Approches

Pipeline Irrigation [Népal]

  • Création :
  • Mise à jour :
  • Compilateur :
  • Rédacteur :
  • Examinateur :

Pipe Sinchai

approaches_2636 - Népal

État complet : 89%

1. Informations générales

1.2 Coordonnées des personnes-ressources et des institutions impliquées dans l'évaluation et la documentation de l'Approche

Personne(s) ressource(s) clé(s)

Spécialiste GDT:
Spécialiste GDT:

Singtan Gangaraj

Chyamrangbesi-2 kavrepalanchowk

Népal

Spécialiste GDT:

Bajracharya Bisweta

bisarm73@gmail.com

Kathmandu University

Dhulikhel

Népal

Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de l'Approche (si pertinent)
Kathmandu University (KU) - Népal

1.3 Conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées

Quand les données ont-elles été compilées (sur le terrain)?

02/01/2013

Le compilateur et la(les) personne(s) ressource(s) acceptent les conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées:

Oui

1.4 Références au(x) questionnaire(s) sur les Technologies de GDT

Pipe Irrigation
technologies

Pipe Irrigation [Népal]

Waterways and pipelines to draw water from closeby rivers for irrigation and household purposes.

  • Compilateur : Sabita Aryal

2. Description de l'Approche de GDT

2.1 Courte description de l'Approche

The process and measures taken to draw water from nearby rivers for irrigation and household purposes.

2.2 Description détaillée de l'Approche

Description détaillée de l'Approche:

Aims / objectives: This approach was carried out to overcome the problem of less agricultural yield due to dry land.

Methods: This approach was first proposed by Mr. Gangaraj Singtan and later on a committee was formed. This committee further carried on the work through interactions.

Stages of implementation: To implement this approach,they had to face financial problems.This was solved by the contribution provided by the District Development Committee.And another was collected from villagers and the work could be carried out further.

Role of stakeholders: Everyone from every ethnic group was involved in the work.However to carry on the major discussions,the committe was formed.The following people were involved on the central committee: Mr. Gangaraj Singtan, Mr. Dand Prasad Dahal, Mr. Khemraj Dahal, Mr. Suman Dahal and mr Kiran Dahal.

2.3 Photos de l'approche

2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où l'Approche a été appliquée

Pays:

Népal

Région/ Etat/ Province:

Chyamrangbesi-2

Autres spécifications du lieu :

kavrepalanchowk

2.6 Dates de début et de fin de l'Approche

Indiquez l'année de démarrage:

2004

2.7 Type d'Approche

  • initiative/ innovation récente locale

2.8 Principaux objectifs de l'Approche

The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (agriculture)

Mainly the approach was carried out to reduce the problem of dry soil that had led to low agricultural production in the village.

The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The main problem to be addressed were the low agricultural production due to soil and the lack of cash to invest for the soil management to overcome the problem.

2.9 Conditions favorisant ou entravant la mise en œuvre de la(des) Technologie(s) appliquée(s) sous l'Approche

disponibilité/ accès aux ressources et services financiers
  • entrave

The villagers could not do the full investment for the adoption of the technology.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: District office provided with 50% investment to carry on the technology.

cadre institutionnel
  • entrave

The villagers did not have any idea of this kind of irrigation.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: The trainers and advisor helped them to know about this approach.

cadre juridique (régime foncier, droits d'utilisation des terres et de l'eau)
  • favorise

The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights greatly helped the approach implementation: The only hindrance was finance.

charge de travail, disponibilité de la main-d'œuvre
  • entrave

Due to financial aid problem it was not possible to appoint labours.

Treatment through the SLM Approach: The villagers themselves worked inorder to make this possible.

3. Participation et rôles des parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche

3.1 Parties prenantes impliquées dans l'Approche et rôles

  • exploitants locaux des terres / communautés locales

Every group of people be it brahmin, tamang , chhetri, etc were involved including women.

Formed a committee for the approach and implemented together. Formed a committee to work on the technology.

  • gouvernement local

DDC provided finance for the implementation.

  • Engineer, MrPadam Bahadur Singtan helped with the model
Si plusieurs parties prenantes sont impliquées, indiquez l'organisme chef de file ou l'institution responsable:

Mainly, Mr. Gangaraj Singtan proposed the idea of the technology followed by discussion and interaction in the whole community.

3.2 Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales aux différentes phases de l'Approche
Participation des exploitants locaux des terres/ communautés locales Spécifiez qui était impliqué et décrivez les activités
initiation/ motivation auto-mobilisation Mr.Gangaraj Singtan initiated the project by forming a committee and further worked in implementing it.
planification interactive Planning for the project was done by interaction in the committee
mise en œuvre interactive Interaction was done in the committee to implement it.
suivi/ évaluation interactive land uses do it themselves in their own house and further interact in the meetings.
Research interactive land users with their involvement in the meetings.

3.3 Diagramme/ organigramme (si disponible)

3.4 Prises de décision pour la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies

Indiquez qui a décidé de la sélection de la Technologie/ des Technologies à mettre en œuvre:
  • les exploitants des terres seuls (auto-initiative)
Expliquez:

Since, the villagers depend on agriculture for there livelihood, to overcome their problem the land users themselves took initiative followed by different procedures upto the district level.

Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up). To implement the technology,District Development Committee helped with financewhich helped the land users to carry out further process.

4. Soutien technique, renforcement des capacités et gestion des connaissances

4.1 Renforcement des capacités/ formation

Une formation a-t-elle été dispensée aux exploitants des terres/ autres parties prenantes?

Non

4.2 Service de conseils

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils accès à un service de conseils?

Oui

  • By Mr.Padam Bahadur Singtan
Décrivez/ commentez:

Name of method used for advisory service: Technical advice by Mr.Padam Bahadur Singtan; Key elements: regarding the size of the pipe, Route of the irrigation pipe; The advice was effective as no problem has been accounted so far.

Advisory service is quite adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; The villagers seem to have idea of the process to be followed further.

4.3 Renforcement des institutions (développement organisationnel)

Des institutions ont elles été mises en place ou renforcées par le biais de l'Approche?
  • non

4.4 Suivi et évaluation

Le suivi et l'évaluation font ils partie de l'Approche? :

Oui

Commentaires:

no. of land users involved aspects were regular monitored by land users through observations; indicators: allocation of project activities

management of Approach aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

There were no changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 Recherche

La recherche a-t-elle fait partie intégrante de l’Approche?

Oui

Spécifiez les thèmes:
  • économie/ marketing
Donnez plus de détails et indiquez qui a mené ces recherches:

The research was entirely villagers work.

Research was carried out on-farm

5. Financement et soutien matériel externe

5.1 Budget annuel de la composante GDT de l'Approche

Si le budget annuel précis n'est pas connu, indiquez une fourchette:
  • 2 000-10 000
Commentez (par ex. principales sources de financement/ principaux bailleurs de fonds):

Approach costs were met by the following donors: local government (district, county, municipality, village etc) (District Development Committtee , Village Development Committee): 50.0%; local community / land user(s) (A committee formed for the project): 50.0%

5.2 Soutiens financiers/ matériels fournis aux exploitants des terres

Les exploitants des terres ont-ils reçu un soutien financier/ matériel pour la mise en œuvre de la Technologie/ des Technologies?

Oui

5.3 Subventions pour des intrants spécifiques (incluant la main d'œuvre)

  • équipement
Spécifiez les intrants subventionnés Dans quelle mesure Spécifiez les subventions
Cement and pipe en partie financé
Si la main d'œuvre fournie par les exploitants des terres était un intrant substantiel, elle était:
  • volontaire
Commentaires:

For the benefit of their land, land users were involved.

The equipment was owned by the land users themselves and for cement and pipes, partly contribution was made by DDC.

5.4 Crédits

Des crédits ont-ils été alloués à travers l'Approche pour les activités de GDT?

Non

6. Analyses d'impact et conclusions

6.1 Impacts de l'Approche

Est-ce que l'Approche a aidé les exploitants des terres à mettre en œuvre et entretenir les Technologies de GDT?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

The runoff of upper soil due to erosion was prevented because of the flow of water through pipe and in fields, more yeild has been noticed.

Est-ce que l'Approche a autonomisé les groupes socialement et économiquement défavorisés?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

All the ethnic group were benefitted as their livelihood improved in different ways.

Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

ward no.9 of the same VDC

Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

Increased yield led to increased incomne so the land users were able to improve their settlement, build good homes, got school fees for their children.

Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
  • Non
  • Oui, un peu
  • Oui, modérément
  • Oui, beaucoup

The income from the yeild helped greatly to improve their way of living, education and better health.

6.2 Principale motivation des exploitants des terres pour mettre en œuvre la GDT

  • augmenter la production

for better cultivation.

  • augmenter la rentabilité/ bénéfice, rapport coûts-bénéfices

better yield leads to better economic condition

  • réduire la charge de travail

no load to carry water from distance

  • affiliation à un mouvement/ projet/ groupe/ réseaux

to prevent dry soil and upper soil loss.

6.3 Durabilité des activités de l'Approche

Les exploitants des terres peuvent-ils poursuivre ce qui a été mis en œuvre par le biais de l'Approche (sans soutien extérieur)?
  • oui
Si oui, décrivez de quelle manière:

They have the idea of the procedures to carry out. Regarding finance also they have been collecting Rs.30 from each month and so far have collected 13000. So, they may not have problem in finance as well.

6.4 Points forts/ avantages de l'Approche

Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue de l'exploitant des terres
Greenery (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: This can be sustained by awareness to the people about consequences of dry soil and poor use of water.)
Better livelihood.
Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé
Increased yeild led to increased income and hence better economic condition.
(How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Proper use of water.)
The committee formed led to united work. (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: Participation of all people without discrimination.)

6.5 Faiblesses/ inconvénients de l'Approche et moyens de les surmonter

Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue de l’exploitant des terres Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
Large amout may lead to water wastage. People must be encouraged to make proper use or go for alternative use.
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés?
Sometimes the water may get wasted if it is not required in the field. The water when not required may be used for other purposes or may just simply drain in other route where it is required.
Sometimes the amount of water required by the crops may exceed due o which the crops may die.

7. Références et liens

7.1 Méthodes/ sources d'information

  • visites de terrain, enquêtes sur le terrain
  • interviews/entretiens avec les exploitants des terres

Modules