Mulching of perrenial crops [Uganda]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Alex Lwakuba
- Editor: –
- Reviewer: Fabian Ottiger
technologies_989 - Uganda
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
SLM specialist:
Emasu Ogwella
MAAIF
Agricultural department, Wera Subcounty, Private Bag, Katakwi
Uganda
SLM specialist:
Ajaru Ali Alias
MAAIF
Kuju subcounty, Katakwi District, PO Box 102 Entebbe.
Uganda
Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries of Uganda (MAAIF) - Uganda1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
18/04/2000
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
mulching of perrenial crops (Banans and pineapples) to conserve moisture
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Dry vegetation is used to mulch bananas and pineapples.
Purpose of the Technology: To conserve soil moisture which is a major constraint in the area.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Maintenance: Termites usually destroys the mulch material, this mulch materials are replaced.
Natural / human environment: the technology is an agronomic measure applied on perrenial crops in a semi arid area. Mainly to conserve soil moisture which is very limiting. The soil type is predominantly sandy free drained shallow and medium to low fertility.
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Uganda
Region/ State/ Province:
Kumi/Soroti/Katakwi
Further specification of location:
Kumi/Soroti/Katakwi
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- less than 10 years ago (recently)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):
through the farmers own intiative.
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- conserve ecosystem
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Annual cropping
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
Main crops (cash and food crops):
Major cash crop perennial tree and shrub cropping: Pineapples, bananas, groundnuts
Major food crop perennial tree and shrub cropping: Cassava millet, sorghum
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Soil erosion, Fertility decline, hard pan.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Soil erosion, fertility decline, underlying gravel
3.3 Further information about land use
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 90 Longest growing period from month to month: Mar - Jun Second longest growing period in days: 60 Second longest growing period from month to month: Aug - Dec
3.4 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- improved ground/ vegetation cover
3.5 Spread of the Technology
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If the Technology is evenly spread over an area, indicate approximate area covered:
- 10-100 km2
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 30 m2.
Area includes all farmers who have adopted
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
Comments:
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.2 Technical specifications/ explanations of technical drawing
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate
Technical knowledge required for land users: low
Main technical functions: increase / maintain water stored in soil
Secondary technical functions: improvement of ground cover, increase of infiltration
Mulching
Material/ species: grass leaves, stovers
Quantity/ density: 6'' depth
Remarks: full cover on the beds across the slopes
Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: cowdung, ash, fym, water
4.5 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Animal traction | ha | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 500.0 | 500.0 | |
Equipment | Machine use | ha | 1.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Seedlings | ha | 1.0 | 190.0 | 190.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost manure | ha | 1.0 | 360.0 | 360.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 1145.0 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)
4.6 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Type of measure | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Clear site, make channels, dig holes for bananas, place compost | Agronomic | dry season / once |
2. | Plant grass | Agronomic | first rains / each cropping season |
3. | Collecting of mulch | Agronomic | dry season / each cropping season |
4. | Mulching | Agronomic | dry / frequently |
4.7 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Seedlings | ha | 1.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 100.0 |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost/manure | ha | 1.0 | 360.0 | 360.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 440.0 |
Comments:
Machinery/ tools: hoes, machette, plough, spade, tape measure, garden rake
dimension of structure is 32 * 40 M, plot size is 20 * 5 M, channels are 0.6 * 0.6 M deep, banana holes are 0.3 * 0.3 M
4.8 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
labour and tool are expensive
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- semi-arid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
Topsoil organic matter:
- low (<1%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil fertility: Low
Soil drainage/infiltration: Good
Soil water storage capacity: Very low
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- mixed (subsistence/ commercial
Off-farm income:
- 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- average
- rich
Level of mechanization:
- manual work
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 50-100 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 1% - 2%
1% of the land users are rich and own 5% of the land.
2% of the land users are average wealthy and own 10% of the land.
75% of the land users are poor and own 75% of the land.
22% of the land users are poor and own 10% of the land.
Off-farm income specification: only petty trade
5.7 Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, not titled
- individual, titled
Land use rights:
- individual
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
Income and costs
farm income
workload
Other socio-economic impacts
On farm employment
Socio-cultural impacts
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Ecological impacts
Soil
soil moisture
soil cover
soil loss
Climate and disaster risk reduction
wind velocity
Other ecological impacts
Good Environment
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
downstream flooding
wind transported sediments
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly negative
Long-term returns:
positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly negative
Long-term returns:
positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
Comments:
There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: trend growing moderately
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
improved soil moisture |
added nutrients |
maintenance of soil fertility |
soil conservation |
weedin cost reduced |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
increase in soil moisture |
additional nutrients How can they be sustained / enhanced? adding fermented urine |
improved fertility How can they be sustained / enhanced? add manure |
soil conservation |
suppression of weeds |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
same as above |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
financial constraints | obtain grants |
labour constrains | use termite repellants |
mulch destroyed by termites |
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules