Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy site treated with restoration technology (right) bordering untreated area (left). (Hanspeter Liniger)

Rangeland Restoration by cutting invasive species and grass reseeding and managing grazing (肯尼亚)

描述

This 'Rangeland Restoration' technology is part of a 'Holistic Rangeland Management' approach. It involves clearing of invasive vegetation (predominantly Acacia reficiens) and reseeding with grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and allowing resting and reduced grazing pressure to rehabilitate degraded communal grazing land.

The 'Rangeland Restoration' technology is applied in degraded sites within the 3,100 Ha 'core conservation area' (an central area with minimised grazing pressure designated for tourism) and 'buffer zone' (an area surrounding the 'core conservation area' with reduced grazing pressure) of the Kalama Community Wildlife Conservancy (total area: 9,500 Ha).

The main characteristics are clearing of invasive woody vegetation (predominantly Acacia reficiens) and reseeding with grass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Acacia reficiens (commonly known as red-bark acacia, red thorn or false umbrella tree or thorn) is a native tree or shrub but is considered an invasive species as it can encroach degraded areas with bare and disturbed soil. It is very opportunistic and hardy and can subsequently take over large areas of native vegetation. The invasion can reach a closed or nearly closed canopy with A. reficiens thickets, which are hindering animals to enter and access fodder thus making the area inaccessible for grazing and browsing. Additionally it can be observed that the soil underneath the canopy remains bare and the grass growth seems to be suppressed. As a result the top soil is compacted or forms crusts, which hinder infiltration. During the erratic but heavy rains most of the water flows away as runoff (research in close by areas show that runoff is between 60-80 % of the rainfall) and increases soil erosion and further degradation of the land despite a rather good tree cover. Rangeland grass and fodder productivity in these areas are reduced to a fraction of their potential.
The main activity is the cutting of the trees and shrubs at a height of ~1 m. The main trunks and branches can be used for fencing, temporary house constructions, firewood and charcoal. Most of the cut trees and the remaining branches are used to spread on the bare land where the trees and shrubs are cut. Underneath this dead material the bare soil receives some cover, which creates favorable conditions and microclimate for termites and other fauna in the soil to brake the hard top soil and crust and enable infiltration of the water during the next rains. This allows regrowth of grasses, particularly in the areas protected by the branches. In the following seasons the spread of the grasses can increase also the the area not protected by the branches. Additionally, seeding with Cenchrus ciliaris (buffel-grass or African foxtail grass), a grass species which is native to most of Africa, enhances the growth of a highly valuable fodder grass. Seeds are hand-broadcasted in the treated areas and germinate during the next rainy season. The first greening is visible in the places where the branches and the wood pieces cover the soil. From there the local annual and perennial grasses start colonising and expanding in the following seasons until, ideally, the whole area that has been bare is covered by valuable perennial grasses. Parallel to the cutting and reseeding is reduced grazing pressure and a resting period over at least one dry season, which is facilitated by the fact that treated areas are situated in the core conservation area or in the buffer zone. This involves the cooperation of the members of Kalama Conservancy, who agree to restrict grazing in the buffer zone and more so in the core conservation area. The exact duration that grazing is allowed in each of these two areas varies year to year depending on drought severity and forage availability. Whereas the grazing pressure by livestock can be regulated, there remains uncontrolled grazing by wildlife. The major herbivores are zebra, elephants and a number of different gazelle and antelope species the grazing pressure by wildlife varies but can be substantial at certain times.

Rehabilitating degraded grazing land is the primary purpose of the technology. Other benefits of the technology include: 1) augmented forage availability for the community; 2) increased livestock production; 3) reduced soil erosion and flooding. Land users enjoy these benefits but would like larger areas to be similarly restored. However, the limiting factor is the funding required to pay for labour, which is the major input required for the clearing and reseeding activities. Establishing a market for removing the main stems and producing and selling charcoal is still an opportunity to further explore immediate benefits and cash income in order to pay for the investment into the clearing.

地点

地点: Samburu County, 肯尼亚

分析的技术场所数量: 2-10个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 37.52845, 0.69574
  • 37.58098, 0.70432
  • 37.56415, 0.69437

技术传播: 适用于特定场所/集中在较小区域

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 2006; 10-50年前

介绍类型
Recently treated site with cut Acacia reficies branches laid on bare ground and in erosion gully. (Hanspeter Liniger)
Site treated approximately 10 years previously. (Hanspeter Liniger)

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用

  • 牧场
    • 半游牧畜牧业
    • 经营牧场
    动物类型: 牛 - 非奶牛牛肉, 牛 - 奶制品, 山羊, 骆驼, 骡子和驴, 绵羊
    产品和服务: 奶类, 肉类
  • 不毛之地 - 具体说明: Bare and/or degraded land
    注释: The area has been overused and continuously grazed for a long period of time without given the land and vegetation a break to recover. Thus a vicious spiral developed: the reduced grass cover lead to degradation of the soil to compaction and crusting, reduced infiltration thus reduced runoff and reduced vegetation growth, which in turn increased the pressure on the remaining vegetation and thus more base soil etc.
供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀 , Wg:冲沟侵蚀/沟蚀
  • 物理性土壤退化 - Pc:压实, Pk:熟化和结壳
  • 生物性退化 - Bc:植被覆盖的减少, Bs:质量和物种组成/多样性的下降, Bl:土壤寿命损失
  • 水质恶化 - Ha:干旱化
SLM组
  • 畜牧业和牧场管理
  • 改良的地面/植被覆盖
  • 改良植物品种/动物品种
SLM措施
  • 植物措施 - V2:草和多年生草本植物, V4:更换或清除外来/入侵物种
  • 管理措施 - M2:改变管理/强度级别

技术图纸

技术规范
A total of 279 hectares were treated with this rangeland restoration technology (clearing invasive Acacia reficiens and reseeding with Cenchrus ciliaris). Treated areas were relatively flat (slope < 5%). A. reficiens were cut ~1 m above the ground and well before the onset of the rains to discourage regeneration. C. ciliaris seeds were hand-broadcast at a rate of ~45 kg/Ha.
Holding membership of multiple community conservancies facilitates the movement between wet season and dry season grazing areas. For example, many of the local communities move their livestock to Losesia, in Sera Conservancy, for dry season grazing. These porous boundaries relieve pressure from Kalama Conservancy during some parts of the year, potentially facilitating recovery of treated areas, but also allows neighbouring communities to access treated areas rendering their grazing management challenging.
Author: Harry Wells

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:279 hectares (total over 6 sites)
  • 成本计算使用的货币:Kenya Shillings
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 101.0 Kenya Shillings
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:450 Kenya Shillings
影响成本的最重要因素
Hiring labour, as it was the most costly component.
技术建立活动
  1. Clearing Acacia reficiens (cutting and spreading) (时间/频率: During dry season, well before the onset of rains to prevent Acacia reficiens regrowth from stump.)
  2. Reseeding with Cenchrus ciliaris grass seed (时间/频率: Prior to the onset of rainy season to maximise germination and establishment of Cenhrus ciliaris..)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per 279 hectares (total over 6 sites))
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Kenya Shillings) 每项投入的总成本 (Kenya Shillings) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Clearing Acacia reficiens person-days 1200.0 450.0 540000.0
Hand-broadcasting Cenchrus ciliaris seeds person-days 1200.0 450.0 540000.0
设备
Machettes units 40.0 500.0 20000.0
植物材料
Cenchrus ciliaris seeds kg 2520.0 50.0 126000.0
其它
Transport of workers to and from site litre 600.0 100.0 60000.0
技术建立所需总成本 1'286'000.0
技术建立总成本,美元 12'732.67
技术维护活动
n.a.

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
以毫米为单位计算的年平均降雨量:351.0
气象站名称:Archer's Post
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考:
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
x
教育

贫瘠
x
技术援助

贫瘠
x
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
x
市场

贫瘠
x
能源

贫瘠
x
道路和交通

贫瘠
x
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
x
金融服务

贫瘠
x

影响

社会经济影响
饲料生产
降低
x
增加


due to degradation fodder production before was minimal both for grasses (hardly that survived the grazing pressure) as well as accessible browse material

饲料质量
降低
x
增加


perennial grasses were brought back

畜牧生产
降低
x
增加

木材生产
降低
x
增加


cut wood of the invasive species can be used for charcoal production, and construction material. The amount is high but the marketing is still weak, so most of it is left to be spread on the ground

森林/林地质量
降低
x
增加


one dominate invasive wood species was removed to give way for other native species to repopulate the area

社会文化影响
食品安全/自给自足
减少
x
改良

SLM/土地退化知识
减少
x
改良

冲突缓解
恶化
x
改良

生态影响
地表径流
增加
x
降低


There is still potential to decrease runoff further as the system is still recovering and improving.

土壤水分
降低
x
增加

土壤覆盖层
减少
x
改良

土壤流失
增加
x
降低

土壤结壳/密封
增加
x
减少

土壤压实
增加
x
减少

养分循环/补给
降低
x
增加

土壤有机物/地下C
降低
x
增加

植被覆盖层
降低
x
增加

生物量/地上C
降低
x
增加

植物多样性
降低
x
增加

场外影响
下游洪水(不希望)
增加
x
减少

下游淤积
增加
x
降低

对公共/私人基础设施的破坏
增加
x
减少


damage on major bridges but also on smaller within the conservancy

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
x
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益

气候变化

渐变气候
年温度 增加

非常不好
x
非常好
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地暴雨

非常不好
x
非常好
干旱

非常不好
x
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Land that was previously considered unproductive is now considered grazing land.
  • Increased infiltration and decreased runoff and water erosion.
  • Recolonisation by local grasses and forbs to replace reseeded Cenchrus ciliaris after 1-2 years provides nutritious forage (particularly the forbs) for livestock.
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • Decreased impact of the invasive Acacia reficiens on vegetation and soil within treated areas.
  • Increased biomass of herbaceous vegetation for livestock and wildlife forage.
  • Augmented biodiversity after reseeded Cenchrus ciliaris replaced by local grasses and forbs.
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • Creates overly high expectations from the community regarding the potential to restore larger areas. Raise awareness among community members regarding the limitations of large-scale restoration.
  • Lack of funds to pay labourers. Paying community members to undertake restoration activities rather than these activities being voluntary is now, in hindsight, perceived to have been a mistake. There will never be enough funding as labourers will continue to expect ever-increasing wages. However, over time, community members may decide to restore land voluntarily. Explore the potential for marketing the main trunks for charcoal production of firewood to pay for the labourers.
  • Controlling grazing in recovering areas. Raise awareness about the restoration projects within immediate and neighbouring communities. Also, ensure grazing by-laws are implemented and offenders fined.
  • Land users unwilling to voluntarily take part in restoration activities. Increase ownership by conducting restoration projects at more local zonal-levels rather than at the conservancy-level. Create additional incentives by using and marketing of some of the wood material (for legal charcoal production)
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • Inability to provide adequate rest to treated areas (i.e. by controlling grazing pressure) leading to unsuccessful establishment of Cenchrus ciliaris or other herbaceous vegetation in treated areas, particularly in 'buffer zone'. Implement grazing rules more stringently.
  • Lack of capacity regarding how to reseed Cenchrus ciliaris in some treated areas. In one case, seeds were buried (as farmers do with maize seeds), which is reported to have contributed to low establishment success of C. ciliaris seeds. Capacity building.
  • Germination and establishment of Cenchrus ciliaris depends on timing in relation to the onset of rains, which are unpredictable and led to unsuccessful rehabilitation of some treated areas. Provide most accurate weather forecasts available.

参考文献

编制者
  • Harry Wells
Editors
审查者
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Donia Mühlematter
  • Barbara *
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Hanspeter Liniger
  • Joana Eichenberger
实施日期: Feb. 5, 2018
上次更新: Nov. 2, 2021
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • 'Northern Rangeland Trust: Baseline assessment of rangeland health - Kalama and Namunyak conservancies', Tor-G. Vågen & Leigh A. Winowiecki, 2014: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/65671/nrtReport_march2014.pdf?sequence=1
链接到网络上可用的相关信息
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International