Technologies

Raised Beds for Onions [Kenya]

Raised Beds for Onions

technologies_1324 - Kenya

Completeness: 76%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

SLM specialist:
SLM specialist:

Omwange Adamba

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Kimengich Baobab

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Chege Timothy

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Home Patrick

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Gathenya Mwangi

Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Karanja Andrew

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Wamuongo Jane

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute

Kenya

SLM specialist:

Namirembe Sara

World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)

Kenya

{'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 46, 'label': 'Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)', 'text': 'KARI Headquarters (KARI Headquarters) - Kenya', 'template': 'raw'} {'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 46, 'label': 'Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)', 'text': 'KARI Headquarters (KARI Headquarters) - Kenya', 'template': 'raw'} {'additional_translations': {}, 'value': 46, 'label': 'Name of the institution(s) which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)', 'text': 'KARI Headquarters (KARI Headquarters) - Kenya', 'template': 'raw'}

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

No

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

These are raised beds measuring one meter in width and 15 cm high used for planting onions after transplanting.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

Raised beds are popular among gardeners with limited space or poor naturally occurring soils. Remember that onions are shallow-rooted, but the majority of the roots are intensely located within 8" of the plant. If you were to plant the lines of the bed closer than 8" it would double the competition for nutrients within that area.

Purpose of the Technology: The main purpose of constructing the raised beds for onions is to ease operation as. e.g watering and weeding. To conserve moisture through reduced water losses. To increase yield through increased planting space. Keeps roots away from contaminated soil. Raised beds for onions are good for disabled or elderly gardeners. The beds are neat, they leads to improved soil structure. It also keeps roots from getting waterlogged in a wet climate.

Establishment / maintenance activities and inputs: The land is fist cultivated the soil clod are broken to attain fine tilth. Mulching is done where the beds width is 1m and path of 1ft is done. soil from the foot paths is scooped and placed on the 1m portion to develop raised beds.

Natural / human environment: In Embu county, most of the farmers construct a bed of 1m wide 4” high and a length equal to the land portion on this raised bed, onions are then planted in rows along the assumed contour.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Kenya

Region/ State/ Province:

Eastern Province

Further specification of location:

Embu District

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • evenly spread over an area
If precise area is not known, indicate approximate area covered:
  • 0.1-1 km2
Comments:

Found at this farmers farm, but from extension officer and this farmer ,other farmers are trying to adopt the technology and others are trying to compare it with the traditional farming system.

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through land users' innovation
  • through projects/ external interventions

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production
  • create beneficial economic impact

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Cropland

Cropland

  • Annual cropping
Annual cropping - Specify crops:
  • vegetables - root vegetables (carrots, onions, beet, other)
Number of growing seasons per year:
  • 2
Specify:

Longest growing period in days: 60, Second longest growing period in days: 60

Comments:

Major land use problems (compiler’s opinion): soil erosion, poor water infiltration and aeration
Major land use problems (land users’ perception): water logging leading to rotting of onion roots

3.4 Water supply

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • mixed rainfed-irrigated

3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • home gardens
  • Raised beds for improved production

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

agronomic measures

agronomic measures

  • A3: Soil surface treatment
structural measures

structural measures

  • S2: Bunds, banks
Comments:

Type of vegetative measures: aligned: -linear

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by water

soil erosion by water

  • Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
Comments:

Main causes of degradation: soil management, poverty / wealth
Secondary causes of degradation: deforestation / removal of natural vegetation (incl. forest fires), Heavy / extreme rainfall (intensity/amounts), labour availability

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • prevent land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

{'additional_translations': {}, 'content_type': 'image/jpeg', 'preview_image': '/media/12/e/12ed3621-538c-48c6-9c43-3b23e704b045.jpg', 'key': 'Technical drawing', 'value': '/media/aa/0/aa020f30-50b7-4aaa-bad3-9b1951c456f5.jpg', 'template': 'raw'}
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):

The technical drawing on the left hand side shows onions planted on raised beds. The beds measure 1 meter in width and the beds are raised 15 CM from the normal surface. there is a foot path in between the beds which doubles as a drainage channel to drain off excess water. It allows planting, weeding and harvesting easy without stepping on the beds.

Location: Embu North District. Eastern province

Technical knowledge required for field staff / advisors: moderate
Technical knowledge required for land users: moderate

Main technical functions: control of concentrated runoff: retain / trap, control of concentrated runoff: drain / divert, reduction of slope angle, increase of infiltration, reduction in wind speed
Secondary technical functions: water harvesting / increase water supply, increase of biomass (quantity)

Agronomic measure: raised beds
Aligned: -linear
Vegetative material: C : perennial crops

Author:

P.Kahiga, 62000-00200 Nairobi

4.3 Establishment activities

Activity Timing (season)
1. Purchase of the seeds Before planting season
2. Ploughing Before planting season
3. Making of raised beds
4. Planting of seedlings

4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Ploughing person days 1.0 4.7 4.7 100.0
Labour Making of raised beds person days 1.0 4.7 4.7 100.0
Labour Planting of seedlings person days 1.0 4.7 4.7 100.0
Equipment Animal traction person days 1.0 5.88 5.88 100.0
Equipment Tools 1.0 10.6 10.6 100.0
Plant material Onion seeds kg 2.0 2.5 5.0 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Fertilizer 1.0 35.3 35.3 100.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 70.88
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 70.88

4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Timing/ frequency
1. Weeding After planting

4.6 Costs and inputs needed for maintenance/ recurrent activities (per year)

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour Weeding Person days 1.0 4.7 4.7 100.0
Equipment Tools for weeding 1.0 5.3 5.3 100.0
Fertilizers and biocides Compost/manure 1.0 3.5 3.5 100.0
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology 13.5
Total costs for maintenance of the Technology in USD 13.5

4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Labour is the most determinate factor affecting the costs.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Agro-climatic zone
  • sub-humid

Thermal climate class: tropics

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • medium (1-3%)
If available, attach full soil description or specify the available information, e.g. soil type, soil PH/ acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, nitrogen, salinity etc.

Soil fertility: High
Soil drainage/infiltration: Good
Soil water storage capacity: Medium

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

5-50 m

Availability of surface water:

good

Water quality (untreated):

good drinking water

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • medium

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Market orientation of production system:
  • mixed (subsistence/ commercial)
Off-farm income:
  • less than 10% of all income
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Land users applying the Technology are mainly common / average land users
Population density: 10-50 persons/km2
Annual population growth: 0.5% - 1%

5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • small-scale

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • individual
Water use rights:
  • individual

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

crop production

decreased
increased

risk of production failure

increased
decreased

land management

hindered
simplified
Income and costs

farm income

decreased
increased

workload

increased
decreased

Socio-cultural impacts

SLM/ land degradation knowledge

reduced
improved

Improved livelihoods and human well-being

decreased
increased

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

excess water drainage

reduced
improved

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

damage on neighbours' fields

increased
reduced

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Hydrological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
general (river) flood well

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

positive

Long-term returns:

positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

Comments:

There is a moderate trend towards spontaneous adoption of the Technology

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Reduce flooding on the fields
Increases crop productivity hence more yields
Reduces crop prone diseases to onions

6.8 Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks of the Technology and ways of overcoming them

Weaknesses/ disadvantages/ risks in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view How can they be overcome?
Its a beat tedious because of raising the soils to form beds Care should be taken to construct standard beds that can with proper drainage channels to safely evacuate run-off water
During heavy storms, they may collapse
May prevent movement of machinery in the farm

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

  • field visits, field surveys
  • interviews with land users
When were the data compiled (in the field)?

18/09/2012

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules