1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Euregio-East Africa Livelihood Improvement Programme (EEALIP)

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Caritas Masaka Diocesan Development Organisation (Caritas MADDO) - 乌干达

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

14/07/2021

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

This integrated soil fertility management approach aims at identifying and promoting practices in land management that can increase soil fertility, reduce land degradation and improve production. Under this specific example, organic manure from a piggery was applied to banana and coffee plantations.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

The main objective of the MADDO approach is to test and promote, in a pilot area, the advantages for small-scale farmers of organic manure from piggeries in coffee and banana plantations. The approach aims not only to increase farmers' production through multiple income streams from the integrated production systems but also to secure those income streams by enhancing soil fertility and decreasing land degradation for long-term sustainability. One distinct feature of the approach is the emphasis on cost-effective technologies for small-scale farmers. In the case of the piggery-banana-coffee enterprise, the investment capital needed is very low and the technology is not complicated.
The focus was on small-scale farmer groups of 30-35 members (roughly 200 farmers in 6 groups participated) and was coordinated by Caritas MADDO (one project coordinator and three field staff officers) and agriculture officers from the subcounty level. Groups were identified and implementation concentrated on various trainings for farmers on piggery management, banana and coffee production. In particular, the production of organic manure was highlighted in training, with emphasis on collection, storage and application. After basic training, farmers are led through the one-year production cycle which includes the following stages: rearing of the pigs; manure collection; storage in a pit for decomposition (one to two months); application of the manure during the rainy season when the plants are healthy and actively growing; and then ongoing monitoring, and if needed repetition of the stages and reapplication of the manure (two times per year).
The small-scale farmers appreciate the technology because of the higher production and income they are gaining. It is easy and cheap - particularly because the enterprise can be spread by beneficiary farmers passing on piglets to new farmers. Nevertheless, there is the possibility of the pigs catching diseases (African swine fever) and once infected the farmers have no options for relief as an entire piggery can be wiped out. Moreover, farmers have complained that water scarcity and unsuitable weather conditions can affect production.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 最近的本地倡议/创新

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The main objective of the approach from an organizational perspective was to test in a pilot area the advantages of organic manure from piggery in a coffee and banana plantation. The approach aims not only to increase farmers' production through multiple income streams from piggery, banana and coffee but also to secure those income streams by enhancing the soil fertility and decreasing land degradation for long-term sustainability.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	The project team involved the community leaders and farmers from prior project phases as well as governmental extension officers have been involved in the initiation of the approach. Activities encompasses the joint group formation and mobilization of fellow farmers to discuss the training needs and capacities.
计划	互动	The above people then continued with jointly discuss the modus operantes with creating a training schedule and actively participating in the learning journey.
实施	自我动员	The implementation mainly encompasses the adoption of the SLM technology, and the farmers were the main implementors and actors with offering pilot land and labor. The project contributed advisory support, monitoring and financial support.
监测/评估	互动	M&E was done by the project staff, extension officers and the farmers together with the community leaders themselves on a regular basis.

3.3 流程图（如可用）

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持

解释:

Mainly land users, supported by implementing organization

明确做出决策的依据:

• 个人经验和意见（无记录）

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者
• 现场工作人员/顾问

培训形式:

• 在职
• 农民对农民

涵盖的主题:

Land and soil management
Sustainable agricultural practices
Piggery management

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

指明是否提供了咨询服务:

• 在土地使用者的土地上

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，少许

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

具体说明支持类型:

• 能力建设/培训

提供进一步细节:

Input support

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

若是，该文件是否用于监测和评估？:

是

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 生态学

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Project staff was during minor research on soil improvement and in particular on fitting livestock integrations. Due to this research pigs were chosen as preferred livestock.

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

说明该方法中SLM部分的年度预算，单位为美元:

50000.00

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 10,000-100,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

The budget includes staff salary, transport, training costs and inputs for the farmers. In total the approach reached around 200 farmers within six groups in Bukomansimbi (30-35 participants each).

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

如果是，请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:

Land users were given input support (coffee seedlings, banana suckers, pigs)

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 无

• 农业

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

5.5 其它激励或手段

是否有其他激励措施或工具用于促进SLM技术的实施？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

With the pass on mechanisms of the pigs and the capacity building through the extension officers. The pass on mechanisms works similar to the Heifer pass on, where participating farmers have to contribute their newborn piglets to other members within the group that have not benefited from the prior project input.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
The pilot small-scale farmers appreciate the approach because of the higher production and income there are gaining. The approach is easy and cheap to be implemented and in particular because a pass-on mechanisms of the pigs were applied.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Advantages was in the participatory approach, and it was an interactive learning experience

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
The approach is unfortunately affected by the possibility of the pigs catching diseases (African swine fever) and once infected the farmers have no options for relief as entire piggery will be wiped out.	Hygiene training was given and practiced
Moreover, farmers have complained that water scarcity and unsuitable weather conditions have affected the approach.	Farmers mobilized for underground water tanks

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
For the compilers it was difficult to access some of the Information from farmers (e.g., basic records on feeding or construction)	Training was given and also information was collected together with farmers (e.g. calculation made together on construction costs)

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Not used

7.3 链接到网络上可用的相关信息

标题/说明:

Not used