Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management. [Spain]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Alicia Morugán-Coronado
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Ursula Gaemperli, Gudrun Schwilch, Alexandra Gavilano
Cow horn manure applied in biodynamic agricultural management.
technologies_2690 - Spain
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Interactive Soil Quality assessment in Europe and China for Agricultural productivity and Environmental Resilience (EU-iSQAPER)Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Agrochesmistry and Environment Department, University Miguel Hernandez (UMH) - Spain1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Ja
1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology
Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?
Nee
1.5 Reference to Questionnaire(s) on SLM Approaches (documented using WOCAT)
Fruit trees under biodynamic agricultural management in southern … [Spain]
Biodynamic farming is a method of farming that aims to treat the farm as a living system, based on the application of specific organic preparations which stimulate the natural functions of the farm soils and provide the necessary component towards a self-sustaining agro-ecological farm management.
- Compiler: Alicia Morugán-Coronado
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
This technology is focused in the application of the preparation number 500 based on cow dung filled in cow horns, and buried in the soil pit during the cooler month to improve soil structure, soil nutrition and humus formation
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
1. Preparation 500 application in agricultural soils under a biodynamic management is applied in a flat peaches orchard of 40 ha located in Jumilla in southeastern Spain. It is sited in the north east of the Region of Murcia, on the Altiplano area, close to the towns of Cieza and Yecla. This area has an important agricultural activity being the mainly crops the vineyards, Jumilla is a Spanish Denominación de Origen (DO) for wines that extends over
the north of the region of Murcia.
2. This technology is based on the application of the preparation number 500, commonly known as cow horn manure. Preparation 500 is made by filling a cow's horn with cow dung every year, and burying it in the soil during the cooler months (November through February). The horns should be buried open end down so that they will not become water logged if the pit is over watered. When the preparation is ready after 4 months should have turned into dark humus. It should be stored in a cool place and in glazed pots isolated. It is sprayed up to four times a year. The best times are in October and November and then again in February and March. It is stirred for one hour making a vortex. The Horn Manure preparation 500 should be diluted in good-quality rainwater that has been properly stored. The preparation is then stirred vigorously for exactly one hour before spraying. The water should be heated before stirring, ideally to body temperature. Spraying in the field area should be done in the evening, not before 5 pm (4 pm in winter) on a day that is not too windy or too hot, avoiding direct sunlight. A slightly overcast, late afternoon is ideal. Avoid spraying in the rain, or if heavy rains are forecast after spraying. Don't spray if night frost is expected, in order to ensure the correct working of preparation 500.
Preparation 500 is basically fermented cow dung. It is the basis for soil fertility, and the renewal of degraded soils.
3. The main purpose of this technology is focused in to treat the farm as a living system, based on preparations
which mean objective is prepare to soil as self-sustaining agro-ecosystem.
4. This flat tree orchard was under organic farming management before the current technology was applied, the major activity was elaborated the preparation 500 and sprayed out in the orchard. Secondary activities were focused in maintain the preparation during the rest of the year and improve the soil keeping vegetation cover and reducing the tillage.
5. There are several benefits observed after this technology was applied, regarding the soil quality a Strong humus layer was formed and organic matter increased, in general the soil structure improved. Another positive impact was the response against plagues, the establishment of self-sustaining agro-ecosystem increase the biodiversity and the
beneficial species in the orchard.
6. Land user is satisfied with the results of this technology in his orchard because a new market sector opens thanks to changing the orchard to biodynamic farming, the crop quality and the soil properties improved, soil organic matter, soil structure and response against plagues were enhanced. On the other hand, land user dislikes the great amount of money to change the agricultural management to biodynamic farming, the preparations and the external organization certifications are expensive.
2.3 Photos of the Technology
2.4 Videos of the Technology
Comments, short description:
The spontaneous plants are cut during may in biodynamic agricultural land in southern Spain
Date:
05/05/2017
Location:
Jumilla
Name of videographer:
Alicia Morugán Coronado
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Spain
Region/ State/ Province:
Murcia
Further specification of location:
Jumilla
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:
- 0.1-1 km2
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
Indicate year of implementation:
2014
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through land users' innovation
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Land use mixed within the same land unit:
Ja
Specify mixed land use (crops/ grazing/ trees):
- Agroforestry
Cropland
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
Tree and shrub cropping - Specify crops:
- grapes
- duraznos planos (Prunus persica var. platycarpa), frutas mediterráneas
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 1
Comments:
Organic farming was stablished in 1998. In 2014 the farmer changed the agricultural management to biodynamic practice with the same crop.
