Controlled grazing - goats (Dino Torri - Italy)

Controlled grazing in deciduous woods as an alternative to grazing on rangeland (Italy)

Pascolo controllato

Description

Controlled grazing in deciduous woods seasonally limited in summer when grass cover in rangeland suffers water stress.

During the driest season, farmers shifts grazing to deciduous forest. Grazing in forest is controlled because it is limited to specific areas and with a controlled number of animals (cows and goats). In deciduous forest, the animals can still find green grass in the dry season. This action prevents excessive stress in the surrounding rangelands, which are suffering from a seasonal summer water deficit, as is typical of areas with a Mediterranean climate.

Purpose of the Technology: One purpose of this management technology is to allow grazing in environments that still preserve grasses in the summer dry season. Moreover, this technology can prevent overgrazing (and its consequences in rangeland and pastures). Controlled grazing is typical in the Rendina watershed (Basilicata, Italy).

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The upper part of the watershed is located above 800 m a.s.l. and is characterized by deciduous oak forest, which every 20 years is subject to selective cutting. Selective cutting involves cutting a high percentage of a limited range of tree species. Within about 10 years, regeneration of the whole wooded area is possible. This allows for a constant regeneration of the woodland and reduces the probability of a progressive degradation as well as of wildfires due to an excessive build-up of the fuel load. The surrounding areas are either cultivated or rangeland and suffer from the soil erosion and landslides that give rise to degradation and hence to the loss of arable lands.

Natural / human environment: Forests are either government-owned or privately-owned, but controlled grazing woodland areas are mostly government-owned. Based on the number of grazing animals admitted, the farmers need to pay a tax to the municipalities or regions. Each farmer has a specific number of animals admitted to the woodland area and there is a overall maximum of animals especially during summer, when a risk of overgrazing exists. Access to private forest, on the other hand, is arranged directly with the owners.
Grazing is organized on a daily basis by the herdsman. The controlled grazing areas are always located in the woodlands where selective cutting is carried out. In such areas livestock during summer can enter and move more easily in the relatively cool conditions.

When controlled grazing is adopted as the conventional management technology, selective cutting of trees every 20 years is also used to provide additional earnings from the sale of firewood.
Annual rainfall is 500 mm with two rainy seasons (October-November and March-May). Potential evapotranspiration is up to 1100 mm annually. The Rendina catchment ranges from humid-subhumid to subhumid-semiarid conditions. The surrounding area ranges from (subhumid)-semiarid to semiarid-arid.

Location

Location: Rendina Basin, Potenza / regione basilicata, Italy

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 15.75, 40.8927

Spread of the Technology:

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Controlled grazing - goats (Dino Torri (Italy))
controlled grazing in deciduous forest (Dino Torri - Italy)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: Yes - Silvo-pastoralism

  • Grazing land
      Animal type: goats, cows
    • Forest/ woodlands
      • (Semi-)natural forests/ woodlands. Management: Selective felling
      Products and services: Grazing/ browsing

    Water supply
    • rainfed
    • mixed rainfed-irrigated
    • full irrigation

    Purpose related to land degradation
    • prevent land degradation
    • reduce land degradation
    • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
    • adapt to land degradation
    • not applicable
    Degradation addressed
    • soil erosion by water - Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
    • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline
    SLM group
    • pastoralism and grazing land management
    SLM measures
    • management measures - M7: Others

    Technical drawing

    Technical specifications

    Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

    Calculation of inputs and costs
    • Costs are calculated:
    • Currency used for cost calculation: euro
    • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 0.8 euro
    • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 100.00
    Most important factors affecting the costs
    Labour costs are the most important determining factor affecting the costs.
    Establishment activities
    1. Selective cutting of woodland (Timing/ frequency: None)
    Establishment inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (euro) Total costs per input (euro) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Selective cutting of woodland ha 2.0 300.0 600.0 50.0
    Labour ha 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology 700.0
    Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 875.0
    Maintenance activities
    1. Selective cutting of woodland every 20 years (Timing/ frequency: None)
    2. Shifting animals in closed woodland areas (Timing/ frequency: None)
    Maintenance inputs and costs
    Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (euro) Total costs per input (euro) % of costs borne by land users
    Labour
    Selective cutting of woodland every 20 years ha 2.0 300.0 600.0 50.0
    Shifting animals in closed woodland areas ha 2.0 150.0 300.0 100.0
    Labour ha 1.0 75.0 75.0 100.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 975.0
    Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 1'218.75

    Natural environment

    Average annual rainfall
    • < 250 mm
    • 251-500 mm
    • 501-750 mm
    • 751-1,000 mm
    • 1,001-1,500 mm
    • 1,501-2,000 mm
    • 2,001-3,000 mm
    • 3,001-4,000 mm
    • > 4,000 mm
    Agro-climatic zone
    • humid
    • sub-humid
    • semi-arid
    • arid
    Specifications on climate
    autumn and spring rain season
    Thermal climate class: temperate
    Slope
    • flat (0-2%)
    • gentle (3-5%)
    • moderate (6-10%)
    • rolling (11-15%)
    • hilly (16-30%)
    • steep (31-60%)
    • very steep (>60%)
    Landforms
    • plateau/plains
    • ridges
    • mountain slopes
    • hill slopes
    • footslopes
    • valley floors
    Altitude
    • 0-100 m a.s.l.
    • 101-500 m a.s.l.
    • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
    • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
    • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
    • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
    • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
    • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
    • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
    Technology is applied in
    • convex situations
    • concave situations
    • not relevant
    Soil depth
    • very shallow (0-20 cm)
    • shallow (21-50 cm)
    • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
    • deep (81-120 cm)
    • very deep (> 120 cm)
    Soil texture (topsoil)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
    • coarse/ light (sandy)
    • medium (loamy, silty)
    • fine/ heavy (clay)
    Topsoil organic matter content
    • high (>3%)
    • medium (1-3%)
    • low (<1%)
    Groundwater table
    • on surface
    • < 5 m
    • 5-50 m
    • > 50 m
    Availability of surface water
    • excess
    • good
    • medium
    • poor/ none
    Water quality (untreated)
    • good drinking water
    • poor drinking water (treatment required)
    • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
    • unusable
    Water quality refers to:
    Is salinity a problem?
    • Yes
    • No

