The Magoye CA planter used for Zero-tillage (Arthur Chomba (Box 670577, Mazabuka, Zambia))

Animal Draft Zero-Tillage (赞比亚)

Direct Planting

描述

Animal draft zero-till involves the use of an animal drawn mechanical planter to plant directly in untilled soil to minimize soil disturbance and leave a cover of crop residues to conserve the soil and water.

Zero-tillage takes advantage of the beneficial effects of biological processes to loosen the soil and to improve fertility. The organic matter from these processes aggregate the soil while the movement of soil organisms like worms and termites loosen the soil. This is called biological tillage and replaces mechanical tillage. The untilled soil surface covered by residues will require a planter specialized to plant in these conditions. In a sense, adopting zero-till does actually require a zero-till planter. The development of the strip-planter has made zero-till a viable option for animal draft farmers, which until now was not possible due to the unavailability or high cost of zero-till planters. The new planter is both cheap and easy to manufacture locally. The planter uses a narrow tine to open a planting furrow and seed/fertilizer is metered by vertically rotating plates. The planter is pulled by oxen and can plant rows of 75cm or 90cm rows with an intra-row which is determined by the seed plate used (3, 4, 5,…… seeds/m). The planting technology needs to be complemented with sound residue cover and weeding management practices.

Purpose of the Technology: The planter enables planting and fertilizing in untilled soil so that the soil residue cover and soil structure are preserved and can be used sustainably. The protective soil cover reduces evaporation and enhances infiltration while the improved soil structure and organic matter content increases soil water storage making zero tillage an important drought mitigating strategy. The immediate benefits of adopting zero-till are the possibility to plant a bigger area quickly and in time as well as the reduced soil erosion.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The first step in establishing zero-till is to assess the soil condition and levels of degradation. Where possible tests should be carried out but where not, the farmer needs to start on a small plot to check if there will be yield reduction from not tilling the soil. Where soils are severely degraded, an establishment phase should be embarked on where reduced tillage is practiced until the soil structure has recovered sufficiently to support crop growth without tillage. Liming acidic soils followed by a final ploughing will be required in the first year to correct the soil pH which otherwise will be difficult to correct once conservation tillage has been established. The organic matter levels need to be increased by increasing the amount of residues produced by the crop (i.e. the yields) and retaining these as soil cover. The next establishment activity is the purchase of the planter unit. Maintenance activities include planting and fertilizing in the same operation and weeding. Weeding will have to involve herbicide use to handle increased weed densities implying that spraying will become a major operation. In addition to the normal conventional inputs, herbicides will also become a major input and cost.

Natural / human environment: Zero-till has been applied in a wide range of bio-physical environments but mostly by the large scale farmers. The unavailability and high cost of specialized zero-till planter for small-scale farming has resulted in low adoption rates. The development of the Magoye Planter creates new opportunities for this practice. The farmer has to have sufficient knowledge to assess the soil condition and decide if is too degraded for zero-till or how long the transitional phase should be. Literacy is essential as the farmers will have to learn new approaches on weed control, pest control and crop rotations and adapt practices to suit his/her specific conditions.

地点

地点: Mazabuka/Magoye, Zambia/Southern Province, 赞比亚

分析的技术场所数量:

选定地点的地理参考
  • 27.60569, -16.03342

技术传播:

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 不到10年前(最近)

介绍类型
A farmer in his field planted with the Magoye CA planter (Arthur Chomba (Box 670577, Mazabuka Zambia))

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用

  • 农田
    • 一年一作: 谷物类 - 玉米, Annual cropping is the main source of livelihood.
    每年的生长季节数: 1
  • 牧场
    • 半游牧畜牧业
供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀
  • 化学性土壤退化 - Cn:肥力下降和有机质含量下降(非侵蚀所致)
  • 物理性土壤退化 - Pk:熟化和结壳
  • 生物性退化 - Bl:土壤寿命损失
SLM组
  • 不适用
SLM措施
  • 农艺措施 - A1:植被和土壤覆盖层, A2:有机质/土壤肥力, A3:土壤表面处理 (A 3.1:免耕), A4:地表下处理, A5:种子管理,改良品种, A6:残株管理, A7:其它

技术图纸

技术规范
Planting lines are done at a depth of 8-12cm with inter row of 75 or 90cm. The width of the open furrow is 5-10cm wide. Planting rows are done across the slope to reduce runoff, these planting rows are done when the soil is moist during the rainy season and planting is done at the same time with land preparation. Farmers in Monze have combined ripping and zero till together. In the dry season they rip with the Magoye Ripper or GART Planter and later when the soil is moist use a zero till implement to plant.

Location: Magoye. Mazabuka/Southern Province/Zambia

Date: 2014-06-29

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high (This is a new technology and the extension staff must be able to help farmers troubleshoot and adapt the technology to local conditions.)

