(Khamzina T. Description: Winter wheat - Legumes - Green manure - Cotton)

Diversification of crops in salinized soils with the introduction of legumes and green manure (Uzbekistan)

Diversification of crops in salinized soils with the introduction of legumes and green manure

Description

Сrop rotation Improvement through the introduction of legumes after harvesting winter wheat and green manure crops in order to reduce land degradation and increase the productivity of irrigated lands

Secondary salinization, decrease in soil organic matter and elements of mineral nutrition of plants are the main indicators of degradation of irrigated arable lands in Uzbekistan. Poor crop rotation is one of the major causes of degradation. Crop rotation “wheat-cotton-wheat” is applied On farm fields: for several years in a row cotton has been cultivated after cotton, or wheat after wheat. After harvesting of winter wheat, plant residues are removed from the fields for economic needs. The field remains fallow since June. The bare land dries up, loses its structure and resistance to soil erosion. Salts from groundwater are pulled up and accumulate in the root zone, which leads to soil salinization and production decrease. Crops diversification improves the existing crop rotation by re-sowing after winter wheat legumes and crops as a green manure/ fertilizer. The improved crop rotation includes the following steps- " winter wheat-legumes (mash, beans) - green manure (rye, etc.) - cotton»: Next, the cycle repeats. The field is under vegetation all year round, unproductive evaporation from the soil surface is reduced, which slows down the development of secondary salinization processes. Plant residues of winter wheat, legumes and green manure plants plowed into the soil replenish humus reserves. The Technology allows to get two crops (wheat and legumes) during the year, which provides land users with additional income from re-culture and contributes to strengthening the country's food security.
Costs of inputs needed for establishment:
The cultivation of repeated crops and green manure is usual, as for other row crops, therefore, local land users are well aware of the methods of preparation and tillage of the technology for growing repeated crops. The Technology does not require large additional financial and labor costs and includes chiseling, harrowing, sowing, cutting irrigation furrows, irrigation, inter-row cultivation. Growing a second crop and green manure will require financial imputs for seed acquisition, sowing and crop care. However, the income received from the re-crop crop (mung bean, beans) is about 4 million Uzbek soums / ha, and fully covers these costs
Natural and human environment:
The technology has been tested on irrigated lands in various agro-climatic zones of Uzbekistan: Kashkadarya, Jizzakh region and in South Karakalpakstan (Beruni, Turtkul and Ellikkala regions). Technology received government support. According to the Decree of the President of the country in 2018, it is planned to place repeated crops of legumes after harvesting winter wheat for 374 thousand hectares. This technology is recommended for use in farms engaged in the cultivation of cotton and winter wheat, within all irrigated areas of the country. The use of irrigation equipment and other methods of an improved surface irrigation method saves the amount of irrigation water

Location

Location: village of Keriz, Jizzakh region, Zarbdar district, Uzbekistan

No. of Technology sites analysed: 2-10 sites

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 68.24097, 40.19353

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: 2002; 10-50 years ago

Type of introduction
Harvesting Winter Wheat (N. Shulepina)
Mung beans re-sowing after Winter wheat harvesting (A. Umirov)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • The main objectives are to improve soil, crop yields and food production
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping
    Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion), Cs: salinization/ alkalinization
  • biological degradation - Bl: loss of soil life
SLM group
  • rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • integrated soil fertility management
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover, A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility

Technical drawing

Technical specifications

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology unit (unit: ha volume, length: 1)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: USD
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 3500.0
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 10 USD
Most important factors affecting the costs
The highest costs relate to the use of machinery, including fuel and mineral fertilizers
Establishment activities
  1. Winter wheat growing activities (Timing/ frequency: October-June)
  2. Bean and siderat re-cultivation activities (Timing/ frequency: July-October)
  3. Plowing, harrowing, levelling (Timing/ frequency: June)
  4. Sowing bean (mash) (Timing/ frequency: The end of June - the beginning of July)
  5. Crop care (cultivation with fertilizer, watering) (Timing/ frequency: July-October)
  6. Harvest (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  7. Plant residues stocking (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  8. Harrowing, levelling and sowing of siderates (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  9. Siderat stocking (Timing/ frequency: April)
  10. Cotton Growing activities (Timing/ frequency: April-October)
Establishment inputs and costs (per ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Hired labor during the growing season (irrigation, crop care, harvesting) USD/ha 1.0 474.2 474.2 100.0
Equipment
Use of machinery (tillage, sowing, cultivation, additional nutrition) USD/ha 1.0 584.5 584.5 100.0
Plant material
Seeds (cotton, wheat, re-crop, green manure) USD/ha 1.0 233.7 233.7 54.5
Fertilizers and biocides
Mineral fertilizers, manure, pesticides, defoliant USD/ha 1.0 559.6 559.6 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'852.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 0.53
Maintenance activities
  1. Winter wheat growing activities (Timing/ frequency: October-June)
  2. Bean and siderat re-cultivation activities (Timing/ frequency: July-October)
  3. Plowing, harrowing, levelling (Timing/ frequency: June)
  4. Sowing bean (mash) (Timing/ frequency: The end of June - the beginning of July)
  5. Crop care (cultivation with fertilizer, watering) (Timing/ frequency: July-October)
  6. Harvest (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  7. Plant residues stocking (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  8. Harrowing, levelling and sowing of siderates (Timing/ frequency: The end of October - the beginning of November)
  9. Siderat stocking (Timing/ frequency: April)
  10. Cotton Growing activities (Timing/ frequency: April-October)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per ha)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (USD) Total costs per input (USD) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Hired labor during the growing season (irrigation, crop care, harvesting) USD/ha 1.0 474.2 474.2 100.0
Equipment
Use of machinery (tillage, sowing, cultivation, additional nutrition) USD/ha 1.0 584.5 584.5 100.0
Plant material
Seeds (cotton, wheat, re-crop, green manure) USD/ha 1.0 233.7 233.7 54.5
Fertilizers and biocides
Mineral fertilizers, manure, pesticides, defoliant USD/ha 1.0 559.6 559.6 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 1'852.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 0.53

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Average annual rainfall in mm: 418.0
90% of the precipitation falls in October-May
Name of the meteorological station: Jizzak
The duration of the growing season is 160 days
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 1.62 tons / ha
Quantity after SLM: 3.18 tons / ha
cotton yields doubled after applying crop diversification system

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased


Increase in income by 500 USD/ ha

workload
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

Ecological impacts
nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased


The assessment was carried out in the second year after the Technology implementation

salinity
increased
x
decreased


The assessment was carried out in the second year after the Technology implementation

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased


The assessment was carried out in the second year after the Technology implementation

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

Quantity before SLM: 2 crops (wheat, cotton)
Quantity after SLM: 4 crops (wheat, cotton, mung bean, winter rye)
Additional cultivation of two crops (mung bean, winter rye again after winter wheat)

Off-site impacts

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

The benefits are already positive in the short term

Climate change

Gradual climate change
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: winter
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: spring
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: summer
seasonal temperature increase

not well at all
x
very well
Season: autumn
annual rainfall decrease

not well at all
x
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local hailstorm

not well at all
x
very well
heatwave

not well at all
x
very well
drought

not well at all
x
very well
insect/ worm infestation

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
x
very well
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Fast high income
  • The ability to produce food crops on the same area
  • Crop Production which is traditionally used in local culture
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • No special training for land users is required (only awareness raising), all activities are based on traditional knowledge
  • Quick income generation: up to 500 USD net income per hectare
  • Local resources and materials are used, no special equipment is required
  • Provides food production
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • Need for additional irrigation water Water conservation
  • The risk of delays with the sowing period (until July 5) and not to get the crop Improve the organization of field work
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Lack of broad information on the costs and inputs of Technology Awareness raising on the costs and benefits of technology on a larger scale
  • Need for additional irrigation water Water conservation provides sufficient water for irrigation of re-crops and siderates (about 1200 m3 / ha)

References

Compiler
  • Rustam Ibragimov
Editors
Reviewer
  • Olga Andreeva
  • Elizaveta Soloveyva
  • Alexandra Gavilano
Date of documentation: April 12, 2018
Last update: Jan. 21, 2020
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Practices And Technologies For Sustainable Use Of Irrigated And RainFed Lands Subject To Salinization And Drought T. Khamzina, T. Mukimov, A. Ismonov, G. Khasankhanova And U. Abdullayev, 2018, Tashkent: "Иклим узгариши шароитида ер ресурсларини баркарор бошкариш" в сборнике статей Республиканского научно-практического семинара
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International