Stabilization Through Conservation ('StabilCon') approach [Kenia]
- Creación:
- Actualización:
- Compilador: Harry Wells
- Editor: –
- Revisor: Rima Mekdaschi Studer
approaches_3615 - Kenia
Visualizar secciones
Expandir todo Colapsar todos1. Información general
1.2 Detalles de contacto de las personas de referencia e instituciones involucradas en la evaluación y la documentación del Enfoque
Persona(s) de referencia clave/s
Protected Area Manager:
1.3 Condiciones referidas al uso de datos documentados mediante WOCAT
¿Cuándo se compilaron los datos (en el campo)?
16/04/2018
El compilador y la/s persona(s) de referencia claves aceptan las condiciones acerca del uso de los datos documentados mediante WOCAT :
Sí
2. Descripción del Enfoque MST
2.1 Breve descripción del Enfoque
The 'StabilCon' approach is a non-aggressive, low-intensity stabilization model that seeks to reconcile the needs of both humans and their natural environment. To achieve this, StabilCon aims to co-develop two mutually beneficial elements: sustainable natural resource management and human security in rural areas.
2.2 Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST
Descripción detallada del Enfoque MST:
StabilCon is a holistic approach that seeks to develop social-ecosystems that accept wildlife and respect natural resources, in order to address complex conservation challenges. Implemented by rural communities, in partnership with local stewardship organizations, such as Tsavo Conservation Group, StabilCon aims to build human and natural resource security. StabilCon also aims to shift the human-wildlife relationship from conflict towards a symbiotic relationship with mutual benefits. The approach is based on the premise that unstable environments (whether due to human, economic or environmental factors) preclude any conservation, sustainable development or natural resource management initiative. Therefore, StabilCon seeks to build institutional capacity in rural communities to achieve four interrelated goals: 1) Support the rule of law (e.g. through training of community rangers) to reduce physical insecurity for humans, wildlife and natural resources to manageable levels as a mandatory first step; 2) Use this security as a foundation on which to build and diversify nature-based economic opportunities (e.g. reduced wildlife poaching facilitates the development of tourism-based economic opportunities, while greater local security can also benefit livestock-keeping by reducing the incidents of stock thefts); 3) Strengthen environmental security to enable benefits of biodiversity conservation and healthy ecosystems to be shared by current and future generations; 4) Develop more robust, equitable and representative community governance system, aligned with county and national government agencies and their objectives (e.g. through governance training within rural communities).
StabilCon aims to use these four interrelated goals to develop a foundation of long-term environmental security and create circumstances conducive to socio-economic progress of rural communities. Activities are conducted by the StabilCon Implementation Unit (SIU), which in the Tsavo Model is composed of 5 members: 1) CEO & co-founder of Tsavo Conservation Group (TsavoCon) - responsibilities include managing TsavoCon's strategic direction through StabilCon, developing & managing strategic relationships, working with Kenya's national and county governments and US government, international fund raising; 2) TsavoCon Chief Financial Officer - Taita Taveta born and a member of the Association of Chartered Accountants (London) who leads human resources issues and is responsible for financial operations (e.g. opening bank accounts for full time staff, introducing and managing accounting software); 3) Operations Officer - supports CEO in developing strategic relationships (e.g. liaison with Taita Conservancy elders, county government officials, NGO partners) and is a Geographic Information System analyst developing a map database (e.g. elephant poaching data); 4) Liaison Officer - responsible for engagement with Orma community members of Malkahalaku Community Conservancy as well as liaison with local and national government officials, and to manage the conservancy's rangers (he was formerly an instructor with the Kenya Wildlife Service); 5) TsavoCon Pilot - responsibilities include managing aerial observation operations, TsavoCon vehicles, communications, resupply & logistics of TsavoCon assets in the field.
2.3 Fotos del Enfoque
Galería de medios
2.5 País/ región/ lugares donde el Enfoque fue aplicado
País:
Kenia
Especifique más el lugar :
Greater Tsavo Ecosystem
Comentarios:
For more details see: http://www.tsavocon.org/
Map
×2.6 Fechas de inicio y conclusión del Enfoque
Indique año del inicio:
2016
Si no se conoce el año preciso, indique la fecha aproximada en la que se inició el Enfoque:
hace menos de 10 años (recientemente)
2.7 Tipo de Enfoque
- iniciativa local reciente/ innovadora
2.8 Propósitos/ objetivos principales del Enfoque
StabilCon seeks to build institutional capacity in rural communities to achieve four interrelated goals:
1) Effective security, law and order - Support the rule of law to reduce physical insecurity for humans, wildlife and natural resources to manageable levels as a mandatory first step to enable the other three goals;
2) Economic security - Use this security as a foundation on which to build and diversify nature-based economic opportunities (e.g. livestock and tourism);
3) Environmental security - Strengthen environmental security to enable benefits of biodiversity conservation and healthy ecosystems to be shared by current and future generations;
4) Social security - Develop more robust, equitable and representative community governance system, aligned with county and national government agencies and their objectives.
2.9 Condiciones que facilitan o impiden la implementación de la/s Tecnología/s aplicadas bajo el Enfoque
normas y valores sociales/ culturales/ religiosos
- facilitan
Livestock, water and security are already top priorities for local communities and are in alignment with StabilCon's objectives.
- impiden
Rural communities, limited in their access to education, find it difficult to navigate the bureaucratic processes involved in securing funding.
disponibilidad/ acceso a recursos y servicios financieros
- facilitan
USAID and other donors assist greatly by funding StabilCon's activities.
colaboración/ coordinación de actores
- facilitan
The improved relationship between the Malkahalaku community and the Kenya Wildlife Service (national government), facilitated by StabilCon's Implementation Unit (SIU), has been beneficial particularly in conflict mitigation.
- impiden
Dysfunctional relationships among local chiefs and between Malkahalau community and the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) were initially hindering. In addition, almost every year, heightened competition over fodder/water for livestock between pastoralists and agriculturalists and between neighbouring pastoral communities lead to conflicts, which are often violent. Previously, the dysfunctional relationship between Malkahalaku community and KWS led to confrontations and destruction of KWS infrastructure. On one occasion, KWS rangers posted in the community were chased out by community members and the KWS ranger post burnt down by community members.
marco de trabajo legal (tenencia de tierra, derechos de uso de tierra y agua)
- facilitan
The official conservancy status given when the Malkahalaku Community Conservancy was established in 2015 was crucial in providing land tenure security. This stronger land tenure security has been instrumental in NRM through resolving conflicts with neighbouring communities over access to grazing/water.
políticas
- facilitan
The Wildlife Act has been particularly beneficial through its support of conservation activities. The Act emphasises effective public participation in the management of wildlife resources, thereby setting a basis for the strengthening of community based NRM.
gobernanza de tierras (toma de decisiones, implementación y aplicación)
- impiden
Poor law enforcement in rural areas leads to social insecurity at the community level. This impacts many aspects of NRM including illegal wildlife poaching and armed conflicts between pastoralist groups over access to grazing/water.
conocimiento de MST, acceso a apoyo técnico
- facilitan
StabilCon aims to integrate the extensive local knowledge relating to pastoralism among Oromo people. However, traditional livestock management practices are also evolving and the Oromo are moving towards reducing livestock numbers and raising livestock quality (similar to the ranching approach).
- impiden
Some previous local pastoral practices are no longer applicable to the changing environment, particularly with regard to quality and number of livestock, but practices are changing. For example, the shift from emphasis on the number of livestock owned towards smaller herd sizes and higher quality livestock.
mercados (para comprar insumos, vender productos) y precios
- impiden
Importing meat from neighbouring countries (e.g. Tanzania, Uganda) floods Kenya's market, leading to a poor economic environment for local livestock production. StabilCon is currently planning to improve Malkahalaku Community Conservancy's access to national beef markets that will provide more favourable prices for the community's members.
carga de trabajo, disponibilidad de mano de obra
- impiden
StabilCon has a small team, but their dedication helps compensate for the limited man hours.
otros
- impiden
Social insecurity is one of the main barriers and it is exacerbated by climatic changes. More specifically, shifts in patterns and temporal distribution of rainfall pose challenges even for highly mobile pastoralists. During drought periods, heightened competition over grazing and water intensify human conflict. These conflicts over basic resources preclude NRM activities.
3. Participación y roles de las partes interesadas involucradas
3.1 Partes interesadas involucradas en el Enfoque y sus roles
- usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales
Taita Taveta Wildlife Conservancies Association and Malkahalaku Community Conservancy.
In the Taita area, Taita Taveta Wildlife Conservancies Association is the main local institutional actor, as it represents all 28 conservancies in the area (a large number of community members sign up to be part of one or more conservancies). In the Tana River County area, Malkahalaku Community Conservancy is the main institutional actor.
- especialistas MST/consejeros agrícolas
Tsavo Conservation Group (TsavoCon). TsavoCon is composed of four members: CEO (an experienced protected area manager and leader of international relations; degree in Wildlife Conservation Management), Tana River County Coordinator (paramilitary-trained with experienced in wildlife conservation/anti-poaching; diploma in Wildlife Sanctuary Management), Taita Taveta County Coordinator (experienced wildlife conservationist and former CEO of Taita Taveta Wildlife Conservancies), Chief Financial Officer (experienced in conservation-focused non-profit management).
In the Tsavo Model of StabilCon, TsavoCon is the main facilitating organization, providing a link between local communities, livestock and rangeland management experts and international funding organisations. TsavoCon acts as the StabilCon Implementation Unit (SIU) in the Greater Tsavo Ecosystem.
- investigadores
Geographic Information System specialist.
This researcher compiles data collected by StabilCon on poaching and insecurity. Tracking trends in elephant poaching as an indicator of increased security is one of the ways in which these data are used.
- ONG
Global Environmental Facility, African Wildlife Foundation, Wildlife Works.
These NGO's fund StabilCon's activities and/or act as conservation partners of Tsavo Conservation Group.
- gobierno local
These include: the county environmental minister and their department; the county minister of lands; the county minister of livestock; the chairman of conservation compensation committee.
These actors are involved in allocation of local government support for community-level projects.
- gobierno nacional (planificadores, autoridades)
Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), County Security Committee (national security apparatus)
These actors are mandated national security agencies. KWS's Law Enforcement Academy trained 22 members of Malkahalaku Community Conservancy (funded by Tsavo Conservation Group), who are now rangers for the conservancy. These rangers patrol their conservancy, increasing human security and reducing poaching. During droughts, KWS allow Malkahalaku Community Conservancy livestock to graze in Tsavo East National Park to relieve pressure on the community and diffuse conflicts over fodder/water. In Kenya, this is a relatively common but controversial practice as it puts pressure on the land within the protected area and potentially increases herd sizes and overall grazing pressure, particularly over the long term.
- organización internacional
USAID, Global Environment Facility, African Wildlife Foundation, Wildlife Works
Funding and/or Tsavo Conservation Group conservation partners.
Si varias partes interesadas estuvieron involucradas, indique la agencia principal:
In the Tsavo model of StabilCon, Tsavo Conservation Group fulfils the role of StabilCon Implementation Unit (SIU), and is the lead facilitator and coordinator in the Greater Tsavo Ecosystem.
3.2 Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales en las distintas fases del Enfoque
| Involucramiento de los usuarios locales de tierras/ comunidades locales | Especifique quién se involucró y describa las actividades | |
|---|---|---|
| iniciación/ motivación | interactivo | Under the StabilCon approach, international and local actors are involved in the initiation phase but it leads towards self mobilization. |
| planificación | interactivo | The StabilCon Implementation Unit (composed of a coordinator, experts/professionals and local actors) leads the planning phase, which includes an area identification and a ground feasibility study. |
| implementación | auto-movilización | All activities are implemented by local communities. |
| monitoreo y evaluación | apoyo externo | Data is mainly collected and analyzed by specialists/experts. |
3.3 Flujograma (si estuviera disponible)
Descripción:
Conceptual model of StabilCon approach and Theory of Change.
3.4 La toma de decisiones en la selección de Tecnología(s) MST
Especifique quién decidió la selección de las Tecnología/ Tecnologías a implementarse:
- principalmente usuarios de tierras con el apoyo de especialistas MST
Explique:
StabilCon aims to bring together international SLM experience with local SLM knowledge to develop activities.
Especifique las bases que sustentaron la toma de decisiones:
- la evaluación de conocimiento MST bien documentado (la toma de decisiones se basa en evidencia)
- la experiencia personal y opiniones (no documentadas)
4. Apoyo técnico, fortalecimiento institucional y gestión del conocimiento
4.1 Construcción de capacidades / capacitación
¿Se proporcionó la capacitación a usuarios de tierras/ otras partes interesadas?
Sí
Especifique quién fue capacitado:
- usuarios de tierras
- local government (e.g. accounting, legal, economic)
Forma de capacitación:
- en el contexto de trabajo
- cursos
Temas avanzados:
22 members of the Malkahalaku Community Conservancy were trained through a Kenya Wildlife Service Law Enforcement Academy programme, to enable them to serve as rangers for their conservancy to improve local security. The StabilCon implementation Unit also conducted courses to train the Conservancy's management and employees in various offices (e.g. accounting, legal, economic) to improve governance in Malkahalaku Community Conservancy.
4.2 Servicio de asesoría
¿Los usuarios de tierras tienen acceso a un servicio de asesoría?
Sí
- Depends on who is receiving the advice.
Describa/ comentarios:
StabilCon Implementation Unit (SIU) provides advice to individuals at multiple levels from government to local.
4.3 Fortalecimiento institucional (desarrollo institucional)
¿Se establecieron o fortalecieron instituciones mediante el Enfoque?
- sí, mucho
Especifique el nivel o los niveles en los que se fortalecieron o establecieron las instituciones:
- local
- regional
- nacional
Describa la institución, roles y responsabilidades, miembros, etc.
Tsavo Conservation Group, as the StabilCon Implementation Unit (SIU), liaise with all stakeholders to develop an integrated landscape security model in Taita
Especifique el tipo de apoyo:
- financiero
- construcción de capacidades/ entrenamiento
Proporcione detalles adicionales:
The Kenya Wildlife Service is due to train 40 Taita community rangers at their Law Enforcement Academy, funded by USAID in conjunction with Tsavo Conservation Group.
4.4 Monitoreo y evaluación
¿El monitoreo y la evaluación forman parte del Enfoque?
No
Comentarios:
The StabilCon approach relies on accurate data to inform decision making. Tsavo Conservation Group maintains a rigorous monitoring and evaluation procedure and maps human-wildlife conflict and rural human dynamics affecting the natural environment in its focal area.
4.5 Investigación
¿La investigación formó parte del Enfoque?
No
5. Financiamiento y apoyo material externo
5.1 Presupuesto anual para el componente MST del Enfoque
Si no se conoce el presupuesto anual preciso, indique el rango:
- 100,000-1,000,000
Comentarios (ej. fuentes principales de financiamiento/ donantes principales):
USAID and private donors are the main funding sources.
5.2 Apoyo financiero/material proporcionado a los usuarios de tierras
¿Los usuarios de tierras recibieron financiamiento/ apoyo material para implementar la Tecnología/ Tecnologías? :
Sí
Si respondió sí, especifique el tipo o los tipos de apoyo, condiciones y proveedor(es) :
Tsavo Conservation Group raises external funding for rangers (training, salaries etc.), security infrastructure (buildings, vehicles etc.); logistics, planning and deployment costs. However, the StabilCon approach aims to make all activities economically self-sustaining through internal funding.
5.3 Subsidios para insumos específicos (incluyendo mano de obra)
- ninguno
Si la mano de obra de usuarios de tierras fue un insumo sustancial, ¿fue:
- pagado en efectivo?
Comentarios:
Conservancy rangers are paid in cash through StabilCon, but these costs will gradually be internalized.
5.4 Crédito
¿Se proporcionó crédito bajo el Enfoque para actividades MST?
No
5.5 Otros incentivos o instrumentos
¿Se usaron otros incentivos o instrumentos para promover la implementación de Tecnologías MST?
No
6. Análisis de impacto y comentarios de conclusión
6.1 Impactos del Enfoque
¿El Enfoque empoderó a los usuarios locales de tierras, mejoró el involucramiento de las partes interesadas?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
The training of community conservancy rangers enables the conservancies to increase the degree to which they manage their own security, and are less dependent on already overstretched government law enforcement agencies.
¿El Enfoque ayudó a los usuarios de tierras a implementar y mantener Tecnologías MST?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
Data collected thus far indicates that elephant poaching has declined considerably since StabilCon's implementation, but it is not yet possible to gauge the sustainability due to the short duration of operation.
¿El Enfoque mejoró la coordinación e implementación efectiva en costos de MST?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
By acting as an impartial arbitrator, the StabilCon Implementation Unit facilitated coordination between chiefs who previously had dysfunctional relationships.
¿El Enfoque movilizó/mejoró el acceso a recursos financieros para implementar MST?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
StabilCon raised funding from international organizations such as USAID, that would otherwise have been inaccessible to local people.
¿El Enfoque mejoró el conocimiento y capacidades de otras partes interesadas?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
Capacity building was provided to local government employees (e.g. accountants, legal, economic). It was also provided to conservancy members in the form of ranger training.
¿El Enfoque construyó/ fortaleció instituciones, colaboración entre partes interesadas?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
StabilCon facilitated collaboration among actors who previously did not coordinate at local-level (chiefs) and government-level (government departments).
¿El Enfoque mitigó conflictos?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
The StabilCon Implementation Unit helped mitigate conflicts between Malkahalaku Community members and the Kenya Wildlife Service (national government) by facilitating dialogue and acting as third party mediators.
¿El Enfoque llevó a un uso más sostenible/ fuentes de energía?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
No energy source dimension to the approach.
¿El Enfoque mejoró la capacidad de los usuarios de tierras a adaptarse a los cambios climáticos/ extemos y mitigar desastres relacionados al clima?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
As StabilCon has only been active for 3 years this is difficult to judge.
¿El Enfoque llevó a oportunidades de empleo, ingresos?
- No
- Sí, un poco
- Sí, moderadamente
- Sí, mucho
StabilCon created job opportunities relating to conservancy security (mainly rangers).
6.2 Motivación principal del usuario de la tierra para implementar MST
- incremento de la renta(bilidad), proporción mejorada de costo-beneficio
Wealth and a better life are the main motivations for all activities.
- reglas y reglamentos (multas)/ aplicación
Law enforcement at the community level in rural communities is one of the main benefits of formally trained conservancy rangers.
- mitigación de conflicto
Conflict mitigation is a significant aspect of this approach. The presence of formally trained rangers benefits community members in the form of improved social security and possibly economic opportunities (e.g. less wildlife poaching may improve tourism and fewer stock thefts may facilitate livestock-keeping).
6.3 Sostenibilidad de las actividades del Enfoque
¿Pueden los usuarios de tierras sostener lo que se implementó mediante el Enfoque (sin apoyo externo)?
- incierto
Si respondió no o incierto, especifique y comente:
StabilCon has only been active for 3 years so this is difficult to gauge.
6.4 Fortalezas/ ventajas del Enfoque
| Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra |
|---|
| Due to StabilCon's structured approach, it can be budgeted in the long term. |
| StabilCon requires minimal intervention and relies mainly on internal motivation and activity. |
| The long-term aim is for revenue to be generated internally and sustainably through a structured investment model. |
| Fuerzas/ ventajas/ oportunidades desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave |
|---|
| Enables local communities to access international funds. |
| The StabilCon approach seeks to leverage the interaction between SLM and human security. |
| Integration of international SLM experience with local knowledge. |
| The StabilCon approach seeks to identify the extraordinary in people and nurture their strengths |
6.5 Debilidades/ desventajas del Enfoque y formas de sobreponerse a ellos
| Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del usuario de la tierra | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
|---|---|
| The need to raise start-up funding. | Ensure adequate focus on fund-raising. |
| StabilCon is not a stand-alone 'silver bullet', but needs a certain amount of national infrastructure in place in order to operate. | None. |
| StabilCon depends heavily on the individuals employed and can thus be impacted considerably by the human weaknesses of individuals. | Over the long-term, educate people to develop interdisciplinary skills. |
| Debilidades/ desventajas/ riesgos desde la perspectiva del compilador o de otra persona de referencia clave | ¿Cómo sobreponerse a ellas? |
|---|---|
| With few years of active experience of StabilCon, the benefits, downfalls and sustainability of the approach are still unclear. | Continuation of the approach will reveal its strengths and weaknesses. |
7. Referencias y vínculos
7.1 Métodos/ fuentes de información
- entrevistas con especialistas/ expertos en MST
One expert (co-founder & CEO of Tsavo Conservation Group and the StabilCon approach)
- compilación de informes y otra documentación existente
Reports and documentation shared by the informant and project websites.
7.2 Referencias a publicaciones disponibles
Título, autor, año, ISBN:
Saunders I, Saunders T (2017) The StabilCon Brief
¿Dónde se halla disponible? ¿Costo?
Freely available an in the public domain
7.3 Vínculos a la información relevante disponible en línea
Título/ descripción:
Stabilization Through Conservation (StabilCon) on Tsavo Conservation Group website
URL:
http://www.tsavocon.org/stabilcon/
Título/ descripción:
Tsavo Conservation Group's eMAP (Elephant Monitoring and Anti-Poaching) project
Vínculos y módulos
Expandir todo Colapsar todosVínculos
No hay vínculos
Módulos
No se hallaron módulos