联合国防治荒漠化公约

Restoring Village Common Land for Sustaining Livelihoods [印度]

  • 创建:
  • 更新:
  • 编制者:
  • 编辑者:
  • 审查者:

报告主体: India

澄清模板中描述的技术或其一部分是否包含在产权范围内。:

完整性: 91%

一般信息

一般信息

最佳实践的标题:

Restoring Village Common Land for Sustaining Livelihoods

国家:

印度

报告主体:

India

产权

澄清模板中描述的技术或其一部分是否包含在产权范围内。:

分类

指定地点的主要土地用途

  • 牧场

对荒漠化、土地退化和干旱(DLDD)措施的贡献

  • 适应

对战略目标的贡献

  • 改善受影响人口的居住条件
  • 改善受影响生态系统的状况

与其他最佳实践主题的联系

  • 能力建设和认知提高
  • DLDD和SLM的监控与评估/研究
  • 知识管理和决策支持
  • 参与、协作和联网

规范

第1节 最佳实践的背景:框架条件(自然和人类环境)

最佳实践的简短描述

Villagers identified the land for work and set up management systems. Then they contacted the Forest Department to get their help for the plan. The villagers were involved with physical work, such as fencing, pit digging, trench, boundary wall and plantation work. plantation of local species raised.|

地点

Village Sagatadi, Panchyat Bori, Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur|

如果该位置有明确的边界,请以公顷为单位说明其延伸范围。:

79.0

居住在该地区的估计人口:

356.0

指定地点内的自然环境简介。

The average rainfall recorded during the rainy season is 550 mm. During May and June months, the temperature was recorded at 45o C and in winter the temperature at night was at a minimum 8o C|
The land is mostly rocky and at some places contain mixture of clay. Top soil layer is 3 to 7 inch, which is also not uniform at all the places. On less undulating places  surface area soil layer is 1 to 6 feet. Higher altitudes covered with grasses & low lying parts having sparse vegetative cover|
Area is hilly. Outcrop Rocks can be observed on slopes. Scanty vegetation is found along drainage lines. General slope of the area is moderate

居住在该地点及/或附近居民的普遍社会经济状况

Main Income source is agriculture supplemented by animal husbandry. Wage labour is also an important source of income for some of the families.
More than 50 per cent families are Below Poverty Line (BPL). Their income is between Rs 10 – 12,000.00 per year per family. Besides, other families have earned 20 – 25,000.00 Rs per year per family|
Average land holding of the families varies between 0.5 to 1.5 hectares. More than 50 per cent area of the village is ether defacto or dejure common. The intervention area is common land for grazing purposes

根据哪些标准和/或指标(与战略无关),在确定建议的实践和相应的技术是否被认为是“最佳”时,应该基于哪些标准和/或指标(与战略无关)?

Consensus evolved during the National Consultation process.

第2节 解决的问题(直接和间接原因)和最佳实践的目标

最佳实践解决的主要问题

Due to ignorance at the community level, uncontrolled grazing and tree felling has accelerated the degradation of the area. |The access and use related conflicts further aggravated the resource exploitation problems.|Lack of any management system for these resources also contributed to the degradation of the area. |Reduction in vegetative cover, increased soil erosion and less production

概述最佳实践解决的具体土地退化问题

Encroachment and degradation of village common lands- particularly grazing lands

具体说明最佳实践的目标

To evolve system for management of village resources|To increase productivity of land and also increase fodder availability|To set up arrangements for maintenance and sustainability of the area

第3节 活动

按目标对主要活动进行简要的描述

Developed pasture land in 79 hectares. At the foot of hillsides, water harvesting system has also been created.|Resolved community and inter-village conflict by using revenue land records and clearing the rights/ownership
Helped community to liason with Forest Department for physical activity work
Prepared community for self management on their resources

本技术的简要说明和技术规范

Sensitization of local community about common resources, their roles & responsibilities. Construction of protection wall to address encroachment, participatory planning for soil & water conservation and regeneration of biomass. Conflict resolution, equity and benefit sharing are ensured. |

第4节 涉及的机构/参与者(协作、参与、利益相关者的作用)

技术开发机构的名称和地址


Praytna Samiti|At Post Gudli, Via Bombora, Tehsil Girwa, Udaipur - 313 706 India

这项技术是合作开发的吗?

