Mobile Community Garden [Alemanha]
- Criação:
- Atualização:
- Compilador/a: Peter Kirch
- Editor: –
- Revisor: Fabian Ottiger
approaches_2603 - Alemanha
Veja as seções
Expandir tudo Recolher tudo1. Informação geral
1.2 Detalhes do contato das pessoas capacitadas e instituições envolvidas na avaliação e documentação da abordagem
Especialista em GST:
Shaw Robert
kontakt@prinzessinnengarten.net
PRINZESSINNENGARTEN BERLIN
Prinzenstrasse 35 – 38, Berlin
Alemanha
Nome da(s) instituição(ões) que facilitou(ram) a documentação/avaliação da Abordagem (se relevante)
Technische Universität Berlin (Technische Universität Berlin) - Alemanha1.3 Condições em relação ao uso da informação documentada através de WOCAT
Quando os dados foram compilados (no campo)?
08/05/2015
O/a compilador/a e a(s) pessoa(s) capacitada(s) aceitam as condições relativas ao uso de dados documentados através da WOCAT:
Sim
2. Descrição da abordagem de GST
2.1 Descrição curta da abordagem
The SLM approach can be defined as community supported mobile urban farm, which serves the goals of vegetable production, and place of learning and knowledge sharing.
2.2 Descrição detalhada da abordagem
Descrição detalhada da abordagem:
Aims / objectives: The objective of the SLM approach 'Prinzessinnengarten' was to create an urban garden on a waste land plot in the center of Berlin. The plot was characterised by having sealed and contaminated soils, which is characteristic for open land plots in most urban areas. The garden is supposed to practically demonstrate an ecologically and socially different approach to urban spaces and their inhabitants, enable the social empowerment of marginalized communities. Furthermore opportunities for local micro-economies and other economic models are supposed to be created. In an unobtrusive and pragmatic way, urban gardens in general aim to raise the question of 'How we want to live in our cities in the future?
Methods: The project was first was implemented by the group Nomadisch Grün (Nomadic Green) in summer of 2009. Along with friends, activists and neighbours, the group realised the first steps of implementation through clearing of rubbish and through the construction of the first cultivation units. The project, being open to everybody, attracted new participants quite fast. Now the garden owes its existence to the commitment of countless neighbors and interested people. The work of these participants, their diverse skills and ideas transform the place continuously.
Stages of implementation: I. Development of the idea. During this phase of implementation mainly Robert Shaw (he was involved in similar projects in Cuba before) and Marco Clausen were involved.. II. Implementation in practice. Starting in summer of 2009, the project idea was being implemented on the ground by a group of people. During this stage of implementation mainly physical work, such as the clearing of rubbish was realised. III. Opening to the wider public (still ongoing). The non-profit company 'Nomadisch Grün (Nomadic Green) serves as a framework for the different social, educational and economic activities with the primary aim of making the garden a place of learning. Skills are gained through practical experience and knowledge sharing.
2.3 Fotos da abordagem
2.5 País/região/locais onde a abordagem foi aplicada
País:
Alemanha
Região/Estado/Província:
Berlin
Especificação adicional de localização:
Kreuzberg
Map
×2.6 Datas de início e término da abordagem
Indique o ano de início:
2009
2.7 Tipo de abordagem
- Iniciativa/inovação local recente
2.8 Principais metas/objetivos da abordagem
The Approach focused mainly on other activities than SLM (utilisation of waste land/abandoned land plots, urban areas,production of vegetables, place of knowledge sharing)
The aim of the project was to find solutions for the lack of knowledge sharing within the society and to address the topic of food production.
The SLM Approach addressed the following problems: The main problems addressed by the approach can be described as manifold, e.g. insufficient local food production, or the general lack of public spaces for knowledge sharing and exchange within the community.
2.9 Condição que propiciam ou inibem a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias aplicada(s) segundo a abordagem
Disponibilidade/acesso a recursos e serviços financeiros
- Inibitivo
Treatment through the SLM Approach: attempt to diversify the income
Quadro institucional
- Inibitivo
no official institution is clearly responsible for this type of approach
Treatment through the SLM Approach: regular exchange with politicians, especially on local level
Quadro jurídico (posse de terra, direitos de uso da terra e da água)
- Propício
The existing land ownership, land use rights / water rights helped a little the approach implementation: As the existing land ownership was already known before the implementation of the approach started, this aspect was being strongly considered (leading to the design of a mobile cultivation system). Furthermore the existing land ownership (the community is owning the land) led to the possibility to have public negotiations about the renting contract. If the area would have been in private ownership such negotiations would not have been possible and it is more than likely that the Approach could not have been realised in the way it is realised now.
- Inibitivo
no long term renting contract, no official institution is clearly responsible for this type of approach
Treatment through the SLM Approach: political campaign
Carga de trabalho, disponibilidade de força de trabalho
- Inibitivo
due to the high presence in the media there is a high demand for communication acitivities
Treatment through the SLM Approach: establishment of paid jobs to have people working professionally on certain topics
3. Participação e papel das partes interessadas envolvidas
3.1 Partes interessadas envolvidas na abordagem e seus papéis
- Usuários de terra/comunidades locais
In the surroundings of the Moritzplatz a great part of the population were/are immigrants (most of them coming from muslim countries) and people without a job. In principle the project was/is open for all people, including disadvantaged groups as well. During the interviews it was said though that the selling and consumption of alcohol on the project area could have led to the fact that especially immigrants from muslim countries could have been felt excluded.
3.2 Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais nas diferentes fases da abordagem
Envolvimento do usuários de terra/comunidades locais | Especifique quem estava envolvido e descreva as atividades | |
---|---|---|
Iniciação/motivação | Automobilização | There was a constant change of the people that were being involved in the different phases of the project. The decision to what degree people got involved, were to be taken under the consideration of the personal needs and possibilities. |
Planejamento | Automobilização | There was a constant change of the people that were being involved in the different phases of the project. The decision to what degree people got involved, were to be taken under the consideration of the personal needs and possibilities. |
Implementação | Automobilização | There was a constant change of the people that were being involved in the different phases of the project. The decision to what degree people got involved, were to be taken under the consideration of the personal needs and possibilities. |
Monitoramento/avaliação | Automobilização | There was a constant change of the people that were being involved in the different phases of the project. The decision to what degree people got involved, were to be taken under the consideration of the personal needs and possibilities. |
Research | Participativo |
3.4 Decisão sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias de GST
Especifique quem decidiu sobre a seleção de tecnologia/tecnologias a serem implementadas:
- Somente usuários da terra (iniciativa própria)
Explique:
Decisions on the method of implementing the SLM Technology were made by by land users* alone (self-initiative / bottom-up)
4. Suporte técnico, reforço das capacidades e gestão do conhecimento
4.1 Reforço das capacidades/ formação
Foi oferecida formação aos usuários da terra/outras partes interessadas?
Sim
Especifique quem foi capacitado:
- Usuários de terra
Tipo de formação:
- Em exercício
- Agricultor para agricultor
- Áreas de demonstração
- Reuniões públicas
- Cursos
Assuntos abordados:
Through creating a open public space/place and by offering manifold practical activity the approach provides training by using a peer to peer approach on topics like biodiversity, healthy eating, recycling, environmental justice, climate change and food sovereignty. This training / awareness raising takes place informally (peer to peer) as well as formally (announced courses, lectures, discussions)
4.2 Serviço de consultoria
Os usuários de terra têm acesso a um serviço de consultoria?
Sim
Descreva/comentários:
Advisory service is inadequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities
4.3 Fortalecimento da instituição (desenvolvimento organizacional)
As instituições foram fortalecidas ou estabelecidas através da abordagem?
- Não
4.4 Monitoramento e avaliação
Monitoramento e avaliação são partes da abordagem?
Sim
Comentários:
bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
bio-physical aspects were regular monitored by other through measurements
technical aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
socio-cultural aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
economic / production aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
no. of land users involved aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
management of Approach aspects were ad hoc monitored by land users through observations
There were several changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation: There is a constant change according to the findings of the monitoring and the needs/possibilites of the project participants.
There were few changes in the Technology as a result of monitoring and evaluation: The research of the Technical University of Berlin showed that vegetables which were cultivated very close to the street, contained more pollutants. Therefore a 'green belt' of about 2 m width was established around the garden, where only non-food-crops are cultivated
4.5 Pesquisa
A pesquisa foi parte da abordagem?
Sim
Especifique os tópicos:
- Ecologia
Dê mais detalhes e indique quem realizou a pesquisa:
There was research on the soil and plant quality and possible contamination of the soil and the plants (performed e.g. by the Technical University of Berlin)
Research was carried out both on station and on-farm
5. Financiamento e apoio material externo
5.1 Orçamento anual para o componente de GST da abordagem
Caso o orçamento exato seja desconhecido, indique a faixa:
- 100.000-1.000.000
Comentários (p. ex. principais fontes de recursos/principais doadores):
Approach costs were met by the following donors: local community / land user(s): 100.0%
5.2 Apoio financeiro/material concedido aos usuários da terra
Os usuários da terra receberam apoio financeiro/material para a implementação de tecnologia/tecnologias?
Sim
5.3 Subsídios para entradas específicas (incluindo mão-de-obra)
- Infraestrutura
Especifique quais entradas foram subsidiadas | Em que medida | Especifique os subsídios |
---|---|---|
Kitchen | Parcialmente financiado | For educational purposes |
Se a mão-de-obra pelos usuários da terra foi uma entrada substancial, isso foi:
- Voluntário
5.4 Crédito
Foi concedido crédito segundo a abordagem para atividades de GST?
Não
6. Análise de impactos e declarações finais
6.1 Impactos da abordagem
A abordagem auxiliou os usuários da terra a implementar e manter as tecnologias de GST?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
The approach helped the land users to cultivate on areas, which were not suitable for cultivation before. Furthermore the approach enhanced the knowledge sharing concering different topics regarding sustainable land management. Therefore the impact of the Approach on SLM is not only to be measured on the project area itself, but also under consideration of the outreach of the project.
A abordagem concedeu autonomia aos grupos social e economicamente desfavorecidos?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
Through the Approach a space for knowledge sharing was created, which is also open for socially and economically disadvantaged groups. The utilisation of this space by the groups in question is limited up to date though.
Did other land users / projects adopt the Approach?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
The approach was adopted in modified ways in several urban gardening projects accross Germany. It is not possible to quantify the number. A guess would be around 20.
Did the Approach lead to improved livelihoods / human well-being?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
Creation of a space open to the public, which is dedicated for knowledge sharing.
Did the Approach help to alleviate poverty?
- Não
- Sim, pouco
- Sim, moderadamente
- Sim, significativamente
The goal of the approach was not set on the alleviation of poverty.
6.2 Principal motivação dos usuários da terra para implementar a GST
- Produção aumentada
- Afiliação a movimento/projeto/grupo/rede
- Consciência ambiental
- well-being and livelihoods improvement
6.3 Atividades de sustentabilidade de abordagem
Os usuários da terra podem manter o que foi implementado através da abordagem (sem apoio externo)?
- Sim
Caso afirmativo, descreva como:
Through the diverse income opportunities (consulting, selling/using the produce in gastronomy, donation) the Approach activities can be self-financed.
6.4 Pontos fortes/vantagens da abordagem
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do usuário da terra |
---|
not dependent on a certain plot (mobility, flexibility) |
flat hierachy leads to the fact, that a lot of people can bring in their ideas easily |
Everybody can decide on his/her own to what extend he/she wants to get involved and in what kind of activity. Through this the participants can focus on their strengths and there is little chance that overworking occurs. |
Creation of paid jobs |
Pontos fortes/vantagens/oportunidades na visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitada |
---|
self-financed |
sharing of knowledge (possible between all participants) |
open to everybody |
6.5 Pontos fracos, desvantagens da tecnologia e formas de superá-los
Pontos fracos/desvantagens/riscos na visão do usuário da terra | Como eles podem ser superados? |
---|---|
only to a certain point 'sustainable', as the project is dependent on a great amount of external inputs (water, plastic boxes) |
Pontos fracos/vantagens/riscos na visão do/a compilador/a ou de outra pessoa capacitada | Como eles podem ser superados? |
---|---|
only to a certain point 'sustainable', as the project is dependent on a great amount of external inputs (water, plastic boxes) |
7. Referências e links
7.1 Métodos/fontes de informação
- visitas de campo, pesquisas de campo
- entrevistas com usuários de terras
7.2 Referências às publicações disponíveis
Título, autor, ano, ISBN:
website, 2015
Disponível de onde? Custos?
prinzessinnengarten.net/
Links e módulos
Expandir tudo Recolher tudoLinks
Não há links
Módulos
Não há módulos