Soil productivity improvement and BXW control in epidemically affected banana zone [Tanzania, United Republic of]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: ALLAN BUBELWA
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Ursula Gaemperli, David Streiff
technologies_1204 - Tanzania, United Republic of
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
Pesha
Kyerwa District Council
Tanzania, United Republic of
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
The Transboundary Agro-ecosystem Management Project for the Kagera River Basin (GEF-FAO / Kagera TAMP )Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Missenyi District Council (Missenyi District Council) - Tanzania, United Republic ofName of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Bukoba district council (Bukoba district council) - Tanzania, United Republic ofName of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Kyerwa District Council - Tanzania, United Republic of1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
25/07/2014
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology
Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?
No
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Restoring banana production through temporal crop substitution and the use of SLM and recommended husbandry practices in controlling the deadly BXW disease.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
This conservation measure is used in BXW epidemically affected areas. Land users in affected areas are trained on the principle behind the diseases and means and ways to overcome it. Banana plants in seriously affected farms are uprooted and destroyed and non disease host crops usually maize and common beans are grown for starvation and destruction of BXW pathogen. The land is not used for banana production for a period of 6 months and instead substitute crops ensures food and income security to land users. Leguminous cover crops (beans) and crop residual management skills applied on the farm revitalize the soil health in terms of biomass, moisture and nutrient recycling. After 6 months, banana production is resumed where production is based on recommended husbandry practices combined with SLM conservation measures. The use of certified banana cultivars, optimal plant geometry and disease control cultural practices are some of the basic recommendation. Certified banana cultivars are planted at a space of 3m x 3m. The size of a hole used to plant banana is 0.9x0.9 m wide and 0.6 deep. During digging top soil is separated from subsoil. 2 -3 tins of manure are mixed with the top soil and the mixture is put in the bottom of the hole. The holes are left for microbial decay to take place and banana planting is done after 1 or 2 months. The tied Fanya chini water retention ditches are water harvesting and conserving structures constructed by digging trenches along the contour where dug soil is thrown to the lower side to form an embankment that prevents soil from falling back in. A-FRAME method is used to mark a contour line and on the other hand ARM OUTSTRETCHED LEVEL method determines how far apart the Fanya chini retention ditch should be. Unlike other retention ditches, the dug ditches are not continuous but instead are tied at regular interval with small cross–ties of 0.4-0.6m length. Ties intercept the ditch at right angle to form a series of narrow rectangular segments of infiltration ditches each of 5 meters long, 0.6m wide and 0.6m deep arranged in series within a contour line. Ties helps to prevent irregular flow of runoff and to ensure an evenly distribution of captured water. Fanya chini embankments are stabilized by planting crops on them the common crops are pigeon pea (space used between plant is stand is 1m x 1m), lemon grass (30cm x 30cm) or pineapples (60cm x 60cm). Mulching is done using grasses. The dominant grass species used is Hyperrenia rufa where a mulching depth of 15 cm is used.
Purpose of the Technology: PURPOSE: Improved food and fodder productivity, soil moisture and water holding capacity, nutrient recycling, and organic matter content, biomass cycle, crop tolerance to drought, income and food security, poverty reduction and health. Prevent unproductive evaporation of green water, combating soil erosion by water runoff and biological degradation due the deadly BXW disease.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: ESTABLISHMENT: procurement and mobilization of working tools, uprooting and destruction of infected plants in affected fields, land tilling and harrowing, planting of alternative crops or creation of a productive disease free buffer zone, temporal harvesting of maize and beans, land preparation/ demarcation and spacing of holes for resumed banana planting, digging holes, manure application before planting, banana planting, demarcation of contour line for construction of Fanyachini contours with ties, digging and construction of Fanya chini contours with ties, vegetative stabilization of Fanya chini bunds (using lemon grass, pineapples or pigeon pea), random planting of castor oil plants for future anchoring support of plants with heavy bunches and mulching application. MAINTENANCE: hand weeding to control noxious weeds combined with other pest and disease control (control of nematodes and weevils), de-suckering to leave the mother plant and two baby plants, de-trashing or trimming of unproductive leaves, regular removal/de-bud of inflorescence (male bud) using a forked wooden pole once the bunch is completed to prevent BXW transition through insect vector , recurrent manure application, removal of sediments and maintenance of Fanyachini bunds, harvest of bananas, maize, pineapples and pigeon pea. INPUTS USED: largely includes labour (strenuously varying from light, medium and heavy), tools (hand hoe, forked hole, machetes, sickles, spade, mattock and A-frame), seedlings; improved or certified banana varieties, pineapples suckers, lemon grass and castor oil, seeds (beans, maize and pigeon pea), farm yard manure and mulching materials (preferably Hyperennial spps).
Natural / human environment: NATURAL ENV: The land use type is cropland with annual, perennial and some fruit tree crops. The technology involves a combination of agronomic, vegetative, structural and management conservation measures. Management measure involves all activities related to temporal shift to alternative crops for making the farm disease hot free and for staving and destroying the disease pathogen. Climatic zone is sub-humid with an average of 210 days of growing period (LGP). Average slope category is gentle lying between 2-5%. A soil texture class is sandy loam with medium depth categories. HUMAN ENV: the level of mechanization is hand tools. Production system is mixed (both subsistence and market or commercial oriented). The average costs of inputs required is 3015.68 USD. Land ownership is largely individual not titled and partly communal.
2.3 Photos of the Technology
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Tanzania, United Republic of
Region/ State/ Province:
Kagera Region Tanzania
Further specification of location:
Kyerwa District Council
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- more than 50 years ago (traditional)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):
This is one of the technologies tested and demonstrated under the support of the Trans Boundary Agro Ecosystem Management Project. Analysis and documentation of this technology is based on perspectives and experiences of field SLM specialist and FFS group members.
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
- create beneficial economic impact
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Annual cropping
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):
major cash crop: Coffee and bananas
major food crop: Maize, beans, root crops and bananas
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Major land problems without land conservation are BXW disease, poor soil fertility, and moisture stress and soil erosion.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): BXW disease.
Type of cropping system and major crops comments: Banana is the major food crop but in the recent years the crop was substituted by maize and beans due the out break of BXW.
3.3 Further information about land use
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- rainfed
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 120; Longest growing period from month to month: September to December; Second longest growing period in days: 90; Second longest growing period from month to month: March to May
3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)
- crop substitution
3.5 Spread of the Technology
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
- 0.1-1 km2
Comments:
The area includes the totality of all farms of FFS members who applied the technology after being trained.
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
- A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
- A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
vegetative measures
- V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
- V5: Others
structural measures
- S11: Others
management measures
- M7: Others
Comments:
Specification of other vegetative measures: Use of leguminous plants
Specification of other structural measures: Water retension ditches with fanya chini bunds and ties.
Specification of other management measures: Temporal substitution of a dominant crop by non disease host crops for pathogen distruction
Type of agronomic measures: mulching, manure / compost / residues
Type of vegetative measures: aligned: -contour
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
biological degradation
- Bp: increase of pests/ diseases, loss of predators
water degradation
- Ha: aridification
Comments:
Main causes of degradation: soil management (Flat cultivation on slopy land and nutrient mining without replenishment), crop management (annual, perennial, tree/shrub) (Poor practices that encourage spread of BXW.), disturbance of water cycle (infiltration / runoff) (No use of cross slope barriers.), change in temperature (Unproductive loos of green water due direct hit of of the soil by sunshine), change of seasonal rainfall (Due to climatic change and variability), poverty / wealth (Incapacity to invest in capital heavy conservation measures), labour availability (Rural to Urban migration of the enegetic youths), inputs and infrastructure: (roads, markets, distribution of water points, other, …) (High input expenses.), education, access to knowledge and support services (Ignorance of SLM and shortage of field extension workers.), governance / institutional (Low capacity of rural based environmental/land committees)
Secondary causes of degradation: droughts (Due unpredictable climatic change and variability), population pressure (Continuous land fragmentation)
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
- restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
Comments:
Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate (Most of the concepts and principles were taught to field/agricultural advisers at the college.)
Technical knowledge required for land users: high (New innovations and change of mind set is crucial e.g. the use of A-frame, the principle behind BXW and cultural methods of controlling the disease.)
Main technical functions: control of raindrop splash, control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, reduction of slope length, improvement of ground cover, stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, water spreading, increase of biomass (quantity)
Secondary technical functions: promotion of vegetation species and varieties (quality, eg palatable fodder)
Mulching
Material/ species: Hyperania grass
Quantity/ density: 15 m3 /ha
Remarks: Across the slope
Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: Farm Yard Manure
Quantity/ density: 40ton/ha
Remarks: 3 tin applied to each banana plant.
Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: C : perennial crops
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.6
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.6
Trees/ shrubs species: pegion peas
Fruit trees / shrubs species: Pineapples
Grass species: lemmon grass
Retention/infiltration ditch/pit, sediment/sand trap
Vertical interval between structures (m): 12
Spacing between structures (m): 12
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 70
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.3
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.6
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 70
Construction material (earth): Soil
Other type of management: Temporal substitution of the a diseased plant with other non-host plants for staving and complete wipe out of the disease causing pathogen. (BXW affected bananas substituted with maize and beans)
4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
Specify currency used for cost calculations:
- US Dollars
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
2.353
4.4 Establishment activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Procurement and mobilization of working tools | Management | |
2. | Initial manure application (before banana planting) | Management | |
3. | Initial banana seedlings (certified varieties) | Management | |
4. | Initial mulching application | Management | |
5. | Uprooting and destruction of infected banana plants in affected fields. | Agronomic | Before onstart of rain |
6. | Land tilling and harrowing. | Agronomic | Before onstart of rain |
7. | Planting of alternative crops (maize and beans) for starving and killing the pathogen. | Vegetative | After the first rains (usually September) |
8. | Demarcation of contour line using A-frame for construction of Fanya chini retention ditches with ties. | Structural | December |
9. | Digging and construction of Fanya chini retention ditches with ties. | Structural | December |
10. | Planting of lemon grass , pineapples and pigeon peas on bunds. | Vegetative | After constrution of fanya chini retension ditches with ties |
4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Planting of lemon grass, pineapples and pigeon peas | persons/day | 5.0 | 2.353 | 11.77 | 100.0 |
Labour | Demarcation of contour line | persons/day | 7.0 | 2.26857 | 15.88 | 100.0 |
Labour | Digging and construction of Fanya | persons/day | 10.0 | 2.353 | 23.53 | 100.0 |
Labour | Uprooting and destruction of infected banana plants | persons/day | 11.0 | 2.353 | 25.88 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Procurement and mobilization of working tools | ha | 1.0 | 76.47 | 76.47 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Lemon grass and pidgeon seeds | kgs | 5.0 | 2.94 | 14.7 | |
Plant material | Pineapple seedlings | pieces | 513.0 | 0.0588304 | 30.18 | |
Plant material | Initial banana seedlings | pieces | 660.0 | 0.441181818 | 291.18 | |
Plant material | Maize and bean seeds | kgs | 81.0 | 0.947654 | 76.76 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | Initial mulching application | bundles | 900.0 | 0.1764666 | 158.82 | |
Fertilizers and biocides | Initial manure application | tons | 28.0 | 10.084 | 282.35 | |
Other | Labour: Land tilling and harrowing | persons/day | 11.0 | 2.353 | 25.88 | 100.0 |
Other | Planting of alternative crops | persons/day | 9.0 | 2.353 | 21.18 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 1054.58 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 9 month(s)
4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Land preparation, demarcation and spacing of holes for resumed banana planting and hole digging for planting bananas | Agronomic | Before onstart of rain |
2. | Manure application before planting Banana | Agronomic | Before onstart of rain |
3. | Banana planting | Agronomic | one to two months after manure application |
4. | Recurrent mulching application | Agronomic | once per season |
5. | Hand weeding to control noxious weeds, De-suckering, De-trashing and trimming | Agronomic | April and December |
6. | Regular removal/de-bud of inflorescence (male bud) using a forked wooden pole once the bunch is completed to prevent BXW transition through insect vector | Agronomic | Routinely as need be |
7. | Recurrent manure application | Agronomic | September/October |
8. | Banana harvesting | Agronomic | Routinely after mature |
9. | Weeding and gap filling of lemon grass, pineapples and pigeon peas. | Vegetative | April |
10. | harvesting of lemon grass, pineapples and pigeon peas | Vegetative | |
11. | Removal of sediments and reshaping/maintenance of Fanya chini retention ditches with ties. | Structural | May |
12. | Weeding and thinning | Management | (twice) first and second |
13. | Harvesting of maize and beans. | Management | January/February |
4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Land preparation, demarcation and spacing of holes for resumed banana planting | persons/day | 35.0 | 2.353 | 82.36 | 100.0 |
Labour | Manure application before planting Banana | persons/day | 33.0 | 2.353 | 77.65 | 100.0 |
Labour | Banana planting | persons/day | 13.0 | 2.353 | 30.59 | 100.0 |
Labour | Recurrent mulching applicatio | persons/day | 6.0 | 2.205 | 13.23 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Mulching material | bundles | 900.0 | 0.176464 | 158.82 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost/manure | tons | 16.0 | 13.235 | 211.76 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Labour: Maintenance of Fanya chini | persons/day | 3.0 | 2.353 | 7.06 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Labour: Weeding an thinning | persons/day | 12.0 | 2.05916 | 24.71 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Labour: Harvesting of maize and beans | persons/day | 12.0 | 2.05915 | 24.71 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Hand weeding to control noxious weeds | persons/day | 15.0 | 2.353 | 35.3 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Regular removal/de-bud of inflorescence | persons/day | 15.0 | 2.353 | 35.3 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Recurrent manure application | persons/day | 22.0 | 2.353 | 51.77 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Banana harvesting | persons/day | 16.5 | 2.353 | 38.82 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Weeding and gap filling of lemon grass, pineapples and pigeon peas | persons/day | 7.0 | 2.353 | 16.47 | 100.0 |
Other | Labour: Harvesting of lemon grass, pineapples and pigeon peas | persons/day | 7.0 | 2.353 | 16.47 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 825.02 |
Comments:
Machinery/ tools: Hand hoe, forked hole, machetes, sickles, spade and mattocks and forked wooden poles., Hand hoe, forked hole and machetes, hand hoe, forked hole, machetes, spade, mattock and A-frame, hand hoe, forked hole, machetes, sickles, spade and mattock.
The above cost were calculated per unit of one land user's land (1.5 acres) where the technology was applied and estimate also done per hectare.
4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
Manure is the most determinant factor
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- sub-humid
Thermal climate class: tropics. average temperature is 21°C
Average length of growing period is 210 days.
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil texture (topsoil): The average soil texture is sandy loam
Topsoil organic matter: Low use and application of mulching and cover crops
Soil fertility is low due to continue washout of the soil surface with rainfall runoff
Soil drainage / infiltration is medium because slope effect minimize the time required for water to infiltrate into the soil.
Soil water storage capacity is low because of low amount of humus and underused of mulching
5.4 Water availability and quality
Ground water table:
5-50 m
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- low
Comments and further specifications on biodiversity:
Only a few perennials and annual crops and minimal fauna diversity due to the washout of organic matter by rainfall runoff
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
- rich
Individuals or groups:
- individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
- manual work
Gender:
- women
- men
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 10-50 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 0.5% - 1%
15% of the land users are rich and own 15% of the land.
70% of the land users are average wealthy and own 80% of the land.
15% of the land users are poor and own 5% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: Some of the land users who are using the technology are running petty business and groceries (selling local brew).
Level of mechanization: Dominated by the use of small tools/implements.
