Acacia ampliceps on a dike in severely salt-affected land two years after planting. (Jilayus Sommutram)

Planting of Acacia ampliceps to control severely salt-affected land. (Thailand)

Planting Acacia ampliceps on severely salt-affected land leveled with ditches and dikes.

Description

Acacia ampliceps is a very salt-tolerant species that can grow well in severely salt-affected areas. Land leveling with ditches and dikes is needed, and they are planted along an east-west direction. The technology is very well accepted by land users.

Acacia ampliceps (salt wattle, a leguminous Australian shrub), has been introduced in salt-affected areas in the Northeast of Thailand for the remediation of saline soils. It is a very salt-tolerant plant that grows well on severely salt-affected land. Leveling the land and furnishing with ditches and dikes is needed first, and then the trees are planted in the affected area, along an east-west orientation on the dikes. The technology is very well accepted by land users. Planting such trees in the severely salt-affected land in Kham Tale Sau, Nakhon Ratchasima Province is a subproject of the LDD project on "Planting Perennial Salt-tolerant Trees in Salt-affected Areas in the Northeast of Thailand", which started since 1997. In the subproject, Acacia ampliceps was grown on 68 rai (approx. 11 hectares) covering >50% of the salt patches in heavily salt-affected barren land owned by Mrs. Nurian Tathaisong at Ban Kok Sa-ad Village, Dansay Sub-district, Buayai District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province. In a recent study, after planting the acacia tree in 2015, her land had changed noticeably from its barren state to being covered with trees that provided shade; native grasses had returned to form a source of fodder for her 14 cattle. The purposes of the project have been to maximize the use of the land with a low level of inputs and to decrease salinity to the level that other less salt-tolerant plant species can survive - and crops can be grown for higher income. Eventually it is hoped that better soil properties will be created.
The technology started with locating severely salt-affected sites, leveling the land and furnishing it with ditches and dikes. Each dike is 2 m wide at its base, 0.5 m high, and 1.5 m wide on top. The ditch is 0.5 m deep and 1 m wide. Acacia ampliceps seeds are treated to break the dormancy by soaking in hot water (80°C) for 10 min before planting in the nursery. The 2-month-old seedlings are planted in pits of 0.3 x 0.3x 0.3 metres on the dike, with the addition of 1 kg each of compost and rice husks. Spacing between planting pits is 2 m as a single row in the middle of the dike. According to the land user, 1 year after planting native grasses had returned while the salt crusts had disappeared. At 2-years old, the average plant height was 1.65 m and continued growing, producing 8-10 coppices per tree, and leafy shade for cattle. Acacia ampliceps wood is used to produce charcoal. Three years after planting, the land user had converted 23 rai (approx. 3.7 hectares) of less saline land to paddy fields. After a period of 3 years, the technology induced a better microclimate and richer diversity of flora and fauna species, e.g. wild flowers, native grasses, frogs, dragonflies, earthworms, birds and rats. The fragrant Acacia ampliceps flowers attract bees, thus in the near future the land user intends to undertake apiculture as well as producing essential oil, and making charcoal. The only visible threat to Acacia ampliceps is a forest-fire risk due to its high oil content; fires could cause damage to crops.

Location

Location: Ban Kok Sa-ard, Moo 10 T. Danchang, A. Buayai, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

No. of Technology sites analysed: single site

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 100.91431, 15.86977

Spread of the Technology: applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area

In a permanently protected area?: No

Date of implementation: 2015; less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
The severely salt-affected barren land. (Chakkaphan Phaosrakhu)
Shading and native grasses returned after 3 years of planting Acacia ampliceps. (Chakkaphan Phaosrakhu)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • Desalination
Land use
Land use mixed within the same land unit: No

  • Unproductive land - Specify: Barren land
    Remarks: There are salt crusts in the heavily salt-affected barren land.
Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • chemical soil deterioration - Cs: salinization/ alkalinization
  • physical soil deterioration - Pc: compaction, Pw: waterlogging
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover, Bq: quantity/ biomass decline, Bl: loss of soil life
  • water degradation - Hg: change in groundwater/aquifer level
SLM group
  • improved ground/ vegetation cover
  • desalination
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • structural measures - S1: Terraces
  • other measures

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The technologies start with locating severely salt-affected sites and land leveling with ditches and dikes. The dike is 2 m wide, 0.5 m high, the top of the dike is 1.5 m wide. The ditch is 0.5 m deep and 1 m wide. Acacia ampliceps seeds are treated to break the dormancy by soaking in 80°C hot water for 10 min before planting in the nursery. The 2-month-old seedlings are planted in a pit of 0.3x0.3x0.3 m on the dike, with an addition of 1 kg each of compost and rice husk, at a spacing of 2 m as a single row in the middle of the dike. The ridges are 20 m apart.
Author: Chakkaphan Phaosrakhu

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated: per Technology area (size and area unit: 45 rai; conversion factor to one hectare: 1 ha = 1 ha = 6.25 rai)
  • Currency used for cost calculation: THB
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 32.0 THB
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 300 THB/day
Most important factors affecting the costs
Land Development Department supports the operational budget particularly cost of Acacia ampliceps plantation at first year, then users are in charge of maintenance and forest fire control. At the first year, the initial cost for Acacia ampliceps plantation is about 1,340 THB. This includes: the cost of hired labour on planting process, 600 THB/rai; the cost of young seedlings, approximately 120 THB/rai and the cost of compost, rice husk and chemical fertilizer, about 620 THB/rai. For the expenditure part on the 1st year, there is a hired labour for harvesting fodder in a period of 6 months, approximately 300 THB/rai (from the early to the end of rainy season). However, land user can produce fodder and have grazing land for 14 cattle for around 180 days/yr. Each cattle needs about 30 kg of fodder a day. The cost for the fodder is 1 THB/kg. Land user can save the cost for cattle feeding approx. 5,400 THB/cattle/yr. In conclusion, land user can save the cost for fodder production and grazing land approximately 1,680 THB/rai. For the expenditure part on 2nd and 3rd year, there is fodder harvesting, trimming process and charcoal production. Land users may obtain approx. 10 bags of charcoal that costs 120 THB/bag. Thus, there is a direct income from charcoal production (about 26.7 THB/rai/yr) and an increase of rice production (up to 5%). Land users can have increased income from selling rice at 100 THB/rai. In conclusion, there is a cost of maintenance during 3 years for approx. 900 THB/rai. Part of the income, the land user can have income from the increased rice yield approx. 100 THB/rai/yr. Otherwise, charcoal production can reduce fuel’s expenditure in daily life for approx. 26.7 THB/rai/yr. Fodder production and grazing land can reduce cost of cattle feeding for approximately 1,680 THB/rai/yr. The land user, however, wants to leave the branches of Acacia ampliceps for watertable control and for cattle shading.
Establishment activities
  1. Nursery of Acacia ampliceps. (Timing/ frequency: May-July)
  2. Preparing the pit for planting (Timing/ frequency: May-July)
  3. Planting Acacia ampliceps (Timing/ frequency: May-July)
Establishment inputs and costs (per 45 rai)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (THB) Total costs per input (THB) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Cost of hired labour on planting process (cost of hired labour/ day is 300 THB, 1 rai needs 2 labourers. Hence, the total cost of hired labour is 600 THB) rai 1.0 600.0 600.0
Plant material
Cost of Acacia ampliceps nursery (1 young seedling costs 1.50 THB). 1 rai needs 80 young seedlings. So, the total cost of young seedlings is 120 THB. seedling 80.0 1.5 120.0
Fertilizers and biocides
The cost of compost is 3.5 THB/kg. Rate of application is 0.5 kg/pit kg 40.0 3.5 140.0
The cost of rice husk is 4 THB/kg. Rate of application is 1 kg/pit kg 80.0 4.0 320.0
The cost of chemical fertilizer (15-15-15) is 20 THB/kg. Rate of application is 0.1 kg/pit kg 8.0 20.0 160.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 1'340.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 41.88
Maintenance activities
  1. Forage harvesting after 1 year of Acacia ampliceps plantation (Timing/ frequency: rainy season, 4 times)
Maintenance inputs and costs (per 45 rai)
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (THB) Total costs per input (THB) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Cost of hired labour on trimming process: 1. The cost of hired labour: 300 THB/8-hr day and 2. Trimming process for 1 rai requires 4 hours each time, twice a year. Hence, the total cost of hired labour on trimming process is 300 THB/rai/yr) time 2.0 150.0 300.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 300.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 9.38

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
Name of the meteorological station: Meteorological Department
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
x
good
education

poor
x
good
technical assistance

poor
x
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
x
good
markets

poor
x
good
energy

poor
x
good
roads and transport

poor
x
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
x
good
financial services

poor
x
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
x
increased

crop quality
decreased
x
increased

fodder production
decreased
x
increased

fodder quality
decreased
x
increased

animal production
decreased
x
increased

wood production
decreased
x
increased

forest/ woodland quality
decreased
x
increased

non-wood forest production
decreased
x
increased

risk of production failure
increased
x
decreased

product diversity
decreased
x
increased

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
x
increased

land management
hindered
x
simplified

energy generation (e.g. hydro, bio)
decreased
x
increased

drinking water availability
decreased
x
increased

drinking water quality
decreased
x
increased

water availability for livestock
decreased
x
increased

water quality for livestock
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water availability
decreased
x
increased

irrigation water quality
decreased
x
increased

demand for irrigation water
increased
x
decreased

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
x
decreased

farm income
decreased
x
increased

diversity of income sources
decreased
x
increased

workload
increased
x
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
x
improved

health situation
worsened
x
improved

land use/ water rights
worsened
x
improved

cultural opportunities (eg spiritual, aesthetic, others)
reduced
x
improved

recreational opportunities
reduced
x
improved

community institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

national institutions
weakened
x
strengthened

SLM/ land degradation knowledge
reduced
x
improved

conflict mitigation
worsened
x
improved

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
x
improved

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
x
increased

water quality
decreased
x
increased

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
x
improved

surface runoff
increased
x
decreased

excess water drainage
reduced
x
improved

groundwater table/ aquifer
lowered
x
recharge

evaporation
increased
x
decreased

soil moisture
decreased
x
increased

soil cover
reduced
x
improved

soil loss
increased
x
decreased

soil accumulation
decreased
x
increased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
x
reduced

soil compaction
increased
x
reduced

nutrient cycling/ recharge
decreased
x
increased

salinity
increased
x
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C
decreased
x
increased

acidity
increased
x
reduced

vegetation cover
decreased
x
increased

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
x
increased

plant diversity
decreased
x
increased

invasive alien species
increased
x
reduced

animal diversity
decreased
x
increased

beneficial species (predators, earthworms, pollinators)
decreased
x
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
x
increased

pest/ disease control
decreased
x
increased

flood impacts
increased
x
decreased

landslides/ debris flows
increased
x
decreased

drought impacts
increased
x
decreased

impacts of cyclones, rain storms
increased
x
decreased

emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
increased
x
decreased

fire risk
increased
x
decreased

wind velocity
increased
x
decreased

micro-climate
worsened
x
improved

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
x
increased

reliable and stable stream flows in dry season (incl. low flows)
reduced
x
increased

downstream flooding (undesired)
increased
x
reduced

downstream siltation
increased
x
decreased

groundwater/ river pollution
increased
x
reduced

buffering/ filtering capacity (by soil, vegetation, wetlands)
reduced
x
improved

wind transported sediments
increased
x
reduced

damage on neighbours' fields
increased
x
reduced

damage on public/ private infrastructure
increased
x
reduced

impact of greenhouse gases
increased
x
reduced

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
x
very positive

Plantation cost in the 1st year is the main cost; the rest is the maintenance cost after 1-2 years of the growing period, including weed control. All kinds of weed can be used for raising animals. Hence, there is not much maintenance cost after establishing the Acacia trees.

Climate change

Climate-related extremes (disasters)
drought

not well at all
x
very well
forest fire

not well at all
x
very well
land fire

not well at all
x
very well
flash flood

not well at all
x
very well
Other climate-related consequences
extended growing period

not well at all
x
very well
reduced growing period

not well at all
x
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
4,665 rai (approx. 745 ha)
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)
  • Acacia ampliceps plantation
The farmer attempted to grow Acacia ampliceps on the leveled land with two methods. The first one: 1) To grow by removing the plastic bag and 2) To grow without removing the plastic bag. The farmers found that removing the plastic bag before planting is better, as the plant growth will not be disrupted.

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • 1) Desalination to 40% after 3 years of planting;
  • 2) Branches of Acacia ampliceps are used as forage and for producing charcoal;
  • 3) The plants provide shade, with increased air humidity, resulting in a better atmosphere to live in; and
  • 4) The plants increase the amount of flora, especially the forage crop.
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • 1) Desalination, thus preventing the spread of salt-affected soil;
  • 2) To increase rice yield and, thus, farmers’ income;
  • 3) To induce better microclimate and biodiversity of both flora and fauna species, e.g. wild flowers, native grasses, frogs, dragonflies, earthworms, birds and rats.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
  • One year after Acacia ampliceps planting, farmers had to investigate their technology, to prevent their technology from animal and fire attack. 1) The farmer had to investigate his technology, to prevent their technology from trapping animals. They have to build firebreak.
  • None 2) The farmer should request his neighbors who raise buffalos and cows to prevent their animals from destroying the technology.
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • Farmers who do not join this project do not know how to plant Acacia ampliceps on farm dikes. Moreover, they do not know where to buy the seeds. Thus, LDD officers or farmers who are engaged with this project have to inform them. LDD officers or farmers who are engaged with this project have to educate other farmers.

References

Compiler
  • Chakkaphan Phaosrakhu
Editors
Reviewer
  • Samran Sombatpanit
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
  • William Critchley
Date of documentation: Oct. 29, 2018
Last update: Jan. 7, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
Key references
  • Land Development Department: http://www.ldd.go.th/ LDD project on planting perennial salt-tolerant trees in salt-affected areas in Northeast Thailand, Mr. Pramote Yamklee,2005
  • LDD project on planting perennial salt-tolerant trees in salt-affected areas in the Northeast. Thailand, Mr. Pramote Yamklee,2005: http://www.ldd.go.th/Lddwebsite/web_ord/Technical/HTML/Technical03030.html
Links to relevant information which is available online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International