Pasture Mangt. through Removal of comiphora [Kenya]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Unknown User
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: David Streiff, Alexandra Gavilano
Kumya Makuu (Kikamba)
technologies_1489 - Kenya
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Pasture management and improvement through weeding comiphora
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
The comiphora trees are ring barked at 2 feet high for the whole plant to die. This gives room for desired species to grow, retain moisture and add soil fertility through its decay. The land can also be given surface treatment through contour shallow ripping and dispersed grass seeding with desired species.
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Kenya
Region/ State/ Province:
Eastern
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, specify area covered (in km2):
0.04
If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:
- < 0.1 km2 (10 ha)
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 0.04 km2.
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- more than 50 years ago (traditional)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)
Comments (type of project, etc.):
From the land users
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
- Improve soil fertility
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Grazing land
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Reduction of the palatable grass species due to bush encroachment
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): DISAPPEARANCE OF SOME PALATABLE GRASS SPECIES AND SOIL EROSION
Grazingland comments: used to be communally grazing system, but has changed to individual
Type of grazing system comments: used to be communally grazing system, but has changed to individual
Number of growing seasons per year: 2
Longest growing period in days: 70 Longest growing period from month to month: Oct - Dec Second longest growing period in days: 60 Second longest growing period from month to month: Mar May
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- improved ground/ vegetation cover
- improved plant varieties/ animal breeds
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
water degradation
- Ha: aridification
Comments:
Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content, Ha: aridification
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: improvement of ground cover
Secondary technical functions: increase in soil fertility, Emergence of palatable spp
Change of land use type: From the land users
Other type of management: pasture management - From the land users
4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
other/ national currency (specify):
Kenya shillings
If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:
70.0
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
1.00
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | Barkringing of comiphora trees | dry season |
2. | fencing/restricting livestock | dry and wet seasons |
3. | shallow ripping | dry |
4. | reseeding | rainy season |
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | controlled grazing | all seasons / annually |
2. | repair of fence | dry season / annually |
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Comments:
per hectare of land management
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
labour for bark ringing and fencing depending on the dencity of the comiphora
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- semi-arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Comments and further specifications on topography:
Slopes on average: Not more than 8%
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
- low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil texture: Coarse/ light (sandy) with tiny stones
Soil fertility is medium with controlled erosion
Topsoil organic matter is low due to limited vegetation cover
Soil drainage / infiltration is good because of sandy soil
Soil water storage capacity is low
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 10-50 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
100% of the land users are average wealthy and own 100% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: most of the landuser depend on the farms
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, titled
Land use rights:
- leased
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
Quantity before SLM:
20
Quantity after SLM:
8
Soil
soil loss
Quantity before SLM:
3
Quantity after SLM:
1
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
positive
Long-term returns:
very positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- 1-10%
If available, quantify (no. of households and/ or area covered):
7 households in an area of 0.4 ha
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 91-100%
Comments:
2% of land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
7 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
Comments on spontaneous adoption: estimates
There is a little trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: men land owners ring bark comiphora as they graze animal. Usally they are 50-60 years old and those with many.
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
7.2 References to available publications
Title, author, year, ISBN:
Farm management hanbook of Kenya
Available from where? Costs?
MOA Nairobi
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules