Technologies

Soil and water conservation. This assists in regeneration of pasture and prevention of desertification due to poor land use practices. [Kenya]

Eramatata e nkulukuoni pee ebulu inkijit

technologies_3220 - Kenya

Completeness: 82%

1. General information

1.2 Contact details of resource persons and institutions involved in the assessment and documentation of the Technology

Key resource person(s)

land user:

MILIA Duncan Milia

NEIGHBOURS INITIATIVE ALLIANCE

Kenya

Name of project which facilitated the documentation/ evaluation of the Technology (if relevant)
Book project: Guidelines to Rangeland Management in Sub-Saharan Africa (Rangeland Management)

1.3 Conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT

The compiler and key resource person(s) accept the conditions regarding the use of data documented through WOCAT:

Yes

1.4 Declaration on sustainability of the described Technology

Is the Technology described here problematic with regard to land degradation, so that it cannot be declared a sustainable land management technology?

No

Comments:

The technology is land friendly and has sustained the Maasai pastoralists livelihood so far.

2. Description of the SLM Technology

2.1 Short description of the Technology

Definition of the Technology:

In this new technology the Maasai people set aside some acres of land, fence it and plant grass where the land is bear or allow natural standing grass to germinate then harvest it and store as hay for future use. This also helps in preventing soil erosion and surface run off.

2.2 Detailed description of the Technology

Description:

The Technology is applied in a natural environment where grass is grow for livestock consumption and sometime for sale in case there is plenty. The main elements of this simple technology is using both existing and experts knowledge to grow grass and conserve it as hay as well as retaining underground water and conserving fertile soils. Identification and fencing of land, planting of grass where necessary has been key in the technology. The purpose of the technology is to regenerate more pasture in arid and semi-arid areas hence sustaining people livelihoods. To maintain the activity, simple tools like sickles, panga, ropes, hay boxes/hole and construction of hay ban/store. The technology helps to provide hay/pasture throughout the season, prevent livestock deaths and providing sustainable source of income for the Maasai. Once there is sustainable income, children will be enrolled in schools and will be able to complete their studies. There will be no livestock migration hence reduced livestock deaths due to diseases and hunger. Land user like continuous supply of hay for livestock, increased production and increased income at the household level. They sometimes do not like to work as labourers as they consider that as lot of work.

2.3 Photos of the Technology

General remarks regarding photos:

A powerful camera might be needed for more clear photos

2.4 Videos of the Technology

Comments, short description:

NO VIDEOS FOR THE TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE FOR NOW

Date:

18/10/2017

Location:

KAJIADO -KENYA

Name of videographer:

NONE

2.5 Country/ region/ locations where the Technology has been applied and which are covered by this assessment

Country:

Kenya

Region/ State/ Province:

KAJIADO

Further specification of location:

ENKORIKA LOCATION OF KAJIADO CENTRAL SUB-COUNTY

Specify the spread of the Technology:
  • applied at specific points/ concentrated on a small area
Comments:

The technology is spreading faster among Maasai pastoralists and its impact is already visible.

2.7 Introduction of the Technology

Specify how the Technology was introduced:
  • through projects/ external interventions

3. Classification of the SLM Technology

3.1 Main purpose(s) of the Technology

  • improve production
  • reduce, prevent, restore land degradation
  • conserve ecosystem
  • reduce risk of disasters
  • adapt to climate change/ extremes and its impacts
  • create beneficial economic impact

3.2 Current land use type(s) where the Technology is applied

Grazing land

Grazing land

Extensive grazing:
  • Semi-nomadic pastoralism
  • Sahiwal, zebu cattle
Products and services:
  • meat
  • milk
Comments:

The land is used for grazing livestock either on open fields or for keeping livestock in fenced secured places, where it is fed with hay (this only happens during dry seasons).

Number of growing seasons per year: 2
April-May and October-December

3.3 Has land use changed due to the implementation of the Technology?

Comments:

The Maasai used to graze their livestock on open grass land during the group ranch tenure system. There were not specific places designated for grazing during the rainy or dry season everybody grazed where they wanted.

3.4 Water supply

Water supply for the land on which the Technology is applied:
  • rainfed
Comments:

This is a semi-arid area with two raining seasons (April-May and October-December) under normal situation but the area can miss rain for an entire year.

3.5 SLM group to which the Technology belongs

  • area closure (stop use, support restoration)
  • pastoralism and grazing land management

3.6 SLM measures comprising the Technology

vegetative measures

vegetative measures

  • V2: Grasses and perennial herbaceous plants
management measures

management measures

  • M2: Change of management/ intensity level
  • M4: Major change in timing of activities
Comments:

Land use is changed from normal grazing land to fenced area designated for hay production.

3.7 Main types of land degradation addressed by the Technology

soil erosion by water

soil erosion by water

  • Wt: loss of topsoil/ surface erosion
biological degradation

biological degradation

  • Bc: reduction of vegetation cover
water degradation

water degradation

  • Ha: aridification
Comments:

The technology address soil and water conservation which increases pasture generation hence safe livelihoods

3.8 Prevention, reduction, or restoration of land degradation

Specify the goal of the Technology with regard to land degradation:
  • reduce land degradation
  • restore/ rehabilitate severely degraded land
Comments:

Most of the land, where the technology is applied on has been degraded hence reducing its production

4. Technical specifications, implementation activities, inputs, and costs

4.1 Technical drawing of the Technology

{'additional_translations': {}, 'content_type': None, 'preview_image': '', 'key': 'Technical drawing', 'value': None, 'template': 'raw'}
Technical specifications (related to technical drawing):

NO drawing available for now.

4.2 General information regarding the calculation of inputs and costs

Specify how costs and inputs were calculated:
  • per Technology area
Indicate size and area unit:

100 acres

other/ national currency (specify):

Kenyan Shilling (KES)

If relevant, indicate exchange rate from USD to local currency (e.g. 1 USD = 79.9 Brazilian Real): 1 USD =:

100.31

Indicate average wage cost of hired labour per day:

500 KES

4.3 Establishment activities

Activity Timing (season)
1. Land identification 6 hours
2. Fencing of identified land 5 or more days depending on land size
3. Land preparation for reseeding 7 days or more
4. Reseeding 3 hours
5. Continuous management and weeding Through out the period when the grass is in the field before harvesting
6. Harvesting 12 hours or more
7. Hay storage 4 hours
Comments:

Each step of the process is important and is given attention for production to be complete

4.4 Costs and inputs needed for establishment

Specify input Unit Quantity Costs per Unit Total costs per input % of costs borne by land users
Labour fencing person days 5.0 500.0 2500.0 100.0
Labour preparation of land and seeding person days 8.0 500.0 4000.0 100.0
Labour fertilization and weeding peson days 7.0 500.0 3500.0 100.0
Labour harvesting person days 1.0 500.0 500.0 100.0
Equipment building of hay storage facility person days 5.0 500.0 2500.0 100.0
Equipment hay bale press (as seen in the picture) machine hour 2.0
Plant material grass seeds kg 8.0
Fertilizers and biocides manure
Construction material fencing material poles pieces
Construction material fencing material wire mesh meters
Construction material storage facility (corrugated metal sheets for roof, cement for base, poles and wire mesh for sides etc
Total costs for establishment of the Technology 13000.0
Total costs for establishment of the Technology in USD 129.6

4.5 Maintenance/ recurrent activities

Activity Timing/ frequency
1. Reparation of fence require repair may be once every season
2. Land preparation Done every raining season
3. Seeds section One on the onset of the planting season
4. Harvesting of hay Hay is harvested once it is ready
5. Safe storage of hay Done once (building the store)

4.7 Most important factors affecting the costs

Describe the most determinate factors affecting the costs:

Purchase of materials at the beginning of the project.

5. Natural and human environment

5.1 Climate

Annual rainfall
  • < 250 mm
  • 251-500 mm
  • 501-750 mm
  • 751-1,000 mm
  • 1,001-1,500 mm
  • 1,501-2,000 mm
  • 2,001-3,000 mm
  • 3,001-4,000 mm
  • > 4,000 mm
Specifications/ comments on rainfall:

Annual rainfall is not predictable, it keeps changing every year

Indicate the name of the reference meteorological station considered:

Kenya Meteorological Department

Agro-climatic zone
  • semi-arid

Long dry, and windy seasons

5.2 Topography

Slopes on average:
  • flat (0-2%)
  • gentle (3-5%)
  • moderate (6-10%)
  • rolling (11-15%)
  • hilly (16-30%)
  • steep (31-60%)
  • very steep (>60%)
Landforms:
  • plateau/plains
  • ridges
  • mountain slopes
  • hill slopes
  • footslopes
  • valley floors
Altitudinal zone:
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
Indicate if the Technology is specifically applied in:
  • concave situations
Comments and further specifications on topography:

The land is flat with little vegetation cover. The area receives minimal rainfall

5.3 Soils

Soil depth on average:
  • very shallow (0-20 cm)
  • shallow (21-50 cm)
  • moderately deep (51-80 cm)
  • deep (81-120 cm)
  • very deep (> 120 cm)
Soil texture (topsoil):
  • medium (loamy, silty)
Soil texture (> 20 cm below surface):
  • fine/ heavy (clay)
Topsoil organic matter:
  • high (>3%)

5.4 Water availability and quality

Ground water table:

> 50 m

Availability of surface water:

medium

Water quality (untreated):

poor drinking water (treatment required)

Is flooding of the area occurring?

