方法

Participartory approach in soil conservation [坦桑尼亚联合共和国]

Mbinu shirikishi za kuhifadhi udongo

approaches_2546 - 坦桑尼亚联合共和国

完整性: 78%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人员

SLM专业人员:

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

2. SLM方法的描述

2.1 该方法的简要说明

SWC using participatory approach in conservation agriculture application of crop rotation, crop residues, covercrops and intercropping by conducting demonstrations, conducting field schools/days and training

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: To introduce farmer groups to sustainable land use practices namely conservation agriculture and evaluate management technologies with farmers in order to come up with best practices that farmer can use. (ii) To demonstrate conservation agriculture technology (iii) To conduct economic analysis of the different patterns of cropping system involvedn i conservatio n agriculture (iv) To prepare work plan for conservation agriculture activities.

Methods: i)Baseline survey conducted consisted of structured questionnaires to gather information demographic socio-economic data of the villages in the study structure and size of the family, age, education of household members, available land and resource endowment (ii) Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools were used to collect information from villages in the study area (iii) Both purposive and random sampling techniques were used the villages were purposively sampled and householdswere randomly selected for questionnaire interviews.Pair wise scoring and ranking enabled the analysis of problems hindering adoption land management technologies. (iv) Semi structured interviews were used to get information to key informants Forty plots were established to demonstrate conservation agriculture

Stages of implementation: a)Collecting base line information in eight villages b)Participatory rural appraisal in eight villages to identify problems and gather information on soil conservation techniques. c) Selecting participating farmersd) Setting demonstration plots and planting crops in farmers field e) Conducting training/ field days/ and schools.f).Evaluating the agriculture conservation technology.

Role of stakeholders: a)Farmers/land users set demonstration plots on CA in their own fieldsb)Researchers and Extension staff assisted farmers in setting demonstration plots and follow up of activities

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

国家:

坦桑尼亚联合共和国

区域/州/省:

Coast Region

有关地点的进一步说明:

Mkuranga & Bagamoyo

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

注明开始年份:

2007

终止年份(若不再采用该方法):

2009

2.7 方法的类型

  • 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused on SLM only (crop roration, cover crop, mulch, crop residues)

i.To disseminate conservation agriculture in the tree based farming systems of coastal area in Tanzania. ii.To evaluate soil management practices used by small holders iii.To conduct economic analysis of the different patterns of cropping system involved in conservation agriculture

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Low agricultural productivity,Lack of technical knowledge, Lack of cash to invest in SLM, and poverty

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
  • 阻碍

few women participants in the project

Treatment through the SLM Approach: education compaigns to involve more women in the project

财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
  • 阻碍

Land user lack funds to invest in conservation agriculture

Treatment through the SLM Approach: advise to join saving society schemes/cooperatives

法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
  • 启动

Most land is owned by farmers either bought or inherinted

了解SLM,获得技术支持
  • 阻碍

lack of technology in SWC

Treatment through the SLM Approach: introduce appropriate management in SWC to farmers

3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

  • 当地土地使用者/当地社区

Farmer groups

40 farmers, 10 farmer groups.
In one of districts the number of women was higher than another district. Religous believes women are supposed to stay at home

  • SLM专家/农业顾问
  • 研究人员

Research and extension staff

  • 地方政府

District Council Village authority

  • 国家政府(规划者、决策者)

Mikocheni Agriculture Research Institute Ministry of Agriculture Tanzania

  • 国际组织

Center for Development and Environment University of Berne Switzerland

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机 自我动员 researchers,extension staff and farmers. Informal meetingsconducted to discuss land issues problemsurveys, questionnaires.carried out to gather various information, soil conservation practices......
计划 互动 researchers,extension staff and farmers.Results from.questionaires gave guidance in planning,planting materials,size of plots,inputs
实施 自我动员 researchers,extension staff were involved in supervision of activities setting demonstration plots,conducting farmer.field days, exchange visits Farmers managed.their plots.
监测/评估 互动 researchers,extension staff and farmers. visited the..plots.regurally. . to minitor progress. at different growth stage
Research

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
  • 主要是SLM专家,咨询土地使用者之后
解释:

land users consists of small holder farmers included various groups from young to old, females and males, poor to middle income farmers. Organised meeting.with villagers

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by land users supported by SLM specialists. Farmers.and extension staff. Farmers formed groups with help of extension staff. .The Farmer groups composed women, men from young to old people female headed households

4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:

明确受训人员:
  • 土地使用者
  • 现场工作人员/顾问
  • politicians
如果相关,请说明性别、年龄、地位、种族等。:

training included variety of small scale farmers of all categories

培训形式:
  • 农民对农民
  • 示范区域
  • 公开会议
涵盖的主题:

Soil water conservation practices more emphasis was in conservation griculture techniques ( cover cropping, rotation mulching and crop residues.

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:

指明是否提供了咨询服务:
  • 在土地使用者的土地上
说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: Field days and field schools; Key elements: crop rotation, cover cropping,rentention of crop /plant residues in the field and much , Types of cover crops

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Lack of extension staff and transport. Lack of funds by local government

4.3 机构强化(组织发展)

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:
  • 是,少许
具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:
  • 本地
具体说明支持类型:
  • 能力建设/培训
提供进一步细节:

workshop and visits

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

明确话题:
  • 社会学
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:

By farmers, reseacher and extension staff through PRA and on farm demonstration plots

Research was carried out on-farm

5. 融资和外部物质支持

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算,请给出一个范围:
  • < 2,000
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international (implementation of approach): 80.0%; government (Supervision of approach): 20.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:

5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)

  • 农业
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 程度如何 对补贴做出具体说明
种子 充分融资
化肥 充分融资
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
  • 自愿
注释:

Labour was voluntary.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:

6. 影响分析和结论性陈述

6.1 方法的影响

该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

farmers obtained appropriate informantion/knowledge and management of conservation agriculture type of seeds of cover crops

该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体?:
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

Women farmers were impowered with CA technology applied in their plots and recorded improved yields in CA plots compared to traditional system because of goodmanagement

The problem is unlikely to be overcome in the near future. Farmers had their own fields so the activities were not affected during implementation phase

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

not at present may be later

Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

in short term increase in yield and food security

Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
  • 是,很少
  • 是,中等
  • 是,支持力度很大

not assessed

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

  • 增加生产

increased crop yield

  • 增加利润(能力),提高成本效益比

increase in come

  • 减少工作量

reduced no. of weedings and fertilizer

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
若否或不确定,请具体说明并予以注释:

As an individual farmer may continue but as a group activity could be difficulty as funds is a limiting factor

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
1)Presence of effective District council authority 2)Presence of Research Institution 3).Presence of Credit Saving Soceities (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: 1)Involvement .of farmer groups in planning of .development activities at all stages 2)Work closely with district councils.and village authorities in issues of land management programme 3)Farmers to join Credit society to secure loans for their farms 4)inorder to expand .impoved practices of CA)
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
1)Ample land for agriculture in the two district is an incentive for expansion in CA 2).Willingness.of farmers to adopt CA is high 3)Formal education of farmers is enough to enable to them to follow up technical issues with help of research and extension staff (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: 1)Strengthening advisory services on CA 2)Have more training programes in CA to all stakeholders. 3)participation in agricultural shows exhibitions and field schools )

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
1.Poverty 2.In adequate marketing facility 3.Men and youths not fully engaged in agriculture. 1. Provide input subsidies (seeds, fertilizer, machinery) 2. Goverment provide market facility 3. Education on gender issues
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
1.lack of CA knowledge 2.In adequate .facility, funds to implement CA 3.inadequate marketing facilty. 3. 1.Conduct. training .programme to. extension staff, framers, policy makers 2. Governments and donor should avail more funds for CA programmes 3.Government .to assist. local. authority construction of mark-ert.facility

7. 参考和链接

7.1 方法/信息来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Project no. Q 701 promoting conservation agriculture for sustained productivity of tree based farming system incoastal belt of Tanzania, Mikocheni Agriculture Research.InstituteDar es Salaam Tanzania

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

Tanzania /300 usdollar

模块