1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的项目名称（如相关）

Euregio-East Africa Livelihood Improvement Programme (EEALIP)

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的机构名称（如相关）

Caritas Masaka Diocesan Development Organisation (Caritas MADDO) - 乌干达

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

是

1.4 所述技术的可持续性声明

这里所描述的技术在土地退化方面是否存在问题，导致无法被认为是一种可持续的土地管理技术？:

否

注释:

The technology under documentation is practically proven for its efficiency and effectiveness in conserving land and improving productivity.

1.5 参考关于SLM方法（使用WOCAT记录的SLM方法）的调查问卷

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

The "Piggery-Banana-Coffee" sustainable land management technology is a proven practice that significantly improves soil fertility and productivity in an integrated farming system for smallholder farmers in Uganda.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

The “piggery-banana-coffee” SLM technology has been widely practiced by smallholders in Bukumansimbi District, Central Uganda for many years. The technology is proven due to its manifold functions and benefits, including increased productivity and improved soil biodiversity leading to better food security with organic, healthy produce. It simultaneously contributes to environmental protection. The technology has been applied for many years in Bukumansimbi but it needed a promotion by the implementer Caritas MADDO for wider adaption by the community.
The technology can be applied in a natural environmental setting with no controlled conditions. Taking a case of one acre (0.4 ha) of land the farmer will need 450 coffee seedlings and 150 banana suckers to establish an integrated banana-coffee plantation. Then there is a requirement for 10 pigs to supply enough manure (urine and dung) to maintain the fertility of the soil in the plantation. Bananas provide shade to the coffee and reduce the impact of wind and soil erosion. Manure from the piggery is applied to the mixed plantation. Manure application increases soil biodiversity and improves both the physical and chemical properties of the soil, including soil structure, aeration, and moisture retention. Integrating piggery components into the system requires shed construction, purchase of piglets, feeding costs, treatment, and vaccinations. The pigsty occupies a space of 50 ft by 25 ft (approx. 15 m x 7.5 m). Each enterprise is complementary to the other: manure from pigs goes to the coffee and banana plantation and in return the banana peelings as well as the household food leftovers are served as important food resources for the pigs.
The land users under the pilot project acknowledge the significance of the technology because of its ability to sustain production and the other benefits listen above. However, swine fever disease is one of the limiting factors to the technology, as the pigs are prone to its outbreak. Moreover, some farmers report the high feeding costs for the pigs’ maintenance - particularly in the dry season (when there are few weeds that can be supplemented to the diet of the pigs).

2.3 技术照片

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

2.6 实施日期

注明实施年份:

2017

如果不知道确切的年份，请说明大概的日期:

• 不到10年前（最近）

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:

• 作为传统系统的一部分（> 50 年）
• 通过项目/外部干预

注释（项目类型等）:

The "piggery-banana-coffee” SLM technology has been practiced as a traditional system in the area for more than 50 years, however the project rebooted the technology and its adoption under the EEALIP project starting in 2017.

3.1 该技术的主要目的

• 改良生产
• 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
• 保护生态系统
• 保持/提高生物多样性
• 创造有益的经济影响

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

同一土地单元内混合使用的土地：:

是

具体说明混合土地使用（作物/放牧/树木）:

• 农林业

3.3 由于技术的实施，土地使用是否发生了变化？

由于技术的实施，土地使用是否发生了变化？:

• 是（请在技术实施前填写以下有关土地利用的问题）

同一土地单元内混合使用的土地：:

是

具体说明混合土地使用（作物/放牧/树木）:

• 农林牧业

注释:

Pigs are kept on zero grazing. There are not allowed to roam in the bananas or coffee farm.

3.4 供水

该技术所应用土地的供水:

• 雨养

注释:

The land is mulched with dry grass and banana materials to conserve rainfed water from evaporation.

3.5 该技术所属的SLM组

• 农业林学
• 农畜综合管理
• 土壤肥力综合管理

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

注释:

The technology is promoting better quality of groundwater on two grounds. Firstly, by applying the organic manure of the pigs on the coffee and banana farm instead of chemical fertilizers no pollution of the waterbodies is given. Secondly, the pigs are confined in their pigs sty and thus due not have the opportunity to go to the water bodies and pollute the water with urine or dung.

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:

• 防止土地退化
• 减少土地退化

注释:

The major purpose for this technology is to prevent soil degradation and improve soil fertility.

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

4.2 有关投入和成本计算的一般信息

具体说明成本和投入是如何计算的:

• 每个技术区域

其它/国家货币（具体说明）:

Uganda Shilling

如相关，注明美元与当地货币的汇率（例如1美元=79.9巴西雷亚尔）：1美元=:

3750.0

4.3 技术建立活动

	活动	时间（季度）
1.	Land clearing and preparation	once a year
2.	Hole digging	once
3.	Coffee and banana planting	once
4.	Pig sty (house) construction	once
5.	Purchase of pigs	once

4.4 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

如果您无法分解上表中的成本，请估算建立该技术所需要的总成本。:

5300000.0

如果土地使用者负担的费用少于100%，请注明由谁负担其余费用:

The Euregio project contributed two pigs and some starter coffee seedlings and banana suckers (roughly 35 % of total establishment costs were catered by the project).

注释:

These costs include the clearing of the land and prior establishment of the coffee and banana plantation. The majority of the costs are attributed to the purchase of pigs and the construction of the pig sty (roughly 3 million UGX).

4.5 维护/经常性活动

	活动	时间/频率
1.	Weeding and garden clearing	Twice a seaon
2.	Manure application	At the onset of rain season
3.	Feeding and watering of pigs	On daily basis
4.	Treatment and deworming of pigs	On monthly basis
5.	Mulching of the garden	Once a year or more
6.	Contour digging	once a year
7.	Pruning of coffee and banana plantation	For banana its done twice a season and for coffee its done every after harvesting season.
8.	Maintenance of piggery sty	once a year

4.6 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入（每年）

如果您无法分解上表中的成本，请估算维护该技术所需要的总成本。:

500000.0

注释:

Estimation of 500,000 UGX per year. Most costs are for the treatment for the pigs and the maintenance of the pigsty. The rest is covered by family labour.

4.7 影响成本的最重要因素

描述影响成本的最决定性因素:

Most costs are connected to the piggery in particular the maintenance of the pigs. Animal diseases and the resulting costs for the treatments are unplanned expenses.

5.1 气候

5.2 地形

5.3 土壤

如有可能，附上完整的土壤描述或具体说明可用的信息，例如土壤类型、土壤酸碱度、阳离子交换能力、氮、盐度等。:

The soils ranging from red laterite, sandy loam and loam.
Soils are generally ferrallisol characterized by red colored sandy clay loams and sandy loams, but relatively productive.

5.4 水资源可用性和质量

水的盐度有问题吗？:

否

该区域正在发生洪水吗？:

否

关于水质和水量的注释和进一步规范:

Major source of water supply is swamp and readily available all the time in both seasons dry and rain season

5.5 生物多样性

关于生物多样性的注释和进一步规范:

No official statistics available, but Banana plantations usually have higher diversity with up to 15 species of other crops within.

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者使用的平均土地面积

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:

• 个人，未命名
• 个人，有命名

土地使用权:

• 个人

用水权:

• 自由进入（无组织）

土地使用权是否基于传统的法律制度？:

是

5.9 进入服务和基础设施的通道

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

收入和成本

社会文化影响

生态影响

土壤

生物多样性:植被、动物

对现场影响的评估（测量）进行具体说明:

All the impacts are based on estimations. Thereby, assessments by farmers have been added with observations from the staff to get a clear understanding of the impacts.

6.2 该技术的场外影响已经显现

对场外影响（测量）的评估进行具体说明:

This impact is based on estimation by the project staff as well as some observations from participants.

6.3 技术对渐变气候以及与气候相关的极端情况/灾害的暴露和敏感性（土地使用者认为的极端情况/灾害）

注释:

The technology was piloted in a 3-year program and climate-related consequences cannot be measured yet.

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术建立成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何（从土地使用者的角度看）？

注释:

After the establishment of the technology, the returns from coffee are attained in period of two years, for banana returns observed in less than one year and for piggery profits attained in period of less than two years.

6.5 技术采用

• 11-50%

如若可行，进行量化（住户数量和/或覆盖面积）:

Mainstreaming of the technology was promoted through copying from the participants and also due to the promotion by the district field staff. The technology has been in existence for years and that is why a high adoption can be observed.

在所有采用这项技术的人当中，有多少人是自发的，即未获得任何物质奖励/付款？:

• 51-90%

注释:

The technology is commonly used in the area. However, those who were not part of the program take short-cuts or do not have such high positive progress as the others.

6.6 适应

最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件？:

否

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Contributes positively to the soil fertility.
Improves the food security and household income

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Farmers were able to local available resources for this technology.
It improved the soil health and contributed to environmental conservation.

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Diseases that affect the piggery (swine fewer).	No mitigation (vaccination) available.
The vet officers are not always available for vaccinations or treatments for the pigs. Moreover, there are quite expensive.	Farmers group together to lobby for the service.

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险	如何克服它们？
Follow up on the management practices for the piggery were time consuming.	Establishment of community-based trainers (CBT) that take over

7.1 信息的方法/来源

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Benefits of sustainable land management, UNCCD

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

https://catalogue.unccd.int/838_Benefits_of_SLM_eng.pdf

7.3 链接到网络上的相关信息

标题/说明:

Sustainable Agriculture in Africa,

URL:

https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34621/RSRSA.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y