Livestock keepers initiative for continued dry season animal drinking water supply [坦桑尼亚联合共和国]
- 创建:
- 更新:
- 编制者: ALLAN BUBELWA
- 编辑者: –
- 审查者: Fabian Ottiger
Emigilile ya abatungi b’ente oyokueshela ente
approaches_2589 - 坦桑尼亚联合共和国
查看章节
全部展开 全部收起1. 一般信息
1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式
SLM专业人员:
SLM专业人员:
SLM专业人员:
Subira John
Missenyi district council
坦桑尼亚联合共和国
SLM专业人员:
Kagaruki Annagrace
Missenyi district council
坦桑尼亚联合共和国
SLM专业人员:
Kitundu Elizabeth
+255 0732983531,
missenyicouncil@yahoo.com
Missenyi District Council
Box 38 Kyaka Missenyi Kagera
坦桑尼亚联合共和国
SLM专业人员:
Kaihura Fidelis
National Project Manager
坦桑尼亚联合共和国
有助于对方法进行记录/评估的项目名称(如相关)
The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - 意大利有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称(如相关)
Missenyi District Council (Missenyi District Council) - 坦桑尼亚联合共和国1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件
(现场)数据是什么时候汇编的?:
28/08/2012
编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:
是
1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考
2. SLM方法的描述
2.1 该方法的简要说明
Livestock keepers groups and local government collaboration for management of livestock watering points.
2.2 该方法的详细说明
该方法的详细说明:
Aims / objectives: The main aim of this approach is to improve management of water resources through strengthening collaboration between land owners and livestock keepers for efficient livestock production/management and increased incomes. This approach ensures livestock watering point accessibility during dry seasons. Objective is to reach a compromise between livestock keepers and land owners on terms of conditions for access and use of watering points. As results livestock keepers and land owner can improve their planning activities and minimize conflict between them.
Methods: A self-help livestock keepers group is normally formed. It establishes regular and efficient cooperation among the livestock keepers and negotiations with land owners on water access issues. They make financial contributions to support the established self-help group. Through these contributions construction and maintenance of the ponds and troughs (the livestock watering system) is assured. Construction and maintenance is also done through voluntary work.
This traditional system was developed by elders and spread through learning by doing from the old to the young generation. In passing over knowledge from the elderly to the youths, experience in livestock and water resources management systems is gained.
The approach is also characterized by reverence to the existing village by-laws reinforced by the village government as well as existing customary laws to prevent degradation and pollution of water sources. Extension officers provide technical backstopping on recommended animal health practices that include deworming, routine spraying and vaccination against diseases.
Stages of implementation: Implementation takes place in three stages
1) Livestock keeper group formation: The group size is determined by the number of livestock. A single trough can accommodate not more than 150 cattle which determine the number of livestock keepers to form a group. The group has its informal organizational system with a nominated leader.
2) Contributions and voluntary works: Each livestock keeper makes a payment of about 20 dollars to the land owner as annual user fee. Maintenance is the responsibility of all livestock keepers.
3) Management: Include use of by-laws and provision of advisory services
Role of stakeholders: Land owner: He has the key role of ensuring that the area is used in a sustainable manner. Group members pay land rent to him for area utilization and management.
Livestock keepers: These are key users of the area, voluntarily participate in construction and maintenance of water troughs, pay land rent, manage and control watering of their animals.
Village and Ward administration and elders: Ensuring that village by-laws and customary laws guiding use of fragile ecosystems are adhered to.
Ward and village extension officers: Provide technical advisory to livestock keepers.
District administration and extension staff: Facilitating and enabling community understanding of policy, acts and laws guiding use of fragile ecosystems so that they can make informed management decision.
Other important information: This approach plays significant role in preventing conflict between domestic water users and livestock keepers especially during the dry season.
2.3 该方法的照片
2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点
国家:
坦桑尼亚联合共和国
区域/州/省:
TANZANIA
有关地点的进一步说明:
MISSENYI
Map
×2.7 方法的类型
- 传统/本土
2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Construction, managment and utilization)
Minimizing of land dagradation and better water availability to contribute to livelihood improvement.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: 1. There was no livestock keepers organization to comprise over use of water resource during the dry season.
2. Water use conflict between livestock keepers and domestic water users
3. Weak administration of bylaws.
2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件
社会/文化/宗教规范和价值观
- 阻碍
Traditionally livestock keepers keep large herds for prestige.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Livestock keeper with large herds are advised to reduce number of animals by selling extra animals and use funds for intensifying management and maximizing productivity.
