Agroforestry: intercropping (maize with beans) with cassava (white arrow) and some Grevillea and Bananas trees (red arrows). (D'Aietti Laura)

Agroforestry system (intercropping beans/maize) with contour ditches, strips of Napier grass, manure and organic fertilizers. (Kenia)

Descripción

The technology is a combination of agricultural (e.g. intercropping, manure/compost/mulching), vegetative (e.g. Napier grass strips, trees planting) and structural (e.g. ditches) measures which aim to maximise the overall land yield in a sustainable manner (e.g. reducing soil erosion and increasing soil quality).

The Agroforestry system combines trees plantation (Bananas, Grevillea and Avocados) for fruits and timber collection with cereal crop, maize (Zea mays). Indeed, in order to increase yields, strip intercropping is practiced: cereal crop (maize) is grown in association with pulse (food legumes): beans. Instead of using expensive commercial fertilizers, beans could facilitate maize growth due to the possible transfer of N during growth or after incorporation of the legume biomass, during the growth period of the cereal (Sangakkara et al., 2003). Furthermore, soil quality (e.g. soil structure) is improved because of the increased amount of humus and organic matter and a better soil cover helps in preventing splash erosion and increase soil moisture content and therefore fertility. Indeed, beans have a beneficial impact for weed control (probably due to the shadow effects) and soil moisture content (Worfswinkel, undated; Odhiambo and Ariga, 2001). Planting different crops helps to diversify production and family food supply. Concerning SWC, hillside ditches have been created at the top of each 'terrace' and trees are also planted nearby and Cassava (a drought resistant plant) at the bottom. Manure/compost and organic fertilizers are supplied regularly both on maize/grass (twice a year) and Bananas (once), as good soil management practice. A higher level of organic matter in the soil indicates reduced bulk density, improved soil structure, aeration and higher water holding capacity (Olabode et al., 2007), which altogether improve the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil (Haering and Evanylo, 2005). Bananas are planted in lines in the upper part of the land. The ditches, large 1m are excavated along the contour; they break slope into shorter segments 11 m long to intercept surface runoff. Ditches also help to prevent soil erosion and to avoid that nutrients and organic matter flow easily downwards into the river, instead they fall into the ditch. A live barrier of Napier grass is present above and below the edge of the five ditches, in two lines, to capture sediments and stabilize the structure, thus it is adequately protected. To conclude, a small area of the land is used to plant Napier grass only for fodder for grazing

Purpose of the Technology: Maize and beans are cultivated for home consumption while Avocados and Bananas are planted for economic (commercial) purposes. Fruits are sold out to the middle-men directly from the house (not at the market), to reduce costs (e.g. transport) and time. Avocados are sold at about 2.5/3 Ksh and Bananas at 200 Ksh. Grevillea trees are considered as saving, and sold out for timber production when the farmer is in need of cash, earning between 800 up to 1500 Ksh, depending on the size-lenght of the tree and the costs for cutting-transportation (e.g. machine operator). In general the selling of timber occurs per feet (running feet). ‘Whole” or standing tree is the preferred mode of selling trees from farms. Negotiation on sales is per tree ‘standing on farm’, with no processing or conversion. Buyers cut and cross cut, and carry timber from farms. Branches and slabs resulting from timber recoveries are left with the farmer depending on price negotiation; if the buyer carries these products then the price of the tree is adjusted upwards (Carsan and Holding , 2006; Holding et al., undated). Furthermore, the farmer underlined how 'bad prunings' at the top of the trees cause holes inside the trunks and thus a higher risk of fungi attacks and other diseases. The majority of the trees are planted along the boundaries of the land, for demarcation and only few are 'dispersed' on the cropland, to avoid excess of shadow to the cereal crop

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: High initial input to construct ditches and planting crop; manure also requires regular work: feeding cows and collect droppings and distribute them twice during the year, also over Napier grass. Dry planting is the preferred practice and the seeds are soaked the night before planting; this practice is advisable especially when the growing period is very short (Schmidt et al., 1983); organic fertilizers are applied over maize after 1 week and during the growing period (after about 18 days). Further maintenance is necessary after every rainy season to remove the sediments accumulated into the ditch and for pruning Grevillea, every three seasons. As mentioned above, pruning requires skills and knowledge to avoid plant diseases and labour is expensive because it is high risk work. The farmer trees plantation account for: 15 Avocados (from 4 seedlings), 100 Bananas (from cutting new suckers) and 50 Grevillea trees

Natural / human environment: The area is characterized by rolling-hilly slope and highly exposed to erosion and land degradation: planting trees protect the soil from nutrients leaching and create a litter which reduces evaporation during dry seasons. Concerning the variety of the trees, (e.g. Avocado) the farmer by grafting with better quality branches, improve the quality of the stock trees with certified variesties: out of 4 seedlings of Avocado (10 Ksh each), he has now 15 seedlings of the better (certified) variety called HASS, which performs well at 800-2100 m asl with well distributed annual rainfall of 1000-1200 mm (Youth Agro-environmental initiative website)

Lugar

Lugar: Muthithi location, Kagurumo sublocation, Central, Kenia

No. de sitios de Tecnología analizados:

Georreferencia de sitios seleccionados
  • 37.09455, 0.85453

Difusión de la Tecnología: distribuida parejamente sobre un área (0.008 km²)

¿En un área de protección permanente?:

Fecha de la implementación: hace menos de 10 años (recientemente)

Tipo de introducción
Legume interplanting: Maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). On the background: Bananas and Grevillea trees. On the right, it is possible to note a portion of the Napier grass strip (red arrow). (Laura D'Aietti (QT6: 2.1.3 (and QT22: 2.5.3)))
Legume intercropping: Maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris); Living fences: on farm boundaries: Euphorbia tirucalli (Kariaria, milk bush) has been planted; Napier grass. (Laura D'Aietti (QT6: 2.1.3 Fig. 2a, b (and QT19: 2.5.2)))

Clasificación de la Tecnología

Propósito principal
  • mejorar la producción
  • reducir, prevenir, restaurar la degradación de la tierra
  • conservar el ecosistema
  • proteger una cuenca hidrográfica/ áreas corriente abajo – en combinación con otras Tecnologías
  • preservar/ mejorar biodiversidad
  • reducir el riesgo de desastres naturales
  • adaptarse al cambio climático/ extremos climáticos y sus impactos
  • mitigar cambio climático y sus impactos
  • crear impacto económico benéfico
  • crear impacto social benéfico
Uso de tierra
Mezcla de tipos de uso de tierras dentro de la misma unidad de tierras: Sí - Agro-silvopastoralismo

  • Tierras cultivadas
    • Cosecha anual: cereales - maíz, cultivos para forraje - pastos, leguminosas y legumbres - frijoles
    • Cultivos perennes (no leñosos): banana/plátano/abacá
    • Cosecha de árboles y arbustos: avocado
    Número de temporadas de cultivo por año: 2
    ¿Se practica el intercultivo? Sí
  • Tierra de pastoreo
    • Cortar y llevar/ cero pastoreo
  • Bosques
    • Plantación de árboles, reforestación
    Tree types: Grevillea robusta
    Productos y servicios: Madera, Frutos y nueces
Provisión de agua
  • de secano
  • mixta de secano – irrigada
  • totalmente irrigada

Propósito relacionado a la degradación de las tierras
  • prevenir la degradación de la tierra
  • reducir la degradación de la tierra
  • restaurar/ rehabilitar tierra severamente degradada
  • adaptarse a la degradación de la tierra
  • no aplica
La degradación considerada
  • erosión de suelos por agua - Wt: pérdida de capa arable/ erosión de la superficie
  • deterioro químico del suelo - Cn: reducción de la fertilidad y contenido reducido de la materia orgánica del suelo (no ocasionados por la erosión)
  • degradación del agua - Hq: reducción de la calidad de subterráneas
Grupo MST
  • n.d.
Medidas MST
  • medidas agronómicas - A1: vegetación/ cubierta del suelo , A2: materia orgánica/ fertilidad del suelo, A3: Tratamiento de superficie del suelo
  • medidas vegetativas - V1: Cubierta de árboles y arbustos , V2: Pastos y plantas herbáceas perennes
  • medidas estructurales - S4: Acequias niveladas, fosas

Dibujo técnico

Especificaciones técnicas
Agroforestry system, which covers an area of 2 acre. The plot is bordered by Euphorbia tirucalli (Kariaria, milk bush) and Grevillea trees. The ditches are characterized by barriers of Napier grass. Intercropping of maize and beans: the distance from one line of maize and the other is of 1m.

Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of dispersed runoff: retain / trap, control of dispersed runoff: impede / retard, reduction of slope angle, reduction of slope length, improvement of ground cover, increase of infiltration, increase / maintain water stored in soil, water harvesting / increase water supply, sediment retention / trapping, sediment harvesting

Secondary technical functions: improvement of topsoil structure (compaction), stabilisation of soil (eg by tree roots against land slides), increase in organic matter, increase in nutrient availability (supply, recycling,…), improvement of water quality, buffering / filtering water, increase of biomass (quantity)

Mulching
Material/ species: Organic residues around Banana trees
Quantity/ density: undefined

Legume inter-planting
Quantity/ density: 4 kg

Manure / compost / residues
Material/ species: Leftovers and manure from two cows
Quantity/ density: 8 tonnes
Remarks: (for 1 year). The mix of organic material is left decomposed in a big hole.

Agronomic measure: organic fertilizers
Material/ species: Acid humic and N, P, K, microelements (Biodeposit Elixir: small bags (sachets) of 12 ml)
Remarks: 5 bags (1×12 litre), applied only on maize

Aligned: -graded strips
Vegetative material: T : trees / shrubs, F : fruit trees / shrubs, G : grass
Number of plants per (ha): 100 a strip
Vertical interval between rows / strips / blocks (m): few cm
Spacing between rows / strips / blocks (m): 1
Vertical interval within rows / strips / blocks (m): 0.25
Width within rows / strips / blocks (m): 1

Trees/ shrubs species: Grevillea (Grevillea robusta)

Fruit trees / shrubs species: Avocados (Persea americana- Mũkorobia), Bananas (Musa sapientum- Irigũ)

Grass species: Pennisetum pyramidalis (Napier grass or elephant grass)

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 10%

If the original slope has changed as a result of the Technology, the slope today is (see figure below): 15%

Gradient along the rows / strips: 5-8%

Diversion ditch/ drainage
Spacing between structures (m): 1
Depth of ditches/pits/dams (m): 40/50
Width of ditches/pits/dams (m): 0.6/1

Slope (which determines the spacing indicated above): 5-8%

Lateral gradient along the structure: 15-20%
Author: D'Aietti Laura

Establecimiento/ mantenimiento: actividades, insumos y costos

Cálculo de insumos y costos
  • Los costos se calculan:
  • Moneda usada para calcular costos: Kenyan Schellings
  • Tasa de cambio (a USD): 1 USD = 85.9 Kenyan Schellings
  • Costo promedio por día del sueldo de la mano de obra contratada: 2.00
Factores más determinantes que afectan los costos
The main environmental constrain is water, in particular during dry season; An important cost is labour required to maintain all the SWC measures.
Actividades de establecimiento
  1. Digging holes (1 feet ×1 feet) and planting trees (e.g. Grevillea trees along the boundaries and in line below the bunds of the ditches) (Momento/ frequencia: March (before rains), 1 year)
  2. Establishment of the ditches(digging ditch and creating soil bunds donward) and terracing. For 1 (in tot. are 5) : 2 p.d. * 1 day at 200 Ksh a day each. (Momento/ frequencia: 2 times per year)
  3. Digging the hole (3m×3m×1.5m) where to compost (Momento/ frequencia: None)
  4. Machine to grill/mill maize leftovers (chap cutter) (Momento/ frequencia: None)
  5. Purchase 2 cows (Momento/ frequencia: None)
  6. Purchase generator (Momento/ frequencia: None)
Insumos y costos para establecimiento
Especifique insumo Unidad Cantidad Costos por unidad (Kenyan Schellings) Costos totales por insumo (Kenyan Schellings) % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras
Mano de obra
Digging the hole (3m×3m×1.5m) where to compost person/days 2,0 3,5 7,0 100,0
Digging holes (1 feet ×1 feet) and planting trees person/days 2,0 3,5 7,0 100,0
Establishment of the ditches (digging ditch and creating soil bunds donward) and terracing person/days 10,0 23,3 233,0 100,0
Equipo
Machine to grill/mill maize leftovers (chap cutter) piece 1,0 1164,0 1164,0 100,0
Generator piece 1,0 582,0 582,0 100,0
Cow piece 2,0 349,0 698,0 100,0
Material para plantas
Seedlings Grevillea pieces 54,0 0,1111 6,0 100,0
Costos totales para establecer la Tecnología 2'697.0
Costos totales para establecer la Tecnología en USD 31.4
Actividades de mantenimiento
  1. Prepare and apply fertilizers (organic) (See Annex 3, Fig. 9&comments) (Momento/ frequencia: Ferlizer application: after 1 week and 18 days, on maize only)
  2. Prepare manure+compost/mulch (Summary 2.1.2 QT4): Labour (to grill/mill leftovers - 300 Ksh for fuel- leftovers to prepare food for cows-3 person days) rest, the farmer by himself feed cows on daily basis (3 times in a day). Fuel: 1litre×1 day (×3 days) (Momento/ frequencia: compost/manure: 2 times/year in the field+grass; once on Bananas (where also added mulch))
  3. Harvesting maize/beans (around Feb/March and Ag/Sept) (Momento/ frequencia: 2 times)
  4. Apply manure, mulch and compost (during March/April-long rains+Sept) just before the rains, when nutrients infiltrate into the soil with rainwater) (Summary 2.1.2 QT4) (Momento/ frequencia: Compost/manure: 2 times/year in the field+grass; once on Bananas (where also added mulch))
  5. Tilling-soil (digging holes to plant maize/beans: 7 inches deep (17cm), spaced 1 feet (0.30 m) in contours: dry planting (before rains starts) (Momento/ frequencia: Twice a year, before rainy season (around March/Sept))
  6. Digging planting holes and planting grass (2 persons × 3 days: 200 Ksh) (Momento/ frequencia: Every season (March/April and Sept/Oct))
  7. Maintenance (weed control and cutting Napier grass and collecting fodder) (Fig. 11 Annex 3) (Momento/ frequencia: Every season (March/Sept); cutting Napier: 3/4 times in a season)
  8. Pruning branches and let them dry for firewood (Momento/ frequencia: Every 3 seasons (and when shortage of firewood))
  9. Clearing the tree for selling timber (the price depends also of the use of the chainsaw (or saw) or not (Momento/ frequencia: When in need of cash (not regularly), not less than 5 years after planting)
  10. Repairing the ditches and remove excess of soil/leaves accumulated during the rainy season (Momento/ frequencia: After rains (every season))
Insumos y costos de mantenimiento
Especifique insumo Unidad Cantidad Costos por unidad (Kenyan Schellings) Costos totales por insumo (Kenyan Schellings) % de los costos cubiertos por los usuarios de las tierras
Mano de obra
Prepare and apply fertilizers (organic) person/days 2,0 2,0 4,0 100,0
Prepare manure+compost/mulch person/days 3,0 2,0 6,0 100,0
Digging planting holes and planting grass person/days 6,0 2,0 12,0 100,0
Maintenance (weed control and cutting Napier grass and collecting fodder) person/days 5,0 12,0 60,0 100,0
Equipo
Fuel l 3,0 1,0 3,0 100,0
Material para plantas
Seedlings grass (per ha) pieces 100,0
Fertilizantes y biocidas
Organic fertilizer (Biodeposit Elixir) from Thika ml 12,0 1,0 12,0 100,0
Otros
Labour: Pruning branches and let them dry for firewood person/days 1,0 4,0 4,0 100,0
Labour: Clearing the tree for selling timber person/days 1,0 7,0 7,0 100,0
Labour: Repairing the ditches and remove excess of soil/leaves accumulated during the rainy season person/days 2,0 2,0 4,0 100,0
Indique los costos totales para mantenecer la Tecnología 112.0
Costos totales para mantener la Tecnología en USD 1.3

Entorno natural

Promedio anual de lluvia
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Zona agroclimática
  • húmeda
  • Sub-húmeda
  • semi-árida
  • árida
Especificaciones sobre el clima
Thermal climate class: subtropics. June, July and August
Pendiente
  • plana (0-2 %)
  • ligera (3-5%)
  • moderada (6-10%)
  • ondulada (11-15%)
  • accidentada (16-30%)
  • empinada (31-60%)
  • muy empinada (>60%)
Formaciones telúricas
  • meseta/ planicies
  • cordilleras
  • laderas montañosas
  • laderas de cerro
  • pies de monte
  • fondo del valle
Altura
  • 0-100 m s.n.m.
  • 101-500 m s.n.m.
  • 501-1,000 m s.n.m
  • 1,001-1,500 m s.n.m
  • 1,501-2,000 m s.n.m
  • 2,001-2,500 m s.n.m
  • 2,501-3,000 m s.n.m
  • 3,001-4,000 m s.n.m
  • > 4,000 m s.n.m
La Tecnología se aplica en
  • situaciones convexas
  • situaciones cóncavas
  • no relevante
Profundidad promedio del suelo
  • muy superficial (0-20 cm)
  • superficial (21-50 cm)
  • moderadamente profunda (51-80 cm)
  • profunda (81-120 cm)
  • muy profunda (>120 cm)
Textura del suelo (capa arable)
  • áspera/ ligera (arenosa)
  • mediana (limosa)
  • fina/ pesada (arcilla)
Textura del suelo (> 20 cm debajo de la superficie)
  • áspera/ ligera (arenosa)
  • mediana (limosa)
  • fina/ pesada (arcilla)
Materia orgánica de capa arable
  • elevada (>3%)
  • media (1-3%)
  • baja (<1%)
Agua subterránea
  • en superficie
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Disponibilidad de aguas superficiales
  • excesiva
  • bueno
  • mediana
  • pobre/ ninguna
Calidad de agua (sin tratar)
  • agua potable de buena calidad
  • agua potable de mala calidad (requiere tratamiento)
  • solo para uso agrícola (irrigación)
  • inutilizable
La calidad de agua se refiere a:
¿La salinidad del agua es un problema?
  • No

Incidencia de inundaciones
  • No
Diversidad de especies
  • elevada
  • mediana
  • baja
Diversidad de hábitats
  • elevada
  • mediana
  • baja

Las características de los usuarios de la tierra que aplican la Tecnología

Orientación del mercado
  • subsistencia (autoprovisionamiento)
  • mixta (subsistencia/ comercial)
  • comercial/ mercado
Ingresos no agrarios
  • menos del 10% de todos los ingresos
  • 10-50% de todo el ingreso
  • > 50% de todo el ingreso
Nivel relativo de riqueza
  • muy pobre
  • pobre
  • promedio
  • rico
  • muy rico
Nivel de mecanización
  • trabajo manual
  • tracción animal
  • mecanizado/motorizado
Sedentario o nómada
  • Sedentario
  • Semi-nómada
  • Nómada
Individuos o grupos
  • individual/ doméstico
  • grupos/ comunal
  • cooperativa
  • empleado (compañía, gobierno)
Género
  • mujeres
  • hombres
Edad
  • niños
  • jóvenes
  • personas de mediana edad
  • ancianos
Área usada por hogar
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Escala
  • pequeña escala
  • escala mediana
  • gran escala
Tenencia de tierra
  • estado
  • compañía
  • comunitaria/ aldea
  • grupal
  • individual, sin título
  • individual, con título
Derechos de uso de tierra
  • acceso abierto (no organizado)
  • comunitarios (organizado)
  • arrendamiento
  • individual
Derechos de uso de agua
  • acceso abierto (no organizado)
  • comunitarios (organizado)
  • arrendamiento
  • individual
Acceso a servicios e infraestructura
salud

pobre
x
bueno
educación

pobre
x
bueno
asistencia técnica

pobre
x
bueno
empleo (ej. fuera de la granja)

pobre
x
bueno
mercados

pobre
x
bueno
energía

pobre
x
bueno
caminos y transporte

pobre
x
bueno
agua potable y saneamiento

pobre
x
bueno
servicios financieros

pobre
x
bueno

Impacto

Impactos socioeconómicos
Producción de cultivo
disminuyó
x
incrementó

producción de madera
disminuyó
x
incrementó

gastos en insumos agrícolas
incrementó
x
disminuyó

ingreso agrario
disminuyó
x
incrementó

Impactos socioculturales
situación de grupos en desventaja social y económica (género, etáreo, estatus, etnicidad, etc.)
empeoró
x
mejoró

Impactos ecológicos
escurrimiento superficial
incrementó
x
disminuyó

evaporación
incrementó
x
disminuyó

humedad del suelo
disminuyó
x
incrementó

cubierta del suelo
disminuyó
x
mejoró

pérdida de suelo
incrementó
x
disminuyó

biomasa/ sobre suelo C
disminuyó
x
incrementó

Impactos fuera del sitio
disponibilidad de agua (aguas subterráneas, manantiales)
disminuyó
x
incrementó

capacidad de amortiguación/ filtrado (por suelo, vegetación, humedales)
disminuyó
x
mejoró

Análisis costo-beneficio

Beneficios comparados con los costos de establecimiento
Ingresos a corto plazo:
muy negativo
x
muy positivo

Ingresos a largo plazo
muy negativo
x
muy positivo

Beneficios comparados con costos de mantenimiento
Ingresos a corto plazo:
muy negativo
x
muy positivo

Ingresos a largo plazo
muy negativo
x
muy positivo

Cambio climático

Cambio climático gradual
temperatura anual incrementó

nada bien
muy bien
Respuesta: no se sabe
Extremos (desastres) relacionados al clima
tormenta de lluvia local

nada bien
x
muy bien
tormenta de viento

nada bien
x
muy bien
sequía

nada bien
x
muy bien
inundación general (río)

nada bien
x
muy bien
Otras consecuencias relacionadas al clima
periodo reducido de crecimiento

nada bien
muy bien
Respuesta: no se sabe

Adopción y adaptación

Porcentaje de usuarios de la tierra que adoptaron la Tecnología
  • casos individuales / experimentales
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
De todos quienes adoptaron la Tecnología, ¿cuántos lo hicieron sin recibir incentivos/ pagos materiales?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
¿La tecnología fue modificada recientemente para adaptarse a las condiciones cambiantes?
  • No
¿A qué condiciones cambiantes?
  • cambios climáticos / extremos
  • mercados cambiantes
  • disponibilidad de mano de obra (ej. debido a migración)

Conclusiones y lecciones aprendidas

Fortalezas: perspectiva del usuario de tierras
  • Better yields thanks to the intercropping measures taken.
Fortalezas: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clave
  • Intercropping is a commonly known practice which improves the overall conditions of the soil and provide better yields.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Besides 'companion planting' there are plants which can be grown as forerunner plants (Storey, 2002). Depending also on the type of soil, attention could be given to some sps. which accumulate concentration of e.g. mineral accumulators, phosporus, potassium, calcium, silica and sulphur .
    Another way to perhaps enhance the yields is relay intercropping. It is undersowing the next crop into the present crop, so that the present crop is a nurse crop and time and water is saved in the establishment of the following crop (Storey, 2002)
    Green manure as a way to add organic nutrients and combine more than one green manure and rotate, both legume (e.g. cowpeas, soybeans, annual sweet clover, vetch, sesbania, and velvet beans ) and not legume (e.g. sudangrass, millet, sorghum, and buckwheat).
  • Agroforestry (Dispersed trees on cropland):
    The technology is simple to adopt and improves a sustainable land management as well as diversification of income sources and food supply.

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? It could be implemented by increasing the number of trees planted (e.g. along the boundaries) and with sps. characterised by deeper root systems, to avoid further water competition. More Avocadoe trees could increase the opportunities for the farmer to be part of a CBO (Community Based Organization) addressed to marketing of Avocadoes for oil production. This could help the farmer to earn more money and invest more in SWC implementation and new methods, in the long run.
    The option of alley cropping (hedgerow
    Intercropping) with leguminous plants e.g. Sesbanian sesban (Ramachandran Nair-ICRAF, 1993) could be considered as another option.
  • Napier grass has very good properties in holding soil; also for ditch stabilization and fodder production

    How can they be sustained / enhanced? Other herbaceous vegetation could be also planted in the field:
    e.g. Tithonia diversifolia (Mexican sunflower), an excellent (high quality-N, P, K concentration) green manure /nutrient release and medicinal plant, or could be also used as a major component of compost manure.
    It is an annual weed that can be used for several purposes: fodders, poultry feed, fuel, compost, land demarcation, soil erosion, building materials, shelter for poultry. It is characterized by adaptability to different environment, rapid growth, fast rate of decomposition. Nevertheless, there is the need to ascertain the extent to which this weed sps. could be used for soil improvement and to determine the best mode of application of the weed sps., (Olabode et al., 2007, Olubukola et al., 2013) and the fact that is a invasive weed (with an aggressive growth) it requires a good knowledge in the land management and weed control.
  • The attention to certified varieties give also more value to the production itself and at market level: an increase of the bargaining power creates more opportunities for better income and chances to explore new and bigger markets, (e.g. Avocados for oil production ).
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: perspectiva del usuario de tierrascómo sobreponerse
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clavecómo sobreponerse
  • The technologies in place require maintenance and monitoring, especially during rainy seasons Eventually subsides or be part of a CBO's (Community Based Organizations) or SHG (Self Help Groups); Still the measures already in place could be improved: diversification of trees (e.g. indigenous) and trainings (e.g. pruning etc) could help the farmer in avoiding tree diseases and allocate more efficiently resources.
  • The amount of work required to carry out all the activities is too much.

Referencias

Compilador
  • Laura D'Aietti
Editors
Revisado por
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Fabian Ottiger
Fecha de la implementación: 27 de febrero de 2013
Últimas actualización: 7 de mayo de 2019
Personas de referencia
Descripción completa en la base de datos de WOCAT
Datos MST vinculados
La documentación fue facilitada por
Institución Proyecto
Referencias claves
  • Holding C., Carsan S., Njuguna P., 2004. Smallholder Timber Marketing: A Kenyan Experience. FAO/ICRAF/GoK multi-stakeholder programme. International Workshop on small holder timber production.:
  • Odhiambo G.D. and Ariga E. S., 2001. Effect of intercropping maize and beans on Striga incidence and grain yield. Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference. 11th -15 th February, 2001. pp. 183-186.:
  • Olabode O.S., Sola O., Akanbi W.B., Adesina G.O., Babajide P.A., 2007. Evaluation of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A Gray for Soil Improvement. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3 (4): 503-507.: http://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas3(4)/15.pdf
  • Olubukola S. A., Aderemi Ojo Ezekiel-Adewoyin O., Dorcas Tinuke D., Akintoye Henry, 2010. Comparing the use of Tithonia diversifolia and Compost as soil amendments for growth and yield of Celosia argentea. New York Science Journal 3 (6).: http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork/ny0306/20_2680_ny0306_133_138.pdf
  • Ramachandran Nair P. K., 1993. An Introduction to Agroforestry- ICRAF.: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/units/library/books/PDFs/32_An_introduction_to_agroforestry.pdf?n=161
  • Sanchez M. A., 2012. Food vs wood: dynamic choices for Kenyan smallholders. A plan B research paper. Master of Science. Michigan State University.: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/134024/2/PeraltaSanchezPlanB.pdf
  • Sangakkara U.R., Richner W., Schneider M. K., Stamp P., 2003. Impact of intercropping beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and sunhemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) on growth yields and Nitrogen uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in the humid tropics during the minor rainy season. Maydica 48: 233-238: http://www.maydica.org/articles/48_233.pdf
  • Schmidt H., Swoboda R., Ralph Jätzold R., 1983. Farm Management Handbook of Kenya. Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Vol. 2.Part B: Central Kenya: http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib/07-1284.pdf
  • Smith D. M., Jackson N. A., Roberts J.M. and Ong C.K., 1999. Root distributions in a Grevillea robusta-maize agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Plant and Soil 211: 191–205, 1999.:
  • Storey P. J., 2002. The conservation and improvement of sloping land. Volume 1: Practical understanding. Chapter 5: Improving the soil management.:
  • Worfswinkel van M., undated. Intercropping of Annual Foodcrops, Agrobrief (Agromisa), N.4: http://www.allindiary.org/pool/resources/intercropping.pdf
  • Carsan S., Holding C., 2006. Growing farm timber: practices, market and policies. The Meru timber marketing pilot programme case studies and reviews. World Agroforestry Centre.: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/publications/PDFs/b14639.pdf
  • Chia-Chun Wu, 1998. Effective conservation practices for the cultivation of slopelands, Extension Bulletin (ASPAC/FFTC), No. 449, 7 p.: http://www.fao.org/prods/gap/database/gap/files/1272_CONSERVATION_ON_SLOPES.PDF
  • Crozier C., 1986. Soil Conservation Techniques for Hillside Farms. A Guide for Peace Corps Volunteers. Appropriate Technologies for Development. Peace Corps Information Collection & Exchange Reprint Series No. R-62. Peace Corps Institution.: (The Humanity Development Library website: http://www.nzdl.org/gsdlmod?a=p&p=home&l=en&w=utf-8)
  • CSIRO (Baldock J.) Soil carbon: the basics. website (http://www.csiro.au/en/Outcomes/Environment/Australian-Landscapes/soil-carbon.aspx) . Also in: Carbon Farming Fact Sheet: Store carbon for healthy soils and better yields.: http://www.grdc.com.au/uploads/documents/GRDC_CarbonFarming_4pp.pdf
  • Elemans A., 2011. Thesis report (unpublished): Green water credits program in Saba Saba sub-catchment in the Upper Tana, Kenya.:
  • Gutteridge R. C. and Sheltong H. M., 1998.eridge R. C. and Shelton H. M., 1998. Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture. (http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/PUBLICAT/Gutt-shel/x5556e00.htm Chapter 5.2: http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Publicat/Gutt-shel/x5556e0q.htm
  • HDRA , undated. Agroforestry in the Tropics.: http://www.thenrgroup.net/member/MRO/AER/AER-560.htm
  • Haering, K., Evanylo G., 2005. Composting and Compost Use for Water Quality. In Composting resource directory. Mid-Atlantic Reg. Water Program.: http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/41/40137.pdf
  • Holding C., Carsan S., Njuguna P., undated. Smallholder timber and firewood marketing in the coffee and cotton/tobacco zones of eastern Mount Kenya. In: Small-scale forestry and rural development: The intersection of ecosystems, economics and society.: http://www.coford.ie/media/coford/content/publications/projectreports/small-scaleforestryconference/Holding.pdf
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International