No

Comments and further specifications on water quality and quantity:

Water quality is poor and its storage is poor too

5.5 Biodiversity

Species diversity:
  • high
Habitat diversity:
  • high

5.6 Characteristics of land users applying the Technology

Sedentary or nomadic:
  • Semi-nomadic
Market orientation of production system:
  • subsistence (self-supply)
Relative level of wealth:
  • average
Individuals or groups:
  • individual/ household
  • groups/ community
Level of mechanization:
  • manual work
  • animal traction
Gender:
  • women
  • men
Age of land users:
  • middle-aged
Indicate other relevant characteristics of the land users:

Most of them are illiterate hence require continuous training and demonstration

5.7 Average area of land used by land users applying the Technology

  • < 0.5 ha
  • 0.5-1 ha
  • 1-2 ha
  • 2-5 ha
  • 5-15 ha
  • 15-50 ha
  • 50-100 ha
  • 100-500 ha
  • 500-1,000 ha
  • 1,000-10,000 ha
  • > 10,000 ha
Is this considered small-, medium- or large-scale (referring to local context)?
  • small-scale
Comments:

The maasai own large pieces of land but only set aside a small portion for the technology.

5.8 Land ownership, land use rights, and water use rights

Land ownership:
  • individual, titled
Land use rights:
  • individual
Water use rights:
  • communal (organized)
Comments:

Most of the water sources are communally own. So rules are set to govern water use.

5.9 Access to services and infrastructure

health:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
education:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
technical assistance:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
employment (e.g. off-farm):
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
markets:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
energy:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
roads and transport:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
drinking water and sanitation:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good
financial services:
  • poor
  • moderate
  • good

6. Impacts and concluding statements

6.1 On-site impacts the Technology has shown

Socio-economic impacts

Production

fodder production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Fodder production was poor before the technology but have improved after the technology

fodder quality

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Fodder quality have also improved after the technology

animal production

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

The Maasai have increased milk and meat production after the technology was introduced.

Water availability and quality

water availability for livestock

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Surface water has been retained under the soil hence regeneration of pasture for long.

Income and costs

farm income

decreased
increased

Socio-cultural impacts

SLM/ land degradation knowledge

reduced
improved

conflict mitigation

worsened
improved

Ecological impacts

Water cycle/ runoff

surface runoff

increased
decreased
Comments/ specify:

surface runoff has been controlled

evaporation

increased
decreased
Soil

soil moisture

decreased
increased
Comments/ specify:

Soil moisture improved after the technology

soil loss

increased
decreased

soil organic matter/ below ground C

decreased
increased

6.2 Off-site impacts the Technology has shown

Overgrazing

increase
decrease

6.3 Exposure and sensitivity of the Technology to gradual climate change and climate-related extremes/ disasters (as perceived by land users)

Gradual climate change

Gradual climate change
Season increase or decrease How does the Technology cope with it?
annual temperature increase moderately
other gradual climate change increase moderately

Climate-related extremes (disasters)

Climatological disasters
How does the Technology cope with it?
drought not well

6.4 Cost-benefit analysis

How do the benefits compare with the establishment costs (from land users’ perspective)?
Short-term returns:

slightly positive

Long-term returns:

positive

How do the benefits compare with the maintenance/ recurrent costs (from land users' perspective)?
Short-term returns:

slightly positive

Long-term returns:

positive

6.5 Adoption of the Technology

  • > 50%
Of all those who have adopted the Technology, how many did so spontaneously, i.e. without receiving any material incentives/ payments?
  • 11-50%

6.6 Adaptation

Has the Technology been modified recently to adapt to changing conditions?

No

6.7 Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities of the Technology

Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the land user’s view
Advantages of producing, managing and storing hay has been seen to improve livestock production hence improving income for the Maasai.
Production of hay also enhance skills and knowledge for the Maasai pastoralists.
Hay can also be produced and sold to other people which means additional income for the household.
Strengths/ advantages/ opportunities in the compiler’s or other key resource person’s view
Production of hay also enhance skills and knowledge for the Maasai pastoralists.
Advantages of producing, managing and storing hay has been seen to improve livestock production hence improving income for the Maasai.
Hay can also be produced and sold to other people which means additional income for the household.
This is a way to adapt to the changing environment for maasai pastoralists be it land tenure, limited mobility, climate variability and change (droughts), social and physical infrastructure etc.

7. References and links

7.1 Methods/ sources of information

Links and modules

Expand all Collapse all

Modules