方法

Food for work [埃塞俄比亚]

approaches_2378 - 埃塞俄比亚

完整性: 72%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO Food and Agriculture Organization) - 意大利

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Food for work is an incentive given to land users for the activities they perform by participating in land management activities.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Food grain and edible oil at a rate of 3kg/day of grain and 200gm/day of oil is paid for an activity undertaken by a person. Land users who are selected to participate in the approach should be able bodied to undertake activities in land management and are paid the amount indicated for a given amount of work done according to the norm. A person is required to perform 10m/day soil bund to be paid the rate described above. Other activities have different norms. There are some land users who could do more than this and are entitled to be paid more according to the norm.

Methods: FFW's role in soil conservation work: 1. it has motivated the involvement of many farmers 2. Help alleviate food shortages 3. Enabled create assets 4. Strengthened the functioning of Kebele Administration. The approach was implemented through a project initiated in 1990 in the woreda. Problems addressed by the approach included: soil erosion, sever gully and land degradation, loss of cultivated lands, absence of legislations, shortage of fuel and construction material and grazing land shortages. The direct causes for the problems were identified to be overgrazing, vegetation clearing, steep slopes cultivation and poor agricultural practices. Main constraints hindering proper implementation of technologies included lack of community collaboration, lack of sense of ownership and shortage of trained extension workers.

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

埃塞俄比亚

区域/州/省:

Tigray

有关地点的进一步说明:

Ana Limu, Hossana

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

注明开始年份:

1996

终止年份(若不再采用该方法):

2003

2.7 方法的类型

  • 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Pond construction, tree planting, development infrastructure.)

Rehabilitation of degraded land and planting trees on denuded slopes and hills: Protecting farmland from soil erosion and improving grazing lands and pasture for improved livestock feed production. The Specific targets are to improve crop and livestock productivity, reduce fuel and construction wood shortages, control farmland soil erosion, improve grazing conditions and increase livestock production, alleviate water shortages by developing springs and pond construction and provide access roads. Benefits obtained included: rehabilitated degraded lands; improved crop and livestock production.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: - to increase community participation, - to work quality activities, - to develop sense of ownership, soil erosion, deforestation.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

Poor farming practice, high no. of holidays

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Improve farming pracitice decrease no. of holidays.

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

Shortage of budget for training & construction payment

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Budget supply

法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
  • 启动

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights moderately helped the approach implementation: There is use right of land.

  • 阻碍

Free grazing

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Apply cut and carry system

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

Lack of knowledge

Treatment through the SLM Approach: Training (LLPPA training)

其他
  • 阻碍

Lack of awarness (no maintenance)

Treatment through the SLM Approach: creation of awarness through meeting, training etc.

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

  • 当地土地使用者/当地社区

LLPPA-Committee

There is no clear demarkation between poor and very poor, so are the community are at equal level.

  • 教师/学龄儿童/学生
  • NGO

WFP

  • 国家政府(规划者、决策者)

MOA

  • 国际组织

WFP

  • Regional

BOANR

如果涉及多个利益相关者,请注明领导机构:

Regional technical aspect of the approach national technical & methodology of the approach , International technical & methodology of the approach.

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机 被动 Mainly:LLPPA; partly: public meetings; At initial during the community meeting the SWC specialist create awarness
计划 互动 LLPPA
实施 外部支持 responsibility for major steps; All the community members participate.
监测/评估 被动 Mainly: measurements/observations; partly: reporting;
Research

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 主要是土地使用者,由SLM专家提供支持
解释:

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

明确受训人员:
  • 土地使用者
  • politicians/decision makers
培训形式:
  • 在职
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
  • 课程
涵盖的主题:

Method of planning, construction of different SWC activities.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:

指明是否提供了咨询服务:
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Government extension system; Key elements: Development agent, Production cadres, SWC specialists; 1) Advisory service was carried out through: government's existing extension system; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: technicians/SWC specialists; Activities: Training of land users of development agents

Advisory service is very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; The government structure is up to grass root level so that is helps to continue the SWC activities.

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:
  • 是,少许
具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:
  • 本地
具体说明支持类型:
  • 能力建设/培训

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:

注释:

bio-physical aspects were regular monitored through observations; indicators: physical achievements

socio-cultural aspects were monitored through observations; indicators: farmers' participation and acceptance

economic / production aspects were monitored through observations; indicators: results obtained

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: The method of training was supported by practical demonstration sites.

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算,请给出一个范围:
  • 100,000-1,000,000
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (-): 80.0%; local community / land user(s): 20.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

  • 设备
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
工具 部分融资 Handtools
  • 农业
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
Seedlings 部分融资
  • 基建
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
Community infrastructure 部分融资
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 以粮换工

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Maintenance of the structures & integrate with biologjical meaures.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Other NGOs also apply the approach exg. world vision.

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
  • 不确定
若否或不确定,请具体说明并予以注释:

At this time the community are food insecured so that if the incentives are stopped the activity may not continue.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
They get food and conserve their land (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Communities shoul work SWC activities on their own land individually.)
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
It creats awarness and strengther local institutions (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: continue training)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
It creates problem in farming increate the spacing of the stractures on cultivated land.
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
There is free grazing area closure, cut and carry, maintain damaged SWC activities.

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

模块