1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)

Youth Ecological Center, Tajikistan (Youth Ecological Center, Tajikistan) - Tajikistan

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)

CDE Centre for Development and Environment (CDE Centre for Development and Environment) - Switzerland

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

05/05/2011

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Ja

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

Использование фитопестицидов, не наносящих ущерба окружающей среде, и сделанных и вытяжки растений для поддержки в борьбе с вредителями и болезнями.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Фитопестициды в основном сделаны из растений, включая: плодоножки картофеля, лука или томата, а также вытяжки из чеснока, перца, одуванчика, полыни горькой и дурмана. Другие биологические пестициды могут быть произведены из золы или мыла. Фитопестициды можно хранить до года.

Purpose of the Technology: Основная цель фитопестицидов – это помощь в борьбе с вредителями и болезнями с использованием естественного метода, не наносящего ущерба окружающей среде, и без использования химических пестицидов. Они не влияют на окружающую флору и фауну и сохраняют биологические организмы в почве.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Это легко используемая и не дорогая технология, которая в основном требует сбор и просушку части растений для создания пестицидов.

Natural / human environment: Технология может использоваться при любой среде в период роста. Технология в настоящий момент используется в засушливой зоне южного Таджикистана, в дехканских хозяйствах и других участках.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

2.6 Date of implementation

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:

• more than 50 years ago (traditional)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

• Традиционный

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

• conserve ecosystem

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Данная технология позволяет избегать использование химических пестицидов. Фитопестициды не уничтожают органический материал почвы, фактически, они обогащают почву и не наносят вреда окружающей среде

Major land use problems (land users’ perception): также

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:

• mixed rainfed-irrigated

Comments:

Water supply: богарное, смешанное богарно-орошаемое, полностью орошаемое, полностью орошаемое

Number of growing seasons per year:

• 1

Specify:

Longest growing period from month to month: в течение вегетационного периода

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

• integrated soil fertility management

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:

• evenly spread over an area

If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:

• < 0.1 km2 (10 ha)

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

Comments:

Main measures: agronomic measures

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

Comments:

Main type of degradation addressed: Бб (Bp): увеличение вредителей / заболеваний, потеря хищников

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:

• reduce land degradation
• restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land

Comments:

Main goals: mitigation / reduction of land degradation, rehabilitation / reclamation of denuded land

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: средний

Technical knowledge required for land users: средний

Main technical functions: сохранение биогумуса впочвенном составе, обогошение микроорганизм почвы, уменьшение вредителей

Agronomic measure: Фитопестициды
Material/ species: картофель, лук, помидор, чеснок, перец, одуванчик, полынь, шип яблоки

Vegetative measure: сохранение микроорганику в почве
Vegetative material: Д: деревья / кустарники, Ф: фруктовые деревья / кустарники, К: многолетние культуры, Т: трава, Др: другие

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: Д: деревья / кустарники, Ф: фруктовые деревья / кустарники, К: многолетние культуры, Т: трава, Др: другие

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: Д: деревья / кустарники, Ф: фруктовые деревья / кустарники, К: многолетние культуры, Т: трава, Др: другие

Vegetative measure: Vegetative material: Д: деревья / кустарники, Ф: фруктовые деревья / кустарники, К: многолетние культуры, Т: трава, Др: другие

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify currency used for cost calculations:

• US Dollars

4.4 Establishment activities

	Activity	Type of measure	Timing
1.	Производство пестицидов	Vegetative	3 часа

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

	Specify input	Unit	Quantity	Costs per Unit	Total costs per input	% of costs borne by land users
Labour	None	None	100.0	0.03	3.0	100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology					3.0

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

	Activity	Type of measure	Timing/ frequency
1.	Подготовка материала	Agronomic	1 чел / день
2.	распыление	Vegetative	1чел / день
3.	покупка распылителя	Vegetative	1

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

	Specify input	Unit	Quantity	Costs per Unit	Total costs per input	% of costs borne by land users
Labour	None	None	1.0	1.0	1.0	100.0
Labour	None	None	100.0	0.03	3.0	100.0
Equipment	None	None	2.0	25.0	50.0	100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology					54.0

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Затраты только на покупку распылителя

5.1 Climate

5.2 Topography

5.3 Soils

5.4 Water availability and quality

Comments and further specifications on water quality and quantity:

Availability of surface water: good, medium

5.5 Biodiversity

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users

Population density: 50-100 persons/km2

Annual population growth: 2% - 3%

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:

• group
• individual, titled

Land use rights:

• open access (unorganized)

Water use rights:

• open access (unorganized)

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

Socio-cultural impacts

Ecological impacts

Biodiversity: vegetation, animals

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Gradual climate change

Gradual climate change

	Season	Type of climatic change/ extreme	How does the Technology cope with it?
annual temperature		increase	well

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Meteorological disasters

	How does the Technology cope with it?
local rainstorm	well
local windstorm	well

Climatological disasters

	How does the Technology cope with it?
drought	well

Hydrological disasters

	How does the Technology cope with it?
general (river) flood	well

Other climate-related consequences

Other climate-related consequences

	How does the Technology cope with it?
reduced growing period	not known

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

• more than 50%

Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?

• 50-90%

Comments:

40 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support

60% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

40 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support

There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Технология приемлема
Технология не наносит ущерба окружающей среды How can they be sustained / enhanced? Технология заменяет химические пестициды на те, которые не наносят ущерба окружающей среде
Не дорого How can they be sustained / enhanced? Фитопестициды можно произвести в любое время

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view	How can they be overcome?
Фитопестициды эффективны только лишь на две недели	Пестициды можно подготовить, и использовать в любое время