Rubagano rooftop rainwater harvesting system (with concrete/brick tank) [Uganda]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Wilson Bamwerinde
- Editor: –
- Reviewer: Fabian Ottiger
Okwombeka tanka z'amaizi ahamaju (Runyankore)
technologies_1595 - Uganda
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:
1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
05/12/2013
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Rain-water from all corrugated iron roof structures in one compound is harvested and stored in underground tanks.
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Despite high precipitation (>1200 mm), Rubagano still experiences water shortage. It is hilly, with steep (>30%) to very steep (>58%) slopes. Rain water runs off to the valleys below, causing erosion and damaging infrastructure such as roads along its course. There is little rain water infiltration and the ground water level low. The few boreholes that government constructed in the area are often dry. Therefore women and children normally walk distances of up to 4 km to fetch water which, in many cases, is actually runoff dammed behind a concrete wall built across an open rock patch. To alleviate water scarcity, farmers have been mobilized by Kagera TAMP project to harvest the rain water from their own roofs. Because water sources are far from most households, rooftop water harvesting has a very high utility for the farmers. Adoption is high.
Purpose of the Technology: The primary goal of the technology is to increase household water availability. It also reduces runoff, produces water for the tree nursery and backyard gardens..
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Requirements for harvesting water on an iron roof are water collection gutters and an underground tank. Rain falling on the roof flows into collection gutters constructed around the roof which angle gently away from the house and end at one or more underground tanks. Excavation and construction of the storage tank is costly and requires well qualified artisans. These are trained locally and are available within the community to minimize costs. The underground tank is constructed by excavating the ground between 3.0 m and 3.5 m deep and 2.0 m to 2.5 m diameter. Thus, a small tank will have a capacity of 38,000 litres (38 cubic metres). The bottom and walls of the pit is then built up throughout with brick and mortar. The top is a concrete slab with 2 openings of 0.3 m diameter, one connected to the gutters and the other through which a plastic container is lowered to fetch water. Though establishment costs appear high for farmers, the longer term benefits outweigh the original cost. Once established the maintenance costs are limited to periodic cleaning.
Natural / human environment: Heavy rainstorms may blow the gutters out of position.
2.3 Photos of the Technology
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Uganda
Region/ State/ Province:
Uganda
Further specification of location:
Mbarara District (Rubagano, Mwizi)
Comments:
Boundary points of the Technology area: -0.85203 30.62232; -0.85850 30.62204; -0.85792 30.62021
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- less than 10 years ago (recently)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through projects/ external interventions
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):
Major cash crop perennial (non-woody) cropping: Banana
Major food crop perennial (non-woody) cropping: Banana
Major cash crop tree and shrub cropping: Coffee
Waterways, waterbodies, wetlands
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Loss of vegetation, soil erosion and very low ground water level. Difficulty in finding access to water for domestic use, livestock and crop irrigation.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Women and children walk very long distances in search of water from permanent natural wells.
3.3 Further information about land use
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- rainfed
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 120 Longest growing period from month to month: September to December Second longest growing period in days: 90 Second longest growing period from month to month: February to May
3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- water harvesting
3.5 Spread of the Technology
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 0.001 m2.
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
structural measures
- S5: Dams, pans, ponds
Comments:
Main measures: structural measures
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
water degradation
- Hs: change in quantity of surface water
- Hp: decline of surface water quality
Comments:
Main type of degradation addressed: Hs: change in quantity of surface water, Hp: decline of surface water quality
Main causes of degradation: soil management (Removal of vegetation cover), deforestation / removal of natural vegetation (incl. forest fires) (Forests harvested for fuel wood, charcoal, agriculture etc.), other natural causes (avalanches, volcanic eruptions, mud flows, highly susceptible natural resources, extreme topography, etc.) specify (Steep slopes increase the speed of runoff and soil erosion)
Secondary causes of degradation: change of seasonal rainfall (Climate change effects of human activity), droughts (Longer dry spells as a result of climatic changes), poverty / wealth (Cannot afford manure or fertilizers to make soil more productive so forest is cut to create more agricultural land)
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Author:
Byonabye Proscovia, Kabale, Uganda
4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing
Details of rainwater harvesting system: roof catchment, gutters and underground storage tank
Location: Rubagano, Mwizi Sub-county, Mbarara District. Uganda
Date: 18 December 2013
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate
Technical knowledge required for land users: low (Artisan's work once the land user has decided on the size of the water tank required)
Main technical functions: water harvesting / increase water supply
Secondary technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: drain / divert, water spreading
Dam/ pan/ pond
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): d=3.0
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): r=2.0
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): n/a
Specification of dams/ pans/ ponds: Capacity 38m3
Catchment area: 900 m2m2
Beneficial area: 900 m2m2
For water harvesting: the ratio between the area where the harvested water is applied and the total area from which water is collected is: 1:0.1
4.3 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
other/ national currency (specify):
UGX
Indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (if relevant): 1 USD =:
2500.0
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
10.00
4.4 Establishment activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Tank construction | Structural | Throughout the year |
2. | Procurement and raising of collection gutters | Structural | Throughout the year |
3. | Wooden poles | Structural | Throughout the year |
4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 500.0 | 500.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Wood | ha | 1.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Bricks | ha | 1.0 | 400.0 | 400.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Cement | ha | 1.0 | 420.0 | 420.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Sand | ha | 1.0 | 160.0 | 160.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 1526.0 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 2 month(s)
4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Tank maintenance (above ground) | Structural | Once a year |
2. | Gutter replacement | Structural | Twice a year |
3. | Wooden poles | Structural | Twice a year |
4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Wood | ha | 1.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Bricks | ha | 1.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Cement | ha | 1.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 100.0 |
Construction material | Sand | ha | 1.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 216.0 |
Comments:
Machinery/ tools: Pick-axe, hand hoe, panga
The calculations were done for a 38.0 cubic meter tank constructed in September 2013
4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
Skilled labor for the construction of the underground tank
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Specifications/ comments on rainfall:
Average annual rainfall for Rubagano is >1200 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- sub-humid
Thermal climate class: tropics
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Comments and further specifications on topography:
Altitudinal zone: 1501-2000 m a.s.l (Ranked 1, rubagano has an average altitude of 1700 m a.s.l) and 1001-1500 m a.s.l. (ranked 2)
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil fertility: Low (ranked 1) and medium (ranked 2)
Soil drainage/infiltration: Medium
Soil water storage capacity: Medium (ranked 1) and low (ranked 2)
5.4 Water availability and quality
Ground water table:
> 50 m
Availability of surface water:
poor/ none
Water quality (untreated):
poor drinking water (treatment required)
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- low
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- subsistence (self-supply)
- mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
Individuals or groups:
- individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
- manual work
Gender:
- women
- men
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users
Population density: 50-100 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
1% of the land users are very rich and own 10% of the land.
15% of the land users are rich and own 20% of the land.
80% of the land users are average wealthy and own 65% of the land (Have an iron roof house, some livestock and land for cultivation).
4% of the land users are poor and own 5% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: Similar statistics for all types of land users as far as off-farm income is concerned
Level of mechanization: Manual work (All land is cultivated manually)
Market orientation of production system: Mixed (ranked 1, most farmers cultivate banana plantations for subsistence and commercial use) and subsistence (ranked 2, a few farmers cultivate for subsisce)
5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- small-scale
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, not titled
Land use rights:
- individual
Water use rights:
- open access (unorganized)
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
wood production
risk of production failure
production area
Water availability and quality
drinking water availability
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
farm income
Socio-cultural impacts
food security/ self-sufficiency
health situation
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
situation of socially and economically disadvantaged groups
Comments/ specify:
Women and children
Improved livelihoods and human well-being
Comments/ specify:
Women and children no longer have to walk long distances in search of water.
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
water quantity
water quality
harvesting/ collection of water
surface runoff
evaporation
Soil
soil moisture
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
plant diversity
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
water availability
downstream flooding
damage on public/ private infrastructure
Comments/ specify:
E.g. Roads
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Gradual climate change
Gradual climate change
Season | Type of climatic change/ extreme | How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|---|---|
annual temperature | increase | well |
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Meteorological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
local rainstorm | well |
local windstorm | well |
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
drought | not well |
Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
general (river) flood | well |
Other climate-related consequences
Other climate-related consequences
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
reduced growing period | well |
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
negative
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
neutral/ balanced
Long-term returns:
very positive
Comments:
The technology may appear expensive to the farmer at the time of establishment but it is cost-effective in the long-term.
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
25
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many have did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 50-90%
Comments:
20% of land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support
5 land user families have adopted the Technology with external material support
80% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
20 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: Regardless of the high costs involved, improved water security has encouraged farmers to adapt the technology.
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
Makes water for drinking and domestic use more readily available to the household How can they be sustained / enhanced? Encourage adoption and maintenance through farmer-to-farmer information |
Saves women and children from walking long distances in search of clean water How can they be sustained / enhanced? Empower women and children to demand and obtain rooftop water harvesting at home |
Rooftop harvested water is cleaner than trapped runoff used by many members of the community How can they be sustained / enhanced? Help households to acquire materials for rooftop water harvesting |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
Technology is expensive to establish | Support government and private sector to subsidize tanking systems for farmers |
Requires technical expertise especially in concrete preparation to prevent cracks and leakages | Ensure farmers who express the need to adapt get access to construction technicians |
7. References and links
7.2 References to available publications
Title, author, year, ISBN:
Kagera TAMP project website
Available from where? Costs?
www.fao.org/nr/kagera/en
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules