1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Decision Support for Mainstreaming and Scaling out Sustainable Land Management (GEF-FAO / DS-SLM)

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Department of Agriculture-Region VIII (DA-8) - 菲律宾

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

10/03/2016

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Synergistic mix of farming ventures implemented by the farm family based on the existing environment and their resources to address food security, income instability, and sustainability.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

The objectives of the approach are the following: to improve resources allocation; to enhance biodiversity and ecological balance; to reduce production risks; and to increase cropping intensity, productivity, profitability, and economic stability. It also includes continuous food supply and higher income for land users. With Palayamanan, the farm is not just intended for rice. It is about food security, livelihood and empowering farmers to become better decision makers and resilient to climate change. It also aims to develop land users to become farmer-researchers, extension workers and entrepreneurs.

Methods: Participatory approach with the stakeholders/land users.

Implementation comprised the following stages: (1) Selection of the demonstration sites an farmer-partners; (2) Conduct participatory rapid appraisal on the sites; (3) Planning; (4) Conduct of training for the farmers (Farmers Field School) and for the Agricultural Extension Workers; (5) Establishment of the demonstration farm; (6) Monitoring and Evaluation; and (7) Human Resource Development for Farmers (to become farmer-researcher, extension worker, entrepreneur)

Stakeholders: A. Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice): take the lead in the implementation of the program; facilitate the conduct of training;provide technical assistance to the program; and monitor the progress of the program.
B. Local Government Unit (Agriculture Office): provide support to the activities of the program; spearhead the dissemination and expansion of the program within their concerned municipality.
C. Farmer: participate in various activities of the program from planning to establishment; conduct on-site researches.

The approach introduced a systematized method of farm management involving technologies and practices to utilize available resources without compromising human health and environment. Some of the technologies incorporated under this approach are the following: crop rotation, aquaculture, waste recycling, diversified cropping, alternate wetting and drying, nutrient management, and integrated pest management.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The objectives of the approach are the following: to improve resources allocation; to enhance biodiversity and ecological balance; to reduce production risks; to increase cropping intensity, productivity, profitability, and economic stability. It also includes continuous food supply and higher income for land users. With Palayamanan, the farm is not just intended for rice. It is about food security, livelihood and empowering farmers to become better decision makers and resilient to climate change.It also aims to develop land users to become farmer-researchers, extension workers and entrepreneurs.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	被动	land users were informed about the program through technical briefing/consultation meetings
计划	互动	PhilRice in consultation with the land users and LGUs
实施	互动	Land users have the option on what technologies they will implement with the technical assistance of PhilRice
监测/评估	互动	farm record keeping, testimonial during field day and Palayamanan Congress, land user as correspondent during project monitoring
research	互动	land users developed their own on-site research; they presented the results in a research study paper contest during Palayamanan Congress

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者
• 现场工作人员/顾问

• Agricultural Extension Workers

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

Farmers Field School (FFS) were conducted to capacitate and inform the land users on various farming technologies (i.e. fertilizer, crop, water, and pest management) and entrepreneurship. Training also incorporated topics on post harvest and farm record keeping. There were also training of trainers (TOT) for farmers on rice production and other crops.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在固定中心

说明/注释:

Advisory through Radio Program, Farmers served as correspondents

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

说明机构、角色和职责、成员等。:

The local government was not supportive in the early stage of the program but after witnessing the positive impact in the agricultural sector, they started to finance the establishment of training centers in the barangays. Agricultural technicians from the LGU were active in the sustainability of the program.

具体说明支持类型:

• 财务
• 能力建设/培训
• 设备

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

若是，该文件是否用于监测和评估？:

否

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 经济/市场营销
• 生态学
• 技术

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Researches were conducted bu the Philippine Rice Research Institute (PHILRICE)

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 2,000-10,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

PhilRice 50%, LGU 20%, Farmers' association 30%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

如果是，请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:

Subsidies from the government were given in terms of seedlings,training, tools and equipment.

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 设备

• 农业

• 基建

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

是

对条件（利率、回报等）进行具体说明:

Credit was provided in terms of agricultural inputs (seeds and fertilizers) and is paid in cash after harvest. This payment will serve as revolving fund of the farmers association.

请具体指明信贷接收人:

Credit receivers are land users covered under the approach.

5.5 其它激励或手段

是否有其他激励措施或工具用于促进SLM技术的实施？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

The approach would continue without the support from Philippine Rice Research (PhilRice) since the technologies were successfully transferred to the land users. The land users or farmer-partners recognized the positive impact and outcome of the technologies in their own farm areas. Moreover, farmer-partners were actively involved in the dissemination on the developed location-specific technologies.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Farmers' receptiveness to the technologies under the approach.
Land users were empowered due to the participatory approach of the program.They developed location specific technologies and practices and are confident in disseminating the knowledge to fellow farmers.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Research studies conducted by the farmers.
Good monitoring activity during the implementation stage of the program.
Land users/farmer-partners were empowered since they have the option on what technologies they want to apply/used in their farm.
Strong cooperation among the implementing partners including PhilRice, LGUs, and farmer-partners in the sustainability of the approach through provision of technical assistance, construction of training centers, subsidy in agricultural inputs and other activities related to Palayamanan.

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Not fully strong collaboration from other agencies	Develop convergence among concerned specialists and agencies
Sustaining the farmer’s participation/attention	Selection/Assessment for identifying the potential beneficiaries
Inability to monitor the sustainability of the project due to no funding	Institutionalize who will monitor the sustainability of the project
No approved budget for the sustainability/exit plan of the program	Institutionalize who will monitor the sustainability of the project

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

PALAYAMANAN: A RICE-BASED FARMING SYSTEMS MODEL FOR SMALL-SCALE FARMERS, RG CORALES et al, 2005

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

http://www.cabi.org/gara/FullTextPDF/2009/20093019315.pdf