Brève description de la meilleure pratique

The origin of the Community Managed Bio-industrial Watersheds Prof. J.S. Bali who called it “Agro-industrial Watershed Management”. The project works on the premise that watershed could go beyond natural resources management, where processing, storage and marketing is integrated with land use system. Thus, the approach builds on the conventional system of watershed management through value addition and new markets with appropriate socio-economic and institutional support systems, owned and managed by the community. |

Site

Community Managed Bio-industrial Watersheds project is implemented by MS Swaminathan Research Foundation in Pudukottai and Villupuram Districts of Tamil Nadu.

Brève description de l’environnement naturel du site

Semi-arid, Average Annual Rainfall 1154.14 mm|
Soil texture is black clay. The bulk density ranges between 1.18-1.22 (2007-pre project), particle density ranged from 1.81 – 2.25 and water holding capacity ranges from 45.95 – 53.75. In 2011 (post project), the bulk density ranged between 1.15 – 1.22, particle density ranged from 2.10 – 2.27 and maximum water holding capacity ranged from 45.80 – 54.63.
Soil samples showed an increase in pH observed (ranging from 7.74 to 8.21) in 2011.

Conditions socio-économiques dominantes des personnes vivant sur ou à proximité du site

Agriculture activities

Sur la base de quel critère/indicateur(s) (sans relation avec la stratégie) la pratique proposée et technologie correspondante ont-elles été considérées comme « meilleures »?

This model of watershed management incorporates suitable land and water management through Capacity Building and Awareness,  trainings, exposure visits and most importantly by bridging the digital divide in a rural context through the VKCs.  Knowledge Management is therefore an important component of the model. The implementation also looks at the particpation of all stakeholders through a District Advisory Committee (DAC) ensuring a  scaleing  up with the participation of the concerned  line departments.|

Principaux problèmes abordés par la meilleure pratique

Land & Water Management: Repairing and rejuvenation of traditional Water bodies:  The  sluices and weir of Periya Eri (Big Tank) in the village repaired, leading to  maximium storage of water. Community wells located in the village were also repaired. Work carried out under convergence of work with the Mahatma Gandhi Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Eeffective water governance also facilitated by creation of a  water user group. Increase in water storage has benefitted poor and marginal farmer|Area under cultivation of each farmer has increased, and most farmers now raise 2 crops in a year. Casurina plantations  reverting to food crop cultivation.|Improving soil health. Soil health cards issued. Green manuring facilitated.  |Diversified livelihoods, especially dairy activities  promoted to enhance the income of poor and marginal farmers. Crop diversification also encouraged for income enhancement. |Water wastage and over use of chemical countered by practices of SRI, IPM and INM through capacity building and Multi Media Package for Crop Pests.

Décrivez les principaux problèmes liés à la dégradation des terres abordés par la meilleure pratique

1. The micro watershed comprises 468 ha land covering wet and dry with a major portion of land being utilized as quarries or as casuarinas and eucalyptus plantations due to scarcity of water for irrigation.
2. The traditional irrigation tanks (eris) and few smaller tanks had  either fallen into disuse or not being utilized to its optimal level due to siltation and damage to the sluice, weirs etc., contributing  to the decline in land productivity.  The community open wells are placed far, so the cost of pumping increases leading the farmer to dig their own wells, but since proper lining is not done, the walls often caved in.
3. Because of Uncontrolled grazing land was being left fallow. Farmers’ were not able to take advantage of the schemes and subsidies of the government for drip/sprinkler irrigation systems since the as the fertile lands are small and split.
4. Granite Quarrying has caused land degradation and damaged the aquifers

Précisez les objectifs de la meilleure pratique

1. Conservation and Enhancement of Natural Resources – Participatory management of common resources through awareness, infrastructure development and facilitation of community based institutions to ensure equity and rights of the socially and economically marginalised; convergence with Panchayati Raj Institutions and Government Departments for bringing in synergy.|2. Improving On-farm Productivity & Profitability – Adopting a Participatory Technology Development (PTD) approach to improve farm productivity through Farmers Field Schools (FFS) and Training of Trainers (ToT), and promoting a holistic Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) for sustainable resource management.|3. Generation of Non and Off-farm Market driven Enterprises – Promoting diversified livelihood options for the watershed community with backward and forward credit, technology and market linkages and using ecotechnologies for livelihood security.

Brève description des principales activités, par objectif

Effective mechanisms for technology diffusion developed, tested and implemented – ICT initiatives.|
Bio-industrial initiatives identified, protocols developed, tested and implemented as alternative livelihood sources.|Project Learning Dissemination System established, policy advocacy carried out for agricultural research and planning.
Sustainable farming systems models and /or eco-friendly technologies developed and implemented.
Participatory Technology Development (PTD) protocol developed and tested addressing researchable issues related to soils, water, nutrients & pest management, value addition and processing.|

Brève description et caractéristiques techniques de la technologie

Community Managed Bio-industrial Watersheds project is implemented by MSSRF . The project works on the premise that watershed could go beyond natural resources management, where processing, storage and marketing is integrated with land use system. Thus, the approach builds on the conventional system of watershed management through value addition and new markets with appropriate socio-economic and institutional support systems, owned and managed by the community. |

Nom et adresse de l’institution développant la technologie

MS Swaminathan Research Foundation|Chennai, Tamil Nadu

La technologie a-t-elle été développée en partenariat ?

Oui

Dressez la liste des partenaires :

The project got financial support from the Jamsetji Tata Trust, Mumbai.|

Précisez le cadre de promotion de la technologie

• Initiative locale

La participation des parties prenantes locales, y compris des OSC, a-t-elle été recherchée au cours du développement de la technologie ?

Oui

Dressez la liste des parties prenantes locales:

1. Women’s Federations and Farmers’ Producer Groups
2. Water user groups
3. SHGs
4. The Bioindustrial Watershed Committee

Précisez le rôle des parties prenantes ci-dessus dans la conception, l’introduction, l’utilisation et la maintenance de la technologie, le cas échéant.

Women’s Federations and Farmers’ Producer Groups formed for enhanced strength to access credit, technology know-how, markets etc . Gender mainstream is seen.  SHGs have been only focused on women and All SHGs are enrolled in the women’s federation. Any intervention MSSRF does in the village, it is  mandatory that the beneficiaries  get approval letter from the federation.
The Bioindustrial Watershed Committee plays a pivotal role in ensuring that the community participates in all the watershed interventions and do so, the members have to be given timely and appropriate orientations and trainings.

La population vivant sur ou à proximité du site a-t-elle été impliquée dans le développement de la technologie?

Oui

Par quels moyens?

• Approches participatives

Décrivez les impacts sur site (les deux principaux impacts par catégorie)

The organic carbon ranged between 0.208–2.179% during 2007 which was higher than the recommended level of 0.5 – 0.75%. In contrast, the organic carbon decreased in most of the fields and the range was 0.341 – 1.03% during 2011. |
As a result of project  intervention there  has been the increase in water storage. A number of  poor and marginal farmers from the Scheduled could benefit by the recharge in their wells.The pumping hours of the wells has risen to one hour from the earlier half an hour.
2. Increase in  acreage and number of  farmers . Yields have gradually increased from 3 tonnes to 3.6 tonnes/acre for the local variety while that of the improved variety from 3.6 tonnes to 4 tonnes/acre. As a result of such efforts, survival rate of the seedlings in the nursery was close to 80%.|
1. Improvement of soil health: Due to the project intervention, the soil analysis based fertilizer application led to an increase in the phosphorus level during 2009 (3.9 to 28.7 Kg/acre). The available potassium ranged between 53.0-465.0 Kg/acre in 2007 which was higher than the recommended level.|
On a gender perspective, the watershed activities focus upon participation from the women and priority is given to women to work in the watershed activities. The BIWS Committee has given importance of bringing people together to represent caste, class and gender on an equitable manner.
System of Rice Intensification (SRI) introduced to substantially improve cultivation practice with reduced cost of cultivation and efficient management of available water.
Acres of permanent fallow could be brought back under cultivation, water for critical irrigation for paddy was made available. Moreover, the farmers could go in for two crops paddy followed by onion and vegetables leading to an increased net area and farmer can also go in for SRI cultivation.
The farmers are cultivating seasonal vegetables, area under cultivation of each farmer has increased, and farmers now raise 2 crops in a year.
With the assurance of water, farmers who were earlier unwilling to take the risk of cultivation land have gained confidence enough to even go cultivation.

Décrivez les deux principaux impacts hors site (dans les environs)

Water recharge
Prevention of outmigration of farmers.

Une analyse coût-avantage a-t-elle été réalisée?

Une analyse coût-avantage a-t-elle été réalisée? :

Oui

La technologie a-t-elle été diffusée/introduite sur d’autres sites?

La technologie a-t-elle été diffusée/introduite sur d’autres sites? :

Non

Pouvez-vous identifier les trois principales conditions ayant favorisé la réussite de la meilleure pratique/technologie présentée?

Promoting diversified livelihood options for the watershed community with backward and forward credit, technology and market linkages and using eco-technologies for livelihood security.    |
Ecology, economics, employment and equity are dealt in a holistic manner. |
Participatory management of common resources through awareness, infrastructure development and facilitation of community based institutions to ensure equity and rights of the socially and economically marginalised; convergence with Panchayati Raj Institutions and Government Departments for bringing in synergy.|

Réplication

Selon vous, la meilleure pratique/technologie proposée peut-elle reproduite, y compris avec un certain degré d’adaptation?

Oui

Liées aux ressources humaines

As a result of project  intervention there  has been the increase in water storage. A number of  poor and marginal farmers from the Scheduled could benefit by the recharge in their wells. The pumping hours of the wells has risen to one hour from the earlier half an hour. The farmers are cultivating seasonal vegetables. Area under cultivation of each farmer has increased, farmers now raise 2 crops in a year. |Land that had been converted into casuarinas plantations is reverted to food crop cultivation. The beneficiary capacity has been raised to manage the entire activities. Improvement in quality of life of women especially. Equitable water sharing with the tail-end farmers also getting water for irrigation. With the assurance of water, farmers who were earlier unwilling to take the risk of cultivation land have gained confidence enough to even go for paddy cultivation

Liées aux aspects techniques

Due to the project intervention, the soil analysis based fertilizer application led to an increase in the phosphorus level during 2009 (3.9 to 28.7 Kg/acre). The available potassium ranged between 53.0-465.0 Kg/acre in 2007 which was higher than the recommended level of 58.0–138.0 Kg/acre. The organic carbon ranged between 0.208–2.179% during 2007 which was higher than the recommended level of 0.5 – 0.75%. |In contrast, the organic carbon decreased in most of the fields and the range was 0.341 – 1.03% during 2011. The exchangeable calcium during 2007 ranged between 18.0 – 36.0 m.equ/100g soil, this was higher than the recommended level of 5.0 – 10.0 m.equ/100g soil. In 2011, the exchangeable calcium decreased to 24.0- 31.0 m.eq/100g soil. Magnesium ranged from 5.6 -24.0 m.eq/100g soil (2007). Exchangeable magnesium decreased in 2007, to ranges of 5.0 – 12.5 m.eq/100g soil. |Ninety eight soil health cards for paddy farmers and thirty four for onion farmers have been issued. Green manuring  and summer ploughing has been adopted by farmers .  Improved water infiltration and water holding capacity and control over weeds and pests has helped influence the yield.|System of Rice Intensification (SRI) introduced to substantially improve cultivation practice with reduced cost of cultivation and efficient management of available water. Testing, demonstration and extension of demonstration trials based on Integrated Pest, Nutrient and Crop Management (IPM/INM/ICM) carried out.  |This was adopted for different crops based on the Participatory Technology Development (PTD) approach, involving a participatory approach to strengthen the farmer’s skills on agriculture; building confidence and dissemination of technology.