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate (The farmers have to adopt new soil management practices, crop rotations and adapt the weeding approaches to complement the planting technology)

Main technical functions: improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil

Secondary technical functions: control of raindrop splash, improvement of ground cover, improvement of subsoil structure (hardpan), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of groundwater level / recharge of groundwater, water harvesting / increase water supply, improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water

Early planting
Material/ species: maize
Quantity/ density: 44,000 pla
Remarks: 25cm intra row by 75cm

Mulching
Material/ species: crop residues
Quantity/ density: 3ton/ha
Remarks: uniformly spread

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: crop residues
Quantity/ density: 3ton/ha
Remarks: uniformly spread

Mineral (inorganic) fertilizers
Material/ species: basal and top dressing
Quantity/ density: 400kg/ha
Remarks: spot application

Soil conditioners (lime, gypsum)
Material/ species: lime
Quantity/ density: 1ton/ha
Remarks: broadcast
Author: Silenga Wamunyima, Box 670577, Mazabuka, Zambia

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:
  • 成本计算使用的货币:Kwacha
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 5.0 Kwacha
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:2.40
影响成本的最重要因素
The weed control method is the main determinate factor depending on whether the farmer uses hand hoe or herbicides. Weed densities are higher in unploughed fields increasing the labour requirements/costs by a factor of about 5 if hand weeding is used instead of herbicides. Another major cost is that of fertilizer which makes up about half the cost hence the total cost will vary significantly depending on fertilizer cost.
技术建立活动
  1. Purchase a magoye planter (时间/频率: None)
  2. Purchase a knapsack sprayer (时间/频率: None)
技术建立的投入和成本
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Kwacha) 每项投入的总成本 (Kwacha) 土地使用者承担的成本%
设备
Magoye Planter piece 1.0 500.0 500.0 100.0
Knapsack sprayer piece 1.0 80.0 80.0 100.0
技术建立所需总成本 580.0
技术建立总成本,美元 116.0
技术维护活动
  1. Slashing, spreading residues (时间/频率: May-June every year after harvest)
  2. Liming (时间/频率: Nov - Dec every 3years)
  3. Planting and fertilizing (时间/频率: Nov-Dec at onset of rain)
  4. Chemical weeding (时间/频率: 3 times per growing season)
  5. Harvesting (时间/频率: May-June)
技术维护的投入和成本
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Kwacha) 每项投入的总成本 (Kwacha) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Slashing, spreading residues person days 8.0 2.5 20.0 100.0
Liming person days 2.0 2.5 5.0 100.0
Chemical weeding person days 24.0 1.0 24.0 100.0
Harvesting person days 8.0 2.5 20.0 100.0
设备
Animal traction for planting and fertilizing ha 1.0 40.0 40.0 100.0
植物材料
Seeds kg 20.0 2.5 50.0 100.0
Fertilizer kg 400.0 0.8 320.0 100.0
Herbicides l 5.0 6.0 30.0 100.0
Lime ton 1.0 42.0 42.0 100.0
技术维护所需总成本 551.0
技术维护总成本,美元 110.2

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
Thermal climate class: subtropics. 3 distinct seasons – summer, winter and one rainy season
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考:
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
  • Land is apportioned by traditional leaders
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
  • Land is apportioned by traditional leaders
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
x
教育

贫瘠
x
技术援助

贫瘠
x
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
x
市场

贫瘠
x
能源

贫瘠
x
道路和交通

贫瘠
x
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
x
金融服务

贫瘠
x

影响

社会经济影响
作物生产
降低
x
增加

饲料生产
降低
x
增加

生产故障风险
增加
x
降低

生产区域(耕种/使用中的新土地)
降低
x
增加

SLM之前的数量: 2-3ha
SLM之后的数量: >10

农业收入
降低
x
增加

收入来源的多样性
降低
x
增加

工作量
增加
x
降低

社会文化影响
娱乐机会
减少
x
改良

生态影响
水质
降低
x
增加

水的回收/收集(径流、露水、雪等)
减少
x
改良

地表径流
增加
x
降低

蒸发
增加
x
降低

土壤水分
降低
x
增加

土壤覆盖层
减少
x
改良

土壤流失
增加
x
降低

土壤结壳/密封
增加
x
减少

土壤压实
增加
x
减少

养分循环/补给
降低
x
增加

盐度
增加
x
降低

土壤有机物/地下C
降低
x
增加

生物量/地上C
降低
x
增加

碳和温室气体的排放
增加
x
降低

场外影响
水的可用性(地下水、泉水)
降低
x
增加

下游洪水(不希望)
增加
x
减少

地下水/河流污染
增加
x
减少

对邻近农田的破坏
增加
x
减少

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

Timely and quicker planting enables larger areas to be planted and with less labour in the short term. Improved soil structure and soil fertility leads to higher yields and better resilience to droughts in the long term

气候变化

渐变气候
年温度 增加

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地暴雨

非常不好
x
非常好
局地风暴

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
干旱

非常不好
x
非常好
比较和缓的(河道)洪水

非常不好
x
非常好
其他气候相关的后果
缩短生长期

非常不好
x
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Enables early planting

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Plant in with the first rain
  • Quicker planting enables the planting of larger areas

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Plant the seed and fertilize in one operation
  • reduced workload

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Encourage minimum tillage
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • Enables early planting

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Plant in November with the first heavy rain
  • Quicker planting enables the planting of larger areas

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Use herbicides because without them, the capacity to weed will limit the production capacity
  • Preserves soil cover and reduces soil disturbance

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Training in residue management and zero till
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • The purchase price of the Magoye planter is quite high Subsidize the implement
  • Excessive weeds and lack of information on herbicide use More training on herbicide use
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • The purchase price for the planter is on the higher side making it affordable only to the larger small-scale farmers the price is likely to go down when the planter is mass produced
  • difficult to control weeds in the absence of herbicides use herbicides

参考文献

编制者
  • Silenga Wamunyima
Editors
审查者
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Fabian Ottiger
实施日期: Jan. 15, 2013
上次更新: Aug. 14, 2019
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • Social-economic analysis of conservation agriculture in southern Africa, FAO, 2011: FAO
  • Conservation farming in Zambia, Steven Haggblade, Gelson Tembo, October 2003: Indaba project, Michigan state university
  • Conservation farming in Zambia, Conservation farming unit (CFU), 2011: cfu@zamnet.zm
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International