Gully control (gabions) at Maandagshoek [South Africa]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Igmé Wilhelm Terblanche
- Editor: –
- Reviewer: David Streiff
Donga control, Maandagshoek Soil Conservation Project
technologies_1378 - South Africa
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Action Green Heritage (Action Green Heritage) - South Africa1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
01/04/1999
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
1.5 Reference to Questionnaire(s) on SLM Approaches
Interactive community approach, biodiversity increase. [South Africa]
Community involvement
- Compiler: Igmé Wilhelm Terblanche
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Stone walls and re-vegetation (planting of indigenous trees) = Rehabilitation
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
For the pilot project loose stones and sometimes concrete walls that work well were used. It is not more expensive than gabions, because a trucker is needed for gabions and it is labour intensive. Wire is also often stolen off the gabions.
The following steps were followed in this technology:
The areas are fenced, barricades (gabion like structure) erected, and planting done. Rehabilitation and environmental education was the overall purpose. Severe erosion dongas can be improved and used for controlled grazing.
The request came from the Communities, they would like to make money and make land available for Nature reserves (it is seen as a status symbol). Hunting by professional hunters and meat for biltong. The excess game goes to hunting (local) and the meat is sold to the community at a lower price. Very little poaching or damage to the fences occurs.
Looking after the fences, roads, gabions and water points (infrastructure) are all part of the maintenance. The Nature reserves are actually surrounded by villages, but there are no problems of people going into the Reserves.
The areas are classified as Nature Reserve - Savannah woodlands (Acock’s veld type: 19), Nebo - transitional zone between 61 and 18 (Acock’s veld type 61) and Sekhukuhne as mixed bushveld (Acock’s 19).
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
South Africa
Region/ State/ Province:
Limpopo Province
Further specification of location:
Nebo District, Sekhukhuneland
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- less than 10 years ago (recently)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through projects/ external interventions
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- conserve ecosystem
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Grazing land
Extensive grazing land:
- Ranching
Main animal species and products:
Game
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Overpopulation (big pressure on veld), poor veld management (overgrazing), poor people. Population density most important factor.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Not enough land, or water for basic needs, agricultural development. Infrastructure was in place in 1964, Government did a lot of training, but there is not much left of anything.
Before the new Government (from 1990) things went downhill. People unsure about their future.
Ranching: Game
Grazingland comments: Trend towards ecotourism, more positive reaction to it.
Type of grazing system comments: Trend towards ecotourism, more positive reaction to it.
3.3 Further information about land use
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 1
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 150; Longest growing period from month to month: Oct - Feb
3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- nature conservancy system
3.5 Spread of the Technology
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
- 10-100 km2
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is Nebo Distr km2.
Former homeland area, communal grazing. SWC technology could also be applied outside of the Nature reserves. Big part of the Northern Province is similar to this area.
