Citrus canopy management and rehabilitation program (Thinley Penjor Dorji)

Citrus Canopy Management and Rehabilitation Program (不丹)

Tshel Shing Zin Chong Dang Nyam Sung Ley Rim (ཚལ་ཤིང་འཛིན་སྐྱོང་དང་ཉམས་སྲུང་ལས་རིམ།)

描述

Citrus canopy management refers to the set of practices and techniques employed to optimize the growth, health, and productivity of citrus trees by manipulating the structure and density of their canopy. Effective canopy management is crucial for achieving desirable outcomes in citrus cultivation, such as improved fruit quality, increased yields, efficient use of resources, and enhanced tree health.

Citrus canopy management practices remain basic in Bhutan. Thus, the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) project was initiated and demonstrated citrus canopy management practices in selected orchards in 2010. In the same year, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) project trained land users and extension officers in eastern Bhutan on citrus management practices such as planting methods, nutrient management, pruning and training including top working, fruit thinning and post-harvest management practices. Since then, citrus growers have been slowly adopting the practices in their orchards. However, the adoption rate is low - affecting the yield and quality.
Bhutan has suitable climatic conditions for citrus production, particularly in the southern parts of the country due to the subtropical climate. Citrus such as oranges, mandarins and lemons are grown in orchards and home gardens. In Bhutan, citrus canopy management practices focus on optimizing tree growth, fruit production, and overall tree health. The main elements include pruning, training systems, canopy density management, tree height and size control, and disease and pest management integrated with irrigation and nutrient management practices. Pruning involves selectively removing branches, shoots, or foliage to shape the tree and improve its health. The stump should always be cut as close to the collar region as possible. Training structures the tree in a specific manner to optimize growth and management. Canopy density management regulates foliage density for light penetration and airflow. Techniques such as hedging or topping control the height and size of trees. Disease and pest management practices include adequate air circulation and sunlight exposure. Integration with irrigation and soil nutrient management enhances tree health and productivity. The desirable shape and size of citrus are variable depending on the grower's choice, location, and - most importantly - operational health and safety concerns. In general, the desirable shape and size of the tree should be 2 to 5 m tall, 2 to 5 m width of canopy, and 4 to 6 primary (scaffold) branches that are at least 1 m above the ground level.
The purposes/functions of citrus canopy management technology are to optimize fruit production, improve tree health, and facilitate harvest and maintenance operations. It helps maximize fruit yield and quality. Pruning and maintenance practices enhance tree vigour, reduce the risk of diseases and pests, and improve overall plant health. Controlling tree size and shape makes harvesting easier and more efficient, and simplifies other maintenance activities such as irrigation, fertilization, and pest control.
To establish and maintain citrus canopy management technology, activities such as regular pruning and training, knowledge and skill development, use of proper tools and equipment, monitoring and assessment, irrigation, and nutrition management are required. Regular pruning and training of citrus trees according to the selected system and management objectives is essential. Monitoring tree growth, health, and productivity is important, along with proper irrigation scheduling, water management, and nutrient application.
The benefits/impacts of the technology are improved sunlight exposure, enhanced air circulation, reduced disease incidence, increased fruit size and quality, ease of harvest, consistent yield, optimized water use, better pest management, and others. A well-managed canopy makes it easier to access the fruit during harvest, and achieve higher yields and better-quality fruits, reduced need for pesticides, as well as directing nutrients toward fruit production rather than excessive vegetative growth. However, there are some drawbacks of the technology such as the requirement for time-consuming manual labour, lower initial yields, high initial investments for equipment, and concerns about over-pruning.

地点

地点: Nindukha Village, Kana Gewog, Dagana Dzongkhag, 不丹

分析的技术场所数量: 单一场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 89.89701, 27.05156

技术传播: 均匀地分布在一个区域 (approx. < 0.1 平方千米(10 公顷))

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 2019

介绍类型
Overview of a citrus orchard (Thinley Penjor Dorji)

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地: 否

  • 农田
    • 乔木与灌木的种植: 柑橘属
    每年的生长季节数: 1
    采用间作制度了吗?: 否
    采用轮作制度了吗?: 否

供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 生物性退化 - Bc:植被覆盖的减少
SLM组
  • 土壤肥力综合管理
  • 灌溉管理(包括供水、排水)
  • Tree canopy management
SLM措施
  • 植物措施 - V5:其它
  • 其它措施 - Improve/optimize fruit production and quality by manipulating the growth and structure of trees.

