Teff row planting [Ethiopie]
- Création :
- Mise à jour :
- Compilateur : Gizaw Desta Gessesse
- Rédacteur : –
- Examinateur : Alexandra Gavilano
Teff bemesmr mezrat (Amharic)
technologies_1192 - Ethiopie
Voir les sections
Développer tout Réduire tout1. Informations générales
1.2 Coordonnées des personnes-ressources et des institutions impliquées dans l'évaluation et la documentation de la Technologie
Spécialiste GDT:
Tefferra Abu
251918701086
buteffera@yahoo.com
Bahir Dar Agricultural Mechanization and Food Science Research Centre
Ethiopie
Nom du ou des institutions qui ont facilité la documentation/ l'évaluation de la Technologie (si pertinent)
Water and Land Resource Centre (WLRC) - Ethiopie1.3 Conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées
Quand les données ont-elles été compilées (sur le terrain)?
28/01/2014
Le compilateur et la(les) personne(s) ressource(s) acceptent les conditions relatives à l'utilisation par WOCAT des données documentées:
Oui
2. Description de la Technologie de GDT
2.1 Courte description de la Technologie
Définition de la Technologie:
Teff row planting is an agronomic practice used to place Teff seeds (very small size) in rows of about 20cm apart and at predetermined depth with sufficient cover of firm soil.
2.2 Description détaillée de la Technologie
Description:
Teff is a staple crop in Ethiopia and used to make 'Injera'. Teff is commonly planted in broadcast technique with a seed rate of 25-30 kg per hectare. This practice results in high competition for nutrient and water, lodging and low productivity (on average 1 ton/ha). Teff row planting is a newly adopted planting method applied for small size seeds of Teff grain. The row planting technique reduces the seed rate from 25kg/ha to 5-8 kg per hectare, ease the weed management, reduce lodging problem, and lessen plant density and then competition for sunlight, nutrient and water. It is practiced on Teff growing soils except on heavy clay soils or Vertisols where it is difficult to prepare defined rows due to the extreme swelling nature of the soil under near saturation moisture condition. However, under optimum soil moisture (45-50%) it is possible to place seeds in row using manual seed drill in black soils with clay texture. The technique is not perfectly working on stony fields. Seed application is possible using locally available plastic bottles with needle size opening to drop seeds, and newly manufactured seed drill pulled by one person.
Purpose of the Technology: The main purpose to practice Teff row planting is to reduce plant density or population per unit area and thereby increase productivity. It also aim to reduce the lodging problem. Additional advantage of row planting for small grain crop, there is some extent of labor reduction for weeding to some extent.
Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: Teff row planting technique applies on fine seed bed after 3-5 tillage frequency using local ard plough called maresha pulled by pair of oxen. Once the seed bed is finely prepared, first using local adopted application tools like plastic bottles or hand metering the farmer prepares seed rate of 5-8 kg per hectare mixed with proportional sand (approximately seed to sand ratio of 1:3) - it is difficult to manage uniform application and even distribution by applying the seed alone. He applies along the row and step on to cover the seed and compact it. Similarly, fertilizer is applied in the same way. Second option, after the preparation of fine seed bed, seed application is facilitated using drum type manual seed drill (of weight 21 kg) manufactured by Bahir Dar Agricultural Mechanization and Food Science Research Center (BAMFSRC) having 3 rows of 20cm apart, average depth and width of planting furrow equals to 3.6 cm and 6.4 cm and operating at field capacity of 0.06ha/hr. The drill can apply 3-6 kg/ha seed rate and pulled by one person. At tillering stage urea is top dressed. The technique requires 50-60 person days per hectare to apply seed and fertilizer using hand metering/bottles compared to 2-4 person days per hectare using drum type seed drill. Labor requirement for weeding is also reduced by using row planting than broadcast method.
Natural / human environment: Teff grows on wider environment of altitude range 1800-2600 m above sea level. It performs well with annual rainfall of 750-850 mm and temperature of 10-27 degree Celsius. In fact, there are varieties with short growing period adapted under low rainfall conditions. The row planting technique applies commonly on red clay soils having high water holding capacity. The technique potentially applies on slopes ranging from 0-10% with low stone cover.
Teff row planting using manual seed application or hand metering technique can easily be practiced by households having large family labor. Farm households who used the manual seed drill of drum type should have the capacity to afford the seed drill and able to buy fertilizer. Teff is produced for food and market. It has a good price for sale.
Although teff has high market price in country as well as an emerging export market potential, it is produced annually by subsistence farmers. The land holding is small to meet their family food demands. Their wealth condition ranges poor to average characterized with low agricultural advisory, market and water supply services and inadequate infrastructures. Energy supply is relied on biomass energy. Rural education and health services are improved. Rural unemployment and landless populations are at high rates. In general, the well being of the rural people is under poor condition.
2.3 Photos de la Technologie
2.5 Pays/ région/ lieux où la Technologie a été appliquée et qui sont couverts par cette évaluation
Pays:
Ethiopie
Région/ Etat/ Province:
Amhara
Autres spécifications du lieu:
Bahir Dar Zuria, Mecha, Yilmana Densa, and Dembecha
Commentaires:
Boundary points of the Technology area: 10.630850, 37.506877; 11.274962, 37.226641; 11.355705, 37.426134; 11.649907, 37.500604
2.6 Date de mise en œuvre de la Technologie
Si l'année précise est inconnue, indiquez la date approximative: :
- il y a moins de 10 ans (récemment)
2.7 Introduction de la Technologie
Spécifiez comment la Technologie a été introduite: :
- au cours d'expérimentations / de recherches
Commentaires (type de projet, etc.) :
Teff row planting technique was started in research stations 10 to20 years ago. The technique is extended to large number of farmers' field since 2011 through the scale up program of the Ministry of Agriculture. For instance, in 2013 the Amhara region planned to cover 20-30% of teff growing fields.
3. Classification de la Technologie de GDT
3.2 Type(s) actuel(s) d'utilisation des terres, là où la Technologie est appliquée
Terres cultivées
- Cultures annuelles
Pâturages
- Livestock is grazing on crop residues
Commentaires:
Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): Major land use problems are soil erosion by water, soil nutrient depletion, gully erosion, steep slope cultivation, land fragmentation, and inappropriate runoff drainage practices like drainage ditches on cultivated fields.
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): Land users commonly specify soil erosion by water, shallow soil depth or soil depletion, low productivity of the soil, scarcity of water, and shortage of grazing land or pasture.
3.3 Informations complémentaires sur l'utilisation des terres
Approvisionnement en eau des terres sur lesquelles est appliquée la Technologie:
- mixte: pluvial-irrigué
Nombre de période de croissance par an: :
- 1
Précisez:
Longest growing period in days: 180Longest growing period from month to month: July to December
3.5 Diffusion de la Technologie
Spécifiez la diffusion de la Technologie:
- répartie uniformément sur une zone
Si la Technologie est uniformément répartie sur une zone, indiquez la superficie couverte approximative:
- 0,1-1 km2
Commentaires:
The area covered with Teff row planting referred in this database only considers the area of the pre-scale up activities in the WLRC learning watersheds. The practice is steadily growing over years in teff growing areas of the country in general and Amhara region in particular.
3.6 Mesures de GDT constituant la Technologie
pratiques agronomiques
- A1: Couverture végétale/ du sol
Commentaires:
Type of agronomic measures: mineral (inorganic) fertilizers
3.7 Principaux types de dégradation des terres traités par la Technologie
dégradation physique des sols
- Pc: compaction
- Pk: scellage et encroûtement
Commentaires:
Main causes of degradation: soil management (Teff fields are tilled 4-5 times and heavily trampled/compacted by livestock before sowing)
Secondary causes of degradation: Heavy / extreme rainfall (intensity/amounts) (Heavy rainfall cause high runoff and then erosion. It also create sealing effect on the soil surface)
3.8 Prévention, réduction de la dégradation ou réhabilitation des terres dégradées
Spécifiez l'objectif de la Technologie au regard de la dégradation des terres:
- prévenir la dégradation des terres
- réduire la dégradation des terres
4. Spécifications techniques, activités, intrants et coûts de mise en œuvre
4.1 Dessin technique de la Technologie
4.2 Spécification/ explications techniques du dessin technique
A sketch describing Teff row planting
Location: Aba Gerima, Debre Mewi, Debre Yacob, Gosh Learning. West Gojam/ Amhara Region
Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: high (Because of its small seed size, the method requires knowledge of the soil where it performs well and at what depth the seed is placed so that there is high germination and minimizing lodging problem)
Technical knowledge required for land users: high (The land user has to develop capacity and skills on the specific soil and slope conditions where row planting performs well, spacing of rows, depth of furrow and seed quantity per unit area.)
Main technical functions: improvement of surface structure (crusting, sealing), increase of biomass (quantity), Reduction of plant population and competition effect
Secondary technical functions: improvement of topsoil structure (compaction)
Agronomic measure: Row planting
Material/ species: Teff seeds
Quantity/ density: 3-6kg/ha
Remarks: Spacing between rows is 20cm
Mineral (inorganic) fertilizers
Material/ species: Urea and DAP
Quantity/ density: 100 kg/ha
Remarks: for each type of fertilizer
4.3 Informations générales sur le calcul des intrants et des coûts
autre/ monnaie nationale (précisez):
ETH BIRR
Indiquer le taux de change du dollars en monnaie locale (si pertinent): 1 USD= :
20,0
Indiquez le coût salarial moyen de la main d'œuvre par jour:
3.00
4.4 Activités de mise en place/ d'établissement
Activité | Type de mesures | Calendrier | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Drum type row teff seeder (with 3 rows) | Modes de gestion |
4.5 Coûts et intrants nécessaires à la mise en place
Spécifiez les intrants | Unité | Quantité | Coûts par unité | Coût total par intrant | % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equipements | machine use | pc | 1,0 | 71,0 | 71,0 | 100,0 |
Coût total de mise en place de la Technologie | 71,0 |
4.6 Activités d'entretien/ récurrentes
Activité | Type de mesures | Calendrier/ fréquence | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Tillage | Agronomique | Annually after onset of rain, 4-5 times |
2. | Seeding | Agronomique | After the soil gets sufficient moisture annually |
3. | Weeding | Agronomique | 2-3 times per season |
4. | Harvesting | Agronomique | Annually at maturity period (Nov-Dec) |
5. | Threshing | Agronomique | Annually during slack period (Dce-Jan) |
6. | Transporting and storing grain and straw | Agronomique | Annually during slack period |
4.7 Coûts et intrants nécessaires aux activités d'entretien/ récurrentes (par an)
Spécifiez les intrants | Unité | Quantité | Coûts par unité | Coût total par intrant | % des coût supporté par les exploitants des terres | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main d'œuvre | labour | 1,0 | 318,0 | 318,0 | 100,0 | |
Equipements | animal traction | 1,0 | 266,0 | 266,0 | 100,0 | |
Matériel végétal | seeds | 1,0 | 4,5 | 4,5 | 100,0 | |
Matériel végétal | fertilizer | 1,0 | 150,0 | 150,0 | 100,0 | |
Coût total d'entretien de la Technologie | 738,5 |
Commentaires:
Machinery/ tools: Seed drill, local plough, sickle, hoe
The costs are calculated on hectare basis covered by row planting method. The costs apply for February/March 2014
4.8 Facteurs les plus importants affectant les coûts
Décrivez les facteurs les plus importants affectant les coûts :
The implementation costs are subject to change due to fluctuation in seasonal labor demand, price of fertilizer, price of iron to construct seed drill, and inflation
5. Environnement naturel et humain
5.1 Climat
Précipitations annuelles
- < 250 mm
- 251-500 mm
- 501-750 mm
- 751-1000 mm
- 1001-1500 mm
- 1501-2000 mm
- 2001-3000 mm
- 3001-4000 mm
- > 4000 mm
Zone agro-climatique
- subhumide
- semi-aride
Thermal climate class: subtropics
5.2 Topographie
Pentes moyennes:
- plat (0-2 %)
- faible (3-5%)
- modéré (6-10%)
- onduleux (11-15%)
- vallonné (16-30%)
- raide (31-60%)
- très raide (>60%)
Reliefs:
- plateaux/ plaines
- crêtes
- flancs/ pentes de montagne
- flancs/ pentes de colline
- piémonts/ glacis (bas de pente)
- fonds de vallée/bas-fonds
Zones altitudinales:
- 0-100 m
- 101-500 m
- 501-1000 m
- 1001-1500 m
- 1501-2000 m
- 2001-2500 m
- 2501-3000 m
- 3001-4000 m
- > 4000 m
5.3 Sols
Profondeur moyenne du sol:
- très superficiel (0-20 cm)
- superficiel (21-50 cm)
- modérément profond (51-80 cm)
- profond (81-120 cm)
- très profond (>120 cm)
Texture du sol (de la couche arable):
- moyen (limoneux)
- fin/ lourd (argile)
Matière organique de la couche arable:
- abondant (>3%)
- moyen (1-3%)
5.4 Disponibilité et qualité de l'eau
Profondeur estimée de l’eau dans le sol:
> 50 m
Disponibilité de l’eau de surface:
bonne
Qualité de l’eau (non traitée):
uniquement pour usage agricole (irrigation)
5.5 Biodiversité
Diversité des espèces:
- faible
5.6 Caractéristiques des exploitants des terres appliquant la Technologie
Orientation du système de production:
- subsistance (auto-approvisionnement)
- mixte (de subsistance/ commercial)
Revenus hors exploitation:
- moins de 10% de tous les revenus
Niveau relatif de richesse:
- pauvre
- moyen
Individus ou groupes:
- individu/ ménage
Niveau de mécanisation:
- travail manuel
- traction animale
Genre:
- femmes
- hommes
Indiquez toute autre caractéristique pertinente des exploitants des terres:
Difference in the involvement of women and men: Women play a role of applying seeds either using locally made plastic bottles or using the manual drum type seed drill to pull. However, men are involved in both in tillage and seeding practices.
Population density: 100-200 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 2% - 3%
5.7 Superficie moyenne des terres détenues ou louées par les exploitants appliquant la Technologie
- < 0,5 ha
- 0,5-1 ha
- 1-2 ha
- 2-5 ha
- 5-15 ha
- 15-50 ha
- 50-100 ha
- 100-500 ha
- 500-1 000 ha
- 1 000-10 000 ha
- > 10 000 ha
Cette superficie est-elle considérée comme de petite, moyenne ou grande dimension (en se référant au contexte local)?
- petite dimension
Commentaires:
Average area of land owned or leased by land users applying the Technology: < 0.5 ha, 0.5-1 ha, 1-2 ha
5.8 Propriété foncière, droits d’utilisation des terres et de l'eau
Propriété foncière:
- état
- individu, avec titre de propriété
Droits d’utilisation de l’eau:
- accès libre (non organisé)
5.9 Accès aux services et aux infrastructures
santé:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
éducation:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
assistance technique:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
emploi (par ex. hors exploitation):
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
marchés:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
énergie:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
routes et transports:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
eau potable et assainissement:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
services financiers:
- pauvre
- modéré
- bonne
6. Impacts et conclusions
6.1 Impacts sur site que la Technologie a montrés
Impacts socio-économiques
Production
production agricole
Quantité avant la GDT:
1.2 ton/ha
Quantité après la GDT:
>2.7 ton/ha
production fourragère
Quantité avant la GDT:
2.4 ton/ha
Quantité après la GDT:
5 ton/ha
qualité des fourrages
production animale
Revenus et coûts
revenus agricoles
Impacts socioculturels
sécurité alimentaire/ autosuffisance
Improved teff agronomic knowledge
Impacts écologiques
Cycle de l'eau/ ruissellement
ruissellement de surface
Sols
humidité du sol
encroûtement/ battance du sol
compaction du sol
Biodiversité: végétale, animale
contrôle des animaux nuisibles/ maladies
6.3 Exposition et sensibilité de la Technologie aux changements progressifs et aux évènements extrêmes/catastrophes liés au climat (telles que perçues par les exploitants des terres)
Extrêmes climatiques (catastrophes)
Catastrophes météorologiques
Comment la Technologie fait-elle face à cela? | |
---|---|
pluie torrentielle locale | pas bien |
Catastrophes climatiques
Comment la Technologie fait-elle face à cela? | |
---|---|
sécheresse | pas bien |
Autres conséquences liées au climat
Autres conséquences liées au climat
Comment la Technologie fait-elle face à cela? | |
---|---|
réduction de la période de croissance | pas bien |
6.4 Analyse coûts-bénéfices
Quels sont les bénéfices comparativement aux coûts de mise en place (du point de vue des exploitants des terres)?
Rentabilité à court terme:
positive
Rentabilité à long terme:
très positive
Quels sont les bénéfices comparativement aux coûts d'entretien récurrents (du point de vue des exploitants des terres)?
Rentabilité à court terme:
légèrement positive
Rentabilité à long terme:
positive
Commentaires:
Since the new technology (Teff row planting) requires high human labor while placing seeds using hand metering or plastic bottles (locally adopted) to apply the seeds, the land users perceived that the cost of labor is high and can not be affordable using family labor alone. Until they developed experience the return may be considered as slightly positive. However, if the land users adopt to use the manual drum type seed drill the return is very positive and positive as compared to the establishment and recurrent costs, respectively.
6.5 Adoption de la Technologie
Commentaires:
There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology
Comments on adoption trend: The adoption is growing with extensive technical guidance and push from the research and extension services.
6.7 Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités de la Technologie
Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue de l'exploitant des terres |
---|
There is yield advantage both grain and straw How can they be sustained / enhanced? The technique needs an improved tool to reduce labor demand. It has to be supported with improved varieties and agronomic practices |
It requires small amount of seed |
According to some farmers it avoids the usual practice called trampling of seed bed by livestock after sowing the seed |
Points forts/ avantages/ possibilités du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé |
---|
Teff row planting can bring 30-50% yield advantage compared to the broadcasting method of planting How can they be sustained / enhanced? The yield advantage can be sustained by using an integrated or package of Teff production technologies such as improved teff varieties, recommended fertilizer, pesticides and weeding |
It reduces three to four times the amount of seed required using the broadcasting method How can they be sustained / enhanced? This advantage can be enhanced or continue to sustain by using an improved low cost seed drills |
The technology eases the weeding practice without damaging the plants How can they be sustained / enhanced? Appropriate low cost weeders or herbicides can be used to further enhance the technique |
The technology reduces damage due to lodging problem along with the use of selected Teff varieties having strong stem How can they be sustained / enhanced? This can be sustained if supported with further research in the depth of seed placement and genetic improvement |
6.8 Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques de la Technologie et moyens de les surmonter
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue de l’exploitant des terres | Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés? |
---|---|
The implement has relatively low stability to make straight rows. | Improving the workmanship will solve the problem |
Non uniform seed application if pulling speed not constant | Proper seed bed preparation and removal of stones will solve the problem |
Faiblesses/ inconvénients/ risques du point de vue du compilateur ou d'une autre personne ressource clé | Comment peuvent-ils être surmontés? |
---|---|
Uniform application and distribution of small amount of seed (as low as 5kg) in rows of 20cm apart become challenging compared to the broadcasting technique | This can be overcome by continuous skill development through practice and training |
The small number of plant populations or vigorous growth of teff plants favor the shoot fly damage. | Application of chemicals will control shootfly |
7. Références et liens
7.2 Références des publications disponibles
Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:
(Unpublished Report, 2013): Technical Evaluation and Selection of Suitable Teff Seed Drill in Amhara Region, by team of Researchers in ARARI, Bahir Dar Mechanization and Food Science research Center and Lecturers from Bahir Dar University
Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:
Dereje Gorfu and Eshetu Ahmed (unpublished). Crops and Agro-ecological Zones of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
Titre, auteur, année, ISBN:
http://www.worldbank.org/html/cgiar/newsletter/Sept97/10tef.html
Liens et modules
Développer tout Réduire toutLiens
Aucun lien
Modules
Aucun module trouvé