Keyhole Garden resisting flooding. (Shahid Kamal)

Keyhole Garden (Bangladesh)

PUSTI BAGAN ("Garden for nutrition")

Descrição

The Keyhole Garden model of homestead vegetable cultivation enhances the resilience of families living in areas with climate-related hazards, such as flooding and drought. Keyhole gardens have been shown to increase vegetable production in all seasons, thereby improving household food autonomy and dietary diversity.

First initiated in Ugandan communities by Send a Cow UK, the keyhole garden technique is widespread in Africa. In 2011, Terre des hommes (Tdh) and Greendots piloted Keyhole Gardens for the first time in Asia, effectively adapting the design and methodology in Africa to the conditions of flood prone areas of Bangladesh, and eventually India. The garden is a good way to enhance dietary diversity, especially for poor/landless families.

Keyhole gardens consist of a raised circular garden made of clay, shaped like a horseshoe or keyhole, with a maximum diameter of approximately three meters. For flood prone areas in Bangladesh and India, the plinth height depends on the location and is typically the same as the house plinth to resist flooding. A compost basket is built at the center of the garden. Organic matter (kitchen cuttings) and residual water are added on a regular basis through the compost pit. In some countries, bricks or stones are used to make the plinth.

The keyhole garden is a typical Low External Input Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA) approach that includes integrated composting, water retention, use of local materials, natural pest and disease control techniques, natural soil fertility measures, and proximity to the kitchen for both harvesting and care of the garden. In regions with mild conditions of flooding, tidal surge and drought, the garden increases the duration of gardening period during the year thus reducing the risk of disaster. In the aftermath of cyclone Mahasen, keyhole gardens demonstrated DRR utility: although many were partially damaged, none had to be rebuilt entirely. Where plants did not survive the storm, users were able to sow seeds immediately. On the other hand, the traditional ground-level plots used for pit and heap gardening were completely flooded / waterlogged and unusable.

Benefits of the technology include: compact size, proximity to the household for convenient maintenance and harvesting, composting of kitchen cuttings in the basket; and an ergonomic structure (raised, accessible). The small size is also ideal to facilitate training on vegetable growing, soil fertility and pest & disease management to first-time gardeners and students in schools. Keyhole gardens are highly productive—in Lesotho a typical garden can satisfy vegetable needs for a family of eight persons (FAO, 2008). Combined, these factors are scalable as an appropriate technology for landless and marginal farmers. In Bangladesh, the gardens enabled families to produce vegetables even during the monsoon period. As the keyhole garden normally does not need to be rebuilt every year it is a more efficient technique in the long-term than traditional methods such as pit and heap.

Users say that their garden produce tends to be larger and tastier than conventional gardens or market produce; and many indicated that they were able to meet their own vegetable consumption needs and to sell surplus or gift vegetables. For some women it was difficult to access sufficient amounts of soil, which meant that they needed to walk long distances to build the plinth. (Fortunately many received support from other villagers.) Secondly, during the monsoon, while most of the land is flooded, the keyhole garden remains dry. Consequently, it may provide shelter to certain animals (e.g. rats) and attract higher number of pests. Regardless of these two limitations users agree that the benefits greatly
outweigh any observed limitations.

Localização

Localização: Kurigram municipality (Kurigram), Patharghata Union (Barguna), Kurigram District / Rajshahi and Barguna District / Barisal, Bangladesh

Nº de sites de tecnologia analisados: 100-1000 locais

Geo-referência de locais selecionados
  • 89.6487, 25.81035

Difusão da tecnologia: Aplicado em pontos específicos/concentrado numa pequena área

Em uma área permanentemente protegida?:

Data da implementação: 2012

Tipo de introdução
Diversity is at the heart of the intervention: increased crop diversity for a healthier garden (resisting pests) and increased dietary diversity for a healthier person. (Sultana Al-Amin)
Keyhole garden resilient to flooding. (Sultana Al-Amin)

Classificação da Tecnologia

Objetivo principal
  • Melhora a produção
  • Reduz, previne, recupera a degradação do solo
  • Preserva ecossistema
  • Protege uma bacia/zonas a jusante – em combinação com outra tecnologia
  • Preservar/melhorar a biodiversidade
  • Reduzir riscos de desastre
  • Adaptar a mudanças climáticas/extremos e seus impactos
  • Atenuar a mudanças climáticas e seus impactos
  • Criar impacto econômico benéfico
  • Cria impacto social benéfico
Uso da terra

  • Terra de cultivo
    • Cultura anual: cereais - quinoa ou amaranto, Legumes e leguminosas - feijão, vegetais - vegetais de folhas (saladas, couve, espinafre, outros), legumes - melão, abóbora ou aboborinha, legumes - outros, legumes - raízes (cenouras, cebolas, beterraba, outros), tomatoes, cauliflower, brocoli, watercress, eggplant, cucumber
    • Cultura perene (não lenhosa): plantas medicinais, aromáticas, agrotóxicas - perenes, chili
    • Homestead Gardening
    Número de estações de cultivo por ano: 3
    O cultivo entre culturas é praticado? Sim
    O rodízio de culturas é praticado? Sim

Abastecimento de água
  • Precipitação natural
  • Misto de precipitação natural-irrigado
  • Irrigação completa

Objetivo relacionado à degradação da terra
  • Prevenir degradação do solo
  • Reduzir a degradação do solo
  • Recuperar/reabilitar solo severamente degradado
  • Adaptar à degradação do solo
  • Não aplicável
Degradação abordada
  • Erosão do solo pela água - Wt: Perda do solo superficial/erosão de superfície
Grupo de GST
  • Gestão integrada de fertilidade do solo
  • Gestão integrada de pragas e doenças (inclusive agricultura orgânica)
  • Hortas familiares
Medidas de GST
  • Medidas agronômicas - A1: cobertura vegetal/do solo, A2: Matéria orgânica/fertilidade do solo
  • Medidas estruturais - S11: Outros

Desenho técnico

Especificações técnicas
Gardens should be built in close vicinity to the beneficiary’s house, because gardens that are easily accessible and clearly visible are visited more regularly and maintained better.

The design is highly adaptable to local conditions and availability of free construction materials. The radius of the garden is 150CM and the delineated radius of the circular compost basket (in the center of the garden) is 45cm. The diagrams show (1) the location is near to house as an entry point for maintaining the garden; (2) the plinth is built to the same level of the house and a step is included where the plinth is high; (3) mulching to conserve the moisture; (4) interplanting a diversity of vegetables for both good vegetable health and good family nutrition; (5) using interplanted natural repellent plants as pest control for vegetables; (6) covering the basket during times of high sun intensity or heavy rain; (7) using liquid manures and plant teas as top dressing fertilisers.

Establishing what is the best height for your plinth very much depends on the local climatological conditions. In Bangladesh, the plinth is built from subsurface clayey soil, typically 2-3 feet in height - dependent on the location and level of seasonal flooding. The house plinth is a good gauge for how high to build the garden plinth. If the plinth is built too high, the roots of the plant will not be able to access sufficient water; and if built too low the next flood during the monsoon season may destroy the garden. Depending on dryness or soil/groundwater salinity, daily maintenance usually includes irrigating the soil. The outer rim of the plinth is protected with mud (and plastic or cloth) or stones. On top of the plinth is a mixture of soil and compost/manure (ratio 2:1) sloped up to the basket at a 30 - 40 degree angle. The central compost basket is filled with layers of fresh and dried vegetable matter, manure and ash to ensure that the soil fertility of the garden.

Women devised a number of different solutions to protecting the wall of the plinth and garden: Plastic bags, a combination of rice sacks (around the plinth edge) and plastic entrance way because of wear and tear (rice sacks erode faster), palm matting and old cloth. Some women put extra manure in the plinth walls to protect against flooding.

Sam Rich (www.fourthway.co.uk) has produced other technical drawings in addition to "How to Make Liquid Manure" such as: "How to make a Natural Pesticide" and "How to Make Plant Tea". There is also a version of the "How to Make a Keyhole Garden" in English from the experience in Africa.
Author: Sam Rich: www.fourthway.co.uk
None
Author: Sam Rich: www.fourthway.co.uk
None
Author: BBC Media Action Bangladesh

Estabelecimento e manutenção: atividades, insumos e custos

Cálculo de insumos e custos
  • Os custos são calculados: Por unidade de tecnologia (unidade:Keyhole Garden)
  • Moeda utilizada para o cálculo de custos: USD
  • Taxa de câmbio (para USD): 1 USD = n.a
  • Custo salarial médio da mão-de-obra contratada por dia: U.S.$2.50
Fatores mais importantes que afetam os custos
Over the last few years, people in disaster-affecteed areas of Bangladesh have become familiar to receiving during humanitarian distributions; and expect “hand-outs” if they were to participate in a development project. The Keyhole garden project, however, follows the LEISA approach and does not rely on giving free inputs to the participants. (In a few cases where the local population was lacking seeds and experience in seed production, women's groups were given seeds and training.) A lack of reliance on external inputs or subsidies contributes to the sustainability of the project. The inputs (clay, manure, sticks, rocks, etc.) are locally available and usually do not require additional expenses. This may not be the case in all contexts.
Atividades de implantação
  1. Clear land; mark out basket and external boundary using rope and stick pivoted from the centre) (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
  2. Build plinth (highest monsoon flood level+30cm); (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
  3. Construct basket at the centre from local materials. Fill basket with composting materials; (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
  4. Bring soil and heap it around the central basket. Any available animal dung can also be added into the soil mix for greater initial productivity. (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
  5. Plant vegetable seeds around the garden - a mix for good family nutrition and to stop the spread of pests and diseases; (Periodicidade/frequência: According to the seasonal varieties)
  6. Mulch between plants to protect the soil. (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
  7. Protect the walls with rice sacks or other waterproof protection if neccessary. (Periodicidade/frequência: Anytime)
Estabelecer insumos e custos (per Keyhole Garden)
Especifique a entrada Unidade Quantidade Custos por unidade (USD) Custos totais por entrada (USD) % dos custos arcados pelos usuários da terra
Mão-de-obra
Building the garden person-days 3,0 2,5 7,5 100,0
Material de construção
clay 20,0
Custos totais para a implantação da tecnologia 7.5
Custos totais para o estabelecimento da Tecnologia em USD 7.5
Atividades de manutenção
  1. Weeding, harvesting, watering (Periodicidade/frequência: Daily)
  2. Structural maintenance on the garden (Periodicidade/frequência: Annual)
Insumos e custos de manutenção (per Keyhole Garden)
Especifique a entrada Unidade Quantidade Custos por unidade (USD) Custos totais por entrada (USD) % dos custos arcados pelos usuários da terra
Mão-de-obra
Maintenance person-days 11,0 2,5 27,5 100,0
Structural maintenance on the garden person-days 1,0 2,5 2,5 100,0
Material de construção
Earth Clay -depends on height: ex .4m plinth) cubic meter 11,0
Manure (quantity depends on design) cubic meter 2,0
Basket (sticks/bamboo with thin sticks to weave the basket Sticks 15,0
Protective material, rice bags/stones/plastic Square meter 18,0
Custos totais para a manutenção da tecnologia 30.0
Custos totais de manutenção da Tecnologia em USD 30.0

Ambiente natural

Média pluviométrica anual
  • <250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1.000 mm
  • 1.001-1.500 mm
  • 1.501-2.000 mm
  • 2.001-3.000 mm
  • 3.001-4.000 mm
  • > 4.000 mm
Zona agroclimática
  • úmido
  • Subúmido
  • Semiárido
  • Árido
Especificações sobre o clima
Pluviosidade média anual em mm: 2666.0
Applied in areas with monsoon and drought like conditions in the project areas in Bangladesh.
Nome da estação meteorológica: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.PRCP.MM
The technology is adapted to semi-arid areas/countries in Africa like Uganda and Tanzania.
Inclinação
  • Plano (0-2%)
  • Suave ondulado (3-5%)
  • Ondulado (6-10%)
  • Moderadamente ondulado (11-15%)
  • Forte ondulado (16-30%)
  • Montanhoso (31-60%)
  • Escarpado (>60%)
Formas de relevo
  • Planalto/planície
  • Cumes
  • Encosta de serra
  • Encosta de morro
  • Sopés
  • Fundos de vale
Altitude
  • 0-100 m s.n.m.
  • 101-500 m s.n.m.
  • 501-1.000 m s.n.m.
  • 1.001-1.500 m s.n.m.
  • 1.501-2.000 m s.n.m.
  • 2.001-2.500 m s.n.m.
  • 2.501-3.000 m s.n.m.
  • 3.001-4.000 m s.n.m.
  • > 4.000 m s.n.m.
A tecnologia é aplicada em
  • Posições convexas
  • Posições côncavas
  • Não relevante
Profundidade do solo
  • Muito raso (0-20 cm)
  • Raso (21-50 cm)
  • Moderadamente profundo (51-80 cm)
  • Profundo (81-120 cm)
  • Muito profundo (>120 cm)
Textura do solo (superficial)
  • Grosso/fino (arenoso)
  • Médio (limoso, siltoso)
  • Fino/pesado (argila)
Textura do solo (>20 cm abaixo da superfície)
  • Grosso/fino (arenoso)
  • Médio (limoso, siltoso)
  • Fino/pesado (argila)
Teor de matéria orgânica do solo superior
  • Alto (>3%)
  • Médio (1-3%)
  • Baixo (<1%)
Lençol freático
  • Na superfície
  • < 5 m
  • 5-50 m
  • > 50 m
Disponibilidade de água de superfície
  • Excesso
  • Bom
  • Médio
  • Precário/nenhum
Qualidade da água (não tratada)
  • Água potável boa
  • Água potável precária (tratamento necessário)
  • apenas para uso agrícola (irrigação)
  • Inutilizável
A qualidade da água refere-se a:
A salinidade é um problema?
  • Sim
  • Não

Ocorrência de enchentes
  • Sim
  • Não
Diversidade de espécies
  • Alto
  • Médio
  • Baixo
Diversidade de habitat
  • Alto
  • Médio
  • Baixo

Características dos usuários da terra que utilizam a tecnologia

Orientação de mercado
  • Subsistência (autoabastecimento)
  • misto (subsistência/comercial)
  • Comercial/mercado
Rendimento não agrícola
  • Menos de 10% de toda renda
  • 10-50% de toda renda
  • >50% de toda renda
Nível relativo de riqueza
  • Muito pobre
  • Pobre
  • Média
  • Rico
  • Muito rico
Nível de mecanização
  • Trabalho manual
  • Tração animal
  • Mecanizado/motorizado
Sedentário ou nômade
  • Sedentário
  • Semi-nômade
  • Nômade
Indivíduos ou grupos
  • Indivíduo/unidade familiar
  • Grupos/comunidade
  • Cooperativa
  • Empregado (empresa, governo)
Gênero
  • Mulheres
  • Homens
Idade
  • Crianças
  • Jovens
  • meia-idade
  • idosos
Área utilizada por residência
  • < 0,5 ha
  • 0,5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1.000 ha
  • 1.000-10.000 ha
  • > 10.000 ha
Escala
  • Pequena escala
  • Média escala
  • Grande escala
Propriedade da terra
  • Estado
  • Empresa
  • Comunitário/rural
  • Grupo
  • Indivíduo, não intitulado
  • Indivíduo, intitulado
Direitos do uso da terra
  • Acesso livre (não organizado)
  • Comunitário (organizado)
  • Arrendado
  • Indivíduo
Direitos do uso da água
  • Acesso livre (não organizado)
  • Comunitário (organizado)
  • Arrendado
  • Indivíduo
Acesso a serviços e infraestrutura
Saúde

Pobre
Bom
Educação

Pobre
Bom
Assistência técnica

Pobre
Bom
Emprego (p. ex. não agrícola)

Pobre
Bom
Mercados

Pobre
Bom
Energia

Pobre
Bom
Vias e transporte

Pobre
Bom
Água potável e saneamento

Pobre
Bom
Serviços financeiros

Pobre
Bom

Impactos

Impactos socioeconômicos
Produção agrícola
diminuído
aumentado

Quantidade anterior à GST: <5% of pilot families growing vegetables in all 3 seasons
Quantidade posterior à GST: 50% of the pilot families able to grow vegetables in 3 seasons
Before the project started, the majority of the participants were not able to produce vegetables year round. Especially during the monsoon months, people were dependent on produce available at the local market. The baseline survey indicated that in both regions more than 50% of the households would cultivate vegetables for a maximum of 3 months per year and in Kurigram 30% of the participants were not able to grow vegetables at all.
This situation has changed significantly after the introduction of the keyhole gardens. At least 50% of the households were able to produce vegetables during each season. Where in the past almost no one was able to cultivate during the monsoon period, now on average 63% of the households in Kurigram and 73% of the households in Patharghata were growing vegetables in the wet season.
The summer figures are actually lower than the monsoon figures. Seeds did not germinate well, because participants were not fully prepared to deal with the dry and saline conditions during this season. Learning from this experience, and with adequate support from Tdh, participants should be able to achieve higher cultivation rates in the future.

Diversidade de produtos
diminuído
aumentado

Quantidade anterior à GST: Average of 2-4 types of vegetables grown.
Quantidade posterior à GST: Average of six types of vegetables grown
During the field visits and individual interviews in June 2013, the majority of the participants indicated that in the keyhole garden they usually grow 6 or more different types of vegetables at any given time. This is a marked difference from previous years, when the majority of people in Patharghata would only grow 2 types of vegetables. In Kurigram the baseline was somewhat higher (31% cultivated 4 types of vegetables per year on average), but still significantly lower than in 2013. By increasing the different types of vegetables grown, the families have access to a more diversified diet.

Área de produção (nova terra sob cultivo/uso)
diminuído
aumentado

Quantidade anterior à GST: 0
Quantidade posterior à GST: 333
In addition to the 175 pilot keyhole gardens, an additional 158 gardens were started on homesteads either via peer to peer pass-along system or spontaneous copy/replication of the technology.

Impactos socioculturais
Estado de saúde
Agravado
Melhorado


The Keyhole Garden supports a diversified diet by enabling year-round vegetable production; thus boosting the resilience of homesteads exposed to extreme weather patterns (drought or monsoon/flood seasons).

Situação de grupos social e economicamente desfavorecidos (gênero, idade, status, etnia, etc)
Agravado
Melhorado


Gardens will quickly increase household vegetable production, easing economic burden and providing for the household consumption or surplus to sell or gift. The latter can increase social bonding and benefit peer to peer linkages.

Teaching
Reduced
Increased


Keyhole garden building and maintenance teaches lessons of good soil, water and vegetable management that can be transferred to field crops or plain large scale vegetable growing.

Impactos ecológicos
Perda de solo
aumentado
diminuído


Precious topsoil is not lost during flooding events.

Impactos da inundação
aumentado
diminuído


Gardens that are not submerged by floods continue to produce in the monsoon season.

Surpluses can be used for selling or gifting; increased vegetables especially at times when they are not usually available enables families to save money on expensive purchases out of the normal vegetable season
None
None

Impactos fora do local
Teaching
Reduced
Increased


Keyhole garden building and maintenance teaches lessons of good soil, water and vegetable management that can be transferred to field crops or plain large scale vegetable growing.

Análise do custo-benefício

Benefícios em relação aos custos de estabelecimento
Retornos a curto prazo
muito negativo
muito positivo

Benefícios em relação aos custos de manutenção
Retornos a curto prazo
muito negativo
muito positivo

No long term study available. In most cases no (or very low) investment cost in materials and a low investment cost in labor was necessary. Thus the establishment and maintenance costs are relatively low compared to the benefit of increased homestead vegetable production and access to produce for increasing dietary diversity. The benefit increases when the technology supports resilience to flooding as was the case from flooding (Kurigram), and partially from a cyclone (Patharghata).

Mudança climática

Extremos (desastres) relacionados ao clima
Tempestade tropical

não bem em absoluto
muito bem
Trovoada local

não bem em absoluto
muito bem
Inundação geral (rio)

não bem em absoluto
muito bem
Maré de tempestade/inundação costeira

não bem em absoluto
muito bem
Outras consequências relacionadas ao clima
Período de crescimento reduzido

não bem em absoluto
muito bem

Adoção e adaptação

Porcentagem de usuários de terras na área que adotaram a Tecnologia
  • casos isolados/experimental
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
De todos aqueles que adotaram a Tecnologia, quantos o fizeram sem receber incentivos materiais?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
Número de residências e/ou área coberta
333 from the pilot study. Subsequent projects by Tdh from 2013-2015 have seen over 3'500 keyhole gardens created in Bangladesh and India.
A tecnologia foi recentemente modificada para adaptar-se as condições variáveis?
  • Sim
  • Não
A quais condições de mudança?
  • Mudança climática/extremo
  • Mercados dinâmicos
  • Disponibilidade de mão-de-obra (p. ex. devido à migração)
The technology was adapted from semi-arid zones in Africa (where soil amelioration and water conservation were priorities and materials such as stones and brick are available) to areas of South Asia prone to flood and tidal surge.

Conclusões e experiências adquiridas

Pontos fortes: visão do usuário de terra
  • Seasonal local agriculturalists reported that gardens yielded high productivity with good vegetable quality and diversity; withstood heavy monsoon rains lasting for several days; and withstood a salt water tidal intrusion that destroyed adjacent traditional gardens. During the FGDs women clearly expressed a lot of enthusiasm for the project and all the participants indicated that they would continue with their garden, even if Tdh would no longer provide any support. One volunteer reported successfully harvesting five common vegetables usually impossible to grow in monsoon conditions:
    - In plain land we can cultivate once in a year but in keyhole garden we can harvest vegetables in three seasons and they don't go underwater in the rainy season
    - Save money for the family: don't need to buy fertilizers or vegetables and some people earn money by selling the garden product
    - We can collect vegetables for the children’s requirements directly from the garden when they need them
    - In a small space you can have lots of different vegetables and the taste is much better because the garden depends on compost – no chemicals
    - The cost to make is it very low, but you need labour; by our own labour we can build it
    - Because of composting the garden can always get nutrients
Pontos fortes: a visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitada
  • The keyhole garden project has been very successful and has largely achieved its core objective to improve year-round access to nutritious food from the homestead area. These benefits are summarized again as:
    - Appropriate size for landless homesteads, also ideal to facilitate training on LEISA techniques to first-time gardeners and students in schools.
    - Proximity to the household for convenient maintenance and harvesting, composting of kitchen cuttings in the basket;
    - Ergonomic structure (raised, accessible).
    - Highly adaptable to local conditions that supports resilience to flood and drought conditions.
    - Highly productive—families produced vegetables even during the monsoon period.
    - As the keyhole garden normally does not need to be rebuilt every year it is a more efficient technique in the long-term than traditional methods such as pit and heap.

    Therefore, the reviewer did not suggest any major changes to the technique or project; rather to focus on specific issues that could help making the project more efficient and that could help broaden its impact.
Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos: visão do usuário de terracomo superar
  • No major weaknesses in the technology or design were expressed. However for some women it was difficult to access sufficient amounts of soil, which meant that they needed to walk long distances to bring soil to build the plinth.
    In coastal areas where saline intrusion in groundwater and soils is on the rise, growing and irrigating crops is difficult in the dry season. Some women received support from other family members or neighbours; identify a support network for families having challenges to access soil to build the plinths.
    Continue to look for for alternative irrigation sources and/or groundwater recharge innovations as well as soil conservation techniques to protect against salinity. Likewise, saline resistant vegetable varieties may be available.
Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos: a visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitadacomo superar
  • More careful planning of the location for the keyhole garden is needed. In Patharghata 11 women decided to relocate their garden within the first year. This suggests that the women appreciate the benefits of the garden, but having to break down and move the garden is a rather laborious activity.
    Not surprisingly, women who have less time to work in the homestead area, e.g. due to work or other out-of-home responsibilities, are not able to maintain their keyhole garden so well. Spend more time to assist the participants with identifying the most suitable locations to construct the garden for a keyhole garden in the homestead area at the start of the project.
    While maintaining a focus on women, involve the husband or other family members/ neighbours and ensure that they are also trained and ensure that the garden is clearly visible and can be accessed.

Referências

Compilador/a
  • John Brogan
Editores
  • Shahid Kamal
Revisor
  • Alexandra Gavilano
  • Deborah Niggli
  • Alvin Chandra
  • Joana Eichenberger
Data da documentação: 29 de Novembro de 2016
Última atualização: 19 de Março de 2019
Pessoas capacitadas
Descrição completa no banco de dados do WOCAT
Dados GST vinculados
A documentação foi facilitada por
Instituição Projeto
Referências-chave
  • "Keyhole Gardens: Improved Access to Homestead Vegetables and Dietary Diversification- External Evaluation and Capitalization of the Keyhole Garden Project in Bangladesh", Van Hout, R., 2013: Freely available: Terre des hommes Lausanne Asia Desk: info@tdh.ch
  • “Keyhole Gardens – great potential for improving homestead crop diversity and mother & child nutrition”, Taylor S, 2013, Discussion paper for the Agrobiodiversity Conference, Dhaka, 28 January 2013: Freely available: Terre des hommes Lausanne Asia Desk: info@tdh.ch
  • "Keyhole Gardens in Lesotho", FAO Nutrition and Consumer Protection Divis"ion (AGN), 2008 (with Send a Cow UK): http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/nutrition/docs/FSNL%20Fact%20sheet_Keyhole%20gardens.pdf
Links para informação relevante que está disponível online
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International