1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Decision Support for Mainstreaming and Scaling out Sustainable Land Management (GEF-FAO / DS-SLM)

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

16/01/2009

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

2.1 该方法的简要说明

Using vegetative approach to stabilize sand dune areas along the coast.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

The approach uses forest species like Casuarina equisetifolia and lately Acacia auricoliformis to stabilize the sand dunes which is constantly being eroded by wind and water. Grasses are also allowed to be stabilized by fencing. Fruit trees are becoming more important component of the approach. Mango and cashew can be raised successfully by employing special soil treatment and provision of adequate water supply during the long dry season which lasts for about seven (7) months. The approach is implemented by various sectors. Afforestation is taken care by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the Local Government Unit (LGU). The establishment of fruit tree plantation was pioneered by the Mariano Marcos State University (MMSU). The university established Techno-Demo Farms using mango and cashew as test crops. These species are well adopted to dry condition. Cashew is well known to strive under conditions of severe water stress and low nutrient supply. The establishment of orchard was successful using a technique called 'resoiling'. A hole of about 1 x 1 x 1 meter is dug in the sand and natural soil and organic fertilizer is put into it. This will provide better anchorage for the crop and will also supply the needed nutrients and moisture during the early stage. Because the demonstration trial was a success, farmers in the locality adopted the approach. It is capital intensive, however, which is a limitation for farmers short of financial resources. Gliricidia planting is also an important conmponent. It thrives well in droughty and fertile-poor soil. Gliricidia is used as fuelwood.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 传统/本土

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

1) Stabilizatin of highly erodible sand dunes. 2) Make the sand dune areas productive for forest and various fruit tree species.

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	Mainly: Personal Contact; partly: public meetings; For commercial tree crop production; initiation is more on a personal contact with individual farmers
计划	互动	Mainly: personal contact; partly: public meetings; Private land-users made land use plans through personal contact with technologists.
实施	互动	Casual labor was employed during planting
监测/评估	互动	Mainly: measurements/observations; partly: reporting; Periodic observation was done regarding plant/crop performance
research	互动	Demonstration trials were established on-farm

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是土地使用者，由SLM专家提供支持

解释:

Extension. University staff campaigned for the approach

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

• school children/students, extensionists/trainers

培训形式:

• personal communication

注释:

Mainly in the form of personal communication with specialist

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

说明/注释:

Farming System Approach: Management/improvement of sand dune area and Adaptability testing.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 是，适度

具体说明机构的强化或建立程度:

• 本地

具体说明支持类型:

• 能力建设/培训

• technology generation

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

否

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 技术

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

Research on the productivity improvement of sand dunes was focused on crop adaptability, nutrition and water management.

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• 2,000-10,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

national government 50% and local community 50%

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 农业

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

注释:

Voluntariliy for private farms; paid in cash for afforestation activities.

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

5.5 其它激励或手段

是否有其他激励措施或工具用于促进SLM技术的实施？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
It makes idle land productive

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
It stabilizes unstable areas like sand dunes
It makes highly constrained area productive
It encourages resourcefulness
It encourages further research

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Laborious	Sourcing of fill materials nearby to lessen hauling cost
Long gestation period for the crops	Good cultural management (fertilization, irrigation)
Lack of capital

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
High plant mortality due to moisture stress	Improved water harvesting technique; putting up of irrigation system (e.g. drip irrigation)
Laborious especially during the 'resoiling' stage	Composting on-site. Look for source if 'fill materials' near the site.

7.1 方法/信息来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

2000 Annual Report

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

Mariano Marcos State University