3.4 Water supply
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- full irrigation
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- integrated soil fertility management
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
- A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
- A3: Soil surface treatment
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
physical soil deterioration
- Pk: slaking and crusting
- Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
biological degradation
- Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
- Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- prevent land degradation
- reduce land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
- per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:
40
other/ national currency (specify):
euro
If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:
0.944508
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
60
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | Preparation process | all year |
2. | Spread out preparation 500 | november, december, january, may |
3. | None | None |
4. | None | None |
5. | None | None |
Comments:
all the costs are for the 40 ha together
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | weed cutting | persona/dia | 2.0 | 60.0 | 120.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | Filling horns, burying and recovery | persona/dia | 15.0 | 60.0 | 900.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | Mixing hummus with water and spread out preparation 500 | persona/dia | 5.0 | 60.0 | 300.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | electricity | item | 2.0 | 18.0 | 36.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Cow horns to be filled with cow dung | item | 100.0 | 10.0 | 1000.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | glazed storing pots for Preparation 500 | item | 3.0 | 50.0 | 150.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | tractor with trailer (hire per day) | pieza | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | cow dung | item | 5.0 | 60.0 | 300.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | shovel | item | 1.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | tank | irem | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | None | None | 1.0 | 3000.0 | 3000.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | cow manure needed to produce Preparation 500 | kg | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | organic amendment | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 5961.0 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 6311.22 |
Comments:
all the costs are for the 40 ha together
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | weed cutting | October |
2. | Biodynamics Preparations | November-December |
3. | Biodynamics preparations application | November to May |
4. | None | None |
5. | None | None |
Comments:
all the costs are for the 40 ha together
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Biodynamics preparations application | persona/dia | 15.0 | 60.0 | 900.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | None | None | 5.0 | 60.0 | 300.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | None | None | 2.0 | 60.0 | 120.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | tractor with trailer (hire per day) | item | 8.0 | 30.0 | 240.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | preparations | item | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | manure | item | ||||
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 1660.0 | |||||
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD | 1757.53 |
Comments:
all the costs are for the 40 ha together
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
Weather conditions could affect the orchard production if heavy rainfall occur or intensive drought affect to vegetative stress.
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:
369.00
Specifications/ comments on rainfall:
Lluvias torrenciales concentradas en Septiembre y Octubre
Agro-climatic zone
- semi-arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
- not relevant
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
- medium (loamy, silty)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
- high (>3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
1157 µS/cm; pH 8; 12% clay, 36% silt; 52% sand; 5.7% organic matter; 5 g/kg Nitrogen; 265 mg(kg available phosphorus.
5.4 Water availability and quality
Ground water table:
5-50 m
Availability of surface water:
good
Water quality (untreated):
for agricultural use only (irrigation)
Is water salinity a problem?
Ja
Specify:
excessive salts content in the irrigation water
Is flooding of the area occurring?
Nee
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- medium
Habitat diversity:
- medium
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Sedentary or nomadic:
- Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
- commercial/ market
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
Individuals or groups:
- individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
- mechanized/ motorized
Gender:
- men
Age of land users:
- middle-aged
5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- medium-scale
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, titled
Land use rights:
- individual
Water use rights:
- communal (organized)
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop quality
production area
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
farm income
Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Comments/ specify:
Biodynamic farming reduce soil degradation
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
water quantity
Soil
soil moisture
Comments/ specify:
the soil keept the moisture because the organic amendment applied in preparation 500
soil loss
soil crusting/ sealing
soil compaction
nutrient cycling/ recharge
soil organic matter/ below ground C
acidity
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
biomass/ above ground C
invasive alien species
beneficial species
habitat diversity
pest/ disease control
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
groundwater/ river pollution
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Gradual climate change
Gradual climate change
Season | increase or decrease | How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|---|---|
seasonal rainfall | autumn | increase | not well |
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
heatwave | not well at all |
drought | not well at all |
Biological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
epidemic diseases | moderately |
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
neutral/ balanced
Long-term returns:
positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- single cases/ experimental
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 91-100%
6.6 Adaptation
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
Nee
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
Strong humus formation |
Improvement against plagues |
Absorption and retention of water is greater |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Increase of organic matter |
Enhancement of soil structure |
Increase biodiversity of soil |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Short response time to the weather risks |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
The high dependency on climatological conditions |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- field visits, field surveys
2
- interviews with land users
1
- interviews with SLM specialists/ experts
2
- compilation from reports and other existing documentation
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
05/05/2017
7.2 References to available publications
Title, author, year, ISBN:
no
7.3 Links to relevant online information
Title/ description:
Web page
URL:
http://www.frutasvargas.com/
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
Fruit trees under biodynamic agricultural management in southern … [Spain]
Biodynamic farming is a method of farming that aims to treat the farm as a living system, based on the application of specific organic preparations which stimulate the natural functions of the farm soils and provide the necessary component towards a self-sustaining agro-ecological farm management.
- Compiler: Alicia Morugán-Coronado
Modules
No modules