Retention pond in demonstration plantation centre Maribor. (Gregor Kramberger)

Retention ponds (Eslovenia)

Mokri zadrževalniki vode

Descripción

Retention ponds (e.g. flood storage reservoirs, shallow impoundments) are water bodies, storing water to attenuate surface runoff during rainfall events. They provide storage as well as improving water quality. Retention ponds may also be used for irrigation of farmland.

“Retention ponds” comprise both simple, small ponds (up to 2000 m3, up to 4 m deep) and larger, more complex reservoirs (greater than 2000 m3). Retention ponds are designed to provide storage capacity to attenuate surface runoff during rainfall events. Each consists of a permanent ponded area with landscaped banks. Retention ponds achieve both storm water attenuation and water quality treatment through supplementary storage capacity of runoff. Water is then released at a controlled rate once the risk of flooding has passed. The technology can be applied in a natural or human environment. Before construction of a pond it is essential to follow legislation, which covers conditions and restrictions for the given location. Once a site is selected, technical documentation is prepared: first the conceptual design, then documentation for obtaining opinion, consent and a building permit. Later there is also project documentation for implementation. If the water is to be used for other purposes as well (e.g. for irrigation), it is necessary to plan for usage and environmental impact. Retention and still water promotes pollutant removal through sedimentation, while aquatic vegetation and biological uptake mechanisms offer additional treatment. Retention ponds are effective in removing urban pollutants and improving water quality.
They are created either by using an existing natural depression, or by excavating a new depression, or by constructing embankments. Existing natural water bodies should not be used however, due to the risk that pollution events and poorer water quality might disturb/damage the natural ecology of the system. A great benefit of retention ponds is that they hold water when there is an excess of it, which can be used later when water is not available (e.g. for irrigation). Irrigation users are farmers, so they see the advantage of using a retention system. In addition to irrigation, water has also been needed in recent years for anti-frost systems (sprinkling a consistent layer of water on the crop during an entire frost event until temperatures are back to safe levels). Disadvantages are mainly restrictions in some areas (e.g. protected areas), preparation of demanding documentation and bureaucracy, and lengthy procedures for obtaining permits.

Lugar

Lugar: Pesnica, Podravska region, Slovenia, Eslovenia

No. de sitios de Tecnología analizados: 2-10 sitios

Georreferencia de sitios seleccionados
  • 15.6842, 46.61512
  • 15.65148, 46.59821
  • 15.63917, 46.63365

Difusión de la Tecnología: aplicada en puntos específicos/ concentrada en un área pequeña

¿En un área de protección permanente?: No

Fecha de la implementación: 10-50 años atrás

Tipo de introducción
Pond where water accumulates along the stream Kobiljski potok. (Gregor Kramberger)
The pond along the Pesnica river is also intended for recreation and tourism. (Gregor Kramberger)

Clasificación de la Tecnología

Propósito principal
  • mejorar la producción
  • reducir, prevenir, restaurar la degradación del suelo
  • conservar el ecosistema
  • proteger una cuenca hidrográfica/ áreas corriente abajo – en combinación con otras Tecnologías
  • preservar/ mejorar biodiversidad
  • reducir el riesgo de desastres naturales
  • adaptarse al cambio climático/ extremos climáticos y sus impactos
  • mitigar cambio climático y sus impactos
  • crear impacto económico benéfico
  • crear impacto social benéfico
Uso de tierra
Mezcla de tipos de uso de tierras dentro de la misma unidad de tierras: No

  • vías fluviales, masas de agua, humedales - Estanques, diques
    Principales productos/ servicios: Retention of water, collection of water. Retention ponds are ponds or basins designed with additional storage capacity to attenuate surface runoff during rainfall events. In dry years, the water can be used for agriculture, e.g. for irrigation.

Provisión de agua
  • de secano
  • mixta de secano – irrigada
  • totalmente irrigada

Propósito relacionado a la degradación de las tierras
  • prevenir la degradación del suelo
  • reducir la degradación del suelo
  • restaurar/ rehabilitar tierra severamente degradada
  • adaptarse a la degradación del suelo
  • no aplica
La degradación considerada
  • erosión de suelos por agua - Wt: pérdida de capa arable/ erosión de la superficie , Wg: erosión en cárcavas, Wo: efectos de degradación fuera del sitio
  • degradación biológica - Bc: reducción de la cobertura vegetal del suelo , Bh: pérdida de hábitats, Bq: reducción de la cantidad/ biomasa, Bs: reducción en la calidad y composición/ diversidad de las especies, Bp: incremento de pestes/ enfermedades, pérdida de depredadores
  • degradación del agua - Ha: aridificación, Hs: cambio en la cantidad de aguas superficiales, Hg: cambio en nivel de aguas subterráneas/ nivel de acuífero, Hq: reducción de la calidad de subterráneas, Hq: reducción de la calidad de aguas subterráneas
Grupo MST
  • cosecha de agua
  • Manejo de irrigación: (incl. provisión de agua, invernaderos)
  • manejo de agua superficial (manantial, río, lagos, mar):
Medidas MST
  • medidas estructurales - S5: Diques, hondonadas, estanques

Dibujo técnico

Especificaciones técnicas
Water retention pond – excavation scheme. R is the top radius of pond, while r is the base radius; h is the height and a refers to the bank slope. Storage volume is estimated by radius r and height h (Figure). We consider potential storage volumes of 5,000 m3 to 10,000 m3.
Prior to start of construction, detention/retention ponds should be designed by a registered design professional. Plans and specifications should be referred to by field personnel throughout the construction process. When placing a detention/retention pond in a space in the first phase it is necessary to produce a conceptual design of the intended construction of a pond, which must show the purpose and goals of the retaining wall, the size of the pond, the location, a list of plots that are encroached upon, distances from neighboring land and neighboring buildings, anticipated activities in the impoundment area, impoundment volume, barrier size data, including stability assessment, and geotechnical data (Hočuršćak 2017). When planning construction of the pond, attention should be paid primarily to the impact on the actual use of space from the point of view of water management regulations, which defines the area of use and activity restrictions, due to the possible negative impact on water and coastal lands, aquatic habitats and the ecosystem created by the construction of the reservoir. After talking with the designer, in order to obtain a water permit and consent from the authorities, it is necessary to prepare technical documentation for the installation and construction, which must also include the basis for monitoring operation and maintenance (Hočuršćak 2017). The technical documentation (dimensioning of the reservoir) may differ from the microlocation and purpose or use of the measure, e.g. if pool is intended only to contain high water, sediment or debris laoding, will it be inhabited by aquatic animals, will water be used for irrigation, drinking, etc. We also consider the shape and size of the area to identify those better suited for allocating ponds also in terms of space availability. For example, it is necessary to exclude locations with a greater slope and distance from the river considering higher slope and distance is more difficult and costly to construct. We also exclude locations where the construction of a pond is not possible because they are too narrow or too small. We should consider water retention ponds as elements of a green infrastructure network together with other natural elements (e.g. vegetated riparian zones) and protected areas (e.g. Natura, 2000 sites) with a pond design that embeds features that enhance their ecological functionality. These include mild-sloped sides with vegetated buffers along the shorelines and vegetated floating islands that facilitate the nesting of birds. We refer to excavated ponds, with no weirs or dams, since inline ponds are more costly and may have negative ecological impacts (A. Staccione et al. 2021).

Presentation of the water reservoir at the Sadjarski Center Maribor (translated: Fruit Growing Center Maribor):
The Sadjarski Center Maribor is located on a sloping terrain, which is pedologically and configuratively quite diverse, with slopes ranging from 5-15%. The soil structure is clayey loam with a basaltic substrate. In the lower, flatter part, the soil was waterlogged, which was resolved through drainage systems. These drains are directed towards a drainage ditch, which serves as the foundation for the pond and is fed by two smaller springs. The intake point is located at the lowest point and at the southernmost part of the complex. It covers an area of 3000 m2 and has a depth of up to 3.8 m. Its capacity is 5500 m3 of water when fully filled. At its southern part, there is a concrete overflow structure (spillway) with a height of 3.8 m, which is used to drain excess water and regulate the water level. A concrete pipe, 20 m in length and 80 cm in diameter, is connected to it for the discharge of excess water. On the western side, a concrete pumping platform with a canopy and an oil trap has been constructed. It houses a 185 kW (252 HP) DAF diesel generator and a Capprari flow pump with a capacity of 300 l/min (18.0 m3/h). The pumping unit is used for filling the reservoir of the irrigation fertigation system.
Author: A. Staccione et al.

Establecimiento/ mantenimiento: actividades, insumos y costos

Cálculo de insumos y costos
  • Los costos se calculan: por unidad de Tecnología (unidad: pond volume, length: 5500)
  • Moneda usada para calcular costos: EUR
  • Tasa de cambio (a USD): 1 USD = 0.97 EUR
  • Costo promedio por día del sueldo de la mano de obra contratada: 90.90
Factores más determinantes que afectan los costos
Construction costs are affected by the shape, size, depth and microlocation of the pond layout. In addition, the cost is also influenced by the purpose of use (e.g. if pool is intended only to contain high water, sediment or debris laoding, will it be inhabited by aquatic animals, will water be used for irrigation, drinking, etc.). Geomechanically conditions are also important, because ponds and reservoirs can affect slope stability and induce landslides. The value of the investment can vary greatly depending on the design of the pond, location, water content of the area, soil structure, climate conditions,... so it is impossible to determine the exact values for pond construction, but we can only give an estimation.
Actividades de establecimiento
  1. Costs of obtaining construction, technical and project documentation (Momento/ frequencia: 1-2 years before before starting construction)
  2. Construction of a pond (Momento/ frequencia: 1st year)
  3. Costs of supervision of construction and craftsmanship (Momento/ frequencia: 1st year)
Costos totales de establecimiento (estimación)
73600,0
Actividades de mantenimiento
  1. Energy for pumping (Momento/ frequencia: annually)
  2. water fee (Momento/ frequencia: annually)
  3. Maintenance costs (vegetation management, inspections, infrastructure maintenance, mulching, invasive species removal, pumping the entire pond for cleaning and sediment removal, sludge cleaning, monitoring, bank stabilization, replacement of damaged parts, and sealing, etc.) (Momento/ frequencia: annually)
Total de los costos de mantenimiento (estiamción)
3000,0

Entorno natural

Promedio anual de lluvia
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Zona agroclimática
  • húmeda
  • Sub-húmeda
  • semi-árida
  • árida
Especificaciones sobre el clima
Promedio anual de lluvia en mm:1080.0
The most precipitation falls in summer, the months with the highest average precipitation are June and August, the least precipitation falls in winter, in January and February at least, and in principle more precipitation falls in autumn than in spring.
Nombre de la estación meteorológica: Jareninski vrh (1981 – 2010)
Mean annual temperature in year 2014 Jareninski vrh is 11,9°C.
Pendiente
  • plana (0-2 %)
  • ligera (3-5%)
  • moderada (6-10%)
  • ondulada (11-15%)
  • accidentada (16-30%)
  • empinada (31-60%)
  • muy empinada (>60%)
Formaciones telúricas
  • meseta/ planicies
  • cordilleras
  • laderas montañosas
  • laderas de cerro
  • pies de monte
  • fondo del valle
Altura
  • 0-100 m s.n.m.
  • 101-500 m s.n.m.
  • 501-1,000 m s.n.m
  • 1,001-1,500 m s.n.m
  • 1,501-2,000 m s.n.m
  • 2,001-2,500 m s.n.m
  • 2,501-3,000 m s.n.m
  • 3,001-4,000 m s.n.m
  • > 4,000 m s.n.m
La Tecnología se aplica en
  • situaciones convexas
  • situaciones cóncavas
  • no relevante
Profundidad promedio del suelo
  • muy superficial (0-20 cm)
  • superficial (21-50 cm)
  • moderadamente profunda (51-80 cm)
  • profunda (81-120 cm)
  • muy profunda (>120 cm)
Textura del suelo (capa arable)
  • áspera/ ligera (arenosa)
  • mediana (limosa)
  • fina/ pesada (arcilla)
Textura del suelo (> 20 cm debajo de la superficie)
  • áspera/ ligera (arenosa)
  • mediana (limosa)
  • fina/ pesada (arcilla)
Materia orgánica de capa arable
  • elevada (>3%)
  • media (1-3%)
  • baja (<1%)
Agua subterránea
  • en superficie
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Disponibilidad de aguas superficiales
  • excesiva
  • bueno
  • mediana
  • pobre/ ninguna
Calidad de agua (sin tratar)
  • agua potable de buena calidad
  • agua potable de mala calidad (requiere tratamiento)
  • solo para uso agrícola (irrigación)
  • inutilizable
La calidad de agua se refiere a: agua superficial
¿La salinidad del agua es un problema?
  • No

Incidencia de inundaciones
  • No
Diversidad de especies
  • elevada
  • mediana
  • baja
Diversidad de hábitats
  • elevada
  • mediana
  • baja

Las características de los usuarios de la tierra que aplican la Tecnología

Orientación del mercado
  • subsistencia (autoprovisionamiento)
  • mixta (subsistencia/ comercial)
  • comercial/ mercado
Ingresos no agrarios
  • menos del 10% de todos los ingresos
  • 10-50% de todo el ingreso
  • > 50% de todo el ingreso
Nivel relativo de riqueza
  • muy pobre
  • pobre
  • promedio
  • rico
  • muy rico
Nivel de mecanización
  • trabajo manual
  • tracción animal
  • mecanizado/motorizado
Sedentario o nómada
  • Sedentario
  • Semi-nómada
  • Nómada
Individuos o grupos
  • individual/ doméstico
  • grupos/ comunal
  • cooperativa
  • empleado (compañía, gobierno)
Género
  • mujeres
  • hombres
Edad
  • niños
  • jóvenes
  • personas de mediana edad
  • ancianos
Área usada por hogar
  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Escala
  • pequeña escala
  • escala mediana
  • gran escala
Tenencia de tierra
  • estado
  • compañía
  • comunitaria/ aldea
  • grupal
  • individual, sin título
  • individual, con título
Derechos de uso de tierra
  • acceso abierto (no organizado)
  • comunitarios (organizado)
  • arrendamiento
  • individual
Derechos de uso de agua
  • acceso abierto (no organizado)
  • comunitarios (organizado)
  • arrendamiento
  • individual
Acceso a servicios e infraestructura
salud

pobre
bueno
educación

pobre
bueno
asistencia técnica

pobre
bueno
empleo (ej. fuera de la granja)

pobre
bueno
mercados

pobre
bueno
energía

pobre
bueno
caminos y transporte

pobre
bueno
agua potable y saneamiento

pobre
bueno
servicios financieros

pobre
bueno

Impacto

Impactos socioeconómicos
Producción de cultivo
disminuyó
incrementó


Irrigation has avoided reduction in production due to drought and frost

calidad de cultivo
disminuyó
incrementó


Improved fruit health (protection against drought and frost)

riesgo de fracaso de producción
incrementó
disminuyó


Protection against drought and frost

área de producción (nuevas tierras bajo cultivo/ en uso)
disminuyó
incrementó


Change of land use (from agricultural land to water body).

manejo de tierras
obstaculizado
simplificado


Increased the complexity of management.

calidad de agua para irrigar
disminuyó
incrementó

demanda de agua para irrigar
incrementó
disminuyó

ingreso agrario
disminuyó
incrementó


Production and income stability.

diversidad de fuentes de ingreso
disminuyó
incrementó


Possible diversification on farm (tourism and recreation).

carga de trabajo
incrementó
disminuyó


Demanding maintenance and increased complexity of management.

Impactos socioculturales
seguridad alimentaria/ autosuficiencia
disminuyó
mejoró


Lower risk of production failure, stability in business, motivation to do business in agriculture

oportunidades recreativas
disminuyó
mejoró


Possible additional activities on farm.

instituciones comunitarias
se debilitaron
se fortalecieron


An example of good practice for the community.

MST/ conocimiento de la degradación del suelo
disminuyó
mejoró


With positive effects more interest of the farmer in sustainable production.

Impactos ecológicos
cantidad de agua
disminuyó
incrementó


Water available in dry months.

cosecha/recolección de agua (escurrimiento, rocío, nieve, etc.)
disminuyó
mejoró

escurrimiento superficial
incrementó
disminuyó

drenaje de agua en exceso
disminuyó
mejoró

evaporación
incrementó
disminuyó

humedad del suelo
disminuyó
incrementó


Increased in case of irrigation

pérdida de suelo
incrementó
disminuyó

ciclo/ recarga de nutrientes
disminuyó
incrementó

cubierta vegetal
disminuyó
incrementó

diversidad vegetal
disminuyó
incrementó


Planting species near/around the pond.

especies invasoras extrañas
incrementó
disminuyó


Danger in case of improper maintenance.

diversidad animal
disminuyó
incrementó


For a green reservoir, a lot of green infrastructure is placed next to it, which serves as protection for animals and plants (beneficial).

especies benéficas (depredadores, gusanos de tierra, polinizadores)
disminuyó
incrementó

diversidad de hábitats
disminuyó
incrementó

impactos de inundaciones
incrementó
disminuyó

deslizamientos/ fluyos de escombros
incrementó
disminuyó

impactos de sequías
incrementó
disminuyó

riesgo de incendio
incrementó
disminuyó


Proximity to water.

micro-clima
empeoró
mejoró


It affects the microclimate, more humidity, slower temperature fluctuations

Impactos fuera del sitio
disponibilidad de agua (aguas subterráneas, manantiales)
disminuyó
incrementó


It is slightly increased as the ponds provide water during dry periods.

corriente confiable y estable fluye en estación seca (inc. caudales bajos)
disminuyó
incrementó


Improved mainly due to water retention during wet seasons for use in dry periods.

inundaciones río abajo (no deseadas)
incrementó
disminuyó


Reduced due to the capacity of ponds to retain excess water during times when rivers may flood.

colmatación río abajo
incrementó
disminuyó


The reservoir also enables sediment retention, preventing sediment from reaching downstream watercourses.

contaminación de aguas subterráneas/ de ríos
incrementó
disminuyó


Many studies indicate that ponds can trap harmful substances, causing them to settle or undergo processes (acting as natural purification systems, especially when appropriate plant species are involved). This helps maintain cleaner downstream flows in terms of pollutants.

capacidad de amortiguación/ filtrado (por suelo, vegetación, humedales)
disminuyó
mejoró


The pond's ability to retain pollutants also contributes to its buffering and filtering capacity.

Análisis costo-beneficio

Beneficios comparados con los costos de establecimiento
Ingresos a corto plazo:
muy negativo
muy positivo

Ingresos a largo plazo
muy negativo
muy positivo

Beneficios comparados con costos de mantenimiento
Ingresos a corto plazo:
muy negativo
muy positivo

Ingresos a largo plazo
muy negativo
muy positivo

The costs of establishing a retention pond are indeed very high, and it is a substantial investment. However, especially in the case of agricultural land irrigation, the benefits can be quite favorable, particularly in terms of drought protection or frost prevention. In the long run, the investment yields significant advantages, as it enables resilience to climate change. Farmers can also receive support through rural development programs, which provide 30-50% project funding. Although the maintenance costs can be considerable, they are necessary and offer substantial benefits to farmers who irrigate their crops or protect them from frost. From land users' perspective it's positive, if they have improved production results.

Cambio climático

Cambio climático gradual
temperatura estacional incrementó

nada bien
muy bien
Estación: verano
lluvia anual disminuyó

nada bien
muy bien
lluvia estacional incrementó

nada bien
muy bien
Estación: primavera
Extremos (desastres) relacionados al clima
tormenta de lluvia local

nada bien
muy bien
ola de calor

nada bien
muy bien
sequía

nada bien
muy bien
inundación general (río)

nada bien
muy bien
Otras consecuencias relacionadas al clima
período extendido de crecimiento

nada bien
muy bien

Adopción y adaptación

Porcentaje de usuarios de la tierra que adoptaron la Tecnología
  • casos individuales / experimentales
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
De todos quienes adoptaron la Tecnología, ¿cuántos lo hicieron sin recibir incentivos/ pagos materiales?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
¿La tecnología fue modificada recientemente para adaptarse a las condiciones cambiantes?
  • No
¿A qué condiciones cambiantes?
  • cambios climáticos / extremos
  • mercados cambiantes
  • disponibilidad de mano de obra (ej. debido a migración)

Conclusiones y lecciones aprendidas

Fortalezas: perspectiva del usuario de tierras
  • Retention ponds are simple if space is provided.
  • They collect water for use in drought conditions.
  • Retention ponds manage storm water quantity and quality, lessening the transfer of pollutants and chemicals into nearby water bodies.
  • Improved storm water collection and flood control.
  • Retention ponds provide habitats for animals, organisms, and insects (biodiversity).
Fortalezas: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clave
  • Local farm water retention systems allow for the detainment of water captured during spring runoff as well as during precipitation events, either directly or due to transport by surface runoff. This provides water storage that can be drawn on when groundwater supplies become depleted.
  • Retention ponds are designed to hold excess storm water runoff and release it slowly to avoid flooding downstream areas. They also serve to reduce downstream peak flow and aid in retaining flood waters which reduces associated flood risks downstream. If water is released from the reservoir, they serve to replenish groundwater stores downstream.
  • Surface water retention systems have shown success in reducing nutrient and sediment loading in various locations worldwide.
  • Under drought conditions these systems enable farmers to draw water from the reservoirs to support crop irrigation. The main value of water retention ponds is related to agricultural water demand in the dry season. They are considered the only effective way to preserve agricultural productivity. The ponds can increase the monetary value of agricultural land that can cope with water needs.
  • In addition to the primary function of retaining high waters, they often also serve a multipurpose use, such as: supply of drinking water, irrigation of agricultural land, protection against erosion, aquaculture, fishing, energy source, preservation of landscape and biodiversity, tourism, recreation and others.
  • Biomass production is another benefit of multi-purpose surface water retention system – cattails bioproduction and nutrient management.
  • In the case of construction of the so-called of a "green" water reservoir, green infrastructure solutions can provide protection for various species of animals and plants, which promotes biodiversity.
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: perspectiva del usuario de tierrascómo sobreponerse
  • Anaerobic conditions can occur without regular inflow. Proper planning and dimensioning of the pond, location and water level are necessary. It is necessary to ensure adequate flow and depth of the pond.
  • May not be suitable for steep sites, due to requirement for high embankments. The construction of the pond is planned at a suitable location.
  • Colonisation by invasive species could increase maintenance and pose a danger to cultivated areas. Regular maintenance and cleaning of the pond bank is necessary.
  • Safety risk in case of slipping and falling into the pond. It is necessary to fence and isolate the access to the pond.
Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos: punto de vista del compilador o de otra persona recurso clavecómo sobreponerse
  • Large investments in the irrigation system and access to funds for irrigation infrastructure can be difficult to attain. The size and holding capacity of retention systems also need to be considered to maximize benefits while limiting the initial costs of building a surface water retention system.
  • The construction requires a lot of technical preparation, planning, documentation and there are many bureaucratic obstacles to comply with the spatial acts of the municipality and to fulfil the requirements of the spatial planning authorities, which also includes large initial costs. The preparation and management of the project should be entrusted to a professional service. Check the conditions ahead of time and plan strategically several years ahead.
  • While irrigation provides an economic gain during drought years, it also increases operational costs for water supplies. Strategies need to provide drought proofing of crops as well as limiting damages caused by floods in non-drought years to reduce risk to farmers and the region.
  • Experts identified some barriers for greener pond implementation, especially related to reduced efficiency. The higher surface required can cause loss of water stored during summer from the higher rate of evaporation. Another risk is associated with vegetation close to the pond banks which can reduce impermeabilization and increase water infiltration due to root growth in the soil. Good technical plan with solutions and compromises for best results with natural (green) benefits. Considering the benefits brought by green systems.
  • Unregulated relations between active/potential users, both in the delimitation of water rights, especially in times of water shortage, and in cases of regulating obligations for the proper operation and maintenance. Collective investments with a good long-term plan for operation and maintenance. Organized management of users from the organization (e.g. municipality, etc.).

Referencias

Compilador
  • Gregor Kramberger
Editors
Revisado por
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
Fecha de la implementación: 22 de junio de 2021
Últimas actualización: 11 de julio de 2023
Personas de referencia
Descripción completa en la base de datos de WOCAT
Datos MST vinculados
La documentación fue facilitada por
Institución Proyecto
Referencias claves
  • An economic assessment of local farm multi-purpose surface water retention systems in a Canadian Prairie setting; Pamela Berry, Fuad Yassin, Kenneth Belcher, Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt, Appl Water Sci (2017) 7:4461–4478.: Web
  • Natural water retention ponds for water management in agriculture: A potential scenario in Northern Italy; Andrea Staccione, Davide Broccoli, Paolo Mazzoli, Stefano Bagli, Jaroslav Mysiak; Journal of Environmental Management 292 (2021) 112849.: Web
  • Natural Water Retention Measures; Report: Individual NWRM - Retention ponds.: Web
  • Vodnogospodarske podlage za nadzor obratovanja in vzdrževanja manjših zadrževalnikov. Miljenko Hočuršćak. Aktualni projekti s področja upravljanja z vodami in urejanje voda. 28. Mišičev vodarski dan 2017.: Web
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International