Technologies

Pilancón [Ecuador]

Pilancón

technologies_3276 - Ecuador

Completeness: 90%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:

Ecuador

Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Decision Support for Mainstreaming and Scaling out Sustainable Land Management (GEF-FAO / DS-SLM)
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Ministerio de Ambiente y Agua Ecuador (MAAE) - Ecuador
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería Ecuador (MAG) - Ecuador
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Organización de la Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura Ecuador (FAO Ecuador) - Ecuador

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

When were the data compiled (in the field)?

20/11/2019

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Ja

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

Nee

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

El Pilancón es un micro-reservorio para almacenar agua ya sea de lluvia y quebradas, y es utilizado para el riego de los cultivos de áreas pequeñas.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Es una estructura formada con hierro, cemento, piedra y ladrillo. Es semejante a un reservorio con la particularidad de estar sobre el nivel del suelo. El volumen de almacenamiento es de 12 m3 en promedio. El agua almacenada es utilizada para los abrevaderos del ganado y para el riego por aspersión o gravedad de los cultivos agrícolas y pastos. El diseño y construcción adecuados de los pilancones son indispensables para asegurar el éxito de estas obras, además de hacerlos más fáciles de cuidar, más seguros y económicos. Es ideal considerar en los aspectos constructivos del reservorio el punto más alto de la finca, de modo que el agua pueda llegar desde este punto hasta cualquier lugar de la propiedad. Sin embargo, no siempre es posible tener las condiciones adecuadas para lograr lo anterior. Si la estructura solo puede ubicarse en un punto muy bajo, será necesario considerar la implementación de bombeo. La selección del sitio adecuado es clave para el éxito del reservorio. Debe tomarse en cuenta la topografía del terreno, la textura del suelo, el destino donde se usará el agua y la disponibilidad de la fuente de agua. Este tipo de reservorio es muy similar al excavado, con la diferencia que el nivel del agua se puede llevar por encima del suelo, mediante la construcción de paredes, principalmente de concreto. Se recomienda para zonas donde otros materiales de construcción no se encuentren disponibles.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.4 Videos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Ecuador

Region/ State/ Province:

Cantón Paltas, Provincia de Loja

2.6 Date of implementation

If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
  • more than 50 years ago (traditional)

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
  • Perennial (non-woody) cropping
  • Tree and shrub cropping
Waterways, waterbodies, wetlands

Waterways, waterbodies, wetlands

3.3 Further information about land use

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 2

3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • water harvesting
  • irrigation management (incl. water supply, drainage)
  • home gardens

3.5 Spread of the Technology

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

structural measures

structural measures

  • S7: Water harvesting/ supply/ irrigation equipment

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

water degradation

water degradation

  • Hp: decline of surface water quality

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

Date:

16/07/2020

4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing

Los pilancones generalmente se construyen de 3 m de ancho por 4 m de largo y 1,5 m de alto lo que da una capacidad de 18 m3 de almacenamiento de agua con una tubería de salida en el extremo bajo de 2" para su distribución.
Es necesario elaborar una base y pilares de hormigón y luego pegar los ladrillos para evitar resquebrajamiento debido a que los suelos donde existen arcillas expansivas someten a la estructura a constantes presiones que sumados al peso del agua almacenada rompen las paredes en corto tiempo.

4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
  • per Technology unit
Specify currency used for cost calculations:
  • US Dollars

4.4 Establishment activities

Activity Type of measure Timing
1. Limpieza de terreno Agronomic None
2. Transporte de materiales Structural None
3. Preparación de materiales Structural None
4. Construcción del pilancón Structural None

4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Limpieza de terreno jornal 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
Labour Transporte de materiales jornal 2.0 15.0 30.0 100.0
Labour Preparación de materiales jornal 2.0 15.0 30.0 100.0
Labour Construcción del pilancón jornal 4.0 15.0 60.0 100.0
Construction material Cemento quintal 20.0 8.0 160.0 20.0
Construction material Arena m3 2.0 13.0 26.0 20.0
Construction material Piedras m3 0.5 24.0 12.0 20.0
Construction material Hierro varilla 1.0 16.0 16.0 20.0
Construction material None None 400.0 0.25 100.0
Construction material None None 1.5 15.0 22.5
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 471.5

4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Type of measure Timing/ frequency
1. None Other measures None

4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour None None 0.3 15.0 4.5 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 4.5

4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

El costo del material de construcción es el que más contribuye al costo total de la tecnología.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • semi-arid
  • arid

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
  • not relevant

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • low (<1%)

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

on surface

Availability of surface water:

medium

Water quality (untreated):

for agricultural use only (irrigation)

Is water salinity a problem?

Nee

Is flooding of the area occurring?

Nee

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium
Habitat diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Sedentary or nomadic:
  • Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • poor
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
  • animal traction
Gender:
  • women
  • men
Age of land users:
  • middle-aged
  • elderly

5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights:
  • leased
  • individual

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased

crop quality

decreased
increased

fodder production

decreased
increased

production area

decreased
increased
Water availability and quality

water availability for livestock

decreased
increased

irrigation water availability

decreased
increased
Income and costs

farm income

decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts

food security/ self-sufficiency

reduced
improved

health situation

worsened
improved

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

harvesting/ collection of water

reduced
improved
Soil

soil moisture

decreased
increased

soil cover

reduced
improved

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

Comments regarding impact assessment:

La tecnología no produce ningún tipo de impacto fuera del sitio de implementación.

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
cold wave very well
drought very well
Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
landslide not well

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

very positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

very positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

  • 10-50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 0-10%

6.6 Adaptation

Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?

Ja

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Mejora la disponibilidad de agua para los abrevaderos del ganado y
para el riego por aspersión o gravedad de los cultivos agrícolas y pastos
Fácil de cuidar, segura y económica

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Es necesario la disponibilidad de material para su construcción.
No es recomendable en parcelas con superficie plana

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys
  • interviews with SLM specialists/ experts
  • compilation from reports and other existing documentation

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules