技术

Contour trenches and contour strips [乌兹别克斯坦]

technologies_7557 - 乌兹别克斯坦

完整性: 86%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人

Research Associate - Spatio-temporal assessment:
Senior Scientist Sustainable Land Management:

Akramkhanov Akmal

International Center of Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)

乌兹别克斯坦

Crop Specialist:

Fayzullayev Abdulla

International Center of Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)

乌兹别克斯坦

Water Harvesting Expert:

Muddaber Mohammad Ali

International Center of Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)

约旦

Water Harvesting Expert:

Jafar Alwidyan

International Center of Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)

约旦

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的项目名称(如相关)
ICARDA Institutional Knowledge Management Initiative

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

1.4 所述技术的可持续性声明

这里所描述的技术在土地退化方面是否存在问题,导致无法被认为是一种可持续的土地管理技术?:

2. SLM技术的说明

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

Contour trenches for the cultivation of almond trees, and contour strips for cereals are types of rainwater harvesting structures. They are designed to capture runoff, reduce erosion, and enhance soil moisture—thereby improving land productivity and supporting climate-resilient agriculture in lowland dry areas.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

Qashqadaryo Province in southern Uzbekistan experiences a hot, dry summer and a mild winter. Combined with unsustainable land management practices, climatic stresses have exacerbated land degradation and made local livelihoods increasingly vulnerable.
As part of the Food Systems, Land Use and Restoration (FOLUR) project, the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) designed and tested rainwater harvesting (RWH) structures to combat land degradation and enhance rural livelihoods. These RWH structures support vegetation growth, reduce surface runoff, prevent erosion, and restore soil health—thereby reversing degradation and improving agricultural productivity.
Based on slope gradients and hydrological characteristics, two RWH techniques were selected: modified contour trenches for the slightly sloping upper areas, and modified contour strips for the flatter zones.
In the upper portion of the site, which spans 1.54 hectares, modified contour trenches were implemented for perennial tree crops. Design calculations suggested a spacing of 8 metres between trenches, and 7 metres between almond trees along each trench.
Implementation began with the marking of contour lines using a laser level: two labourers worked for two days. Then a tractor fitted with a three-mouldboard plough dug the trenches. While the tractor generally performed well, work had to be completed manually at sharp bends and gully crossings. Eight labourers then spent two days shaping and stabilizing the trenches. In total, approximately 1,300 metres of trench lines were created.
Costs were relatively modest. The tractor, hired from a farmer, cost $150 per day. Manual labour amounted to 24 person-days at $10 per day. 100 almond trees were planted, and 85 tamarix trees were added as a protective windbreak.
In the lower, flatter part of the site—about 1.68 hectares—standard contour strips were unsuitable due to the very low slope, which would not generate enough runoff. Instead, a modified version was implemented. Low ridges along contour at a vertical interval of 30 cm, allowed rainwater to pool and infiltrate. The same tractor was used with a single mouldboard plough to form nine contour ridges, shaped by two passes.
Afterwards, ten local women labourers finalized the ridges manually. The total length of the contour strips reached 500 metres, and the ratio of catchment to cultivated area varied from 5:1 in the upper sections to 1:1 in the lower zones, based on expected runoff.
The cost of this phase included one day of tractor use and 15 person-days of labour, totalling approximately $300. This site is intended for rainfed cultivation, and will follow a crop rotation system including barley, legumes and fallow periods. Over time, farmers are encouraged to adopt no-till practices to improve soil health.
Following implementation, light rainfall provided a test of the structures. Both the contour trenches and strips performed as intended, with no damage observed.
The interventions demonstrate how a tailored combination of RWH structures and cropping systems can rehabilitate degraded land. Local involvement helped to build community ownership. The result is a more productive and climate-resilient landscape that offers long-term benefits for soil conservation and rural livelihoods.

2.3 技术照片

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

国家:

乌兹别克斯坦

有关地点的进一步说明:

8°43'14.26"N, 66°41'51.87"E

具体说明该技术的分布:
  • 均匀地分布在一个区域
如果不知道精确的区域,请注明大致覆盖的区域:
  • < 0.1 平方千米(10 公顷)
技术现场是否位于永久保护区?:

2.6 实施日期

注明实施年份:

2024

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:
  • 通过项目/外部干预

3. SLM技术的分类

3.1 该技术的主要目的

  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

同一土地单元内混合使用的土地::


农田

农田

  • 一年一作
  • 多年一作(非木材)
年作 - 具体指明作物:
  • 谷类 - 大麦
  • Nuts/ fruits including almonds
每年的生长季节数:
  • 1
采用间作制度了吗?:

采用轮作制度了吗?:

如果是,请具体说明:

Barley, legumes etc

注释:

Note fruits/ nuts on one part of the land and cereals/ legumes/ fodder on another section (see 2.2)

3.3 由于技术的实施,土地使用是否发生了变化?

由于技术的实施,土地使用是否发生了变化?:
  • 是(请在技术实施前填写以下有关土地利用的问题)
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地::

牧场

牧场

粗放式放牧:
  • 半游牧畜牧业
  • Mixed

3.4 供水

该技术所应用土地的供水:
  • 雨养

3.5 该技术所属的SLM组

  • 改良的地面/植被覆盖
  • 横坡措施
  • 集水

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

农艺措施

农艺措施

  • A1:植被和土壤覆盖层
  • A3:土壤表面处理
  • A4:地表下处理
植物措施

植物措施

  • V1:乔木和灌木覆盖层
结构措施

结构措施

  • S1:阶地
  • S2:堤、岸
  • S3:分级沟渠、渠道、水道
  • S7:集水/供水/灌溉设备
管理措施

管理措施

  • M1:改变土地使用类型

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

土壤水蚀

土壤水蚀

  • Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀
  • Wg:冲沟侵蚀/沟蚀
  • Wo:场外劣化效应
土壤风蚀

土壤风蚀

  • Et:表土流失
  • Ed:风蚀风积
  • Eo:场外劣化效应
物理性土壤退化

物理性土壤退化

  • Pc:压实
  • Pk:熟化和结壳
生物性退化

生物性退化

  • Bc:植被覆盖的减少
  • Bq:数量/生物量减少
  • Bl:土壤寿命损失

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地

4. 技术规范、实施活动、投入和成本

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

技术规范(与技术图纸相关):

This top-view diagram shows the layout of modified contour trenches along contour lines, spaced 8 meters apart vertically. Each trench supports either:

Almond trees, spaced 7 meters apart, or

Shrubs, spaced 3.5 meters apart.
Each trench is aligned to follow the natural contour of the land to intercept runoff and enhance infiltration. Shrubs and trees are planted separately in designated trenches, not mixed.

作者:

ICARDA

日期:

2025

技术规范(与技术图纸相关):

This cross-sectional profile illustrates the physical dimensions of a modified contour trench:

Width: 40–60 cm

Depth: 20–50 cm

Bund height (upslope side): 30–50 cm

Trench spacing: 8 meters
These dimensions are designed to retain and slow down surface runoff on slopes of 10–20%, enhancing water infiltration for tree or shrub growth.

作者:

ICARDA

日期:

2025

技术规范(与技术图纸相关):

This diagram shows the layout of modified contour strips designed to enhance rainwater harvesting and crop productivity on sloped land. Each unit consists of a cultivated strip supported by a bund, located just downslope of a catchment area that concentrates surface runoff toward the crops.

Water flows downslope through the system.

The catchment-to-cultivated area ratio increases downslope to account for the growing volume and force of accumulated runoff, as well as differences in slope and infiltration capacity:

1:1 in the upper strips, where the steeper slope generates stronger runoff, and only limited water is desired to avoid erosion or damage.

3:1 in the middle strips, where moderate runoff accumulates.

5:1 in the lower strips, where the gentler slope allows more infiltration and where the lower kinetic energy of the runoff poses less risk to the structures.

作者:

ICARDA

日期:

2025

技术规范(与技术图纸相关):

This cross-sectional view illustrates a modified contour strip:

A 30 cm high earth bund holds runoff upslope.

The cropping area (e.g., barley) is placed directly upstream (behind) the bund.

A catchment area lies upslope, sloped to direct water into the cultivated zone.
The catchment-to-cultivated ratio ranges from 5:1 (upper strips) to 1:1 (lower strips) depending on expected runoff volume, ensuring efficient water use and soil conservation.

