CBP

Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Summary Module

Technology: Improvement of land under arid conditions through the creation of pistachio plantations (CACILM) (Central Asian Countries Initiative for Land Resource Management (CACILM))

cbp_6145

View sections

Expand all Collapse all
Completeness: 100%

1. General information

1.1 Name of the SLM Technology

Name:

Improvement of land under arid conditions through the creation of pistachio plantations (CACILM)

Locally used name:

Central Asian Countries Initiative for Land Resource Management (CACILM)

Country:

Uzbekistan

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment

Key resource person(s)

CBP specialist:

Eleanor Milne

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment (if relevant)
Watershed Science Colorado State University (Watershed Science Colorado State University) - United States
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment (if relevant)
Carbon Benefits Project (CBP)

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When was the Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment compiled?

26/07/2021

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Ja

2. Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment

2.1 Summary PDF from Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Assessment

Assessment Results Description (related to Carbon Benefits Project (CBP) Summary PDF):

This technology considered the ‘Improvement of land under arid conditions through the creation of pistachio plantations under the original CACILM project’. The area reported on was 42 ha and a 20 year analysis was done covering the period 2016 – 2036. The main activity was the introduction of Pistachio plantations on sloping land to improve the lands productivity and to rehabilitate the arid land in the hill zone.
The CBP analysis found the technology to have a GHG benefit of -11,898 t CO2 e over 20 years which gives a rate of -595 t CO2 e / year (a negative number shows C sequestration and or avoided GHG emissions). This included -11,807 t CO2 e accumulated tree biomass and -167 accumulated in soils.

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules

No modules