财务资源和服务的可用性/可得性
- 阻碍
Livestock keepers are not aware of the services provided by financial institutions and are ignorant of the basic bookkeeping skills.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Sensitized livestock keepers on utilization of financial institutions and provide training in the basic bookkeeping skills.
机构设置
- 阻碍
Livestock keepers informally organized but not legally recognized; the groups are not registered and have no written constitution.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Livestock keeper advised to strengthen their groups/organization through registration by relevant authorities and establish a written group constitution.
法律框架(土地使用权、土地和水使用权)
- 阻碍
Ignorance of livestock keepers on the Act, Laws and Rules governing the use of fragile ecosystems.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Extension workers enabling and facilitating community understanding of policy and acts guiding use of fragile ecosystems.
了解SLM,获得技术支持
- 阻碍
Low knowledge on recommended livestock rearing practises and water borne diseases.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Training livestock keepers on recommended livestock rearing practices, prevention and controll of water borne diseases as well as water hygine and sanitation.
工作量、人力资源可用性
- 阻碍
High work load needed in filling of the water troughs
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Livestock keepers advised to use water pumping machines (simple and manually operated machines).
3. 相关利益相关者的参与和角色
3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责
- 当地土地使用者/当地社区
Key implementer and user of the SLM approach, the land owner and the livestock keepers
Traditionally grazing stocks (cattle, sheep and goats) are owned and reared by men and therefore the approach mainly involves men. The roles area largely men specific.The approach also targeted low income livestock owners (casual cattle herds man).
- SLM专家/农业顾问
District, ward and village extension officers
- 地方政府
Provision of technical advisory services, policy and act interpretation and reinforcement of village bylaws.
- 国家政府(规划者、决策者)
Village and Ward elected and employed representatives.
3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段
当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与 | 指定参与人员并描述活动 | |
---|---|---|
启动/动机 | 自我动员 | Livestock keepers /elders: Inheritance and transference of the approach to youth. |
计划 | 自我动员 | Livestock keepers /elders: Informal planning and improvement through cycles of action and reflection. |
实施 | 自我动员 | Livestock keepers individuals and groups, village leaders and agricultural advisers: use of the approach, law enforcement and technical advisory services and interpretation of act, law and guidelines protecting fragile ecosystems. |
监测/评估 | 自我动员 | Livestock keepers individuals and groups, village leaders and agricultural advisers and SLM specialists: manage effective use of the technology, ensure adherence of Acts, Rules and Regulation and SLM documentation for dissemination and sharing. |
Research | 互动 | Livestock keepers individuals and groups and agricultural advisers and SLM specialists: identification and documentation of researchable issues. |
3.3 流程图(如可用)
具体说明:
Livestock keepers initiative for continued dry season animal drinking water supply.
作者:
Allan Bubelwa (Box 38 Kyaka, Missenyi, Kagera, United Tanzania)
3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策
具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:
- 仅限土地使用者(自主)
解释:
A decision to use the technology relies on livestock keepers self-mobilization, own choice induced through inheritance and learning by doing.
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up). Decision to use the method is partly through spontaneous adoption from elders and improvement through cycles of action and reflection.
4. 技术支持、能力建设和知识管理
4.1 能力建设/培训
是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训?:
是
明确受训人员:
- 土地使用者
- 现场工作人员/顾问
- village and ward leaders
如果相关,请说明性别、年龄、地位、种族等。:
both men and women and all ages (youth and elders).
培训形式:
- 在职
- 公开会议
培训形式:
- seminar and workshops.
涵盖的主题:
Act and Laws guiding the use of fragile ecosystems, prevention of water borne diseases, recommended livestock keeping methods and water management.
4.2 咨询服务
土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗?:
是
指明是否提供了咨询服务:
- 在土地使用者的土地上
说明/注释:
Name of method used for advisory service: Farmer field school ; Key elements: learning by doing on the job and in the field (Number of knowledge sharing activities: on the job training, field practice), adult learning – livestock self-help groups , livestock management. , indegenous and technical knowledge balanced and combined in a complementary manner.; Technical advisory services largely involved building on and improving the successful experience resulted from the use of indigenous knowledge.
Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; The increase number of extension workers from 1 to 2 and introduction of TAMP project (trans boundary agro-ecosystem management project) in the village will speed up implementation of conservation activities in the village.
4.3 机构强化(组织发展)
是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构?:
- 否
4.4 监测和评估
监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗?:
是
注释:
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by government, land users through observations; indicators: extent of area eroded
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by government, land users through measurements; indicators: Ponds/troughs and maintenance requirements
technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: number of livestock keeper trained
technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through measurements; indicators: number of conflicts between land owners and livestock keepers
socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations; indicators: number of water conflict emerged and number resolved
socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored by government, land users through measurements; indicators: livestock production and productivity
economic / production aspects were regular monitored by government through observations; indicators: increase in milk and meat productivity
economic / production aspects were regular monitored by government, land users through measurements; indicators: livestock keepers using the technology
no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by government, land users through observations; indicators: number of livestock keepers using the technology
no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by government, land users through measurements; indicators: adherence to water protective bylaws
management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by government through observations; indicators: % number of village bylaws used and adhered to
management of Approach aspects were regular monitored by government through measurements; indicators: None
There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Implementation of group roles and adherence to by-laws e.g. protection of natural vegetation.
There were few changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: decrease in destruction of natural vegetation and reduction of eutrophication at the water source.
4.5 研究
研究是该方法的一部分吗?
是
- adaptive SLM trials
提供进一步的细节,并指出是谁做的研究:
Adaptive trials through SLM demos by TAMP, ARI MARUKU and community. Farmers select the best bets technologies to apply on their own fields.
Research was carried out on-farm
5. 融资和外部物质支持
5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算
如果不知道准确的年度预算,请给出一个范围:
- < 2,000
注释(例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (animal related extesion services, policy and law enforcement.): 20.0%; local community / land user(s) (voluntary contribution by livestock keeper groups and land owner ): 80.0%
5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援
土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持?:
否
5.3 对特定投入的补贴(包括劳动力)
如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入,那么是不是:
- 自愿
注释:
labour is needed in taking the animals for watering as well as during actual watering of the animals.
5.4 信用
是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值?:
否
6. 影响分析和结论性陈述
6.1 方法的影响
该方法是否帮助土地使用者实施和维护SLM技术?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
This approach plays significant role in reducing conflict between domestic water users, increased availability of water and conservation of water resources.
该方法是否有助于社会和经济弱势群体?:
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
The approach enables low income-cattle herd man to earn income.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
other livestock group adopted the approach (in dry season).
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
Livestock keepers that joined self-help groups improved livestock productivity and increased income
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
- 否
- 是,很少
- 是,中等
- 是,支持力度很大
year round availability of water for animals, increased animal production and productivity and income to livestock keepers and improve rural socio-economic conditions.
6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机
- 增加生产
improved animals heath and increased production
- 规章制度(罚款)/执行
rules preventing livestock keepers from watering their animals in domestic water sources
- 环境意识
developed through various SLM trainings provided by extension officers.
6.3 方法活动的可持续性
土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施(无外部支持的情况下)?:
- 不确定
若否或不确定,请具体说明并予以注释:
in the future a support is needed in terms of group management and organizational development, marketing and business planning skills and livestock keepers also need further exposure to SLM concept.
6.4 该方法的长处/优点
土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会 |
---|
Is a mechanism for assurance of water availability for animal watering in the dry season. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: continue with good collaboration with the land owner and livestock keeper solidarity.) |
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会 |
---|
The training of extension officers, elders etc covered many aspects of sustainable livestock production and natural water resources protection (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Activities presented during the training should be put into practice and spread among other livestock keepers ) |
Involvement of the district administration, wards, elders in the approaches implementation (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: insist on active involvement ) |
Strong commitment of livestock keepers to improve livestock production and their livelihood (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Awareness raising ) |
Reduced conflict between water for domestic use and for watering animals (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: strengthen use of the approach and bylaws guiding it ) |
Reduced cost and largely relies on self mobilization and voluntarism of the livestock keepers. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Group management and organizational development to strengthen cohesiveness.) |
Is dynamic, flexible and accommodate outside advisory and technical support and therefore opens opportunities for future improvement. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Needs assessment and provision of appropriate advisory and technical support. ) |
6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法
土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 | 如何克服它们? |
---|---|
low know how | broadern know how |
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 | 如何克服它们? |
---|---|
The approach is largely informal in terms of livestock keepers organization. There is no written constitution and the groups are not registration. | improvement in terms of formulation of group constitution, opening of bank account and group registration. |
Narrow focus largely relies solely on indigenous knowledge base . | broaden horizon of understanding by combining with technical knowledge base. |
Lack of promotion materials to involve other livestock keepers | increase number of promotion materials |
Rural poverty not reduced significantly | more activities that can lead to reduction of rural poverty required |
7. 参考和链接
7.1 方法/信息来源
- 实地考察、实地调查
- 与土地使用者的访谈
7.2 参考可用出版物
标题、作者、年份、ISBN:
Kagera TAMP project (pdfFinal Report 2013)
可以从哪里获得?成本如何?
http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/oed/docs/GCPRAF424GFF_2013_ER.pdf
链接和模块
全部展开 全部收起链接
无链接
模块
无模块