1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Approach

Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Approach (if relevant)

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA / COSUDE / DDC / SDC) - Switzerland

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Approach has been applied

2.9 Conditions enabling or hindering implementation of the Technology/ Technologies applied under the Approach

3.1 Stakeholders involved in the Approach and their roles

3.2 Involvement of local land users/ local communities in the different phases of the Approach

	Involvement of local land users/ local communities	Specify who was involved and describe activities
initiation/ motivation	interactive	Workshops / seminars; They have a less precise idea of ​​technology and the specialist helps them to clarify it
planning	interactive	Method of access to participatory research
implementation	interactive	responsibility at minor stages; The operators execute the plan and the program of the activities under the supervision of the specialists
monitoring/ evaluation	none
Research	none

4.1 Capacity building/ training

Was training provided to land users/ other stakeholders?

Yes

Subjects covered:

Corridor cultivation and windbreaks, planting techniques and hedge management

4.2 Advisory service

Do land users have access to an advisory service?

Yes

Describe/ comments:

Advisory services are very adequate to ensure the continuation of land conservation activities; Resources is available at ITRA, ICAT, to pay the Supervision of Operators

4.3 Institution strengthening (organizational development)

Have institutions been established or strengthened through the Approach?

• yes, a little

Specify the level(s) at which institutions have been strengthened or established:

• local

4.4 Monitoring and evaluation

Is monitoring and evaluation part of the Approach?

Yes

Comments:

bio-physical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

technical aspects were ad hoc monitored through observations

economic / production aspects were regular monitored through measurements

There were no changes in the Approach as a result of monitoring and evaluation

4.5 Research

Was research part of the Approach?

Yes

Give further details and indicate who did the research:

Technical improvements are constantly sought and the market conditions are also studied

5.2 Financial/ material support provided to land users

Did land users receive financial/ material support for implementing the Technology/ Technologies?

No

5.3 Subsidies for specific inputs (including labour)

If labour by land users was a substantial input, was it:

• voluntary

Comments:

The operators themselves solicit specialists

5.4 Credit

Was credit provided under the Approach for SLM activities?

No

6.1 Impacts of the Approach

6.4 Strengths/ advantages of the Approach

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
1) am??lioration des connaissances techniques et ??conomiques (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: continuer la formation avec lui)
2) am??lioration des rendements de culture (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: lui fournir des docuements de gestion technique des cultures)

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
1) responsabilisation des exploitants (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: lui confier beaucoup plus d'ex??cution des plans d'action)
2) am??lioration des connaissances agro-??conomiques de l'exploitant (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: renforcer la formation en fonction du niveau intellectuel des exploitants)
3) cr??ation de lien de confiance entre l'exploitant et vulgarisateur (How to sustain/ enhance this strength: montrer ?? l'exploitant le bien fonc?? de l'approche)

6.5 Weaknesses/ disadvantages of the Approach and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view	How can they be overcome?
difficile ?? appliquer si l'exploitant n'est pas instruit	essayer la formation en langue locale

7.1 Methods/ sources of information