Apple tree with irrigation tube (Alab Abdulqodirov)

Irrigation of orchards by using low cost drip irrigation technique (Tajikistan)

Обёрикунии богхо бо истифода аз технологияи обзахиракунии камнарх

Description

Irrigation of a young orchard using locally available and low-cost materials for a drip irrigation system in the Pamir’s arid zone

The system consists of a reservoir and polyethylene irrigation tubes and emitters installed along the rows of trees. Water accumulates in the reservoir during spring and early summer when there is no deficit in irrigation water. During the dry summer months water is then used for drip irrigation. Located in the upper part of the system, the reservoir ensures water pressure in the system. Due to the complex local topography, this irrigation method can be used without water pumps since natural water pressure ensures normal functioning of the system. Even though this water saving technology is quite effective, drip irrigation is rarely used since both the construction and maintenance of the system are quite expensive. With the introduction of this technology into the poor mountain communities of GBAO, the overall objective was to make drip irrigation technology cheaper and more easily available to farmers. The objective was achieved by the use of simple polyethylene irrigation tubes, simple screws instead of expensive emitters, and natural water pressure excluding the construction of a water pump station. Water is dripped directly to the roots of the trees, thus excluding loss of water and soil erosion. Fertilisers can be added directly to the water reservoir. This technology allows increased water savings of 50%, and 90% of fertilisers. During the growing period trees are watered once every 6 days.

Purpose of the Technology: The purpose of this technology is to improve the water supply for fruit orchards during the growing period in the arid conditions of the Pamirs where available water is very limited.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Steps to implement the technology include the following: dig holes for trees, plant trees, establish water reservoir, lay polyethylene tubes, install emitters and regularly clean irrigation system.

Natural / human environment: The plot is located in an arid zone at the height of 2000m above sea level. It is a high mountain area with typical brown soils and slopes up to 60 degrees steepness. Annual precipitation is quite low and mainly occurs in the autumn and winter period. Summers are extremely dry. The main occupations of the local population include agriculture and cattle breeding.

Location

Location: Shugnan, GBAO, Tajikistan

No. of Technology sites analysed:

Geo-reference of selected sites
  • 71.5191, 37.5832

Spread of the Technology: evenly spread over an area (approx. < 0.1 km2 (10 ha))

In a permanently protected area?:

Date of implementation: less than 10 years ago (recently)

Type of introduction
Drip irrigation polyethylene tube with screw (Alab Abdulqodirov)

Classification of the Technology

Main purpose
  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • protect a watershed/ downstream areas – in combination with other Technologies
  • preserve/ improve biodiversity
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • mitigate climate change and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact
  • create beneficial social impact
  • adapt to enviroment
Land use

  • Cropland
    • Annual cropping: fodder crops - alfalfa
    • Tree and shrub cropping: stone fruits (peach, apricot, cherry, plum, etc), tree nuts (brazil nuts, pistachio, walnuts, almonds, etc.), pome fruits (apples, pears, quinces, etc.)
    Number of growing seasons per year: 1

Water supply
  • rainfed
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated
  • full irrigation

Purpose related to land degradation
  • prevent land degradation
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
  • adapt to land degradation
  • not applicable
Degradation addressed
  • biological degradation - Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
  • water degradation - Ha: aridification
SLM group
  • irrigation management (incl. water supply, drainage)
SLM measures
  • agronomic measures - A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
  • vegetative measures - V1: Tree and shrub cover
  • management measures - M4: Major change in timing of activities

Technical drawing

Technical specifications
The system consists of a reservoir and polyethylene irrigation tubes and emitters installed along the rows of trees.

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase / maintain water stored in soil, water harvesting / increase water supply

Secondary technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), water spreading, increase of biomass (quantity), promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)

Aligned: -linear
Vegetative material: F : fruit trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 400
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 3
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 3

Fruit trees / shrubs species: apricot, peach, european walnut, apple

Perennial crops species: alfalfa

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 8.00%

Establishment and maintenance: activities, inputs and costs

Calculation of inputs and costs
  • Costs are calculated:
  • Currency used for cost calculation: Tajik Somony
  • Exchange rate (to USD): 1 USD = 4.45 Tajik Somony
  • Average wage cost of hired labour per day: 3.00
Most important factors affecting the costs
equipment for irrigation system (polyethylene tubes)
Establishment activities
  1. tree planting (Timing/ frequency: first year)
  2. mounting of drip irrigation system (Timing/ frequency: before planting)
Establishment inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tajik Somony) Total costs per input (Tajik Somony) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Tree planting Persons/day 2.0 11.0 22.0 100.0
Mounting of drip irrigation system Persons/day 5.0 25.2 126.0
Equipment
Tools pieces 5.0 1.2 6.0 100.0
Other Tools pieces 5.0 2.2 11.0
Polyethylene tube meters 2200.0 0.445454545 980.0
Watertank pieces 1.0 600.0 600.0
Plant material
Tree seedlings pieces 360.0 0.675 243.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer kg 10.0 1.7 17.0 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 2'005.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 450.56
Maintenance activities
  1. sanitary cutting of trees (Timing/ frequency: every 3-5 years)
  2. hay harvest (Timing/ frequency: three time per year)
  3. unclogging the irrigation tubes (Timing/ frequency: every year)
Maintenance inputs and costs
Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit (Tajik Somony) Total costs per input (Tajik Somony) % of costs borne by land users
Labour
Sanitary cutting of trees Persons/day 0.6 16.66667 10.0 100.0
Hay harvest Persons/day 1.0 9.0 9.0 100.0
Unclogging the irrigation tubes Persons/day 1.0 11.0 11.0
Equipment
Tools (Scissors) pieces 2.0 2.5 5.0 100.0
Tool for harvesting pieces 1.0 2.0 2.0 100.0
Tools for unclogging tubes pieces 2.0 2.25 4.5 100.0
Polyethylene tube meters 56.0 0.445454545 24.95 100.0
Water tank repair 1.0 10.0 10.0 100.0
Plant material
Seedlings tree replacement pieces 15.0 0.675 10.13 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides
Fertilizer kg 10.0 1.7 17.0 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 103.58
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 23.28

Natural environment

Average annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • humid
  • sub-humid
  • semi-arid
  • arid
Specifications on climate
260mm per year, winter summer rains. Length of dry period is about 120 days.
Thermal climate class: temperate. 2 mounth below 5°C and 6 mounth above 10°C
Slope
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitude
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Technology is applied in
  • convex situations
  • concave situations
  • not relevant
Soil depth
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface)
  • coarse/ light (sandy)
  • medium (loamy, silty)
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter content
  • high (>3%)
  • medium (1-3%)
  • low (<1%)
Groundwater table
  • on surface
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Availability of surface water
  • excess
  • good
  • medium
  • poor/ none
Water quality (untreated)
  • good drinking water
  • poor drinking water (treatment required)
  • for agricultural use only (irrigation)
  • unusable
Water quality refers to:
Is salinity a problem?
  • Yes
  • No

Occurrence of flooding
  • Yes
  • No
Species diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low
Habitat diversity
  • high
  • medium
  • low

Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation
  • subsistence (self-supply)
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
  • commercial/ market
Off-farm income
  • less than 10% of all income
  • 10-50% of all income
  • > 50% of all income
Relative level of wealth
  • very poor
  • poor
  • average
  • rich
  • very rich
Level of mechanization
  • manual work
  • animal traction
  • mechanized/ motorized
Sedentary or nomadic
  • Sedentary
  • Semi-nomadic
  • Nomadic
Individuals or groups
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
  • cooperative
  • employee (company, government)
Gender
  • women
  • men
Age
  • children
  • youth
  • middle-aged
  • elderly
Area used per household
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Scale
  • small-scale
  • medium-scale
  • large-scale
Land ownership
  • state
  • company
  • communal/ village
  • group
  • individual, not titled
  • individual, titled
Land use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Water use rights
  • open access (unorganized)
  • communal (organized)
  • leased
  • individual
Access to services and infrastructure
health

poor
good
education

poor
good
technical assistance

poor
good
employment (e.g. off-farm)

poor
good
markets

poor
good
energy

poor
good
roads and transport

poor
good
drinking water and sanitation

poor
good
financial services

poor
good

Impacts

Socio-economic impacts
Crop production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 45kg per ha
Quantity after SLM: 80kg per ha
water availability increase production of fruits

fodder production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 5 centner/ha
Quantity after SLM: 20 centner/ha
grass between rows used for fodder

fodder quality
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: bad
Quantity after SLM: high
before natural grass - after alfa alfa

animal production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 2- 5per hose
Quantity after SLM: 6-15 per hose
increase of fodder production stimulate livestock development

wood production
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0.5 m3/hose
Quantity after SLM: 1-5m3/hose
sanitary cutting of tress

risk of production failure
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 100%
increased water availability

production area (new land under cultivation/ use)
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 10%
Quantity after SLM: 70%
technology helps to use steep slopes

expenses on agricultural inputs
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 50%

farm income
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 10%
Quantity after SLM: 80%
increased harvest

Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
reduced
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: None

conflict mitigation
worsened
improved

Quantity before SLM: 50%
Quantity after SLM: 0%
decreased conflict related to irrigation water use

situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups (gender, age, status, ehtnicity etc.)
worsened
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 50%
increased incomes of poor farmers

Livelihoods and human well-being
reduced
improved


After the implementation of the technology the households were protected from negative influence of dry season.

Ecological impacts
water quantity
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 10%
Quantity after SLM: 60%

harvesting/ collection of water (runoff, dew, snow, etc)
reduced
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 100%

surface runoff
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 100%
Quantity after SLM: 0%
all the water can be absorbed by soil

evaporation
increased
decreased

Quantity before SLM: 0
Quantity after SLM: 10%
transpiration of trees and grass

soil moisture
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 80%
during the dry season

soil cover
reduced
improved

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 20%

soil loss
increased
decreased

soil crusting/ sealing
increased
reduced

soil compaction
increased
reduced

biomass/ above ground C
decreased
increased

plant diversity
decreased
increased

habitat diversity
decreased
increased

Hazards towards adverse events
improved
reduced

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 100%
reduced dry season effect

Off-site impacts
water availability (groundwater, springs)
decreased
increased

Quantity before SLM: 0%
Quantity after SLM: 50%

Cost-benefit analysis

Benefits compared with establishment costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Benefits compared with maintenance costs
Short-term returns
very negative
very positive

Long-term returns
very negative
very positive

Increase of irrigation water availability will improve agricultural production and cover all the expenses that were needed for the establishment of the irrigation system

Climate change

Gradual climate change
annual temperature increase

not well at all
very well
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
local rainstorm

not well at all
very well
local windstorm

not well at all
very well
drought

not well at all
very well
general (river) flood

not well at all
very well
Other climate-related consequences
reduced growing period

not well at all
very well

Adoption and adaptation

Percentage of land users in the area who have adopted the Technology
  • single cases/ experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have done so without receiving material incentives?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Number of households and/ or area covered
18 households (area is 10 ha)
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
  • Yes
  • No
To which changing conditions?
  • climatic change/ extremes
  • changing markets
  • labour availability (e.g. due to migration)

Conclusions and lessons learnt

Strengths: land user's view
  • Increase water resources for irrigation of orchards
Strengths: compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
  • Increases water saving up to 50%
  • Opportunity to irrigate orchards during droughts and dry spells (when there is no irrigation water available)
  • Opportunity to apply this technology on steep slopes
  • Reservoir can be filled with rainwater

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? through installation of rainwater harvesting system
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: land user's viewhow to overcome
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks: compiler’s or other key resource person’s viewhow to overcome
  • The system has to be regularly cleaned from sediments use filters to clean water from sediments

References

Compiler
  • Aslam Qadamov
Editors
Reviewer
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • David Streiff
  • Joana Eichenberger
Date of documentation: April 11, 2011
Last update: Nov. 2, 2021
Resource persons
Full description in the WOCAT database
Linked SLM data
Documentation was faciliated by
Institution Project
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International