Winter pasture lands for the nomads of Dhur (Dr Jigme Thinley, Department of Livestock)

Managed Burning of Rangeland (不丹)

Tshaezin Gi Thogley Meytang Tey Tsadrok Zinchong (ཚད་འཛིན་གྱི་ཐོག་ལས་མེ་བཏང་སྟེ་ཙྭ་འབྲོག་འཛིན་སྐྱོང་།)

描述

Burning of rangeland (“tsamdro”) is a traditional management practice adopted by highlanders to control unpalatable grass and shrub species. This helps them produce adequate fodder for their yaks, cattle, horses, and sheep by creating a favorable environment for palatable grasses.

The practice of burning rangeland (“tsamdro”) is a longstanding tradition among highlanders, whose livelihoods depend on livestock including yaks, cattle, horses and sheep. It is mainly practiced by transhumant communities or individuals who rely on livestock for their livelihoods. They follow a migratory livestock husbandry system that takes them from the highlands to the lowlands dependent on the availability of fodder resources, while simultaneously avoiding the extremes of climate. In the past, rangeland was allocated to individuals, communities, or religious bodies through payment for a minimal annual grazing permit, granting grazing rights. When pasture was scarce, controlled fires were intentionally set in specific areas to rejuvenate the rangeland with fresh grass and control unpalatable grasses and shrubs. For instance, the transhumant nomadic communities of Dhur village, Choekhor Gewog, in Bumthang have adopted the practice of burning rangeland. This practice is implemented during the winter months, dependent on weather, vegetation status, and wind patterns. Rooted in traditional knowledge and cultural practices, the practice is slowly diminishing nowadays due to environmental concerns and labour shortages as young nomads migrate - seeking better employment in towns.
The technique serves multiple purposes. These include promoting the growth of fresh and palatable pasture rich in protein, increasing plant diversity, adding nutrients to the soil through ash, and reducing dead plant material that inhibits new plant growth. Additionally, rangeland burning contributes to the control of livestock pests, especially ticks and flies. While rangeland burning is a straightforward process, it requires careful planning of time and location, creation of fire breaks to prevent uncontrollable spread, and leaving the land fallow for 2 to 3 years after burning to encourage grass growth.
Land users appreciate the technology for reducing their workload in collecting wild fodder grasses, enhancing visibility by removing trees and shrubs, and reducing the risk of predators. However, risks include the potential for uncontrolled fires if not properly managed and harm to the ecosystem and biodiversity in and around the pastureland. Burning also contributes to the loss of carbon dioxide (a greenhouse gas) to the atmosphere.

地点

地点: Dhur village, Choekhor Gewog (Block), Bumthang Dzongkhag (District), 不丹

分析的技术场所数量: 2-10个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 90.65579, 27.61877

技术传播: 均匀地分布在一个区域 (approx. 0.1-1 平方千米)

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 50多年前(传统)

介绍类型
Enumerators and land user, who practiced rangeland burning for pasture land establishment (Tshewang Phuntsho)
Winter pastureland of one of the nomads in Dhur (Tshering Zangmo)

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地: 是 - 林牧业

  • 牧场
    • 游牧
    • Pasture grass is natural grown and livestock are allowed to graze on it
    是否实行作物与牲畜的综合管理?: 否
    产品和服务: 肉类, 奶类, 外皮/兽皮
      品种计数
      牛 - 奶制品50
      牛 - 奶制品55
    • 森林/林地
      • (半天然)天然森林/林地: 温带山地系统天然植被. 管理: 清除枯木/剪枝
      Tree types (常绿): 不适用
      产品和服务: 自然保持/保护

    供水
    • 雨养
    • 混合雨水灌溉
    • 充分灌溉

    土地退化相关的目的
    • 防止土地退化
    • 减少土地退化
    • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
    • 适应土地退化
    • 不适用
    解决的退化问题
    • 其它 - 具体说明: Revitalise and regenerate growth of palatable grass species to be used for livestock grazing
    SLM组
    • 畜牧业和牧场管理
    SLM措施
    • 管理措施 - M5:物种组成的控制/变化

    技术图纸

    技术规范
    Firebreak of 5 m are kept to control the burning
    Author: Ongpo Lepcha

    技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

    投入和成本的计算
    • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:1 acres;换算为1公顷的换算系数:1 公顷 = 0.4 hectare
    • 成本计算使用的货币:Bhutanese Ngultrum
    • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 82.08 Bhutanese Ngultrum
    • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:1200
    影响成本的最重要因素
    Labour cost
    技术建立活动
    1. Creating fire break around the pasture land (时间/频率: During the winter season)
    2. Burning of the pasture land (时间/频率: During the winter season)
    3. After burning the land is left fallow for the pasture land to establish (时间/频率: Kept fallow for the next 2 to 3 years)
    技术建立的投入和成本 (per 1 acres)
    对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (Bhutanese Ngultrum) 每项投入的总成本 (Bhutanese Ngultrum) 土地使用者承担的成本%
    劳动力
    Labours person-days 9.0 1200.0 10800.0 98.0
    设备
    grass cutter No 1.0 15000.0 15000.0
    Pipe Bundle 1.0 3000.0 3000.0
    Spade No 3.0 500.0 1500.0
    技术建立所需总成本 30'300.0
    技术建立总成本,美元 369.15
    技术维护活动
    1. Land is left fallow (时间/频率: For 2 to 3 years)

    自然环境

    年平均降雨量
    • < 250毫米
    • 251-500毫米
    • 501-750毫米
    • 751-1,000毫米
    • 1,001-1,500毫米
    • 1,501-2,000毫米
    • 2,001-3,000毫米
    • 3,001-4,000毫米
    • > 4,000毫米
    农业气候带
    • 潮湿的
    • 半湿润
    • 半干旱
    • 干旱
    关于气候的规范
    The data was used from the National Center for Hydrology and Meteorology from the nearest weather station.
    气象站名称:https://www.nchm.gov.bt/home/pageMenu/906
    Cool temperate zone
    斜坡
    • 水平(0-2%)
    • 缓降(3-5%)
    • 平缓(6-10%)
    • 滚坡(11-15%)
    • 崎岖(16-30%)
    • 陡峭(31-60%)
    • 非常陡峭(>60%)
    地形
    • 高原/平原
    • 山脊
    • 山坡
    • 山地斜坡
    • 麓坡
    • 谷底
    海拔
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    ......应用的技术
    • 凸形情况
    • 凹陷情况
    • 不相关
    土壤深度
    • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
    • 浅(21-50厘米)
    • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
    • 深(81-120厘米)
    • 非常深(> 120厘米)
    土壤质地(表土)
    • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
    • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
    • 细粒/重质(粘土)
    土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
    • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
    • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
    • 细粒/重质(粘土)
    表土有机质含量
    • 高(>3%)
    • 中(1-3%)
    • 低(<1%)
    地下水位
    • 表面上
    • < 5米
    • 5-50米
    • > 50米
    地表水的可用性
    • 过量
    • 中等
    • 匮乏/没有
    水质(未处理)
    • 良好饮用水
    • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
    • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
    • 不可用
    水质请参考: 地表水
    盐度是个问题吗?

    洪水发生
    物种多样性
    • 中等
    栖息地多样性
    • 中等

    应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

    市场定位
    • 生计(自给)
    • 混合(生计/商业)
    • 商业/市场
    非农收入
    • 低于全部收入的10%
    • 收入的10-50%
    • > 收入的50%
    相对财富水平
    • 非常贫瘠
    • 贫瘠
    • 平均水平
    • 丰富
    • 非常丰富
    机械化水平
    • 手工作业
    • 畜力牵引
    • 机械化/电动
    定栖或游牧
    • 定栖的
    • 半游牧的
    • 游牧的
    个人或集体
    • 个人/家庭
    • 团体/社区
    • 合作社
    • 员工(公司、政府)
    性别
    • 女人
    • 男人
    年龄
    • 儿童
    • 青年人
    • 中年人
    • 老年人
    每户使用面积
    • < 0.5 公顷
    • 0.5-1 公顷
    • 1-2 公顷
    • 2-5公顷
    • 5-15公顷
    • 15-50公顷
    • 50-100公顷
    • 100-500公顷
    • 500-1,000公顷
    • 1,000-10,000公顷
    • > 10,000公顷
    规模
    • 小规模的
    • 中等规模的
    • 大规模的
    土地所有权
    • 公司
    • 社区/村庄
    • 团体
    • 个人,未命名
    • 个人,有命名
    土地使用权
    • 自由进入(无组织)
    • 社区(有组织)
    • 租赁
    • 个人
    用水权
    • 自由进入(无组织)
    • 社区(有组织)
    • 租赁
    • 个人
    进入服务和基础设施的通道
    健康

    贫瘠
    教育

    贫瘠
    技术援助

    贫瘠
    就业(例如非农)

    贫瘠
    市场

    贫瘠
    能源

    贫瘠
    道路和交通

    贫瘠
    饮用水和卫生设施

    贫瘠
    金融服务

    贫瘠
    注释

    Access to these services and infrastructure were based on their winter home, during the summer they would travel to the more higher altitudes where none of these services are available except for drinking water.

    影响

    社会经济影响
    饲料生产
    降低
    增加


    The land users shared that fodder production is relatively higher when practicing rangeland burning.