列出合作伙伴:

Prayatna Samiti|Villagers

具体说明该技术推广的框架

  • 地方自主性

当地利益相关者(包括CSO)的参与是否促进了技术的开发?

列出涉及的当地利益相关者:

Local community|Forest Department|Society for Wasteland Development|Revenue Department

对于上面列出的利益相关者,说明他们在该技术的设计、引入、使用和维护(如果有的话)中的角色。

Forest department- plantation and physical work to the community; Local community- implementation & facilitation; SPWD constructed a water harvesting structure on the intervened area; Revenue Department provided land records for conflict resolution among three villages

居住在该地区和/或附近的居民是否参与了该技术的开发?

通过什么手段?:
  • 咨询
  • 参与途径

分析

第5节 对影响的贡献

描述现场影响(按类别划分的两类主要影响)

People's interest in animal husbandry increased and milk availability also increased.
• When the work starts, the production level is nothing or minimum. After one year when the land produced fodder, people got 2000 pullas of grass fodder during the first time. In 1997, after 3 years, the community got 9480 pullas. Currently they have been able to get 24,000 pullas yearly. |
Reduced Soil erosion and land productivity increased; Tree Canopy area increased.
People saved money, which they have spent on the fodder. Each family saved almost Rs 1000.00 per year. |
Run off is stopped and protection of top soil layer; Degraded land became cultivated.
Before, the land which is degraded, has now become available or converted for pastureland. This has helped reduce soil erosion and increase the number of trees|

描述两个主要的场外影响(即不是发生在现场,而是发生在周围区域)

Ten villages learned them for pastureland development and about 570 hectares of ten villages’ land have also been treated.
Dispute around three adjoining boundaries of villages were resolved ;Pastureland development activity increased in the adjoining three villages

对生物多样性和气候变化的影响

解释原因:

• Peoples do not cut trees during lopping, natural regeneration continues.
• Water conservation is increased in land and mountain during the rainfall.
• Moisture retention is maintained for a long time in the land.
• Moisture retention increased in the soil.
• Evaporation becomes less through biomass.  
• Heat of rock is reduced.
• Birds provided place for stay.
• Reduced Soil erosion.
• Layer of soil has increased and plantation in the area.
• Productivity of land is increased.

是否进行了成本效益分析?

是否进行了成本效益分析?:

具体说明:

• Per family investment of Rs.200 per year.
• Per family benefited with 600 Kg fodder per year, which is Rs 2400.00. Thus, total area of fodder in Rs 2400.00 (Per family)
• Other side, goat lopping facilities is also provided. 50 per cent families having a goat in the HH. Yearly they have benefits |

第6节 采用和可复制性

该技术是否传播/引进到其他地方?

该技术是否传播/引进到其他地方?:

传播/引进到哪里?:

Girwa block of Udaipur District

您能否确定目前最佳实践/技术成功的三个主要条件?

Active participation of villagers and highly motivated stakeholders; Benefited villages which organized into a unit; Equal participation and execution in management.
Extremely favourable weather conditions
Community monitoring and financial management system is well delivered.

可复制性

在您看来,您所提出的最佳实践/技术可以复制到其他地方,尽管有一定程度的适应?:

适应程度如何?:
  • 地方
  • 次国家

第7节 吸取的教训

人力资源相关

Through united efforts from the stakeholders, any task can be accomplished. Equal opportunity and equal participation in decision making should be ensured while undertaking the tasks.
|As the productivity of the land increases, stakeholder participation increases; positive association of stakeholders, thus, ensures sustainability.

与财务方面有关

By better practices of our community resources, we can get more production in minimum expenditure and its regular.  And whole community get benefited from profit or production. |

与技术方面有关

Through regeneration activity we can preserve and promote our resources. |Management gives to community hand, we should give outer support. And play a role at the one limit.

模块