1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

food-for-work programm with distribution of grains and oil

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: Overall purpose: contribute to the SWC of the area; Specific objectives: build the level bunds, reforestation and the cut-off drains

Methods: Incentives for work

Stages of implementation: Collect farmers, tell them about the conservation, they formed groups/units who worked under a unit leader (capo=chief)

Role of stakeholders: Farmers carried out the work, the construction of the level bunds, the planting of trees. The technician told them what to do. Passive role of the farmers.

Other important information: Discussion started after implementation when farmers came to eht research station to get advice what they could do about the narrow terraces on the steep steep slopes and against the rats. Together they found a solution.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (1984 construction of water channel for water pump for an irrigation project (outside of described catchment, but affectsuing people within catchment as well), road from main road Dessie-Jemme-Borana down to lake was constructed through the same approach)

give food and get work for it; not just getting the food even though there was a drought, but the people received only food if they worked for it

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: drought, to improve the field qualities, prevention of erosion, to give the hungry farmers food because they were suffering from shortage of food

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	无
计划	被动	information
实施	外部支持	Mainly: casual labour; partly: responsibility for major steps; the capo has a greater responsibility
监测/评估	无
Research	被动	on-station

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 仅限SLM专家

解释:

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by SLM specialists alone (top-down)

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• SWC specialists

培训形式:

• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

the cattle should not enter the cultivated land until bund is established; how to maintain the bunds was also demonstrated

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在固定中心

说明/注释:

1) Advisory service was carried out through: projects own extension structure and agents; Extension staff: mainly government employees 2) Target groups for extension: land users

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; they need new, different technologies, another training to give to the people

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 否

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 社会学
• 生态学

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

it was especially undertaken for the environment

Research was carried out on station

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: international non-government (WFP): 100.0%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 设备

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 以粮换工

注释:

grains and oil

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 不确定

若否或不确定，请具体说明并予以注释:

only some of them can because it needs lots of labor and time

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
incentives are good to start the project (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: give food, material)
they learned a lot from the project (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: give them more information, train them)
they were happy to get some food

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
pass on information, trainings (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: give more information and trainings)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
payment was fixed, but because of the drought, the farmers were too weak to work	payment should be flexible
top-down	more bottom-up

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
not having asked the farmers; top-down approach	involve farmers from the beginning, so they feel needed and useful
local knowledge has not been considered	ask the farmers and integrate their knowledge
incentive food should be reconsidered especially because it was not flexible and there was a drought and they strictly distributed it according to their measures and not according to the situation	no strict calulation formula of the food, so there is space to give more food if needed as it would have been the case here since there was a serious drought at the stage of implementation

7.1 方法/信息来源