permanent grass covers the land used for grazing cattles (Brigitta Szabó)

Meadows and pastures (匈牙利)

Rétek és legelők

描述

Permanent meadows or pastures are more effective in controlling land degradation than arable cropping. They are especially appropriate in hilly regions on sloping land where the risk of water erosion is high.

Permanent meadows and pastures are more effective in controlling land degradation than arable cropping. They are especially appropriate in hilly regions on sloping land where the risk of water erosion is high. This is a relevant technology also for valley floors where there is a regular inflow of water – resulting in sediment accumulation. Such grass cover has relevance also in plantations on sloping land.

There are some differences between pastures and meadows especially in their vegetation and land use. In general, meadows have a variety of natural growing plant species while pastures are often planted with specific types of grasses. Pastures are generally used for grazing animals while meadows are often mowed or harvested for hay (that is also often used for animal feed). Meadows may also be situated along streams or rivers on lowland areas, while pastures are typically situated on hilly regions.
Some of the most common grass species in Hungarian meadows are: meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis), smooth meadow-grass (Poa pratensis), and meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis). Wildflowers (e.g Oxeye daisy, Field scabious) are also often growing on natural meadows in Hungary. On pastures the most common grass species are: ryegrass (Lolium perenne), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Hungarian pastures may also include legumes, such as red clover (Trifolium pratense) or white clover (Trifolium repens), which can help fix nitrogen in the soil and improve forage quality for grazing animals.

In the case of pastures farmers generally use a rotational grazing system, where the pasture is divided into sections and animals are periodically moved between them. Properly timed resting periods and regular rotation of pastures are essential for protecting the soil from erosion, promoting plant growth and nutrient uptake, and ensuring the long-term health and productivity of the pastures.

The main purpose of the technology (meadow and pasture land use) is to provide feed for livestock while reducing soil erosion and improving trafficability. The main conservation benefits are protection of the soil surface against transportation of particles by water or wind, thus avoiding soil loss and sedimentation. Due to lower velocity of surface runoff, more time is provided for infiltration of water into the soil, resulting in better water retention. In terms of production, meadows and pastures are predominantly used for providing hay or grazing land for ruminants. Different animals graze land differently, so the risk of soil degradation is lower in the case of cattle (which leave taller grass) and higher in case of sheep (which graze down to the soil surface), while in case of goats or pigs, the soil surface is easily damaged. In some special cases the main purpose of grass cover is simply soil conservation (very steep slopes, gully, etc.).

A significant proportion of grasslands (meadows and pastures) in Hungary are permanent, and they play an important role in agricultural production and the preservation of rural landscapes in the country. The common rules regarding the temporary or permanent use of agricultural land for this purposes (pasture or meadow) are contained in the Act CXXIX of 2007. The request for a land use change can be submitted at the local land offices. The most important requirement for land use change is that it must not result in a decrease in the total area of arable land below the minimum threshold set by the authorities and must not result in a decrease in the ecological value of the land. The conversion must be approved by the authorities and the appropriate land use permit must be obtained.

The application trend of this technology/solution is significantly depends on the situation of livestock production of a country. In Hungary, animal husbandry can be mentioned as the driving force of agriculture in the 1980s, with a share of 55-60% of its production value. However, by the end of the 1990s, this proportion had reversed and crop production had predominated. As there is no need for further pastures due to the decrease in livestock population, in recent times this type of land use change is not very common in Hungary.

地点

地点: The case study area is situated within the Balaton Catchment Area in the western Hungary. The climate is moderately warm, moderately humid, the number of sunshine hours per year are high. Mean annual temperature of the region of the Lake Balaton is about 10 ˚C. The average amount of rainfall (600-700 mm / year) nationally means a medium rainfall zone. The Balaton Catchment area is 5765 km2. The main environmental purpose is to reduce pollutant (phosphorus and other plant nutrients) loads of Lake Balaton, where anthropogenic eutrophication is the main issue of environmental concern. Lake Balaton, with its nearly 600 sqkm area, is the largest shallow lake in Middle Europe. The lake as well as the surrounding area form very important natural (ecological, water and landscape) resources and are one of the major target areas of water related recreational tourism in Europe as a whole. 37% of the total catchment area is arable land which is much lower than the national average, 27% is forest, which exceeds the national average. 15% of the land suitable for grassland management, 5% is horticulture, 3% is pomiculture, 2% is viticulture, 1% is reed management and fish farming. The „Kis-Balaton” nature conservation area situated within the Balaton Catchment area. The „Kis-Balaton” wetland is under protection of the Ramsar Convention habitat., Zala County, 匈牙利

分析的技术场所数量: 2-10个场所

选定地点的地理参考
  • 16.84562, 46.67349

技术传播: 适用于特定场所/集中在较小区域

在永久保护区?:

实施日期: 10-50年前

介绍类型
An example of meadow in the catchment area of Felső-Válicka (Brigitta Szabó)
Pasture in the Felső-Válicka catchment area (Brigitta Szabó)

技术分类

主要目的
  • 改良生产
  • 减少、预防、恢复土地退化
  • 保护生态系统
  • 结合其他技术保护流域/下游区域
  • 保持/提高生物多样性
  • 降低灾害风险
  • 适应气候变化/极端天气及其影响
  • 减缓气候变化及其影响
  • 创造有益的经济影响
  • 创造有益的社会影响
土地利用
同一土地单元内混合使用的土地: 否

  • 农田
    • 一年一作: 谷类 - 大麦, 谷物类 - 玉米, 谷类 - 小麦(冬季), 油料作物 - 向日葵、菜籽、其他
    每年的生长季节数: 1
    采用间作制度了吗?: 是
    采用轮作制度了吗?: 是

供水
  • 雨养
  • 混合雨水灌溉
  • 充分灌溉

土地退化相关的目的
  • 防止土地退化
  • 减少土地退化
  • 修复/恢复严重退化的土地
  • 适应土地退化
  • 不适用
解决的退化问题
  • 土壤水蚀 - Wt:表土流失/地表侵蚀 , Wg:冲沟侵蚀/沟蚀
SLM组
  • 畜牧业和牧场管理
SLM措施
  • 农艺措施 - A1:植被和土壤覆盖层

技术图纸

技术规范

技术建立与维护:活动、投入和费用

投入和成本的计算
  • 计算的成本为:每个技术区域 (尺寸和面积单位:ha
  • 成本计算使用的货币:美元
  • 汇率(换算为美元):1 美元 = 不适用
  • 雇用劳工的每日平均工资成本:50
影响成本的最重要因素
prices of input materials (fertilizers, pesticides, fuel)
技术建立活动
  1. fertilization (时间/频率: before primary tillage)
  2. stubble tillage (时间/频率: None)
  3. weed control (时间/频率: None)
  4. primary tillage (时间/频率: None)
  5. secoundary tillage (时间/频率: None)
  6. seedbed preparation (时间/频率: None)
  7. sowing (时间/频率: None)
技术建立的投入和成本 (per ha)
对投入进行具体说明 单位 数量 单位成本 (美元) 每项投入的总成本 (美元) 土地使用者承担的成本%
设备
stubble tillage ha 1.0 33.0 33.0 100.0
weed control ha 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
fertilization ha 1.0 15.0 15.0 100.0
primary tillage (ploughing 25-30 cm) ha 1.0 72.0 72.0 100.0
secoundary tillage (harrow+packer) ha 1.0 31.0 31.0 100.0
seedbed preparation ha 1.0 20.0 20.0 100.0
sowing ha 1.0 24.0 24.0 100.0
植物材料
seed (55 kg/ha) ha 1.0 262.0 262.0 100.0
肥料和杀菌剂
fertilizers ha 1.0 380.0 380.0 100.0
herbicide ha 1.0 40.0 40.0 100.0
技术建立所需总成本 892.0
技术建立总成本,美元 892.0
技术维护活动
n.a.

自然环境

年平均降雨量
  • < 250毫米
  • 251-500毫米
  • 501-750毫米
  • 751-1,000毫米
  • 1,001-1,500毫米
  • 1,501-2,000毫米
  • 2,001-3,000毫米
  • 3,001-4,000毫米
  • > 4,000毫米
农业气候带
  • 潮湿的
  • 半湿润
  • 半干旱
  • 干旱
关于气候的规范
distribution of rainfall is uneven
斜坡
  • 水平(0-2%)
  • 缓降(3-5%)
  • 平缓(6-10%)
  • 滚坡(11-15%)
  • 崎岖(16-30%)
  • 陡峭(31-60%)
  • 非常陡峭(>60%)
地形
  • 高原/平原
  • 山脊
  • 山坡
  • 山地斜坡
  • 麓坡
  • 谷底
海拔
  • 0-100 m a.s.l.
  • 101-500 m a.s.l.
  • 501-1,000 m a.s.l.
  • 1,001-1,500 m a.s.l.
  • 1,501-2,000 m a.s.l.
  • 2,001-2,500 m a.s.l.
  • 2,501-3,000 m a.s.l.
  • 3,001-4,000 m a.s.l.
  • > 4,000 m a.s.l.
......应用的技术
  • 凸形情况
  • 凹陷情况
  • 不相关
土壤深度
  • 非常浅(0-20厘米)
  • 浅(21-50厘米)
  • 中等深度(51-80厘米)
  • 深(81-120厘米)
  • 非常深(> 120厘米)
土壤质地(表土)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
土壤质地(地表以下>20厘米)
  • 粗粒/轻(砂质)
  • 中粒(壤土、粉土)
  • 细粒/重质(粘土)
表土有机质含量
  • 高(>3%)
  • 中(1-3%)
  • 低(<1%)
地下水位
  • 表面上
  • < 5米
  • 5-50米
  • > 50米
地表水的可用性
  • 过量
  • 中等
  • 匮乏/没有
水质(未处理)
  • 良好饮用水
  • 不良饮用水(需要处理)
  • 仅供农业使用(灌溉)
  • 不可用
水质请参考: 地表水
盐度是个问题吗?

洪水发生
物种多样性
  • 中等
栖息地多样性
  • 中等

应用该技术的土地使用者的特征

市场定位
  • 生计(自给)
  • 混合(生计/商业)
  • 商业/市场
非农收入
  • 低于全部收入的10%
  • 收入的10-50%
  • > 收入的50%
相对财富水平
  • 非常贫瘠
  • 贫瘠
  • 平均水平
  • 丰富
  • 非常丰富
机械化水平
  • 手工作业
  • 畜力牵引
  • 机械化/电动
定栖或游牧
  • 定栖的
  • 半游牧的
  • 游牧的
个人或集体
  • 个人/家庭
  • 团体/社区
  • 合作社
  • 员工(公司、政府)
性别
  • 女人
  • 男人
年龄
  • 儿童
  • 青年人
  • 中年人
  • 老年人
每户使用面积
  • < 0.5 公顷
  • 0.5-1 公顷
  • 1-2 公顷
  • 2-5公顷
  • 5-15公顷
  • 15-50公顷
  • 50-100公顷
  • 100-500公顷
  • 500-1,000公顷
  • 1,000-10,000公顷
  • > 10,000公顷
规模
  • 小规模的
  • 中等规模的
  • 大规模的
土地所有权
  • 公司
  • 社区/村庄
  • 团体
  • 个人,未命名
  • 个人,有命名
土地使用权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
用水权
  • 自由进入(无组织)
  • 社区(有组织)
  • 租赁
  • 个人
进入服务和基础设施的通道
健康

贫瘠
教育

贫瘠
技术援助

贫瘠
就业(例如非农)

贫瘠
市场

贫瘠
能源

贫瘠
道路和交通

贫瘠
饮用水和卫生设施

贫瘠
金融服务

贫瘠

影响

社会经济影响
作物生产
降低
增加


Later it may still be possible to continue with crop production on the area.

饲料生产
降低
增加


Arable land use was turned into pasture

畜牧生产
降低
增加


In this example beef cattle production was started as a new business

收入来源的多样性
降低
增加

社会文化影响
生态影响
地表径流
增加
降低


As soil surface is covered permanently in a meadow or pasture, surface runoff decreases significantly.

多余水的排放
减少
改良

土壤覆盖层
减少
改良


The most important benefit of meadows and pastures is that soil is covered permanently, that helps in the prevention of soil loss by erosion.

土壤流失
增加
降低

土壤结壳/密封
增加
减少

土壤有机物/地下C
降低
增加


Using mowed grass as mulch can increase the carbon content of the soil.

植被覆盖层
降低
增加


There are more plant species present simultaneously in meadows and pastures than in cultivated fields, which is beneficial for soil health

动物多样性
降低
增加


Especially naturally managed meadows attract wildlife and therefore increase biodiversity

栖息地多样性
降低
增加

场外影响
缓冲/过滤能力(按土壤、植被、湿地划分)
减少
改良


Water retention is better

风力搬运沉积物
增加
减少


As the grass binds the soil particles, the wind cannot pick them up and carry them away even during dry periods.

成本效益分析

与技术建立成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

与技术维护成本相比的效益
短期回报
非常消极
非常积极

长期回报
非常消极
非常积极

气候变化

渐变气候
季节性温度 增加

非常不好
非常好
季节: 夏季
季雨量 减少

非常不好
非常好
季节: 夏季
气候有关的极端情况(灾害)
干旱

非常不好
非常好

采用和适应

采用该技术的地区内土地使用者的百分比
  • 单例/实验
  • 1-10%
  • 11-50%
  • > 50%
在所有采用这种技术的人当中,有多少人在没有获得物质奖励的情况下采用了这种技术?
  • 0-10%
  • 11-50%
  • 51-90%
  • 91-100%
最近是否对该技术进行了修改以适应不断变化的条件?
什么样的变化条件?
  • 气候变化/极端气候
  • 不断变化的市场
  • 劳动力可用性(例如,由于迁移)

结论和吸取的教训

长处: 土地使用者的观点
  • Permanent soil cover
  • Continuous income
长处: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点
  • Provide better habitat conditions
  • Ecological advantages
弱点/缺点/风险: 土地使用者的观点如何克服
  • Not enough hay/grass in drought seasons locally grown fodder should be supplemented by external sources
  • Income is less than in crop production
弱点/缺点/风险: 编制者或其他关键资源人员的观点如何克服

参考文献

编制者
  • Brigitta Szabó
Editors
  • Piroska Kassai
  • Zoltan Toth
审查者
  • William Critchley
  • Rima Mekdaschi Studer
实施日期: March 29, 2022
上次更新: April 24, 2023
资源人
WOCAT数据库中的完整描述
链接的SLM数据
文件编制者
机构 项目
主要参考文献
  • The grassland care handbook: Einböck (einboeck.eu), info@einboeck.at
  • Verba&Kőszegi: The situation of livestock production, its prospects through the examples of a farm in Bács-Kiskun County. Gradus Vol 9, No 1 (2022) ISSN 2064-8014: https://gradus.kefo.hu/archive/2022-1/2022_1_AGR_003_Verba.pdf
链接到网络上可用的相关信息
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareaAlike 4.0 International