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
vegetative measures
management measures
Comments:
Main measures: management measures
Secondary measures: vegetative measures, structural measures
Type of vegetative measures: scattered / dispersed
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
- Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
water degradation
- Ha: aridification
Comments:
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion, Ha: aridification
Main causes of degradation: overgrazing, other human induced causes (specify) (Agricultural causes - Poor land-use practice), poverty / wealth (Lack of captial)
Secondary causes of degradation: deforestation / removal of natural vegetation (incl. forest fires), over-exploitation of vegetation for domestic use, other natural causes (avalanches, volcanic eruptions, mud flows, highly susceptible natural resources, extreme topography, etc.) specify (Soil types, especially in the eastern areas), education, access to knowledge and support services (Lack of knowledge), Lack of enforcement of legislat./authority (Becoming a bigger problem (is already a problem))
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
Comments:
Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation, mitigation / reduction of land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting
Secondary technical functions: reduction of slope angle
Scattered / dispersed
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 150
Trees/ shrubs species: Tree species: adapt technology – no soil. Bigger holes, cattle manure (local available) and mixed
Other species: Botusantes speciosus, Peltophorum africanum Mainly this two species, also some Figus ingens
Structural measure: gabion
Construction material (stone): Started with big one and made it smaller (job creation)
Change of land use practices / intensity level: Fencing the area off
4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
other/ national currency (specify):
Rand
Indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (if relevant): 1 USD =:
6.0
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
3.50
4.4 Establishment activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Dig a hole | Vegetative | |
2. | Plant the seedling | Vegetative | |
3. | Watering | Vegetative | |
4. | Collecting stones | Structural | Before rainy season |
5. | For concrete structures, fix it on the side (dig in) | Structural | |
6. | Fencing the area off | Management | |
7. | Reintroducing of game (Government paid for this) | Management |
4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Construction of gabions and planting | ha | 1.0 | 3100.0 | 3100.0 | |
Equipment | Machine use | ha | 1.0 | 210.0 | 210.0 | |
Plant material | Tree seedlings | ha | 1.0 | 625.0 | 625.0 | |
Construction material | Fencing | ha | 1.0 | 210.0 | 210.0 | |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 4145.0 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 36 month(s)
4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Watering | Vegetative | For some months / |
2. | Bring loose stones back after very heavy storms | Structural | Rainy season/Once a year |
4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Comments:
5ha, concrete was used; land was given by the community, it was not possible to use it for something else (before rehabilitation); in other cases government paid 100% for the nature reserve and the pilot project
4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
Got funding only for a part of the area for one year. Then in the next year more funding, but never sure if enough funding will be available.
5 ha at Chuniespoort more expensive (concrete walls used). The costs for the community are the given land they couldn’t used for grazing anymore.
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- semi-arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Comments and further specifications on topography:
Slopes on average: Gentle for Potlake and rolling for Nebo
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- medium (1-3%)
- low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil depth on average: Very shallow in Mantrombi, except behind the gabion and deep in Nebo
Soil texture: Coarse especially behind gabion
Soil fertility is low for Mantrombi, except silt deposit and medium for the rest
Topsoil organic matter is low for Mantrombi, but improving and medium for the rest
Soil drainage / infiltration is good
Soil water storage capacity is low for Maandagshoek, medium for Potlake and good for Nebo
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- commercial/ market
Off-farm income:
- 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- very poor
- poor
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 200-500 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
(shop owners, doctors, etc).
40% of the land users are poor and own 40% of the land.
60% of the land users are poor and own 60% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: Working people are in towns, people who are living in the rural areas are children, women, and old people.
Market orientation of production system: Trends towards ecotourisme, more positive reaction to it. Game meat always popular, and becoming more regularly available to community. If it is available, they will go for it. Set area apart.
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- communal/ village
Land use rights:
- communal (organized)
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
fodder production
Comments/ specify:
Mantrombi
fodder quality
Comments/ specify:
Mantrombi
wood production
Comments/ specify:
Potlake
production area
Comments/ specify:
Not used for domestic livestock
Income and costs
farm income
Comments/ specify:
Game meat
Other socio-economic impacts
thatch grass
Comments/ specify:
Mantrombi
Socio-cultural impacts
recreational opportunities
Comments/ specify:
Convince people of department, that something is possible to work in black areas
community institutions
national institutions
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Comments/ specify:
Bigger awareness through Olifants River Forum
Environmental education
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
excess water drainage
Soil
soil moisture
soil cover
soil loss
Other ecological impacts
biodiversity
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
downstream siltation
Comments/ specify:
In principal significant
groundwater/ river pollution
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly negative
Long-term returns:
slightly negative
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
Nature Reserves a possible income |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Reduce siltation for whole catchment (dam build in 1965 silted up in ±20 years!) |
For recovery of vegetation and made wasteland available again for grazing |
Retain water for aquifer and household uses. |
Nature Reserves: Increase in biodiversity & income for community. |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
High cost for fencing etc. | |
Soil conservation project – temporarily loss of land |
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
Interactive community approach, biodiversity increase. [South Africa]
Community involvement
- Compiler: Igmé Wilhelm Terblanche
Modules
No modules