作者:

ICARDA

日期:

2025

4.2 有关投入和成本计算的一般信息

具体说明成本和投入是如何计算的:
  • 每个技术区域
注明尺寸和面积单位:

3 ha (with half: half of each RWH technology)

具体说明成本计算所用货币:
  • 美元
注明雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:

10

4.3 技术建立活动

活动 时间(季度)
1. Contour marking 22–23 September
2. Tractor ploughing 24–25 September
3. Manual shaping/finishing 25–26 September
4. Tree/shrub planting 26–27 September

4.4 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 每项投入的总成本 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力 Contour trench construction Person-days 24.0
劳动力 Bunds for contour strips Person-days 15.0
劳动力 Marking contours Person-days 4.0
设备 Ploughing (contour trenches) Machine-days 3.0
设备 Ploughing (contour strips) Machine-days 2.0
植物材料 Almond seedlings 100.0
植物材料 Shrubs 85.0
肥料和杀菌剂 Manure kg 600.0
其它 Lumpsum contour strips 1.0 1000.0 1000.0
其它 Lumpsum contour trenches 1.0 1000.0 1000.0
技术建立所需总成本 2000.0
技术建立总成本,美元 2000.0
如果您无法分解上表中的成本,请估算建立该技术所需要的总成本。:

2000.0

注释:

Total implementation costs are around 2k USD. 50/50 between the two designs.

We have spent around 310 for tractor
300 for loader for levelling
270 labour for shaping the pits (after tractor)

400 for ploughing prior of planting the barley
340 for no till planter services for planting the barley

250 labour for applying fertilizer
100 for fertilizer (inc transport)

Estimation 20-50 for labour for plating the seedlings

4.5 维护/经常性活动

活动 时间/频率
1. Inspection and incidental repairs
2. Potentially sediment cleaning

4.6 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入(每年)

注释:

No numbers have been recorded yet as the structures are new. An estimate of the maintenance costs would be 10-25% of the establishment costs.

5. 自然和人文环境

5.1 气候

年降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
指定年平均降雨量(若已知),单位为mm:

325.00

农业气候带
  • 半干旱

5.2 地形

平均坡度:
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形:
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
垂直分布带:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
说明该技术是否专门应用于:
  • 不相关
关于地形的注释和进一步规范:

The strips are better suited for the flatter areas and the trenches on the higher sloping areas.

5.3 土壤

平均土层深度:
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土):
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
土壤质地(地表以下> 20厘米):
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
表土有机质:
  • 中(1-3%)

5.4 水资源可用性和质量

地下水位表:

5-50米

地表水的可用性:

匮乏/没有

水质(未处理):

仅供农业使用(灌溉)

水质请参考::

地下水和地表水

水的盐度有问题吗?:

该区域正在发生洪水吗?:

规律性:

偶然

5.5 生物多样性

物种多样性:
栖息地多样性:

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

定栖或游牧:
  • 定栖的
生产系统的市场定位:
  • 混合(生计/商业)
非农收入:
  • 收入的10-50%
相对财富水平:
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
个人或集体:
  • 个人/家庭
  • 员工(公司、政府)
机械化水平:
  • 手工作业
  • 机械化/电动
性别:
  • 男人
土地使用者的年龄:
  • 儿童
  • 中年人

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者使用的平均土地面积

  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
这被认为是小规模、中规模还是大规模的(参照当地实际情况)?:
  • 小规模的

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权:
  • 个人
  • Water not available
土地使用权是否基于传统的法律制度?:

5.9 进入服务和基础设施的通道

健康:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
教育:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
技术援助:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
就业(例如非农):
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
市场:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
能源:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
道路和交通:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
饮用水和卫生设施:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的
金融服务:
  • 贫瘠
  • 适度的

6. 影响和结论性说明

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

作物生产

降低
增加
注释/具体说明:

At first relatively unproductive land, with rwh techniques, production is increase is expected

生产故障风险

增加
降低
注释/具体说明:

More water is retained in the land and in the soil hence less drought vulnerable

产品多样性

降低
增加
注释/具体说明:

Trees, shrubs, and crops

土地管理

妨碍
简化
注释/具体说明:

Structures require some maintenance

收入和成本

农业收入

降低
增加
注释/具体说明:

Increase in more stable yield is positive for farm income

社会文化影响

食品安全/自给自足

减少
改良
注释/具体说明:

Less dependent on external food during dry periods

SLM/土地退化知识

减少
改良
注释/具体说明:

Implementation was together with local land users, enhancing their knowledge in SLM

生态影响

水循环/径流

水的回收/收集

减少
改良
注释/具体说明:

Water is much better retained as consequence of the rwh structures.

地表径流

增加
降低
注释/具体说明:

Run-off (damage) poses less because the ability to accumale is limited because water is now trapped by trenches and bunds

土壤

土壤水分

降低
增加

土壤覆盖层

减少
改良

土壤流失

增加
降低

土壤堆积

降低
增加
生物多样性:植被、动物

植被覆盖

降低
增加

生物量/地上C

降低
增加
对现场影响的评估(测量)进行具体说明:

Expert estimates

6.2 该技术的场外影响已经显现

下游洪水

增加
减少
注释/具体说明:

More water is retained in the catchment, hence less flood risk downstream

下游淤积

增加
降低
注释/具体说明:

The RWH structures can trap sediments

风力搬运沉积物

增加
减少
注释/具体说明:

Because of improved vegetation cover, soil is better held together, becoming less susceptible for being lifted up the wind

对邻近农田的破坏

增加
减少

对公共/私人基础设施的破坏

增加
减少
对场外影响(测量)的评估进行具体说明:

Expert estimates

6.3 技术对渐变气候以及与气候相关的极端情况/灾害的暴露和敏感性(土地使用者认为的极端情况/灾害)

渐变气候

渐变气候
季节 增加或减少 该技术是如何应对的?
年降雨量 减少 适度

气候有关的极端情况(灾害)

水文灾害
该技术是如何应对的?
山洪暴发

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术建立成本相比如何(从土地使用者的角度看)?
短期回报:

轻度消极

长期回报:

非常积极

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何(从土地使用者的角度看)?
短期回报:

积极

长期回报:

非常积极

注释:

Expectations

6.5 技术采用

  • 单例/实验
在所有采用这项技术的人当中,有多少人是自发的,即未获得任何物质奖励/付款?:
  • 0-10%

6.6 适应

最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?:

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

土地使用者眼中的长处/优势/机会
Income diversification through forest nut and fodder production: Modified contour trenches enable the planting of both almond trees and fodder shrubs, supporting a mix of high-value cash crops and livestock-based livelihoods while restoring degraded sloped land.
Higher and more stable yields in flat rainfed systems: Modified contour strips improve water use efficiency and infiltration in cereal fields (e.g., barley), leading to better germination, stronger crop stands, and increased yields—especially valuable in low-rainfall zones where productivity is otherwise constrained.
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Improved erosion control and landscape stability: Both techniques reduce surface runoff, limit gully formation, and prevent soil loss—thereby rehabilitating degraded land and protecting long-term soil productivity.
Enhanced soil moisture and drought resilience: By capturing and infiltrating rainwater along the contour, both methods improve water availability in the root zone, boosting the performance of crops and vegetation under arid and increasingly variable climate conditions.
Cost-effective and locally scalable: Constructed with accessible tools like mouldboard ploughs and finished by manual labour, both structures are affordable, require minimal inputs, and are suitable for community-based, participatory land restoration efforts.

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
One challenge with modified contour trenches is that their effectiveness can be reduced over time due to sediment accumulation inside the trenches, which may reduce their water storage capacity and redirect runoff flow, especially during intense rainfall events. In addition, the bunds can weaken or collapse if the soil is loosely compacted or livestock walk over them. Periodic maintenance is required every 4–5 years to remove sediment, re-shape trenches, and recompact or reinforce bunds, especially in sensitive segments. Involving local land users in routine inspection and light seasonal upkeep helps sustain long-term functionality. Introducing controlled grazing or fencing can prevent trampling by animals.
Modified contour strips are relatively low structures and therefore vulnerable to damage or overtopping if catchment-to-cultivated ratios are misjudged, or if bunds are not compacted well—especially during unexpected intense rainfall. Another limitation is that the strips rely on proper elevation spacing and contour accuracy, which requires some technical skill. Ensuring accurate layout using a laser level and proper training of local staff during implementation is key. Adjusting catchment ratios downslope (e.g., from 5:1 to 1:1) helps avoid overloading. Annual visual checks and minor repairs after each rainy season are usually sufficient to maintain bund height and integrity.

7. 参考和链接

7.1 信息的方法/来源

  • 实地考察、实地调查
  • 与土地使用者的访谈
  • 与SLM专业人员/专家的访谈
  • 根据报告和其他现有文档进行编译

7.3 链接到网络上的相关信息

标题/说明:

Oweis, T. and Haddad, M. 2023. Rainwater Harvesting Design Manual: Micro-catchment Systems for Drylands Agriculture. Lebanon, Beirut: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).

URL:

https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169777

标题/说明:

Mekdaschi Studer, R. & Liniger H. (2013). Water Harvesting: Guidelines to Good Practice. WOCAT, Bern, Switzerland

URL:

wocat.net/documents/85/WaterHarvesting_lowresolution.pdf

标题/说明:

Critchley, W. & Siegert, K., (1991). Water Harvesting: A Manual for the Design and Construction of Water Harvesting Schemes for Plant Production. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome

URL:

https://www.fao.org/3/U3160E/U3160E00.htm

模块