Alfalfa crop in the blooming phase (National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment (ICPA) - Romania)

Leguminous crop cultivated in plot temporarely set outside the crop rotation (Romania)

Description

Introducing the leguminous crops in crop rotation to improve soil fertility, as field plot set temporarely outside the crop rotation. Crop rotation with legumes is an alternative to rotation containing only cereals.

The technology is applied in Braila region and is located in north-eastern part of Romanian Plain. It has an agricultural area of 387,646 ha (of which 350,001 ha are arable land), and has specific geomorphologic, hydrological and climatic conditions which need to use ameliorative agricultural systems. Within Braila County are distinguished the following relief units: Calmatui Plain, part of the Braila Plain (51% from County area) and the Floodplains of Danube (Big Island of Braila), Siret, Buzau and Calmatui rivers (49% from County area).
Braila Plain is characterized by a specific micro-relief of Baragan type with large floodplains, poorly fragmented, with altitudes ranging between 20-25 m in the east part and 35-40 m to the west part, with soils mainly of chernozem type, formed on loess and loess deposits and which shows numerous small depression areas. Floodplains, areas adjacent to Danube, Siret, Buzau and Calmatui rivers are located at lower altitudes, ranging between 2-4 m and 13-15 m and are characterized by the presence of alluvial soils formed on river-limnic and alluvial deposits, with alternating of layers with different textures. According to United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Braila County is located in arid region with an average annual temperature of 10.9°C, long-term average annual precipitations (P) of 447 mm, potential evapotranspiration (ETP) of 705 mm (750-800 mm in dry years) and an average climatic water deficit of 258 mm (350-400 mm in dry years). The biophysical aridity index (P/ETP = 0.50-0.65) places the Braila region in area with moderate risk to desertification. Both intensive and extensive farming systems are practiced within Braila County. Intensive agriculture, characterized by high inputs and yield levels, is realized on large vegetal farms. On the other hand, extensive agriculture, with low input and yield levels, is practiced by farmers on small vegetal farms, and is so-called the semi-subsistent agriculture.
Crop rotation with legumes (such as alfalfa) is is generally limited to a maximum period of time of 5 to 6 years, providing a plant succesion of spring (generally maize, soybean, sunflower) and winter crops (such as wheat, rapeseed, barley). The technology consists of a crop rotation in which one parcel/field plot is cultivated with perennials legumes and set temporarily outside the crop rotation for 4-5 years. During this period, the field plot cultivated with perennials legumes recovers its fertility by improving the soil aeration status, water infiltration and storage rate and soil aggregate stability. Leguminous crops play an important role in crop rotation because it favors the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen and bind it into the soil with a significant increase in soil fertility. Crop rotation with legumes reduces the biocides use because it breaks the pest cycles and weeds. Leguminous crops also improve the soil structure and its stability, increases water permeability, soil biodiversity and soil quality. At the same time, crop rotation with legumes represents a supplemental income source for land users. After alfalfa baling, this is sold to the nearby livestock breeders.
Crop rotation with legumes has many advantages, such as increase of soil agro-ecosystem biodiversity, reduction of chemical inputs, reduction of soil structure degradation processes, increase of nutrient availability and consequently increase of soil fertility, and increase of farm income. Also in the land user's view, crop rotation with legumes may improve land productivity, even though it increase the costs of inputs and management for crop establishment, and for this reason the land user's awareness is low.

Location

Location: Braila, Braila, Romania

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 27.58161, 45.39581

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Plot with alfalfa next to sunflower plot in a crop rotation of a farm (National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment (ICPA) - Romania)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: cereals - barley, cereals - maize, fodder crops - alfalfa
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
  • physical soil deterioration - Pu: loss of bio-productive function due to other activities
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The technology consists of a crop rotation in which one parcel/field plot is cultivated with perennial crop (alfalfa) and set temporarily outside the crop rotation for 4-5 years. During this period, the field plot cultivated with perennial crop recovers its fertility by improving the soil aeration status, water infiltration and storage rate and soil aggregate stability.
After completing one rotational cycling plan, the field plot cultivated with perennial crop will be set in another plot from the crop rotation, until all the plots of the rotation plan will be cultivated with perennial crop.
Author: National Research and Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environment (ICPA) - Romania

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 1 ha)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4.12
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 17.60 USD
Most important factors affecting the costs
Certified seed material and costs with alfalfa cutting and baling are the most determining factors affecting the costs.
Establishment activities
  1. fertilisation (Timing/ frequency: after harvest of previous crop)
  2. ploughing (Timing/ frequency: after harvest of previous crop)
  3. seedbed preparation (Timing/ frequency: after ploughing)
  4. alfalfa sowing (Timing/ frequency: autumn)
  5. fertilisation (Timing/ frequency: spring)
  6. chemical weeds control (Timing/ frequency: spring - summer)
  7. pest control (Timing/ frequency: spring - summer)
  8. alfalfa cutting (Timing/ frequency: summer)
  9. alfalfa baling (Timing/ frequency: summer)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 1 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labor person-days 3.0 17.6 52.8 100.0
Equipment
fertilisation machine-hours 1.0 13.37 13.37 100.0
ploughing machine-hours 3.0 12.39 37.17 100.0
seedbed preparation machine-hours 2.0 19.67 39.34 100.0
alfalfa sowing machine-hours 1.0 17.32 17.32 100.0
fertilisation machine-hours 1.0 13.37 13.37 100.0
herbicides & pests control machine-hours 2.0 8.4 16.8 100.0
alfalfa cutting machine-hours 1.0 50.96 50.96 100.0
alfalfa baling machine-hours 2.0 36.4 72.8 100.0
Plant material
alfalfa seeds kg/ha 22.0 6.12 134.64 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
complex fertilizers kg/ha 150.0 0.28 42.0 100.0
ammonium nitrate kg/ha 200.0 0.14 28.0 100.0
herbicides l/ha 0.5 13.75 6.88 100.0
biocides l/ha 0.1 110.55 11.05 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 536.5
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 130.22
Maintenance activities
  1. fertilisation (Timing/ frequency: spring)
  2. herbicides & pests control (Timing/ frequency: spring - summer)
  3. alfalfa cutting (Timing/ frequency: summer)
  4. alfalfa baling (Timing/ frequency: summer)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 1 ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
labor person-days 1.0 17.6 17.6 100.0
Equipment
fertilisation machine-hours 1.0 13.37 13.37 100.0
herbicides & pests control machine-hours 2.0 8.4 16.8 100.0
alfalfa cutting machine-hours 1.0 50.96 50.96 100.0
alfalfa baling machine-hours 2.0 36.4 72.8 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
ammonium nitrate kg/ha 200.0 0.14 28.0 100.0
herbicides l/ha 0.5 13.75 6.88 100.0
biocides l/ha 0.1 110.55 11.05 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 217.46
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 52.78

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 447.0
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
fodder production
decreased
increased


Increases competition among feed suppliers in the nearby area, so the animal breeders can have more options of sources from which they can buy feed for animals.

product diversity
decreased
increased


By introducing the alfalfa crop in rotation, the land user diversifies the farm crop plan and also increases the income of the farm by selling alfalfa balls to the nearby animal breeders.

diversity of income sources
decreased
increased


The hay baling production and selling of the hay bales outside the farm is an additional source of income for the land user.

Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
improved


The land user gains knowledge concerning the efficiency of alfalfa in soil protection against degradation processes such as soil organic matter loss.

Ecological impacts
soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
increased


Cultivation of the alfalfa improves the soil organic matter content.

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
increased


Alfalfa plants are attractive to pollinators.

pest/ disease control
decreased
increased


Crop rotation with legumes reduces the biocides use because it breaks the pest cycles and weeds.

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Improve land productivity
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Improve soil fertility, soil structure, organic matter content and biodiversity.
  • Improve natural control of the weeds.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Increase costs of inputs and management for crop establishment increase awareness on long-term about soil benefits and subsidies
  • Land users awareness is low education and training
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • no weakness from compiler's view

References

Compiler
  • Olga Vizitiu
Editors
Reviewer
  • Ursula Gaemperli
  • Gudrun Schwilch
  • Nina Lauterburg
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: July 19, 2017
Last update: June 14, 2019
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International