5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- small-scale
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, not titled
Land use rights:
- individual
Water use rights:
- open access (unorganized)
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
Quantity before SLM:
5 fingers
Quantity after SLM:
12 fingers
Comments/ specify:
Increased banana yield due to use of SLM and good husbandry practices
risk of production failure
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Risk due to low moisture
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Caused by the use of mulching and manure
farm income
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Income accrued from increased production and diversification to pineapples and lemon grass
workload
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Attributable to added tasks from use of SLM
Socio-cultural impacts
health situation
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Improved nutrition from e.g. introduction of pineapples
community institutions
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Use of FFS have induced togetherness and group working spirit
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
SLM knowledge and skills gained through FFS trainings
situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Indiscriminate participation of all genders, age and ethnicity
livelihood and human well-being
Comments/ specify:
Initially the technology has resulted to increased production, diversification to production of other income generating crops and dietary enrichment crops. The overall result is farmers capacity to meet education and health expenses
attraction to theiving
Quantity before SLM:
high
Quantity after SLM:
low
Comments/ specify:
Good looking banana bunches attract thieving
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
Quantity before SLM:
high
Quantity after SLM:
low
Comments/ specify:
Use of mulching and water retension ditches
Soil
soil moisture
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Following use of mulching and manure
soil cover
Quantity before SLM:
40%
Quantity after SLM:
90%
Comments/ specify:
Improved soil coved caused by the use of grass mulching
soil loss
Comments/ specify:
Controll of soil erosion attributable to use of mulching and construction of water retension ditches.
nutrient cycling/ recharge
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Use of luguminous plants, application of manure and mulching
soil organic matter/ below ground C
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Use of manure
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
biomass/ above ground C
Quantity before SLM:
40%
Quantity after SLM:
90%
Comments/ specify:
Biomass result from use of mulching and improved managment of crop residuals
animal diversity
Comments/ specify:
Increased richness of soil fauna caused by the use of manure
pest/ disease control
Quantity before SLM:
0%
Quantity after SLM:
95%
Comments/ specify:
Control of BXW
Climate and disaster risk reduction
drought impacts
Quantity before SLM:
high
Quantity after SLM:
low
Comments/ specify:
Increased tolerance to drought and BXW infestation
emission of carbon and greenhouse gases
Comments/ specify:
Managment of crop residues and manure
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
buffering/ filtering capacity
Quantity before SLM:
low
Quantity after SLM:
high
Comments/ specify:
Of the neighbouring Kashasha wetland
damage on neighbours' fields
Quantity before SLM:
high
Quantity after SLM:
low
Comments/ specify:
Attributable to use of closs slope barriers
damage on public/ private infrastructure
Quantity before SLM:
high
Quantity after SLM:
low
Comments/ specify:
Attributable to use of closs slope barriers
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Gradual climate change
Gradual climate change
Season | Type of climatic change/ extreme | How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|---|---|
annual temperature | increase | well |
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Meteorological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
local rainstorm | not known |
local windstorm | not known |
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
drought | well |
Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
general (river) flood | not well |
Other climate-related consequences
Other climate-related consequences
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
reduced growing period | well |
Comments:
Retention ditches supported with ties to prevent flow of water and to encourage evenly distribution of water. The fanya chini bunds are stabilized by planting vegetation on them (pineapples, pigeon peas and lemon grass).
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
Comments:
The high investment costs cause slight realization of rewards but in the long run very positive benefits are realized by land users.
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- more than 50%
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
42 households covering 77 percent of the stated area
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 10-50%
Comments:
42 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support
Comments on acceptance with external material support: Supplied with banana suckers, farm yard manure and grass mulch.
42 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
Comments on spontaneous adoption: land users who received suckers from neighbors but procured grass mulch and manure.
There is a strong trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: most of the land users are impressed with the results attributable to the technology in terms of control of BXW, increased banana production, control of soil erosion and promising increase in income.
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
The technology useful to the community and is easy to learn. |
Encouraging results in terms of improved productivity and general performance of banana and other crops like coffee within the technology area attributable to use of technology. |
The technology has made significant achievement in terms of decrease of BXW infestation. |
Soil health has improved as the result of use of mulching materials, manure, leguminous plants and application water harvesting cross slope barriers. |
There is positive change of mind set towards the use of SLM |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Good and attractive crops that consumers are willing to purchase at a high price have resulted to emergence of thieving. | Spread the technology and supply improved banana suckers to other farmers so that more farmers are engaged in banana production. Strengthen community police. |
The technology initially is labour and capital intensive | Encourage group working spirit. |
Unplanned Changes of service providers which may fall in the hands of untrustworthy service providers. | Pluralism in service delivery should be planned with doubly consciousness to take care of untrustworthy service providers. |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- field visits, field surveys
- interviews with land users
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules