1.2 参与方法评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Kathmandu University (KU) - 尼泊尔

有助于对方法进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Sarada Batase Village Development Committee (Sarada Batase VDC) - 尼泊尔

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

（现场）数据是什么时候汇编的？:

18/01/2014

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 SLM技术问卷的参考

2.1 该方法的简要说明

The ways and means used to promote and implement to improved stove to improve human well-being and sustainable land use.

2.2 该方法的详细说明

该方法的详细说明:

Aims / objectives: The main objectives of the approach was to conserve forest and to improve human well-being
villagers facing major health risks due to smoke like eye itchiness, allergies, bronchitis.

Methods: The idea was proposed by REMRIC Nepal and was supported by Nepal Government. The approach was further enhanced by VDC and few local committes, public participation was an important part of the approach.

Stages of implementation: 1. Research : Questionnaires asked to land users and thier viewpoints noted.
2. Training : REMRIC provided trainiing to 9 people within the village
3. Financial support : Funding provided by VDC, REMRIC and other local bodies. Technician provided.

Role of stakeholders: Private contribution was not made. Organizations provided full financial funding and trained people. Involved organizations also did the research work and training people. A part from this, public participation had the significant role.

2.3 该方法的照片

2.5 采用该方法的国家/地区/地点

2.6 该方法的开始和终止日期

2.7 方法的类型

• 基于项目/方案

2.8 该方法的主要目的/目标

The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities (Forest Production, Manure for agriculture, Improved human health, Kitchen efficiency)

The main objectives of the approach were to improve health hazards caused by the smoke trapped int he room and for forst conservation.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: 1. Lack of technical knowledge
2. Lack of cash to invest in SLM

2.9 推动或妨碍实施本办法所适用的技术的条件

3.1 该方法涉及的利益相关者及其职责

3.2 当地土地使用者/当地社区参与该方法的不同阶段

	当地土地使用者/当地社区的参与	指定参与人员并描述活动
启动/动机	互动	Public meetings, research questionnaires
计划	互动	Interviews, public meetings
实施	自我动员	responsibility of major and minor steps, casuale labor
监测/评估	互动	Measurements/observations, interviews/questionnaires
Research	被动	Answer questionnaires, informed about SLM technology, but do not take the final decision.

3.4 有关SLM技术选择的决策

具体说明谁有权决定选择要实施的技术:

• 主要是SLM专家，咨询土地使用者之后

解释:

Initiations of approach by REMRIC and later involvement of local bodies and active involvement of VDC. However, research done actively and consulted land users about family size, thier input was considered valuable.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by mainly by SLM specialists with consultation of land users. The implementation was made by mutual agreement between the SLM specialists and the land users. However, the funding was solely done by SLM specialists.

4.1 能力建设/培训

是否为土地使用者/其他利益相关者提供培训？:

是

明确受训人员:

• 土地使用者

如果相关，请说明性别、年龄、地位、种族等。:

Male, 25-35 years of age

培训形式:

• 农民对农民
• 示范区域
• 公开会议

涵盖的主题:

Interviews/questionnaires, setup, construct and design technology

4.2 咨询服务

土地使用者有权使用咨询服务吗？:

是

说明/注释:

Name of method used for advisory service: VDC; Key elements: Structure, Cost; But people have ample technical knowledge, also take advice from neighbours

Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Not that hard or costly to manage the technology. So, self sustaining is sufficient for continuation of technology.

4.3 机构强化（组织发展）

是否通过这种方法建立或加强了机构？:

• 否

4.4 监测和评估

监测和评估是该方法的一部分吗？:

是

注释:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through measurements; indicators: VDC, Trainees

area treated aspects were ad hoc monitored by project staff through observations; indicators: None

There were few changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Once a year, REMERIC visits and monitors give suggestions.

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: Land user self-maintenance

4.5 研究

研究是该方法的一部分吗?

是

明确话题:

• 技术

提供进一步的细节，并指出是谁做的研究:

how many family members in each house

Research was carried out both on station and on-farm

5.1 该方法中SLM组成部分的年度预算

如果不知道准确的年度预算，请给出一个范围:

• < 2,000

注释（例如主要的资助来源/主要捐助者）:

Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (Nepal Government); national non-government (REMRIC); local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (VDC); local community / land user(s) (Chakreshwar, Nawa prativa, Siddhartha, Jyoti sahakari)

5.2 为土地使用者提供财政/物质支援

土地使用者是否获得实施该技术的财政/物质支持？:

是

如果是，请具体说明支持的类型、条件和提供者:

Technician provided

5.3 对特定投入的补贴（包括劳动力）

• 无

如果土地使用者的劳动力是一项重要的投入，那么是不是:

• 自愿

注释:

Technician was paid for construction of SLM Technology

5.4 信用

是否根据SLM活动的方法给予信用值？:

否

6.1 方法的影响

6.2 土地使用者实施SLM的主要动机

6.3 方法活动的可持续性

土地使用者能否维持通过该方法实施的措施（无外部支持的情况下）？:

• 是

若是，请说明如何维持:

the approach was not difficult to implement. Simple concept was needed. Only cleanliness reqiured.

6.4 该方法的长处/优点

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
1. Smoke no longer trapped in the room 2. Less wood consumption 3. Utensils are not damaged (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Cleaning the stove plant trees, cooking multiple items at a time)

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
1. Improved kitchen efficiency 2. Better channel for smoke outlet 3. Less wood consumption 4. Manure used for agriculture which kills the pests (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Cleaning and self-maintainance Cleaning the outlet pipe from time to time cooking, boiling water cleaning and collecting the ashes)

6.5 该方法的弱点/缺点以及克服它们的方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
cooks faster than traditional stove however slower than modern stove

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
1. Smoke outlet system is slightly poor 2. When one spot is used for cooking the other one has to be used too	raise the outletpipe vertically Some sort of door that can be open and closed when needed.

7.1 方法/信息来源