技术

Minimum Tillage and Direct Planting [加纳]

technologies_1329 - 加纳

完整性: 67%

1. 一般信息

1.2 参与该技术评估和文件编制的资源人员和机构的联系方式

关键资源人

SLM专业人员:

Adjimon Souroudjaye

Volta Environmental Conservation Organization

加纳

有助于对技术进行记录/评估的项目名称(如相关)
Book project: SLM in Practice - Guidelines and Best Practices for Sub-Saharan Africa (SLM in Practice)

1.3 关于使用通过WOCAT记录的数据的条件

编制者和关键资源人员接受有关使用通过WOCAT记录数据的条件。:

2. SLM技术的说明

2.1 技术简介

技术定义:

Minimum tillage and direct planting are two conservation agriculture practices which basically consist of leaving crop residues on the soil surface without burning and subsequent planting through the mulch.

2.2 技术的详细说明

说明:

The traditional slash-and-burn land use system in the case study area – involving clearing natural vegetation followed by 2-5 years of cropping – has become unsustainable as land pressure has greatly increased, shortening fallow periods. Under the SLM practice of ‘minimum tillage and direct planting’, land is prepared by slashing the existing vegetation and allowing regrowth up to 30 cm height. A glyphosate-based round-up herbicide (Round-up, Chemosate or Helosate) is sprayed with a knapsack fitted with a low-volume nozzle. The residue is left on the soil surface without burning. After 7–10 days, direct planting is carried out in rows through the mulch. Maize is the main crop planted under this system. Planting is practiced manually using a planting stick.

Purpose of the Technology: The mulch layer has several important functions: it helps to increase and maintain water stored in the soil, reduces soil erosion, contributes to improve soil fertility (after crop residues have decomposed in subsequent seasons) and it efficiently controls weeds by hindering their growth and preventing weeds from producing seeds. The use of herbicides requires adequate knowledge. An even better option is to introduce multipurpose cover crops to control weed populations, improve soil fertility, and enhance yields while diversifying crop production and thus reducing dependence on the use of herbicides. Labour inputs for land preparation and weeding is considerably decreased under conservation agriculture. Women benefit most from the workload reduction since these time-consuming activities are their task. For men, the new technology usually means heavier work, especially during the 1st year, since they have to plant through the mulch. Using a jab planter makes the work easier

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Minimum tillage and direct planting includes the following recurrent activities: 1. Initial land clearing: slash existing vegetation and allow regrowth (up to 30 cm); before onset of rains season.
2. Spraying of pre-emergence herbicide; 300 ml (2 sachets) for every 15 litres water for annual weeds; 450 ml (3 sachets) for every 15 litres water for perennial weeds.
3. Leave residues on the soil surface without burning.
4. Planting through the mulch.
5. Spraying post-emergence herbicide; after regrowth of weeds (7-10 days after planting).
6. Harvesting.
All activities are carried out manually (each cropping season) using jap planter (or a planting stick) and knapsack sprayers.

Natural / human environment: Both case study areas fall within the wet semi-equatorial zone of Ghana with a mean monthly temperature of between 23 °C and 33 °C (SDA 1995). Rainfall is bimodal in both districts with a peak rainy season from the end of March to July and again from September to November, after a short dry spell in August. In general soil characteristics in the study areas vary from well drained with high organic matter content in the forest area, to poorly drained with low organic matter content in the savannah belt.

2.3 技术照片

2.5 已应用该技术的、本评估所涵盖的国家/地区/地点

国家:

加纳

区域/州/省:

Brong Ahafo Region

有关地点的进一步说明:

Sunyani and Atwima district

2.6 实施日期

如果不知道确切的年份,请说明大概的日期:
  • 10-50年前

2.7 技术介绍

详细说明该技术是如何引入的:
  • 在实验/研究期间
注释(项目类型等):

early 1990s

3. SLM技术的分类

3.1 该技术的主要目的

  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响

3.2 应用该技术的当前土地利用类型

农田

农田

  • 一年一作
年作 - 具体指明作物:
  • 谷物类 - 玉米
注释:

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Fertility decline and reduced organic matter, water erosion, destruction of vegetation trough fires

3.5 该技术所属的SLM组

  • 改良的地面/植被覆盖
  • 最小的土壤扰动

3.6 包含该技术的可持续土地管理措施

农艺措施

农艺措施

  • A1:植被和土壤覆盖层
管理措施

管理措施

  • M2:改变管理/强度级别
注释:

Main measures: agronomic measures

Secondary measures: management measures

3.7 该技术强调的主要土地退化类型

土壤水蚀

土壤水蚀

  • Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀
化学性土壤退化

化学性土壤退化

  • Cn:肥力下降和有机质含量下降(非侵蚀所致)
生物性退化

生物性退化

  • Bq:数量/生物量减少
  • Bf:火灾的有害影响
注释:

Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion, Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content

Secondary types of degradation addressed: Bq: quantity / biomass decline, Bf: detrimental effects of fires

Main causes of degradation: soil management, population pressure, land tenure

3.8 防止、减少或恢复土地退化

具体数量名该技术与土地退化有关的目标:
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化

4. 技术规范、实施活动、投入和成本

4.1 该技术的技术图纸

技术规范(与技术图纸相关):

Residue management on a field with mature maize plants

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of raindrop splash, improvement of ground cover, increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase / maintain water stored in soil

作者:

Souroudjaye Adjimon, Volta Environmental Conservation Organization, Ghana

4.3 技术建立活动

活动 时间(季度)
1. Purchase jab planter
2. Purchase herbicides
3. Purchase knapsack

4.4 技术建立所需要的费用和投入

对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 每项投入的总成本 土地使用者承担的成本%
设备 Tools ha 1.0 70.0 70.0 100.0
技术建立所需总成本 70.0
技术建立总成本,美元 70.0
注释:

Remarks: Input costs include Jab planter US$ 20; herbicides US$ 5-6/liter. A knapsack costs US$ 50, which not affordable for small-scale farmers (they have to get organised in groups, or hire spraying gangs). Comparing to the traditional slash-and-burn system, Minimum tillage and direct planting has increased inputs costs but reduced labour costs and higher yields, which makes the conversion profitable!

4.5 维护/经常性活动

活动 时间/频率
1. Initial land clearing: slash existing vegetation and allow regrowth (up to 30 cm) before onset of rainy season
2. Spraying of pre-emergence herbicide; 300 ml (2 sachets) for every 15 litres water for annual weeds; 450 ml (3 sachets) for every 15 litres water for perennial weeds
3. Leave residues on the soil surface without burning
4. Planting through the mulch
5. Spraying post-emergence herbicide; after regrowth of weeds 7-10 days after planting

4.6 维护/经常性活动所需要的费用和投入(每年)

对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 每项投入的总成本 土地使用者承担的成本%
劳动力 Labour ha 1.0 83.0 83.0 100.0
设备 Tools ha 1.0 18.0 18.0
肥料和杀菌剂 Herbicides ha 1.0 110.0 110.0
技术维护所需总成本 211.0
技术维护总成本,美元 211.0
注释:

Machinery/ tools: jap planter, knapsack sprayer

4.7 影响成本的最重要因素

描述影响成本的最决定性因素:

Costs for herbicides and spraying equipment are the most determinant factor affecting the costs. Comparing to the traditional slash-and-burn system, Minimum tillage and direct planting has increased inputs costs but reduced labour costs and higher yields, which makes the conversion profitable!

5. 自然和人文环境

5.1 气候

年降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
有关降雨的规范/注释:

1400-1850 mm, bimodal

农业气候带
  • 半湿润

Thermal climate class: tropics

5.2 地形

平均坡度:
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形:
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
垂直分布带:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
关于地形的注释和进一步规范:

Altitudinal zone: 101-500 m a.s.l. (220-380 m a.s.l.)

5.3 土壤

平均土层深度:
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
表土有机质:
  • 高(>3%)
  • 低(<1%)
如有可能,附上完整的土壤描述或具体说明可用的信息,例如土壤类型、土壤酸碱度、阳离子交换能力、氮、盐度等。:

Topsoil organic matter: High (forest area) and low (savannah area)
Soil drainage/infiltration: High (forest area) and low (savannah area)

5.5 生物多样性

物种多样性:

5.6 应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

生产系统的市场定位:
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
相对财富水平:
  • 贫瘠
个人或集体:
  • 个人/家庭
机械化水平:
  • 手工作业
性别:
  • 女人
  • 男人
说明土地使用者的其他有关特征:

Population density: 100-200 persons/km2

100% of the land users are poor.

5.7 应用该技术的土地使用者使用的平均土地面积

  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
这被认为是小规模、中规模还是大规模的(参照当地实际情况)?:
  • 小规模的

5.8 土地所有权、土地使用权和水使用权

土地所有权:
  • 社区/村庄
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权:
  • 租赁
  • 个人

6. 影响和结论性说明

6.1 该技术的现场影响

社会经济效应

生产

作物生产

降低
增加
SLM之前的数量:

0.75-1 t

SLM之后的数量:

3t / ha

收入和成本

农业投入费用

增加
降低
注释/具体说明:

Only input costs are higher than for slash and burn, but labour costs are reduced

农业收入

降低
增加
SLM之前的数量:

50 US

SLM之后的数量:

123 US

工作量

增加
降低
SLM之前的数量:

83

SLM之后的数量:

48

注释/具体说明:

Critical labour shortage at weeding time is avoided, increased labour constraints only in the first year

其它社会经济效应

Possibility of early planting

decreased
increased
注释/具体说明:

Benefit from early rains, due to minimal land prep.

社会文化影响

健康状况

恶化
改良
注释/具体说明:

Might occur if no proper handling of herbicides is ensured

社会经济弱势群体的情况

恶化
改良
注释/具体说明:

Women / children benefit most from workload reduction

生态影响

水循环/径流

水的回收/收集

减少
改良
土壤

土壤水分

降低
增加

土壤覆盖层

减少
改良

土壤流失

增加
降低

6.3 技术对渐变气候以及与气候相关的极端情况/灾害的暴露和敏感性(土地使用者认为的极端情况/灾害)

渐变气候

渐变气候
季节 增加或减少 该技术是如何应对的?
年温度 增加

气候有关的极端情况(灾害)

气象灾害
该技术是如何应对的?
局地暴雨
局地风暴 未知
气候灾害
该技术是如何应对的?
干旱
水文灾害
该技术是如何应对的?
比较和缓的(河道)洪水 未知

其他气候相关的后果

其他气候相关的后果
该技术是如何应对的?
缩短生长期
注释:

The technology is tolerant to climatic extremes, contrary to the traditional slash-and-burn practice

6.4 成本效益分析

技术收益与技术维护成本/经常性成本相比如何(从土地使用者的角度看)?
短期回报:

中性/平衡

长期回报:

积极

6.5 技术采用

如若可行,进行量化(住户数量和/或覆盖面积):

193 households and 100% of the area covered

在所有采用这项技术的人当中,有多少人是自发的,即未获得任何物质奖励/付款?:
  • 11-50%
注释:

88% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

170 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

12% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

23 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

There is no trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

Comments on adoption trend: 30% of farmers ceased conservation farming practices after termination of projects input. 21 communities with 193 farmers (125 male, 68 female) apply the technology in the case study area (totally 2845 km2). Around 88% accepted the technology receiving incentives. There is little trend towards spontaneous adoption (through cross farmer visits); 30% of farmers ceased conservation farming practices after termination of projects input

6.7 该技术的优点/长处/机会

编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的长处/优势/机会
Increased crop yield
Increased farm income

6.8 技术的弱点/缺点/风险及其克服方法

土地使用者认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
High amounts of soil cover impeded germination of the main crop, thereby affecting productivity partial burning appeared necessary in such cases to reduce the quantity of mulch on the field
Fields that had been ploughed for years recorded slightly lower yield with minimal tillage and herbicide application, probably due to ploughing pan formation (hindering root penetration) ripping
编制者或其他关键资源人员认为的弱点/缺点/风险 如何克服它们?
Knowledge/experience is needed for adequate application of herbicides and handling of jab planters training/advisory service
Increased expenses and dependence on herbicides introduce multipurpose cover crops to control weed populations, improve soil fertility, and enhance yields while diversifying crop production
Availability of / access to herbicides and equipment is limited; some dealers sell adulterated or fake products that are harmful to the environment hire spraying gangs; provide training; set up rent-a-knapsack
Increased labour constraints in the first year; need for a long term investment good rates of return are achieved in the 2nd year of continuous use of the technology; long term user rights are crucial

7. 参考和链接

7.2 参考可用出版物

标题、作者、年份、ISBN:

Boahen P, B.A. Dartey, G.D. Dogbe, E. A. Boadi, B. Triomphe, S. Daamgard-Larsen, J. Ashburner. 2007. Conservation agriculture as practised in Ghana. Nairobi. African Conservation Tillage Network. FAO.

可以从哪里获得?成本如何?

FAO

模块