    Occurrence of flooding
    • Yes
    • No
    Species diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low
    Habitat diversity
    • high
    • medium
    • low

    Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

    Market orientation
    • subsistence (self-supply)
    • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
    • commercial/ market
    Off-farm income
    • less than 10% of all income
    • 10-50% of all income
    • > 50% of all income
    Relative level of wealth
    • very poor
    • poor
    • average
    • rich
    • very rich
    Level of mechanization
    • manual work
    • animal traction
    • mechanized/ motorized
    Sedentary or nomadic
    • Sedentary
    • Semi-nomadic
    • Nomadic
    Individuals or groups
    • individual/ household
    • groups/ community
    • cooperative
    • employee (company, government)
    Gender
    • women
    • men
    Age
    • children
    • youth
    • middle-aged
    • elderly
    Area used per household
    • < 0.5 ha
    • 0.5-1 ha
    • 1-2 ha
    • 2-5 ha
    • 5-15 ha
    • 15-50 ha
    • 50-100 ha
    • 100-500 ha
    • 500-1,000 ha
    • 1,000-10,000 ha
    • > 10,000 ha
    Scale
    • small-scale
    • medium-scale
    • large-scale
    Land ownership
    • state
    • company
    • communal/ village
    • group
    • individual, not titled
    • individual, titled
    Land use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Water use rights
    • open access (unorganized)
    • communal (organized)
    • leased
    • individual
    Access to services and infrastructure
    health

    poor
    good
    education

    poor
    good
    technical assistance

    poor
    good
    employment (e.g. off-farm)

    poor
    good
    markets

    poor
    good
    energy

    poor
    good
    roads and transport

    poor
    good
    drinking water and sanitation

    poor
    good
    financial services

    poor
    good

    Impacts

    Socio-economic impacts
    Crop production
    decreased
    increased

    animal production
    decreased
    increased

    risk of production failure
    increased
    decreased

    energy generation (e.g. hydro, bio)
    decreased
    increased


    Forest wood

    Socio-cultural impacts
    SLM/ land degradation knowledge
    reduced
    improved

    Improved livelihoods and human well-being
    decreased
    increased


    The technology can contribute to education of young farmers.

    Ecological impacts
    soil cover
    reduced
    improved

    soil loss
    increased
    decreased

    biomass/ above ground C
    decreased
    increased

    Risk of overgrazing in the woodland
    increased
    decreased


    Only if grazing is not well controlled

    Off-site impacts
    downstream flooding (undesired)
    increased
    reduced

    downstream siltation
    increased
    decreased

    damage on public/ private infrastructure
    increased
    reduced

    Cost-benefit analysis

    Benefits compared with establishment costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Benefits compared with maintenance costs
    Short-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    Long-term returns
    very negative
    very positive

    It is very cheap to maintain the measure. In the surrounding areas, where land should be less degraded due to reduced grazing, more trees can be planted and allowed to grow in future.

    Climate change

    Gradual climate change
    annual temperature increase

    not well at all
    very well
    Other climate-related consequences
    reduced growing period

    not well at all
    very well

    Adoption and adaptation

    Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
    • single cases/ experimental
    • 1-10%
    • 11-50%
    • > 50%
    Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
    • 0-10%
    • 11-50%
    • 51-90%
    • 91-100%
    Number of households and/ or area covered
    20
    Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
    • Yes
    • No
    To which changing conditions?
    • climatic change/ extremes
    • changing markets
    • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

    Conclusions and lessons learnt

    Strengths: land user's view
    • good animal production

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? the general quality of the products of the grazing (milk, beef and cheese) is improved due to the availability of more grass and water in the driest periods of the year.
    Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
    • good impact with low cost

      How can they be sustained / enhanced? facilitate access to public forest land
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
    • risk of overgrazing of the woodland area, if the area is not well controlled ensure control mechanisms
    • rights of access to public lands and forest management rules the regional legislative process should define better the management of the access of farmers to public lands and in general the whole controlled grazing process.
    Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
    • limited wooded areas available for public access creation of managed enlosures in order to increase natural reforestation or afforestation.

    References

    Compiler
    • Lorenzo Borselli
    Editors
    Reviewer
    • Deborah Niggli
    • Alexandra Gavilano
    Date of documentation: June 5, 2011
    Last update: April 17, 2019
    Resource persons
    Full description in the WOCAT database
    Linked SLM data
    Documentation was faciliated by
    Institution Project
    Key references
    • Official Bulletin of the Basilicata region (Italy): N. 29 – 29/04/2002; N. 22 – 16/06/2008.Cocca C. & Campanile G. (2005). Pascolo in bosco solo se controllato. Agrifoglio, N. 7, pages 20-21.:
    This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International