Organic agriculture with vegetable and arable crops on sandy loam soils [Netherlands]
- Creation:
- Update:
- Compiler: Marie Wesselink
- Editor: –
- Reviewers: Gudrun Schwilch, Ursula Gaemperli, Alexandra Gavilano
Biologische landbouw met groente en akkerbouw gewassen op zandige leem
technologies_3305 - Netherlands
View sections
Expand all Collapse all1. General information
1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology
Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Interactive Soil Quality assessment in Europe and China for Agricultural productivity and Environmental Resilience (EU-iSQAPER)Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek, Wageningen University & Research Centre (DLO) - Netherlands1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT
The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:
Yes
1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology
Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?
No
2. Description of the SLM Technology
2.1 Short description of the Technology
Definition of the Technology:
Certified Organic Agriculture (EU standards) with a combination of arable and vegetable crops on sandy loam soils in the Netherlands
2.2 Detailed description of the Technology
Description:
The technology is in this specific case applied on sandy loam soils in the Netherlands. It is not limited to those specific conditions. Organic agriculture could as well be applied on other soil types, and it could be applied in various cropping systems as well. There are no environmental limitations known which would prevent a farmer from applying certified organic agriculture on his farm fields.
The characteristics which a system has to fulfill to be certified organic agriculture are to be found in the standards for organic production in the EU (Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007). Main points in this standard are: no application of synthetic pesticides and no use of synthetic fertilizer. Next to that, there are certain specifications on how many crops you need to have as a minimum in your rotation etc. The purpose of this technology is a sustainable production in general. The idea behind is, that with more care and attention for your production, without the use of synthetic products, you will have a more sustainable and resilient system.
The major input in organic agriculture is organic manure. Because synthetic fertilizers are not allowed more care and attention is paid to apply the right amount of the right organic fertilizers. In general this leads to higher inputs of organic matter to the soil.
The positive impacts of organic agriculture are:
- better general soil quality (more organic matter, better structure, higher fertility, more soil life, more diverse soil life)
- better water holding capacity
- reduced nitrate leaching to the groundwater
- good economic impact (with the label 'organic' farmers can sell their products for a higher price)
Organic agriculture (compared to conventional) also has a negative impact: yields are in general up to 20% lower than conventional production. This yield reduction is mainly caused by pests and diseases, because no synthetic pesticides are allowed, the control of many diseases and pests is not possible.
Land users like this technique because it is actually more than just an application of a technique, it is a way of farming. Organic farming calls upon the craftmanship of the farmers. They like it because they know they are contributing to a more sustainable farming system. Farmers may dislike it because it is complicated to obtain the same yields as with conventional agriculture, and because it is not yet possible to control all pests and diseases.
2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment
Country:
Netherlands
Region/ State/ Province:
Flevoland - Flevopolder
Further specification of location:
Surroundings of Lelystad
Specify the spread of the Technology:
- evenly spread over an area
If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:
- 0.1-1 km2
Comments:
At this farm, they have 60 hectares of organic agriculture
Map
×2.6 Date of implementation
Indicate year of implementation:
2009
2.7 Introduction of the Technology
Specify how the Technology was introduced:
- through land users' innovation
- during experiments/ research
- through projects/ external interventions
Comments (type of project, etc.):
Researchers, policy makers and farmers are all more and more aware that it is important to work towards a more sustainable farming system. At first, organic agriculture was mainly applied within research and by precursor farmers, but it is becoming more common and widespread.
3. Classification of the SLM Technology
3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology
- reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
- preserve/ improve biodiversity
- adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
- create beneficial economic impact
3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied
Cropland
- Annual cropping
Annual cropping - Specify crops:
- vegetables - other
Number of growing seasons per year:
- 1
Specify:
The climate is limiting the growing season
3.4 Water supply
Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
- mixed rainfed-irrigated
3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs
- rotational systems (crop rotation, fallows, shifting cultivation)
- integrated soil fertility management
- integrated pest and disease management (incl. organic agriculture)
3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology
agronomic measures
- A1: Vegetation/ soil cover
- A2: Organic matter/ soil fertility
management measures
- M2: Change of management/ intensity level
3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology
soil erosion by wind
- Et: loss of topsoil
chemical soil deterioration
- Cn: fertility decline and reduced organic matter content (not caused by erosion)
physical soil deterioration
- Pc: compaction
biological degradation
- Bs: quality and species composition/ diversity decline
- Bl: loss of soil life
water degradation
- Hq: decline of groundwater quality
3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation
Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
- prevent land degradation
4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs
4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):
The most important aspects of organic agriculture are: application of only organic manure and no application of synthetic pesticides, with the idea that soil quality and environment can be positively effected by this.
4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs
Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
- per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:
50 hectares
other/ national currency (specify):
euro
If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:
0.87
Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:
160
4.3 Establishment activities
Activity | Timing (season) | |
---|---|---|
1. | Adapt/change machinery | before and during conversion to organic |
2. | Stop using synthetic pesticides | before conversion to organic |
3. | Stop using synthetic fertilizers | before conversion to organic |
4. | Choose conversion period crops | 2 years before start certified organic production |
5. | start conversion period | 2 years before start certified organic production |
6. | Design and adapt crop choice and rotation | Before/during and after conversion |
4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equipment | Investment in mechanical weed control machine | piece | 1.0 | 5000.0 | 5000.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for establishment of the Technology | 5000.0 | |||||
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD | 5747.13 |
Comments:
The costs for establishing organic agriculture are hard to estimate, it depends on the farm specific situation. Anyway, there will be a need to adapt machinery for the weed control. there will be a loss (in turnover and profitability) in the conversion period, because crops grown in this period are organically managed, but cannot yet be sold as organic.
4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities
Activity | Timing/ frequency | |
---|---|---|
1. | Mechanical weed control instead of herbicides | each cropping season |
2. | Handlabour for weed control | each cropping season |
3. | Spread of organic fertilizers instead of synthetic fertilizer | each cropping season |
Comments:
These are the biggest, most important activities that change by converting from conventional to organic. There are more smaller activities not listed here.
4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)
Specify input | Unit | Quantity | Costs per Unit | Total costs per input | % of costs borne by land users | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Additional handlabour mostly for weeding | hours | 250.0 | 160.0 | 40000.0 | 100.0 |
Labour | Additional labour for mechanical weed control | hours | 75.0 | 160.0 | 12000.0 | 100.0 |
Equipment | Yearly costs of weed control mechanization | euro | 1.0 | 5000.0 | 5000.0 | 100.0 |
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology | 57000.0 | |||||
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD | 65517.24 |
Comments:
The additional costs (compared to conventional) and yield losses are most of the time more than covered by additional income because of premium product prices. Costs are calculated for a 50 ha farm.
4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs
Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:
Increase in labour for weed control
5. Natural and human environment
5.1 Climate
Annual rainfall
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1,000 mm
- 1,001-1,500 mm
- 1,501-2,000 mm
- 2,001-3,000 mm
- 3,001-4,000 mm
- > 4,000 mm
Specify average annual rainfall (if known), in mm:
800.00
Indicate the name of the reference meteorological station considered:
Lelystad
Agro-climatic zone
- sub-humid
5.2 Topography
Slopes on average:
- flat (0-2%)
- gentle (3-5%)
- moderate (6-10%)
- rolling (11-15%)
- hilly (16-30%)
- steep (31-60%)
- very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
- plateau/plains
- ridges
- mountain slopes
- hill slopes
- footslopes
- valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
- 0-100 m a.s.l.
- 101-500 m a.s.l.
- 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
- 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
- 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
- 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
- 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
- 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
- > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
- not relevant
Comments and further specifications on topography:
The area is reclaimed land from the sea, it is therefore about 3 meters below sealevel.
5.3 Soils
Soil depth on average:
- very shallow (0-20 cm)
- shallow (21-50 cm)
- moderately deep (51-80 cm)
- deep (81-120 cm)
- very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
- medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
- high (>3%)
- medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.
Remark: the organic matter in the topsoil is around 3%
5.4 Water availability and quality
Ground water table:
< 5 m
Availability of surface water:
good
Water quality (untreated):
for agricultural use only (irrigation)
Is water salinity a problem?
No
Is flooding of the area occurring?
No
5.5 Biodiversity
Species diversity:
- medium
Habitat diversity:
- low
5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology
Sedentary or nomadic:
- Sedentary
Market orientation of production system:
- commercial/ market
Off-farm income:
- less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
- rich
Individuals or groups:
- individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
- mechanized/ motorized
Gender:
- men
Age of land users:
- middle-aged
5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology
- < 0.5 ha
- 0.5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1,000 ha
- 1,000-10,000 ha
- > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
- medium-scale
5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights
Land ownership:
- individual, not titled
Land use rights:
- individual
Water use rights:
- communal (organized)
5.9 Access to services and infrastructure
health:
- poor
- moderate
- good
education:
- poor
- moderate
- good
technical assistance:
- poor
- moderate
- good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
- poor
- moderate
- good
markets:
- poor
- moderate
- good
energy:
- poor
- moderate
- good
roads and transport:
- poor
- moderate
- good
drinking water and sanitation:
- poor
- moderate
- good
financial services:
- poor
- moderate
- good
6. Impacts and concluding statements
6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown
Socio-economic impacts
Production
crop production
Comments/ specify:
Crop yields in organic agriculture are up to 20% lower compared to conventional
Income and costs
expenses on agricultural inputs
Comments/ specify:
Organic planting material is more expensive than conventional
farm income
Comments/ specify:
Per product organic farmers will get a higher price
workload
Comments/ specify:
The use of (hand)weeding increases because of no herbicide use
Ecological impacts
Water cycle/ runoff
surface runoff
Comments/ specify:
Due to better soil structure runoff is limited, therefor the water holding capacity and natural drainage of the soil improves.
Soil
soil moisture
Comments/ specify:
Due to higher organic matter (manure) inputs the water holding capacity of the soil improves.
soil cover
Comments/ specify:
In general, soils used in organic agriculture are covered during more months within a year, due to more usage of cover crops in winter season for example
nutrient cycling/ recharge
Comments/ specify:
More attention is paid to the nutrientcycles, cover crops are used to maintain nutrients for the next season
soil organic matter/ below ground C
Comments/ specify:
More organic matter is applied, slowly this will lead to a higher content in the soil
Biodiversity: vegetation, animals
plant diversity
Comments/ specify:
No use of pesticides gives the opportunity for a diverse range of plants to develop
beneficial species
Comments/ specify:
Pesticides can also harm the beneficial species, no pesticides = more benificial species
habitat diversity
Comments/ specify:
The whole agricultural system gets more diverse due to more organic inputs and less pesticide inputs
pest/ disease control
Comments/ specify:
It is harder to control pests and diseases, when synthetic pesticides are not allowed. There is no organic cure for all pests and diseases (yet)
Climate and disaster risk reduction
drought impacts
Comments/ specify:
Due to better soil structure the soil is less vulnerable for drought events
6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown
groundwater/ river pollution
Comments/ specify:
With organic agriculture there is less nitrate leaching
6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)
Climate-related extremes (disasters)
Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it? | |
---|---|
drought | well |
6.4 Cost-benefit analysis
How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:
neutral/ balanced
Long-term returns:
positive
How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:
slightly positive
Long-term returns:
positive
6.5 Adoption of the Technology
- 1-10%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
- 91-100%
Comments:
There is no support/financial compensation from governments. Switching to organic agriculture is driven by the mindset that taking good care of the soil and environment is crucial for the future of agriculture
6.6 Adaptation
Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?
No
6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view |
---|
better soil quality |
more income per product |
challenges your farmer skills |
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view |
---|
more sustainable |
more resilient |
less nitrate leaching |
6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the land user’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
More handlabour for weeding | improve mechanical weeding techniques, more craftmanship |
more losses due to pests and diseases | resistant varieties,enhancement of natural enemies, more crop diversity |
more work to market your products | better market organisation, cooperation |
Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view | How can they be overcome? |
---|---|
High dependancy on manure from animal husbandry in the region | mixed farms, cooperation between organic animal farms and organic arable farms |
risk of dependency on biopesticides | More resilient production systems, resistant |
7. References and links
7.1 Methods/ sources of information
- interviews with land users
Landowner and some landworkers provided information
- interviews with SLM specialists/ experts
Involved researchers were consulted
When were the data compiled (in the field)?
20/11/2017
Links and modules
Expand all Collapse allLinks
No links
Modules
No modules