Ponds with brush packing for water harvesting and reduced soil erosion in the Baviaanskloof, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa (Anna Pepper)

Ponds to establish micro catchments, harvest runoff water and reduce soil erosion. (南非)

Ponding

描述

Semi-circular ponds are depressions constructed in the soil to harvest water, reduce runoff, increase infiltration, break soil sealing and crusting, capture organic material and seed where sheet erosion is predominant in degraded, low gradient hillslopes. The opening of the semi-circular pond is up-slope for runoff water to flow into the pond.

Ponds are applied to disturbed and degraded natural and agricultural areas that have undergone sheet erosion, sealing and crusting on slopes not exceeding 10 degrees. Ponds are constructed of semi-circular hollows dug out of the soil. Ponds are constructed either by hand (micro-ponds) or mechanically using a backhoe-loader or excavator (macro-ponds). Micro ponds are typically 1m wide, 1m long and 30cm deep at its centre, with a water holding capacity of 131 litres. Macro-ponds are typically 3m wide, 3m long and 50cm deep at its centre, with a water holding capacity of approximately 600 litres. The function of ponds is primarily to reduce surface or small rill erosions, reduce water velocity down slope and to harvest water to increase infiltration. Additionally, ponds reduce down-slope siltation of streams, wetlands, dams or reservoirs and even damage to infrastructure like low water bridges, capture seed and organic matter and provide a preferable environment for plant recruitment, particularly in arid areas. Micro-ponds are constructed by pick, to loosen the soil. Loosened soil is then removed by spade and deposited on the downward slope of the pond to form a semi-circular wall similar to that of a dam. The pond wall should be compacted with a spade to reduce breakage during flooding events. Approximately 15% of ponds exhibit broken “dam walls” after two years in extremely arid environments and are greatly dependant on vegetative recruitment. This happened mainly with micro-ponds. Follow-up repairs are advised during the first year, but not thereafter as ponds are also prone to silt up. In arid environments, ponds that do not adequately develop above ground biomass initially are prone to silting closed within three years. Siltation is also dependant on ponding density, spacing and soil type for both micro and macro ponds. The reason for this is they are bigger in size and from our experience, more effective in this arid landscape. Macro-ponds exhibit an increased rate of vegetative recruitment and biomass production, presumably due to less erosion of surface soil and soil nutrients, increased soil moisture content and water retention capacity compared to micro-ponds. Micro-ponds are typically constructed at an average rate of four (4) ponds per hour and 19 ponds per day per person. Production rates are typically 34% lower in hot summer months (2.39 ponds/hour). Macro-ponds are constructed at a rate of approximately 4.43 pond’s per machine hour. Volumetric costs are approximately 31% less expensive when constructed mechanically per litre of water holding capacity. However, large machinery can only be used in severely degraded areas and where access to the project site is available. Ponding density and spacing for micro as well as macro ponds depend on the topography of the landscape to be rehabilitated, the budged and resources available. The more dense, the more effective but also the more expensive the total operation. Some of the threats associated to constructing ponds are soil loss when pond walls break and in the case of steeper slopes may lead to the start of erosion head-cuts if not constructed appropriately. Pond inlets should be constructed at as low gradient decline as possible to reduce the probability of head-cut incision. Ponding at steeper gradients nearing 10-degree slope require particular consideration regarding spacing and density to avoid causing erosion associated to pond breakage. Staggered rows should be considered along the contour. In severely degraded areas, ponds are applied at approximately 400 micro-ponds or 100 mega-ponds per hectare. In severely degraded sites, micro-ponds are applied at approximately 250 ponds per hectare and 160 ponds per hectare in moderately degraded locations. Application rates are greatly determined by soil type and structure, slope, costs and local legislation regarding soil disturbance. Local South African environmental legislation require an Impact Assessment to be done if a certain cubic metres of soil is disturbed, even for rehabilitation purposes. In order to avoid this very costly and tedious approval process, consideration should be given to the amount of soil disturbed or moved. Caution must be taken in severely dispersive soils with regards to soil loss when flooded. Duplex soils are prone to “undercutting” and ponding on these kind of soils should be avoided. Pond depth should be considered with regards to soil water infiltration rates and saturation rate.
The effect of plant growth in and around ponds could also be accelerated or improved by brush packing if material is available in the area. If not, the cost become to high to transport material. Brush packing in the ponds further help to create a micro environment for plant growth by providing a bit of shade, nutrients from the decaying branches and also protection against grazing of newly sprouted plants within the ponds by wildlife occurring naturally in the area. Ponding in semi-arid environments are only used on natural areas, mostly used for grazing of wildlife and livestock. Ponding are usually not used on cultivated fields. Other measures like contours and waterways, vegetative strips are rather used than ponding. There are also very little cultivation happening in semi-arid areas, this project area in Baviaanskloof specifically due to low and unreliable rainfall. Since ponding provide a favourable micro environment for plant growth, grass, shrub and tree species, adaptable and endemic to the area, can be manually planted in the ponds to accelerate vegetative recovery and also to improve the biomass production and species composition in the area. This technology is applied by farmers and land rehabilitation projects. Considering the cost of ponding, it is mainly used in development and restoration projects with donor or government support. In south Africa, this technology is preferred in donor or government funded development project for job creation purposes. Lastly, ponding help reduce soil erosion, increase water infiltration and eventually working towards improve vegetation cover by establishing favourable micro habitats in and around the ponds for vegetation growth. Increased vegetation growth, especially Spekboom, reduced erosion all help to store soil organic carbon and is therefor a carbon mitigation measure as well. Ideally the whole area is withdrawn from grazing for at least 3 years to allow revegation to happen.

地点

地点: Baviaanskloof, Eastern Cape Province, 南非

分析的技术场所数量: 10-100个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 23.97312, -33.55528

技术传播: 均匀地分布在一个区域 (6.0 km²)

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 2019; 不到10年前(最近)

介绍类型
Photo of semi-circular micro-ponding across a slope in a degraded natural rangeland close to valley bottom (Otto Beukes)
Workers constructing semi-circular ponds towards Thicket rehabilitation. (Jennifer McEneaney (UNDP))

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地: 否

  • 牧场
    • 经营牧场
    动物类型: 山羊, 骡子和驴, 绵羊, 野生动物 - 大型食草动物
    是否实行作物与牲畜的综合管理?: 否
  • 不毛之地 - 具体说明: Degraded rangelands

供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀 , Wg:冲沟侵蚀/沟蚀 , Wo:场外劣化效应
  • 土壤风蚀 - Et:表土流失
  • 化学性土壤退化 - Cn:肥力下降和有机质含量下降(非侵蚀所致)
  • 物理性土壤退化 - Pc:压实, Pk:熟化和结壳, Pu:由于其他活动而导致生物生产功能的丧失
  • 生物性退化 - Bc:植被覆盖的减少, Bh:栖息地丧失, Bq:数量/生物量减少, Bs:质量和物种组成/多样性的下降
  • 水质恶化 - Ha:干旱化, Hs:地表水良变化, Hg:地下水/含水层水位的变化, Hp:地表水水质下降, Hw:湿地缓冲能力下降
SLM组
  • 改良的地面/植被覆盖
  • 集水
  • 减少基于生态系统的灾害风险
SLM措施
  • 植物措施 - V1:乔木和灌木覆盖层, V2:草和多年生草本植物, V5:其它
  • 结构措施 - S4:平沟、坑, S7:集水/供水/灌溉设备
  • 管理措施 - M1:改变土地使用类型, M2:改变管理/强度级别

技术图纸

技术规范
The technical drawing on the left shows the measurements of a typical average micro-pond. Its about 1m wide on the upstream (open) end and about 1m to the semi-circular edge wall on the downstream side. The pond should be dug out with a spade at an angle of 15 degrees towards the wall of the pond at the downstream end. Use the removed soil to form the semi-circular edge wall as illustrated on the left hand drawing. Use the spade or your feet to compact the soil of the semi-circular wall.
The drawing on the right illustrates the pond arrangement along a slope. The ponds should be staggered in lines across the contour to make sure the water flowing between ponds in the first line, flows into the ponds in the second line or row. The ponds don't need to be exactly in lines across the contour, but it is very important that the pond openings are perpendicular to the slope direction and form an appearance of fish scales.
Author: Kyra Lunderstedt

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:600 ha
  • 成本计算使用的货币:South African Rand
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 15.0 South African Rand
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:ZAR 150 - ZAR 262
影响成本的最重要因素
For manually constructed ponds: Climatic conditions, particularly heat. Productivity (labour) is approximately 34% greater in the cooler winter months (April-October) and reduce during summer months with regular temperatures above 30°C. The activity is generally stopped when temperatures exceed 32°C. Soil structure (Clay, Sand and rock proportions particularly) effect production rate and longevity. High rock content and dense silt and clay soils reduce productivity (rate at which ponds are dug manually). When constructing ponds mechanically, soil structure appears to have the greatest effect on production rates.
技术建立活动
  1. Terrain inspection and pecking out pond positions and lines (时间/频率: Any time of the year)
  2. Manual digging of micro-ponds (时间/频率: Any time of the year)
  3. Seeding of ponds (Optional) (时间/频率: Before or at start of rain season)
  4. Brush packing if material is available (时间/频率: Any time of the year)
  5. Inspection and maintenance of ponds (时间/频率: During the rainy season, especially after heavy thunderstorms)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per 600 ha)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (South African Rand) 每项投入的总成本 (South African Rand) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Manual digging of micro-ponds Person-days 1677.0 215.0 360555.0
设备
Spade Number 24.0 250.0 6000.0
Pick Number 24.0 350.0 8400.0
植物材料
Grass seeds 25 kg bags 10.0 250.0 2500.0
其它
Transport km 15960.0 6.2 98952.0
Staff overheads Per person day 1677.0 76.0 127452.0
Management Per field day 399.0 438.0 174762.0
技术建立所需总成本 778'621.0
技术建立总成本,美元 51'908.07
技术维护活动
  1. Restructuring of broken ponds (S) (时间/频率: After heavy rain event)
  2. Densification (S) (More ponds are dug when needed (时间/频率: After rain event and assessment of effective functioning and impact)
  3. Supplementary seeding (V) (时间/频率: Dependant on species seasonality)
  4. Brush-packing (时间/频率: After ponding to increase plant recruitment & survival)
总技术维护成本(估算)
25000.0

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
以毫米为单位计算的年平均降雨量:280.0
: 60% summer rainfall, 40% winter rainfall. Thunder storms in summer deposit large quantities at once (>50mm/occasion). 67% standard deviation around mean across 100 years recorded. Peak rainfall September and March, but no predictable long term or annual patterns. Less than half mean annual rainfall per year from 2015-2019 during analysed implementation period. March and April are the only months that have not experienced zero rainfall over a 100-year period. Approximately 30 days per annum are frost prone in the implementation area
PET effects do not exceed 10mm of effective rainfall per month. Approximately 43mm of rainfall per annum is effective
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考: 地表水
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
教育

贫瘠
技术援助

贫瘠
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
市场

贫瘠
能源

贫瘠
道路和交通

贫瘠
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
金融服务

贫瘠

影响

社会经济影响
饲料生产
降低
增加


Increased soil moisture content and prolonged retention

饲料质量
降低
增加


General biomass increase, pioneer species variable

生产区域(耕种/使用中的新土地)
降低
增加


Increased biomass on previously sealed and crusted soils

土地管理
妨碍
简化


Slight increased production and maintenance.

家畜用水的可用性
降低
增加


Increased infiltration, groundwater and surface water

工作量
增加
降低

社会文化影响
社区机构
削弱
加强


Increased rangeland quality

SLM/土地退化知识
减少
改良


Consequences of overgrazing and subsequent erosion

生态影响
水量
降低
增加


Reduction in runoff and siltation

水的回收/收集(径流、露水、雪等)
减少
改良


Improved capture of surface runoff

地表径流
增加
降低

土壤水分
降低
增加

SLM之前的数量: 5%
SLM之后的数量: 11.5%
Gravametric soil moisture content increase (n=320; randomized pond vs control). The initial decrease is by cultivating soils to build the ponds

土壤覆盖层
减少
改良


Significant increase of fractional green canopy cover

土壤流失
增加
降低


Decreased sheet erosion

土壤堆积
降低
增加


Soil accumulation in the ponds

土壤结壳/密封
增加
减少


Localized

植被覆盖层
降低
增加


Localized

生物量/地上C
降低
增加


Localized

动物多样性
降低
增加

SLM之前的数量: None
SLM之后的数量: 400%
Insect diversity

场外影响
下游洪水(不希望)
增加
减少


Positive effect, reduced runoff

下游淤积
增加
降低


Positive effect, reduced siltation

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

气候变化

渐变气候
年温度 增加

非常不好
非常好
年降雨量 减少

非常不好
非常好
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地暴雨

非常不好
非常好
局地雷暴

非常不好
非常好
热浪

非常不好
非常好
干旱

非常不好
非常好
陆地火灾

非常不好
非常好
答案:未知
比较和缓的(河道)洪水

非常不好
非常好
山洪暴发

非常不好
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
户数和/或覆盖面积
600 ha
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)
Packing with thorn brush from pruned pioneer trees (Vachelia karoo), planting of trees (Portulacaria afra) and seeding (Predominantly grass spp.)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • It creates employment opportunities for unskilled labourers
  • Plants return to barren areas
  • Increased grazing capacity for small stock
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • The technology is simple and extremely adaptable to ecological and economic variables through changes in density and dimension
  • The technology is relatively inexpensive and effective
  • The technology is relatively risk free when applied within application criteria
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • Production rates are slow, labourers require access to land to construct ponds for extended periods of time Use larger labour forces to complete areas faster
  • Ponds are slow to revegetate in drought conditions Seeding and brush-packing increase recruitment and survival rates
  • Unwanted pioneer weedy species may recruit and outcompete slower growing desired species Seeding with or planting preferable pioneer species
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • Ponds may silt up before recruiting new vegetation, particularly during heavy rain events and is highly dispersive soils Apply more stringent site selection criteria based on climatic and soil conditions. Adjust pond size and density to reduce rate of siltation

参考文献

编制者
  • Lehman Lindeque
Editors
审查者
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
实施日期: July 6, 2020
上次更新: Aug. 31, 2020
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • •Caring for Natural Rangelands, Ken Coetzee, University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2005, ISBN:1869140710, 9781869140717, 129 pages.: ZAR 129
  • •De Abraeu,, P. 2011. Unpublished thesis. The effect of rehabilitation on ecosystem services in the semi-arid Succulent Karoo lowlands of the Little Karoo, South Africa. University of Cape Town, South Africa: http://www.pcu.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/192/de%20abreu%202010.pdf
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International