技术图纸

技术规范
The spacing between trees is 6 m. There are a total of 100 trees per acre. Diseased or damaged trees are removed.
Author: Thinley Penjor Dorji

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:2.47 acre;换算为1公顷的换算系数:1 公顷 = 1
  • 成本计算使用的货币:Ngultrum (Nu.)
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 80.0 Ngultrum (Nu.)
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:500
影响成本的最重要因素
The land users mentioned that the equipment is the main factor affecting cost.
技术建立活动
  1. Pruning (时间/频率: Right after harvest)
  2. Applying Bordeaux mixture (时间/频率: Anytime)
  3. Making basin (时间/频率: Winter)
  4. Applying manure (时间/频率: Anytime)
  5. Removal of dead woods or shoots (时间/频率: Anytime)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per 2.47 acre)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Ngultrum (Nu.)) 每项投入的总成本 (Ngultrum (Nu.)) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Pruning Person/day 17.0 500.0 8500.0 100.0
设备
Pruning saw Number 1.0 2000.0 2000.0 100.0
Secateurs Number 1.0 2500.0 2500.0 100.0
植物材料
Sapling Number 247.0 150.0 37050.0
肥料和杀菌剂
Bordeaux mixture Litres 12.0 125.0 1500.0
技术建立所需总成本 51'550.0
技术建立总成本,美元 644.38
技术维护活动
  1. Pruning of dead woods and water shoots (时间/频率: Anytime)
  2. Fertilizer application (时间/频率: Anytime)
  3. Shoot selection in the following years (时间/频率: Every year when new shoots sprout)
技术维护的投入和成本 (per 2.47 acre)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Ngultrum (Nu.)) 每项投入的总成本 (Ngultrum (Nu.)) 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力
Pruning Person/day 7.0 500.0 3500.0 98.0
技术维护所需总成本 3'500.0
技术维护总成本,美元 43.75

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
The area falls under the humid Subtropical zone from the six Agro-ecological zones of Bhutan.
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考: 地表水
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
教育

贫瘠
技术援助

贫瘠
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
市场

贫瘠
能源

贫瘠
道路和交通

贫瘠
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
金融服务

贫瘠

影响

社会经济影响
作物生产
降低
增加


Land users mentioned that there was a significant increase in crop yield after canopy management.

作物质量
降低
增加

SLM之前的数量: 50-60%
SLM之后的数量: 80%
The land users stated that the size of the fruit was bigger and of better quality after canopy management.

生产故障风险
增加
降低


The land users stated that the risk of producing lower quality fruits that are not acceptable in the market has greatly reduced.

农业投入费用
增加
降低


The cost of equipment is moderately expensive. However, the land users feel the cost is compensated by the increase in income. The land users also take special care of the equipment.

农业收入
降低
增加


Improved quality and quantity of citrus are directly related to increased farm income as there is a higher price provided for good quality produce.

工作量
增加
降低

SLM之前的数量: 40%
SLM之后的数量: 50%
The management practices such as training, pruning, and application of Bordeaux mixture are laborious. Therefore, the workload of land users has increased by about 10 per cent.

社会文化影响
食品安全/自给自足
减少
改良


The land users are self-sufficient in terms of citrus. Further, the portion of their yield is shared with their relatives making the community self-sufficient. The income generated from selling the produce is used to procure nutritious foods from the market making them food secure.

健康状况
恶化
改良


Improved income if used efficiently increases the health situation of the family members.

SLM/土地退化知识
减少
改良


The traditional practice did not include nutrient management of the orchard. The citrus canopy management technology includes proper manuring or nutrient management of the orchard leading to increased knowledge of SLM for the land users.

生态影响
植被覆盖层
降低
增加


The technology improved tree health reducing the risk of orchards converting to fallow land and increasing vegetation cover.

有益物种(捕食者、蚯蚓、传粉者)
降低
增加


The improved soil and canopy management increased earthworm and bee populations on the farm.

害虫/疾病控制
降低
增加


After canopy management, the land users stated that they have experienced fewer pest and disease incidences. This could be due to better sunlight penetration and air movement in the tree canopy.

场外影响
对邻近农田的破坏
增加
减少


The orchard harbouring pests and diseases can damage neighbouring fields as the diseases are transmitted from one field to another through vectors and other sources. Therefore, the technology improves the health of the orchard and prevents the risk of damaging neighbouring orchards.

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

气候变化

渐变气候
年温度 增加

非常不好
非常好
年降雨量 减少

非常不好
非常好
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
局地雹灾

非常不好
非常好
流行病

非常不好
非常好
昆虫/蠕虫侵扰

非常不好
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
户数和/或覆盖面积
7 households adopted the technology from the total of 50 households.
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Increased production. The canopy management technology increases production in the long run although there is a sudden reduction in the yield in the first year of implementation.
  • Improved quality. The technology is a wholesome approach to improving the canopy, nutrient management and irrigation management leading to quality fruit production.
  • Reduced pests and disease incidence. The technology reduces the favourable environment for the multiplication of diseases and pest. For example, by pruning the canopy which increases aeration ultimately reducing fungal growth.
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • Increased income and improved livelihood. Canopy management increases yield in the long run leading to increased farm income and improved living standards of the land users.
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • Labour intensive. The technology includes pruning, thinning, irrigation and nutrient management activities which require a lot of labour. Implementing a labour-sharing mechanism as it is cost-effective and strengthens community collaboration.
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
  • Low initial crop yield. Due to excessive pruning in the first year of technology implementation, there is a marked reduction in the yield of the citrus. With better care and management, yields increase after 2 to 3 years.

参考文献

编制者
  • Nima Dolma Tamang
Editors
  • Kuenzang Nima
审查者
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • Joana Eichenberger
实施日期: July 12, 2023
上次更新: May 30, 2024
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
链接到网络上可用的相关信息
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International