Ridge bund [Ethiopia]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Unknown User
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Fabian Ottiger, Alexandra Gavilano
Ketara (Oromigna)
technologies_1046 - Ethiopia
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
it is an embankment of soil constructed along the contour on crop lands
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
Ridge bund is an earth enbankment constructed along the contour inorder to control runoff. The technique can be stablize using suitable plant species, forage and fruit trees.
Purpose of the Technology: To obtain maximum sustained level of production from a given area of land by reducing runoff and soil loss below thrushold level and maintain soil moisture.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: it involves massive movment of earth and it requires substantial inputs of labour during establishment, while during maintenance relatively lower input is required but it requires frequent maintenance.
Natural / human environment: enhance vegetation growth, increases ground water recharging, reduce dawn slope damage
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Ethiopia
Region/ State/ Province:
West Hararghe, Oromia
Further specification of location:
Habro
Comments:
Total area covered by the SLM Technology is 39.37 km2.
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
If precise year is not known, indicate approximate date:
- more than 50 years ago (traditional)
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- as part of a traditional system (> 50 years)
Comments (type of project, etc.):
they learn from their ancestors
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- improve production
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Annual cropping
- Perennial (non-woody) cropping
- Tree and shrub cropping
Annual cropping - Specify crops:
- cereals - maize
- cereals - sorghum
- legumes and pulses - peas
- chickpea
Tree and shrub cropping - Specify crops:
- coffee, open grown
- catha.edulis, cordia africana, erythrina abyssinica, chat
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 2
Specify:
Longest growing period in days: 120 Longest growing period from month to month: May - AugSecond longest growing period in days: 60Second longest growing period from month to month: Mar - Apr
Is intercropping practiced?
Yes
If yes, specify which crops are intercropped:
maize
Comments:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): soil erosion, gully formation, losses of soil fertility
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): soil erosion, water scarcity, decreasing of productivity
Type of cropping system and major crops comments: perenial crops are planted between the structures and the annual crops are grown on the structures
3.4 Water supply
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- rainfed
Comments:
Water supply: post-flooding
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- cross-slope measure
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by water
- Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
- Wg: gully erosion/ gullying
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
water degradation
- Ha: aridification
Comments:
Main type of degradation addressed: Wt: loss of topsoil / surface erosion
Secondary types of degradation addressed: Wg: gully erosion / gullying, Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content, Ha: aridification
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- reduce land degradation
Comments:
Secondary goals: prevention of land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
Oromia
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: low
Technical knowledge required for land users: high
Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap
Secondary technical functions: reduction of slope length, increase of infiltration
Mixed cropping / intercropping
Material/ species: maize
Quantity/ density: 7000
Remarks: 0.5m x 3m
Aligned: -contour
Vegetative material: C : perennial crops
Number of plants per (ha): 1400
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 3
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 2
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.75
Scattered / dispersed
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs
Number of plants per (ha): 50
Trees/ shrubs species: cordia africana, erythrina abyssinica
Perennial crops species: coffee, catha edulis/chat
Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 9.00%
Bund/ bank: level
Spacing between structures (m): 3m
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.5m
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 1.5m
Length of ditches/pits/dams (m): 40m
Height of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.35m
Width of bunds/banks/others (m): 0.7m
Length of bunds/banks/others (m): 40m
Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 9%
Vegetation is used for stabilisation of structures.
4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
other/ national currency (specify):
Birr
If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:
8.0
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
1.00
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | ploughing | dry season and onset of rain |
2. | pit preparation | dry season and onset of rain |
3. | plantation | rain season |
4. | layout | onset of rain |
5. | diging of ditches along the contour | onset of rain |
6. | shape the structure by increasing its height | onset of rain |
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 200.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | Planting | ha | 1.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | |
Labour | Weeding | ha | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | |
Labour | Pitting | ha | 1.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | |
Equipment | Animal traction | ha | 1.0 | 56.0 | 56.0 | |
Equipment | Tools | ha | 1.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Seeds | ha | 1.0 | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
Fertilizers and biocides | Fertilizer | ha | 1.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost/manure | ha | 1.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 443.5 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 55.44 |
Comments:
Duration of establishment phase: 12 month(s)
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | breaking compacted soils | onset of rain / 3 times |
2. | mixed cropping | rain season / each cropping season |
3. | collection of animal dung and plant residues | onset of rainfall / each cropping season |
4. | weeding | rainy season /each cropping season |
5. | reshape the brocken structure | onset of rain/each cropping season |
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Labour | ha | 1.0 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 100.0 |
Plant material | Seeds | ha | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
Fertilizers and biocides | Fertilizer | ha | 1.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | |
Fertilizers and biocides | Compost/manure | ha | 1.0 | 80.0 | 80.0 | |
Other | Weeding | ha | 1.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 155.0 | |||||
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD | 19.38 |
Comments:
Machinery/ tools: shovel, hoe
the cost depends on the specification of the structure (length, width and height) and it was assumed that 3km ridge bund is constructed on a hectar of cultivated land.
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
high labour requirment affects the cost of the technique
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
- sub-humid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- coarse/ light (sandy)
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Soil fertility is medium-low
Soil drainage/infiltration is good
Soil water storage capacity is high-medium
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Market orientation of production system:
- subsistence (self-supply)
- mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
Off-farm income:
- 10-50% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- poor
- average
Level of mechanization:
- manual work
- animal traction
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:
Population density: 100-200 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
10% of the land users are very rich and own 25% of the land.
50% of the land users are average wealthy and own 50% of the land.
30% of the land users are poor and own 20% of the land.
10% of the land users are poor and own 5% of the land.
5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- state
Land use rights:
- individual
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
wood production
production area
land management
Income and costs
farm income
economic disparities
workload
Other socio-economic impacts
Input constraints
Socio-cultural impacts
community institutions
national institutions
SLM/ land degradation knowledge
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
Quantity before SLM:
20
Quantity after SLM:
10
excess water drainage
Soil
soil moisture
soil cover
soil loss
Quantity before SLM:
42
Quantity after SLM:
20
Other ecological impacts
Biodiversity
Soil fertility
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
reliable and stable stream flows in dry season
downstream flooding
downstream siltation
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
negative
Long-term returns:
positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
positive
Long-term returns:
positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 91-100%
Comments:
9458 land user families have adopted the Technology without any external material support
Comments on spontaneous adoption: survey results
There is a strong trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: better production is only possible if one can practice the technique on her/his field, therefore the adoption of the technique is one of the strategy for survival
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
control soil erosion How can they be sustained / enhanced? maintain the structure |
maintain soil moisture How can they be sustained / enhanced? maintain the ditches |
increase productivity |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
erosion control How can they be sustained / enhanced? frequent manitenance of the structure |
moisture maintenance How can they be sustained / enhanced? maintain the dithes |
reduction of slope length How can they be sustained / enhanced? proper layout and construction of the structure |
increase infiltration rate |
increase the productivity of land per unit area |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
labour consuming | group work |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
no standard specification | through extension |
labour consuming |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules