1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.1 该方法的简要说明

group approach where women groups are visited by local specialists for on-farm demonstrations on use of double dug beds

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Women group approach to promote vegetable growing for improvement of food availability to the home and improvement of moisture availability and rooting depth in the home gardens. Improve moisture availability and rooting depth in the home gardens.

Methods: Group farm is used for demonstrating the performance of the technique and after seeing the benefits the individualmembers of the group are expected to transfer the technology into their own farms. At the group level, the group plot is used as a teaching class for all the members where they observe and participat in the preparation of the beds, planting, weeding upto harvesting of the produce. The produce is sold to raise funds for the groups investiments

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Fertility improvement, kitchen gardening, nutritional improvement)

promote food production for rural families through techniques that enhance moisture availability. - to target the women who are the main producers to ensure food availabity for the whole family

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: food security for the rural farm families and inadequate moisture availability for vegetable production on kitchen gardens. Poor nutritional provision for rural families.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	Mainly:public meetings; partly: workshops/seminars; the groups were sensitised through meetings with specialists. Field training/demonstrations were also carried out
计划	自我动员	public meetings; the women group members were invited for meetings by specialists where activities planning was carried out.
实施	互动	Mainly: group work; partly: casual labour; rich farmers can afford hired labour, but others benefit from group work
监测/评估	无
Research	无

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后

解释:

Consultative. The technology was on trial stage initially through few groups but the demand increased

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. Land user driven (bottom-up). Specialists exposed the land users who later demanded it through women groups

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• school children/students, teachers

培训形式:

• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

manure handling and quality maintenance, compst making and moisture conservation

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: women group visits and training; Key elements: group demonstrations and farm visits, individual member farm visits, participatory learning and doing; 1) Mainly: non-governmental agency, Partly: government's existing extension system 2) Mainly: non-governmental agency, Partly: government's existing extension system; Extension staff: mainly government employees 3) Target groups for extension: land users; Activities: demonstration on establishment of double beds

Advisory service is very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; the NGO promoting the technology had few staff and was mainly relying on government extension in the project area

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

具体说明支持类型:

• 能力建设/培训

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored

area treated aspects were regular
no. of land users involved aspects were regular

management of Approach aspects were None

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

• efficiency of the system

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

determined through its potential to increase yields of crops

Research was carried out on-farm

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 2,000-10,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: national non-government (-): 20.0%; local community / land user(s) (-): 80.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

否

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 设备

• 农业

注释:

Women group members worked on each others farm

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 不确定

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
improves vegetable supply for the kitchen
improves nutrition
better yields
increased moisture
the approach has helped them to learn from one another.
encouraged development of leadership skills

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
key members of the family, woman/children (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: the women group can be tranformed into a group to provide soft credit to facilitate commercial production of vegetables to pay back for the investiment)
acts as group pressure for adoption
trains farmers in their familiar surroundings
women form the backbone of farmers and are best target

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
unfair distribution of benefits by inactive members.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
encouraged laziness for certain individuals	duty roster and division of responsibility
suppressing of the opinion of the weak ones