    饲料质量
    降低
    增加


    When comparing cut grass and grass in burned rangeland, the land users prefer the grass in the burned rangeland.

    畜牧生产
    降低
    增加


    According to the land users, milk yield is better and higher from cattle fed on grasses from rangeland, which was burnt previously.

    生产故障风险
    增加
    降低


    Land user also shared that burning rangeland provides enough food for their livestock which is sufficient throughout the year. This reduces the risk of production due to a shortage of grasses/feed.

    农业收入
    降低
    增加


    Farm income is higher when compared to dairy supplemented with commercial feed in the winter. In addition, the establishment cost and implementation cost is also very low.

    社会文化影响
    生态影响
    植被覆盖层
    降低
    增加


    Vegetation cover is reduced because of this technology. This is because shrubs and trees are intentionally removed from the rangeland.

    植物多样性
    降低
    增加


    Plant diversity is also very minimal since tree saplings and shrubs are burned leaving only the pasture grass to grow on the land

    栖息地多样性
    降低
    增加


    Only grass is maintained as part of the technology. Habitat diversity is very low as trees and shrubs which also serve as habitats for many insects and arthropods are removed from rangeland.

    害虫/疾病控制
    降低
    增加


    It is reported in the literature that rangeland burning can reduce pest like tick and flies.

    场外影响
    温室气体的影响
    增加
    减少


    Burning of the rangeland leads to the production of several greenhouse gases, inevitably.

    成本效益分析

    与技术建立成本相比的效益
    短期回报
    非常消极
    非常积极

    长期回报
    非常消极
    非常积极

    与技术维护成本相比的效益
    短期回报
    非常消极
    非常积极

    长期回报
    非常消极
    非常积极

    Since minimal cost goes into implementing the technology, the income earned from it is high. Further, the land users also earn income from cordyceps, therefore, off farm income is very high than from dairy produced from the cattles.

    气候变化

    渐变气候
    年温度 增加

    非常不好
    非常好
    年降雨量 减少

    非常不好
    非常好
    气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
    局地暴雨

    非常不好
    非常好
    局地雷暴

    非常不好
    非常好
    局地雹灾

    非常不好
    非常好
    局地雪暴

    非常不好
    非常好
    局地风暴

    非常不好
    非常好
    寒潮

    非常不好
    非常好
    干旱

    非常不好
    非常好
    森林火灾

    非常不好
    非常好
    滑坡

    非常不好
    非常好

    采用和适应

    采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
    • 单例/实验
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    户数和/或覆盖面积
    17 households from a total of 105 household in the village are land users and practice rangeland burning.
    最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
    什么样的变化条件?
    • 气候变化/极端气候
    • 不断变化的市场
    • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

    结论和吸取的教训

    长处: 土地使用者的观点
    • Feed security for livestock: Land users have high-quality grasses in enough quantity to feed his/her cattle for the seasons.
    • The land is revitalized for better growth of the pasture grass: fresh and healthy grasses growing after the burning of rangeland are rich in protein and enhanced digestibility
    • Less workload: Implementation of this technology is easy and land users have enough time to di off-farm activities.
    长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
    • Rangeland burning helps control the spread of woody plants and invasive species.
    • Rangeland burning has cultural significance and is deeply rooted in traditional knowledge and practices.
    弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
    • Can lead to forest fire Land users should create fire break to prevent the fire from becoming uncontrollable
    • Affect ecosystem and biodiversity in and around the pasture land Using better varieties of pasture grass.
    弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服
    • Intense fires or repeated burning in the same areas can lead to increased soil erosion. Implementing proper rotational burning practices, where different areas of the rangeland are burned in a planned sequence.
    • Rangeland burning can produce smoke and affect air quality and add carbon dioxide (green house gases) to the atmosphere. Burns should be carried out under favorable weather conditions, taking into account wind direction and dispersion patterns.

    参考文献

    编制者
    • ONGPO LEPCHA
    Editors
    • chenga Tshering
    审查者
    • William Critchley
    • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
    • Joana Eichenberger
    实施日期: July 15, 2023
    上次更新: June 4, 2024
    资源人
    WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
    链接的SLM数据
    文件编制者
    机构 项目
    主要参考文献
    • Mapiye, C., Mwale, M., Chikumba, N. & Chimonyo, M. (2008). Fire as a Rangeland Management Tool in the Savannas of Southern Africa. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 8, 115-124.: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/939/93980201.pdf
    • Sabiiti, E. N., Wamara, J. B., Ogen-Odoi, A. A. & Wein, R. W. (1992). The Role of Fire in Pasture and Rangeland Management. Nomadic Peoples, 21, 107-110.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43123378
    链接到网络上可用的相关信息
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International