Water Resource Users Association for the management of water resources in a river sub-catchment. [Kenya]
- Création :
- Mise à jour :
- Compilateur : Manuel Fischer
- Rédacteur : –
- Examinateur : Fabian Ottiger
approaches_2477 - Kenya
Voir les sections
Développer tout Réduire tout1. Informations générales
1.2 Coordonnées des personnes-ressources et des institutions impliquées dans l'évaluation et la documentation de l'Approche
Spécialiste GDT:
Ndung'u Martin
0735-789-423
WRUA Naro Moru
Naro Moru, P.O box 32-10105 Naro Moru
Kenya
Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
University of Bern, Institute of Geography (GIUB) - SuisseNom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
Water Resource Use Association Naro Moru (WRUA Naro Moru) - Kenya1.3 Conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées
Le compilateur et la(les) personne(s) ressource(s) acceptent les conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées:
Oui
2. Description de l'Approche de GDT
2.1 Courte description de l'Approche
WRUA are associations of water users and riparian land owners who have associated for the purposes of cooperatively sharing, managing and conserving a common water resource.
2.2 Description détaillée de l'Approche
Description détaillée de l'Approche:
Aims / objectives: The overall objective is to facilitate everybody in the river sub-catchment with sufficient and good quality water supply even during dry spells. Further objectives are to conserve the water catchment, to manage the resources properly, to preserve riverine forests and the riparian ecosystem, stop pollution and establish water use rules that are broadly accepted.
Methods: The WRUA is an association of stakeholders who wants to achieve the objectives mentioned above. During the regular meetings each stakeholder can raise his voice, express his needs and vote in a democratic manner. For outsiders and the government it is also an official contact in terms of water resources. The WRUA members arrive at a decision together and thus lead to direct democratic and sustainable development. Together, they accomplish the activities mentioned below.
Stages of implementation: First, a WRUA needs to register at the regional WRMA (Water Resources Management Authority) office, this ensures legal security for the WRUA. The WRMA provides the WRUA with technical and administrative advisory and is part of the Ministry of Water and Irrigation. The members of the WRUA conduct a water abstraction survey in the sub-catchment to identify all legal and illegal water abstractions. It is crucial to know the accurate water flows before you can conserve the water resources. The goal is to convince illegal abstractors to apply for a permit to legalise the abstractions. The WRUA
organises meetings, called barazzas, with the local chief and the riparian land users. In these meetings special conservation measures applied in the riparian area are discussed together with land management specialists. The conservation measures are cutting of water guzzling trees, planting of water-friendly indigenous trees, raise public awareness of pollution, rehabilitation of riverbanks and introduction of new technologies like drip
irrigation and rooftop water harvesting. To raise public awareness of the importance of the riparian area, the WRUA members conduct a pegging campaign along the main river of the sub-catchment. The water act 2002 dictates a riparian area of at least 6 metres on either side of the river. This area is being delineated to indicate the location of the protected to the land users. During water shortages (for example a dry spell), the WRUA publishes rules for water abstractions to ensure water supply for all land users.
Role of stakeholders: Furthermore, the WRUA is an important tool for stakeholders for communication and conflict management related to water resources. Due to the immense importance of water for ecosystem services a proper management of this resource is required.
2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où l'Approche a été appliquée
Pays:
Kenya
Région/ Etat/ Province:
Kenya/Central Province
Autres spécifications du lieu :
Nyeri/Naro Moru
Map
×2.6 Dates de début et de fin de l'Approche
Indiquez l'année de démarrage:
2002
2.7 Type d'Approche
- government
2.8 Principaux objectifs de l'Approche
The Approach focused mainly on SLM with other activities
The objective of implementing a governmental promoted association was to counter the numerous conflicts that have
arisen around water resources. The water resources were distributed inequitably and the riparian ecosystem was
damaged. Therefore WRUAs were built to improve water quality and increase water quantity by implementing protective
measures in riparian zones, mediate conflicts concerning water, stop river pollution and establish water use rules.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The WRUA was formed when some non-riparian water abstractors had no more water because the river was running dry.
Meanwhile also bad land use practices in the riparian zones of Kapingazi river diminished water quality. Due to forest
clearing close to the river, the soil lost its water storage capacity, even worse indigenous trees were replaced by water
guzzling trees like eucalyptus. The knowledge about conservation measures in the riparian areas was very low.
2.9 Conditions favorisant ou entravant la mise en œuvre de la(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche
autre
- entrave
There are land users who do not want to implement the proposed technologies. Some land users do not agree with the ideas of the WRUA, others are just conservative and want to continue their old habits.
Treatment through the SLM Approach: Restless spreading of the ideas and reasons of the WRUA can maybe convince some land users.
3. Participation et rôles des parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche
3.1 Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles
- exploitants locaux des terres / communautés locales
Especially riparian land users
All riparian users were adressed no matter what social or economical status they had. However it must be said that the riparian land users are among the more privileged ones, because they have direct access to water resources. In this sense, non-riparian land users were disadvantaged, because they could not profit of the seedling distribution. Non-riparian users were not target of the approach. The men/women ratio of the adressed land users depended strongly on the point in time the meetings were scheduled. At a morning meeting in a downstream area, 60% of the present land users were women. The reason is that many men were not available at this time, so the wife replaced them. In an upstream area, there were mostly men attendant.
In this region, the land ownership traditionally belongs to the man of the family. That is the reason why mostly men are adressed and participated at the barazza meetings. In case the husband is not available, the wife participates at the meeting.
- Spécialistes de la GDT/ conseillers agricoles
- gouvernement national (planificateurs, décideurs)
Water Resources Management Authority
3.2 Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche
Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales | Spécifiez qui était impliqué et décrivez les activités | |
---|---|---|
initiation/ motivation | auto-mobilisation | In the year 1999 Naro Moru river dried completely up for the first time. The consequence was a big clash between up- and downstreamers. The downstreamers located below Naro Moru town blamed the upstreamers and their irrigation systems for the low flows. The downstreamers walked upwards the river in search of water, eating food from the fields of upstreamers. This conflict made the formation of the association necessary involving all relevant water users. |
planification | soutien extérieur | The final measures were elaborated with support of the Water Resource Management Authority (WRMA). WRMA supported capacity building in terms of administrative knowledge and conservation technologies. |
mise en œuvre | interactive | The implementation took place at barazzas with local chiefs. The associated riparian land users came together and were informed by the members of the WRUA and a land use specialist about the advantages of riparian protection. The different measures like tree planting and introduction of Napier were communicated. Water unfriendly trees like Eucalyptus were recommended to be cut. Also, the background of water quality and improved drought resistance were teached. Seedlings were distributed. |
suivi/ évaluation | auto-mobilisation | The monitoring is done by the WRUA. Members walk regularly along the river and point out positive and negative examples. In case of negative examples, persuading of the land users is needed. |
Research | aucun |
3.3 Diagramme/ organigramme (si disponible)
Description:
The Chart shows how WRMA and WSTF support the WRUA with knowledge, technical advisory and financial assistance. The WRUA, composed of land users, is in contact with the land users via the chief.
Auteur:
Manuel Fischer
3.4 Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies
Indiquez qui a décidé de la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies à mettre en œuvre:
- principalement les exploitants des terres soutenus par des spécialistes de la GDT
Expliquez:
The WRUA was thinking about measures that could be implemented and proposed them.
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by WRUA. The members of the water resource users association mainly decided and implemented the measures for the protection of the riparian areas.
4. Soutien technique, renforcement des capacités et gestion des connaissances
4.1 Renforcement des capacités/ formation
Une formation a-t-elle été dispensée aux exploitants des terres/ autres parties prenantes?
Oui
Formats de la formation:
- entre agriculteurs (d'exploitants à exploitants)
- zones de démonstration
- réunions publiques
Thèmes abordés:
The most recent knowledge in riverbank protection and land conservation was communicated by the
WRMA to the WRUA and from the WRUA to the land users. Subjects treated are planting of waterfriendly indigenous
trees and chopping of water guzzling eucalyptus trees, as well as riverbank stabilization with trees and Napier grass. Pegging techniques were introduced to outline the riparian area. Furthermore, pollution prevention and new water-saving land use technologies were discussed.
4.2 Service de conseils
Les exploitants des terres ont-ils accès à un service de conseils?
Oui
Spécifiez si le service de conseils est fourni:
- dans les champs des exploitants?
Décrivez/ commentez:
Name of method used for advisory service: Technical and institutional advisory; Key elements: Conservation advisory, Administrative advisory; The WRMA provides technical training for the WRUA members concerning planting of waterfriendly/water guzzling trees, riverbank stabilization with trees and Napier grass, pollution prevention, new water-saving land use technologies and also climate change issues that rose recently. The WRUA wrote also a sub-catchment management plan in cooperation with WRMA advisors.
Advisory service is very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Campaigns are being done as planned, but patrolling is not that profound.
4.3 Renforcement des institutions (développement organisationnel)
Des institutions ont elles été mises en place ou renforcées par le biais de l'Approche?
- oui, modérément
Spécifiez à quel(s) niveau(x), ces institutions ont été renforcées ou mises en place:
- local
- Seedling were bought locally
Donnez plus de détails:
The seedlings were bought from local community based organisations.
4.4 Suivi et évaluation
Le suivi et l'évaluation font ils partie de l'Approche? :
Oui
Commentaires:
bio-physical aspects were None monitored by land users through observations; indicators: surviving trees were counted
There were several changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: It turned out that areas for the seedling distribution should be identified in a first step.
Also care taking of the seedlings is an important step to ensure the survival, since 25% of the seedlings died.
4 out of ten drip irrigation demonstration plots were relocated.
There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation
5. Financement et soutien matériel externe
5.1 Budget annuel de la composante GDT de l'Approche
Si le budget annuel précis n'est pas connu, indiquez une fourchette:
- 10 000-100 000
Commentez (par ex. principales sources de financement/ principaux bailleurs de fonds):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: government (Water services trust fund): 57.0%; local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (Laikipia Wildlife Forum): 43.0%
5.2 Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres
Les exploitants des terres ont-ils reçu un soutien financier/ matériel pour la mise en œuvre de la Technologie/ des Technologies?
Oui
Si oui, spécifiez le(s) type(s) de soutien, les conditions et les fournisseurs:
Got the seedlings
5.3 Subventions pour des intrants spécifiques (incluant la main d'œuvre)
- intrants agricoles
Spécifiez les intrants subventionnés | Dans quelle mesure | Spécifiez les subventions |
---|---|---|
semences | entièrement financé | |
Commentaires:
Land users got the seedlings and planted them by themselves.
5.4 Crédits
Des crédits ont-ils été alloués à travers l'Approche pour les activités de GDT?
Non
6. Analyses d'impact et conclusions
6.1 Impacts de l'Approche
Est-ce que l'Approche a aidé les exploitants des terres à mettre en œuvre et entretenir les Technologies de GDT?
- Non
- Oui, un peu
- Oui, modérément
- Oui, beaucoup
Water quality has been improved, riverine wildlife habitats have been enlarged, water storage capacity of the riparian zone has been ameliorated, vegetation cover and biodiversity have been increased.
Est-ce que l'Approche a autonomisé les groupes socialement et économiquement défavorisés?
- Non
- Oui, un peu
- Oui, modérément
- Oui, beaucoup
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- Non
- Oui, un peu
- Oui, modérément
- Oui, beaucoup
Even land users who did not participate at the barazzas finally implement the proposed technologies, because they communicated with other land users.
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
- Non
- Oui, un peu
- Oui, modérément
- Oui, beaucoup
Higher water quality is a direct output. In a long-term view, water availability will be bigger and riparian ecosystems will be able to regenerate.
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
- Non
- Oui, un peu
- Oui, modérément
- Oui, beaucoup
6.2 Principale motivation des exploitants des terres pour mettre en œuvre la GDT
- paiements/ subventions
seedlings
- règles et règlements (amendes)/ application
- law
water act was recited at the meetings
- current state of the riparian
makes farmers think about the future
6.3 Durabilité des activités de l'Approche
Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en œuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur)?
- oui
Si oui, décrivez de quelle manière:
Under the condition that they keep applying the conservation measures. Public awareness raising and patrols by the WRUA have to continue.
6.4 Points forts/ avantages de l'Approche
Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue de l'exploitant des terres |
---|
The meetings show a good turn up of people, this shows that they are needed. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Maybe even more land users can be motivated to show up at the meetings.) |
A main advantage is that it is easy to communicate among the water stakeholders. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Regular meetings should be scheduled.) |
6.5 Faiblesses/ inconvénients de l'Approche et moyens de les surmonter
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue de l’exploitant des terres | Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés? |
---|---|
Not all riparian members are totally committed to the activities of the WRUA. | Try to persuade them to show more motivation. |
7. Références et liens
7.1 Méthodes/ sources d'information
- visites de terrain, enquêtes sur le terrain
- interviews/entretiens avec les exploitants des terres
Liens et modules
Développer tout Réduire toutLiens
Aucun lien
Modules
Aucun module trouvé