Extension officer approached by Commercial farmers [南非]
- 创建:
- 更新:
- 编制者: Philippe Zahner
- 编辑者: –
- 审查者: Fabian Ottiger
approaches_2645 - 南非
查看章节
全部展开 全部收起1. 一般信息
1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA / COSUDE / DDC / SDC) - 瑞士1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件
编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:
是
2. SLM方法的描述
2.1 该方法的简要说明
Farmer approached extension officer (acquire free service) for technical advise & subsidy
2.2 该方法的详细说明
该方法的详细说明:
Aims / objectives: The farmer was faced with serious sheet erosion on his farm. The farmer had good results where there had been treatment of this problem on a small scale. Having grown up with parents who were keen soil conservationists it was his duty to do something about this serious problem. The farmer then approached the local extension officer for technical advice and also subsidy. Work of this volume is a long-term project and needs support in the form of subsidies as no farmer can afford these expenses, due to the low returns of livestock farming today and the lack of capital. As far back as 1960, ripping of sheet erosion was being done successfully without a subsidy. This was on a small scale, bit by bit each year as our finances dictated.
2.3 该方法的照片
2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点
国家:
南非
区域/州/省:
Eastern Cape
Map
×2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期
注明开始年份:
1980
2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused on SLM only
To get subsidies to be able to do a good job of the ripping. We had seen from past experiences that shallow and inadequate ripping was a waste of money. Equipment would have to be bought or hired, however.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: Subsidy for ripping sheet erosion
2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件
财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
- 阻碍
Capital and unable to pay interest rates asked by banks
Treatment through the SLM Approach:
3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色
3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
- 当地土地使用者/当地社区
Working land users were mainly men (Owner & staff)
3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 | 指定参与人员并描述活动 | |
---|---|---|
启动/动机 | 自我动员 | own idea |
计划 | 互动 | rapid/participatory rural appraisal; Farmer approached Department of Agriculture |
实施 | 自我动员 | responsibility for major steps; Farmer approached Department of Agriculture |
监测/评估 | 互动 | Mainly: measurements/observations; partly: reporting; Farmer keep records on economics, extension officer wrote reports |
Research | 互动 | on-farm; Farmer informed extension officer about changes, results of measurements kept by extension officer |
3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策
具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
- 仅限土地使用者(自主)
解释:
land user driven (bottom-up).
4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理
4.1 能力建设/培训
是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:
是
涵盖的主题:
Farmer asked for support by the Department. The technology was a co-development of farmer and extension officer.
4.2 咨询服务
土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:
是
指明是否提供了咨询服务:
- 在土地使用者的土地上
说明/注释:
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; A lot of them have been visiting the place. Results and reports are available by the Department and there were also some scientists of a University who produced a database on SWC. (Potchefstroom).
4.4 监测和评估
监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:
是
注释:
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations
technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through measurements
area treated aspects were regular monitored through observations
4.5 研究
研究是该方法的一部分吗?
是
明确话题:
- 技术
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:
Experiences on how deep to rip and what and when to sow.
5. 融资和外部物质支持
5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (national - subsidy): 50.0%; other (farmer): 50.0%
5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:
是
5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)
- 劳动力
程度如何 | 对补贴做出具体说明 |
---|---|
部分融资 |
- 设备
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 | 程度如何 | 对补贴做出具体说明 |
---|---|---|
机械 | 部分融资 | |
- 农业
具体说明哪些投入得到了补贴 | 程度如何 | 对补贴做出具体说明 |
---|---|---|
种子 | 部分融资 | |
5.4 信用
是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:
是
对条件(利率、回报等)进行具体说明:
repayment conditions: Subsidy.
Interest was lower than market rate.
请具体指明信贷接收人:
Land ownership
6. 影响分析和结论性陈述
6.1 方法的影响
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
New ideas (extension) for developing technology further.
6.3 方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
- 是
6.4 该方法的长处/优点
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会 |
---|
Owner supported financially by government (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Continue with subsidies) |
Department open for new ideas |
Extension officer very enthusiastic (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Good partnership) |
7. 参考和链接
7.1 方法/信息来源
- 实地考察、实地调查
- 与土地使用者的访谈
链接和模块
全部展开 全部收起链接
无链接
模块
无模块