county, Hummuli, One site at Rapla, second at Tartu, third at Valga (erosion), 爱沙尼亚

分析的技术场所数量: 2-10个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 26.28492, 58.26778
  • 24.872, 58.99193
  • 26.05224, 57.89212

技术传播: 均匀地分布在一个区域 (approx. 1-10 平方千米)

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 10-50年前

介绍类型
Cutted grassland on Histosol (Endla Reintam)
Natural thick grass and litter cover on Histosol (Endla Reintam)

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地: 是 - 农牧业(包括农牧结合)

  • 农田
    • 一年一作: 谷类 - 大麦, 谷物类 - 玉米, 谷类 - 燕麦, 谷类 - 黑麦, 豆科牧草和豆类 - 豆子, 豆科牧草和豆类 - 豌豆, 油料作物 - 向日葵、菜籽、其他, 根/块茎作物 - 土豆, 蔬菜 - 叶菜(色拉、卷心菜、菠菜和其他), 蔬菜 - 根茎类蔬菜(胡萝卜、洋葱、甜菜等), wheat
    每年的生长季节数: 1
  • 牧场
    • 经营牧场
    • 改良牧场
    动物类型: 牛 - 奶制品, 牛 - 非奶牛牛肉, 绵羊
    产品和服务: 肉类, 奶类
供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀
  • 土壤风蚀 - Et:表土流失
  • 化学性土壤退化 - Cn:肥力下降和有机质含量下降(非侵蚀所致)
  • 物理性土壤退化 - Pc:压实
SLM组
  • 改良的地面/植被覆盖
  • 最小的土壤扰动
SLM措施
  • 农艺措施 - A3:土壤表面处理
  • 植物措施 - V2:草和多年生草本植物
  • 管理措施 - M1:改变土地使用类型

技术图纸

技术规范
The requirements to create a permanent grassland depends on soil type.
Species mixture suitable for the permanent grassland on wet soils (Histosols): Bromus sitchensis 30%, Phalaris arundinacea 45%, Phleum pratense 20%, Poa pratensis 5%. Sowing rate 20 kg/ha.
For the drier areas (eroded soils) the next mixture is suitable: Dactylis glomerata 65%, Phleum pratense 26%, Poa pratensis 9%. Sowing rate 23 kg/ha.
Author: Endla Reintam
None
Author: Endla Reintam

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术单元 (单位:per hectar)
  • 成本计算使用的货币:EUR
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 1.18 EUR
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:36-40 EUR/day + taxes
影响成本的最重要因素
Fuel price.
技术建立活动
  1. Tillage (ploughing, cultivation) (时间/频率: in spring)
  2. Collecting stones, slip (by demand) (时间/频率: in spring)
  3. Fertilization (时间/频率: in spring complex fertilizer)
  4. Sowing (时间/频率: in spring)
  5. Rolling (时间/频率: in spring)
  6. Cutting the weeds (时间/频率: during growth (summer))
  7. Fertilization during growth period (时间/频率: after every cut of grass, if cutted grassland, N-fertilizer)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per per hectar)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (EUR) 每项投入的总成本 (EUR) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Driver (machinery work) person day 0.5 36.0 18.0 100.0
设备
Equipment (machinery) cost on establishment year year 1.0 207.0 207.0 100.0
植物材料
Seeds kg 22.0 2.47 54.34 100.0
肥料和杀菌剂
Complex fertilizer kg 500.0 0.42 210.0 100.0
Ammonium fertilizer kg 100.0 0.33 33.0 100.0
技术建立所需总成本 522.34
技术建立总成本,美元 442.66
技术维护活动
  1. Cutting or grazing the grass (时间/频率: 1-4 times per vegetation period)
  2. Fertilization (时间/频率: in spring in the beginning of season and after every cut N-fertilizer, after each second year complex fertilizer)
技术维护的投入和成本 (per per hectar)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (EUR) 每项投入的总成本 (EUR) 土地使用者承担的成本%
设备
Grasslands for cutting - machinery costs year 1.0 141.0 141.0 100.0
肥料和杀菌剂
Ammonium fertilizer kg 200.0 0.33 66.0 100.0
Complex fertilizer kg 200.0 0.42 84.0 100.0
其它
Materials for hay making year 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
技术维护所需总成本 306.0
技术维护总成本,美元 259.32

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
以毫米为单位计算的年平均降雨量:696.0
Average 696 mm, almost equally spread over the year, more from July to October, less in March and April
气象站名称:Tartu Tõravere
LGP 180-195 days
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考:
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
  • individual/open access
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
x
教育

贫瘠
x
技术援助

贫瘠
x
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
x
市场

贫瘠
x
能源

贫瘠
x
道路和交通

贫瘠
x
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
x
金融服务

贫瘠
x

影响

社会经济影响
作物生产
降低
x
增加


The area will be excluded from crop production and it means no cash crops can be cultivated on this area. Instead of crops hay or silage is possible to sell.

饲料生产
降低
x
增加


As it is not allowed to renew these grasslands intensively, the quantity of grass will drop. For short term clover+grasses mixture the average yield is 16 tons/ha per year, for long-term grass mixtures 5.2 tons/ha per year.

饲料质量
降低
x
增加


Due to the change of species in the mixture, the protein level will drop. Instead of red clover grasses will be used in the mixture of long-term grasslands.

畜牧生产
降低
x
增加


Due to the changes in silage/hay quality (protein) there can be reduction of milk and meat production if the differences will not be covered with other fodder.

产品多样性
降低
x
增加


In case of crop orientation, there are new products to sell - grass, hay, silage, or grasslands to rent.

土地管理
妨碍
x
简化


Depending on the farm it can be simplified or hindered. If focus was on crops, then new machinery is needed to manage grasslands (for cutting, hay or silage making).

农业投入费用
增加
x
降低


As renewing of grassland is after every 5 years, there is no need to buy seeds every year, as well as pesticides and to till the soil.

农业收入
降低
x
增加


Due to the reduction of the inputs costs, the income my increase. Also the government pays support 50 EUR/ha for the land under these measures.

收入来源的多样性
降低
x
增加


Next to the yield (grass, silage, hay) the support from the government (50 EUR/ha)

工作量
增加
x
降低


It may decrease due to no need of every year tillage and sowing and due to the change from 2 year short-term grasslands to the permanent grasslands. However, if not managed grasslands earlier it may increase the workload as cutting and collecting the grass is needed.

社会文化影响
食品安全/自给自足
减少
x
改良


More land under grasslands than under crops. Grasses are suitable for animals feeding, not for human direct consumption.

SLM/土地退化知识
减少
x
改良


If land was eroded before and soil was on the road, everybody can see the differences after establishment of the grasslands. It is not so severe in case of peatlands, however, less tractors will stuck in to the mud on rainy period.

生态影响
地表径流
增加
x
降低


In case of erosion, no soil will be washed down to the hill as plant cover protects soil surface and increases infiltration. In case of peatlands, grass cover creates better structure and increases water infiltration thus decreases surface runoff during heavy rainfall.

多余水的排放
减少
x
改良


Grass creates protection to the soil surface and raindrops can't destroy the soil structure any more. Also grass roots create better porosity and structure in the soil leading to better water drainage.

土壤水分
降低
x
增加


The difference in soil moisture between mineral and organic soils under cereals and under grassland was ca 5% and 25%, respectively, in favour to the grasslands in autumn 2016.

土壤覆盖层
减少
x
改良

SLM之前的数量: 40%
SLM之后的数量: 100%
Under spring cereals soil is covered only 4-5 months per year, under grasses soil is covered 100% of the year.

土壤流失
增加
x
降低


On the slopes depending o the crop and the amount of precipitations, the loss varied from 3 to 60 tons/ha, under permanent grass cover it is less than 0.05 tons/ha per year. Without every year tillage there is no intensive decomposition of the peat, as well as no wind erosion.

土壤堆积
降低
x
增加


Under grasses we can increase the soil organic matter content by 0.35 t/ha in 5 year period in peatlands. In eroded soils we can increase 0.02% per year.

土壤结壳/密封
增加
x
减少


As plants protect soil surface, raindrops can't destroy the soil structure and there will be no crust formation

土壤压实
增加
x
减少


Under the grasslands the bulk density was lower by 0.1-0.2 g/cm3 compared to tilled soil.

养分循环/补给
降低
x
增加


As the intensive decomposition of the peat stops or there will not be any leaching by water, more nutrients remain in the soil. Also the permanent plant cover during the whole year stops nutrient leaching.

土壤有机物/地下C
降低
x
增加


Under permanent grasslands the Corg increases by 0.35 t/ha per 5 year period.

酸度
增加
x
减少


Without periodic liming the acidity of peatlands starts to increase. If no CaCO3 in mineral part, also pH of previously eroded soils starts to decrease slowly, as organic acids form during decomposition process.

植被覆盖层
降低
x
增加


Thanks to the permanent plant cover there is no period of the year without vegetation.

生物量/地上C
降低
x
增加


If previously the plant residues were mixed with the soil by tillage, now there will always some extent of plant mass be left above ground (5-10 cm), even if the most is removed for hay or silage.

植物多样性
降低
x
增加


Long-term grassland includes at least 4 species in the mixture, short-term mixtures 2-3 species. However, compared with the cereals, the annual weeds will disappear and the diversity may decline.

动物多样性
降低
x
增加


There are more spiders, ants, beets.

有益物种(捕食者、蚯蚓、传粉者)
降低
x
增加

SLM之前的数量: 2 species of earthworms
SLM之后的数量: 3-4 species of earthworms
Under grasslands were 1-2 more earthworm species than under tilled management. More spiders and ground beetles were found there compared to the tilled soil.

栖息地多样性
降低
x
增加


Grasslands create untilled patterns to the landscape.

害虫/疾病控制
降低
x
增加


Grasses surpress many soil born crops diseases and pests, also annual and perennial weeds.

干旱影响
增加
x
降低


Grass roots go to the deeper soil and they are not so sensitive to the drought.

碳和温室气体的排放
增加
x
降低


Under permanent grasslands reduced CO2 emission by 1.10 t/ha per year compared to the tilled areas.

火灾风险
增加
x
降低


If the grass will not be cutted before winter, the dry grass has the risk of higher landscape fires in the spring.

微气候
恶化
x
改良


The changes of soil temperature as well as moisture content are smaller under permanent grass cover than under tillage.

场外影响
缓冲/过滤能力(按土壤、植被、湿地划分)
减少
x
改良


All year plant cover helps to bind nutrients and stop their leaching from the soil. Higher amount of organic matter in the soil increases water holding capacity.

风力搬运沉积物
增加
x
减少


Organic peat particles are light and are easy subject of wind erosion in dry conditions by tillage. Permanent plant cover stops such kind of erosion

对邻近农田的破坏
增加
x
减少


On hilly landscape no extra soil is flushed to neighbours fields. In case of peatlands no dust is carried around.

对公共/私人基础设施的破坏
增加
x
减少


In case of erosion, no soil is carried by water or wind to the ditches and on the roads.

温室气体的影响
增加
x
减少


Under permanent grasslands reduced CO2 emission by 1.10 t/ha per year compared to the tilled areas.

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

气候变化

渐变气候
年温度 增加

非常不好
x
非常好
季节性温度 增加

非常不好
x
非常好
季节: 冬季
季节性温度 增加

非常不好
x
非常好
季节: 春季
年降雨量 增加

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
季雨量 增加

非常不好
非常好
季节: 冬季 答案:未知
季雨量 增加

非常不好
非常好
季节: 秋季 答案:未知
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地暴雨

非常不好
x
非常好
局地雷暴

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
局地雹灾

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
局地雪暴

非常不好
x
非常好
局地风暴

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
寒潮

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
极端冬季条件

非常不好
x
非常好
干旱

非常不好
x
非常好
陆地火灾

非常不好
x
非常好
比较和缓的(河道)洪水

非常不好
x
非常好
风暴潮/沿海洪水

非常不好
x
非常好
滑坡

非常不好
x
非常好
流行病

非常不好
x
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
户数和/或覆盖面积
In 2016 two hundred four households got the governmental support, in total 10554 ha
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Better soil protection
  • Possibility to earn money in unsuitable soil conditions.
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • Reduces soil erosion on hilly landscape
  • Reduces the decomposition of peat on Histosol
  • Reduces CO2 emission from agricultural land.
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • Loss of income Governmental support (50 EUR/ha)
  • Problems with the grass (farms without animals) Cooperation with neighbours, selling the hay for energy production
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • Farmers don't want to use the technology More effective lobbying
  • Wrong declaration of the land under the technology Better advisory system and improvement of electronic databases

参考文献

编制者
  • Endla Reintam
Editors
审查者
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Alexandra Gavilano
实施日期: Aug. 14, 2017
上次更新: March 27, 2019
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • Bender, A. (koostaja) 2006. Eritüübiliste rohumaade rajamine ja kasutamine. I. ja II. osa. Jõgeva:
  • Bender, A. 2010. Heintaimede sordiaretus ja seemnekasvatus. Jõgeva Sordiaretuse Instituut:
  • Older, H. 2011. Kohalikud söödad. Eesti Rohumaade Ühing.:
链接到网络上可用的相关信息
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International